[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Smear Of Ben Stein's Film 'Expelled' Already Begun
Source: News With Views
URL Source: http://www.rense.com/general81/conven.htm
Published: Apr 9, 2008
Author: Devvy Kidd
Post Date: 2008-04-09 19:49:47 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 973
Comments: 74

The big guns are coming out already.

This scorching is by Roger Friedman. Notice how he puts his own beliefs in wrapped up as "conventionally accepted Darwinism. "

Ben Stein: Win His Career By Roger Friedman

After seeing a new non-fiction film starring Comedy Central's Ben Stein, you may not only be able to win his money, but also his career.

Stein is that whiny little guy with the monotone voice that makes him seem funny and an unlikely "character" for TV appearances. But that career may be over come April 18 when a movie he co-wrote, narrates and appears in, called "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed," is released.

Directed by one Nathan Frankowski, "Expelled" is a sloppy, all-over-the-place, poorly made (and not just a little boring) "expose" of the scientific community. It's not very exciting. But it does show that Stein, who's carved out a career selling eye drops in commercials and amusing us on sitcoms, is either completely nuts or so avaricious that he's abandoned all good sense to make a buck.

To wit: Stein, Frankowski and pals say in "Expelled" that perfectly good scientists and educators are being stigmatized for wanting to teach their students creationism and "intelligent design" - in other words, junk science - in addition to or instead of conventionally accepted Darwinism. You see, Stein, like some other celebrities, finally has shown his true colors and they aren't so pretty.

The gist of Stein's involvement is: He's outraged! He believes in God! God created the universe! How can we not avail our students of this theory? What do you mean we're just molecules?

What the producers of this film would love, love, love is a controversy. That's because it's being marketed by the same people who brought us "The Passion of the Christ." They're hoping someone will latch onto an anti-Semitism theme here since there's a visit to a concentration camp and the raised idea - apparently typical of the intelligent design community - that somehow the theory of evolution is so evil that it caused the Holocaust. Alas, this is such a warped premise that no one's biting.

The whole idea of Stein, a Jew, jumping on the intelligent design bandwagon of the theory of evolution begetting the Nazis is so distasteful you wonder what in - sorry - God's name - he was thinking when he got into this. Who cares, really, if "Expelled" is anti-Semitic? It will come and go without much fanfare.

But Stein is another matter. Can he really be amusing selling eye drops or acting like a nebbish on game shows if we now have this new insight into his thinking?

You know Ben Stein from his voice. He used it to intone Ferris Bueller's name iconically at the beginning of that 20-year-old Matthew Broderick movie. His laconic delivery and deadpan presence have given him a benign celebrity - until now.

But this is what he wrote last fall on the "Expelled" movie Web site:

"Darwinism is still very much alive, utterly dominating biology. Despite the fact that no one has ever been able to prove the creation of a single distinct species by Darwinist means, Darwinism dominates the academy and the media. Darwinism also has not one meaningful word to say on the origins of organic life, a striking lacuna in a theory supposedly explaining life.

"Alas, Darwinism has had a far bloodier life span than Imperialism. Darwinism, perhaps mixed with Imperialism, gave us Social Darwinism, a form of racism so vicious that it countenanced the Holocaust against the Jews and mass murder of many other groups in the name of speeding along the evolutionary process."

In a word: Urgggh. Suddenly Stein is not so amusing anymore. I want my eye drops from someone else.

PS: Following "The Passion" release pattern, "Expelled" will open wide on the 18th but mostly in rural and poor neighborhoods. It's got just one theater in all of New York City, in Times Square, none in places like Beverly Hills or wealthier, better-educated urban neighborhoods where more "evolved" people might live.

According to the film's Web site, the producers are in a whopping 45 theaters in North Carolina, and a mere seven in Massachusetts, 35 in Georgia, 11 in New Jersey, four in Connecticut and one in Vermont. And so on. There are huge numbers of screens in Florida and Texas taking the film, particularly seven in San Antonio. If I lived in the Deep South, I'd boycott the filmmakers for thinking of me as this gullible and unsophisticated.

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,348468,00.html


Poster Comment:

Notice that this review from Friedman ran originally at FOX news which is supposed to be conservative. Actually, it is Zionist and changes sides when convenient. Currently, many conservatives are willing to kill Muslims for Israel so FOX is conservative.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#1. To: Horse (#0)

If you want to make a Darwinist froth tell them you believe in evolution but could you please explain exactly how one species turned into another?

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-04-09   19:53:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: YertleTurtle (#1)

If you want to make a Darwinist froth tell them you believe in evolution but could you please explain exactly how one species turned into another?

They don't froth, they simply go into the Cline theory and show how small genetic differences over an expanse of territory eventually keeps one member of the species at one edge of the Cline from breeding with another an the other end of the cline. From that point genetic differences eventually lead to a new but related species.

This argument went down at the same time that the argument that life doesn't violate the second law of thermodynamics went down in flames. And remember that that failure so discredited "Creationism" that it was necessary to replace the snake oil with "Intelligent Design".

...  posted on  2008-04-09   20:16:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: ... (#6) (Edited)

From that point genetic differences eventually lead to a new but related species.

Like I said, they froth.

Explain EXACTLY how one species turned into another.

You can't do it, only babble.

I'll make it easy: explain how squirrels evolved into flying squirrels. Richard Dawkins eternally made a fool out of himself over that one.

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-04-09   20:25:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: YertleTurtle (#8)

I'll make it easy: explain how squirrels evolved into flying squirrels. Richard Dawkins eternally made a fool out of himself over that one.

Calm down. Your rage is showing. Mindless fundie hate never solved anything. Just ask Fred Phelps.

The basic theory says that there are a series of mutations in the gene pool. One gives the membrane between the arms and legs, which is quite common in many different species. Just as webbed toes are. Others give enhanced balance and other necessary components. Most of these mutations kill the individual. But when conditions confer a survival advantage for a combination of the mutations, they get passed on.

For a good example of this, look at the collection of intermediate fossils tracing the evolution of dynosauria to birds.

...  posted on  2008-04-09   20:31:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: ... (#12)

The basic theory says that there are a series of mutations in the gene pool

You're proving my point. You can't do it.

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-04-09   20:34:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: YertleTurtle (#13)

You're proving my point. You can't do it.

I just did. But what you will do is keep asking for specifics until you ask for the exact date a normal squirrel emerged into a flying squirrel.

This sort of silly argument is your only defense.

But let's turn this around. Prove to me that an old man in the clouds snapped his fingers and created the flying squirrel. You can't do this. In fact, you have no objective proof that your particular creation myth is any better than that of the Church of Scientology.

And this is why the World Scientific community has dismissed you as a kook.

...  posted on  2008-04-09   20:37:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: ... (#15)

Prove to me that an old man in the clouds snapped his fingers and created the flying squirrel.

I never said a word about God or creationism. You did.

I also didn't ask for a date when a squirrel turned into a flying squirrel.

I want to know EXACTLY how one species turned into another. That's all I'm asking, and you keep avoiding the question, because you and every other evolutionist in the world don't have a clue, and you know it.

YertleTurtle  posted on  2008-04-09   20:44:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: YertleTurtle (#21) (Edited)

My position is that I don't buy the biblical creation myth, and I don't buy the one from church of Scientology either. I also don't buy the Zuni creation myth.

None of them are science and because of that, they don't belong in a science class.

Evolution is the currently accepted scientific theory and, as such, it does belong in a science class.

If you want it out, get a degree, become a researcher, publish a paper with appropriate support and initiate a Thomas Khun style scientific revolution. It happens all the time in all fields of science.

I do object to propaganda and legal gyrations that attempt to put that which is not science in a science class, i.e., cram somebody's religion down anther person's craw by means of politics or force of law. And that is what the film discussed above is trying to do.

...  posted on  2008-04-09   20:55:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: ... (#29) (Edited)

Not to put too fine a point on it, but natural selection is Darwin's theory of evolution.

Similar to gravity, vs. Einstein's theory of gravity, in that the phenomenon exists whether or not the theory explains/predicts everything the phenomenon does, the phenomenon of evolution is not a theory, it's a physical fact. It's also a well-recorded fact.

nobody  posted on  2008-04-09   21:03:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: nobody (#31)

I know that evolution is a fact, and I realize that it may not explain everything. I was just reading something interesting about the evolution of bees and other social insects that talked about other factors at play.

The point I was trying to make was that it was the accepted scientific model and, as such, that is what should be taught in a science class. If somebody wants to give a grad seminar on Intelligent Design and who facts might line up for it, that is fine - as long as its not being presented as the accepted theory.

Forcing creationism into a biology class is like forcing Hebrew into a French class because "It's the language of the Lord".

...  posted on  2008-04-09   21:15:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: ... (#33)

Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory, it's a conspiracy any more. It should be taught in a religious conspiracy study class.

nobody  posted on  2008-04-09   21:24:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: nobody (#35)

religious conspiracy study class

the next tv reality show?

Dakmar  posted on  2008-04-09   21:30:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Dakmar (#37) (Edited)

"Christians and Conspiracy Theories"

www.acts17- 11.com/conspire.html

Favorite snippet:

10) Making Idols of Mere Men

Conspiracy Theory practitioners are miles away from "honoring the king," or showing "proper respect" for leaders. ...

Heads in the sand.

nobody  posted on  2008-04-09   21:38:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: nobody (#38)

Conspiracy Theory is more than just the belief in an occasional conspiracy. Simply put, it is a belief system that asserts that world events are being controlled in secret by a group of ultra-powerful puppeteers behind the scenes. While nothing much can be done about this overall conspiracy, at least we can have the satisfaction of being smart enough to have figured it all out.

That's hilarious. Us true illuminati know how to use puppets and flashcards to mezmerize your children, don't try to stop us or we'll call you haters of something or other. Just keep buying the plastic toys from China and everything will be alright.

Dakmar  posted on  2008-04-09   21:48:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

        There are no replies to Comment # 39.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]