[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980 Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State Let her cry The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’ Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump 2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything) The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped. Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound) Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH... ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES Trump to send troops to Memphis Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out) Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter? What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!) Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas, Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World - Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: ARG Poll has PA tied between Obama and Clinton at 45-45
Source: Democratic Underground
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 7, 2008
Author: DU people
Post Date: 2008-04-07 17:42:11 by ghostdogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 5170
Comments: 259

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 148.

#1. To: ghostdogtxn (#0)

I doubt Obama is electable in the fall, but I KNOW Hillary isn't.

Sam Houston  posted on  2008-04-07   17:51:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   9:37:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I didn't get the impression there was a big surge for Obama when I was in the southeast part of the state around Easter. It was non-stop MSM politics. People are sick of it.

angle  posted on  2008-04-08   9:57:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   10:06:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I think there's a lot of misunderestimation going on about Obama.

Rendell & Hillary are right. He can't win a national. There simply aren't enough guilt laden whites out here.......thank god.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-04-08   10:13:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   10:18:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

There may not be enough guilt laden whites out there, but how many bloodthirsty warmongers are left?

Plenty in both so called "parties".

We received next to zilch support here for Ron Paul, the only non war monger, but all of a sudden the Obama chorus is loud and clear. Very odd.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-04-08   10:21:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   10:24:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Geeze. You make me sad, Cyni. You really do.

ghost...

You raised the "war mongering" issue.

Paul was the only man that would have ended the war, yet 4um gave next to zero support. Now all of a sudden we justify supporting Obama because he is not a warmonger????

Yet openly he says we need to move more troops into Afghanistan. why is that ghost, for what useful purpose????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-04-08   10:27:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   10:31:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

WTF are you talking about? 4um gave Ron Paul tons of support,

rah rah cheer leading does not count, money received counts. Obama received 2 million per day with little effort.

Now we seem to understand from whence it came.

" As for the troops in Afghanistan, it's a stupid move, a blunder,

Lets discuss that part, have you given it any thot as to WHY Obama would want more troops in Afghanistan???

Cynicom  posted on  2008-04-08   10:36:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   10:43:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

As for WHY Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan, I don't know that he really does.

He says so, but you don't know if he means it? Utter crap. I don't get where you're coming from at all.

angle  posted on  2008-04-08   11:18:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   13:17:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

This has nothing to do with whether he'd make a good president or not. I think he'll be a poor president at best, but less of a disaster than the other 2 options.

As for WHY Obama wants more troops in Afghanistan, I don't know that he really does. He says so, but you don't know if he means it? Utter crap. I don't get where you're coming from at all.

So you take a politician at his word during campaign season?

Me, not so much.

If you don't take him at his word, how did you conclude he would be less of a disaster than the other 2? Was it is voting record? I am seriously trying to understand how some have come to this conclusion. Maybe it's just a 'feeling'... please elaborate!

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-08   13:21:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-04-08   13:33:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So basically, without a record and believing what you don't see is proof that he is not bought and sold, you just sort of feel that his is better choice.

To excuse his non-voting record as okay because it's politically smart to keep everyone guessing is giving the guy a blank check with your life.

This to me, hooks you a position to support him no matter what he does for purposes of loyalty to his success at the possible expense to your own.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-08   13:44:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So basically, without a record and believing what you don't see is proof that he is not bought and sold, you just sort of feel that his is better choice.

Better than someone who's open to being in Iraq for 100 years and sings "Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran"?

It's about impossible to imagine Obama be a worse choice, ergo, he must be at least a little better. Would that be wrong?

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-04-08   14:14:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#158. To: Pinguinite (#148)

Better than someone who's open to being in Iraq for 100 years and sings "Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb, bomb Iran"?

It's about impossible to imagine Obama be a worse choice, ergo, he must be at least a little better. Would that be wrong?

When you look at his advisors, and read how his position has shifted time and again, he is being politically cute to obtain the support he needs from the audience he speaks before.

We know McCain is nuts. We know Barack is controlled. We know HIllary want's to be Queen and is as ruthless as they come.

Obama could indeed be worse, by looking at his fiscal mentality, of which there is none. Spend spend spend, more more programs, and we are broke. He is well aware that we are in the ME forever.

Sorry, he is the worst of the three without fully knowing his own true positions. That said, he could state them, and then bring the truth of the matter to the people. Example, before we establish more entitlement programs, we must balance our budget and fund current commmittments such as Social Security etc. No, we see he supports a global tax, (more cfr crap) as well as a mandated health care program. Where, is the money going to come from? Is that leadership? Or is that pandering? Is there even a possibility it could happen at all? We are being pushed into socialized healthcare no doubt, but the responsible thing is to be honest about the true economic state of the nation, and the truth about our foreign committments.

Peppa  posted on  2008-04-08 14:33:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]