[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Clinton Says She Is Only Candidate Who Will End the War in Iraq ALIQUIPPA, Pa., April 9 -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday that she is the only presidential candidate who will end the Iraq war, as she sought to assert her foreign policy credentials a day after hearing congressional testimony from top U.S. leaders in Iraq. Speaking at an event with retired flag officers here, Clinton (N.Y.) accused her rival for the Democratic nomination, Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), of being disingenuous about his promise to end the war. "We need to be planning and preparing to start bringing our troops home, and I have committed to doing that within 60 days of my becoming president," she said. "Senator Obama, on the other hand, says he'll end the war, but his top foreign policy adviser said he won't necessarily follow the plan he's been talking about during this campaign -- that the plan is 'just words.' Well, you can count on me to end the war safely and responsibly." At a stop outside Pittsburgh later in the day, Clinton added Republican Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) to her line of attack, saying, "One candidate will continue the war, one candidate only says he'll end the war, and one candidate is ready, willing and able to end the war." Obama spokesman Hari Sevugan dismissed Clinton's criticism as a "tired and discredited attack." Clinton was referring to comments by then-Obama adviser Samantha Power weeks ago that Obama's plans to pull combat troops out of Iraq in 16 months were a "best-case scenario." Power later resigned from the campaign. Despite the attacks by Clinton, Obama and McCain largely ignored her and dueled with each other over Iraq and the economy. Campaigning Wednesday in Malvern, Pa., Obama continued his focus on the economy as he tries to win over blue-collar voters in Pennsylvania and elsewhere with a message that reflects working-class concerns, from gasoline prices to declining wages. He decried the "Bush-Cheney-McCain" principle of "you're on your own," rather than "we're all in this together." Obama also said Republican policies have led to income inequality, boom-and-bust cycles such as the current housing market crisis, job outsourcing and income stagnation. "And that is why there will be a very clear choice in this election," he said, referring to a potential matchup against McCain in November, rather than against Clinton in the remaining primaries. "If you believe that our economy's on the right path, then John McCain's the candidate for you." At a campaign stop at Bridgewater Associates, a global investment firm in Westport, Conn., McCain was asked whether he would raise taxes, cut entitlement or defense spending, or increase the deficit. McCain rejected all four options, arguing that his proposal to cut taxes and eliminate wasteful earmarks would erase the deficit. "My answer to you is, you grow the economy," he said. "I believe we can grow this economy and reduce this deficit . . . by the kinds of pro-growth, pro-stimulus packages that have shown throughout history they can grow the economy." Appearing on Fox News, McCain also called on Obama to repudiate comments from liberal radio host Ed Schultz describing the senator from Arizona as a "warmonger." "If Senator Obama is going to wage the kind of campaign that he says he is, I hope that he will, he personally, will repudiate that kind of language," McCain said. The Obama campaign has played down the controversy as a bid by McCain for media attention, noting that Schultz is not connected to the campaign, as the radio host has repeatedly said. "John McCain is not a warmonger and should not be referred to as such," said Obama spokeswoman Jen Psaki. A day after testimony by Army Gen. David H. Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan C. Crocker before the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees, McCain took pains to distance himself from President Bush even as he reiterated his support for Petraeus's handling of the war in Iraq. He vowed to confer more with congressional leaders on matters of war and to "be humble" in his dealings with foreign leaders. Asked whether he would reject Bush's "preemptive war" strategy, he did not rule it out but said he would take a sharply different tack when weighing military action overseas. "I think you need to consult more closely and carefully, not with every member of Congress, but with the leadership of Congress," he told the crowd of several hundred employees at Bridgewater. "If they're not in on the takeoff, they're not going to be in on the landing." In her remarks in Aliquippa, Clinton called on Bush to answer questions that she said were ignored Tuesday. "I asked General Petraeus for the conditions under which he would actually support a change of course in Iraq and to begin a drawdown of our troops, given that the surge has failed to achieve its stated goal of political reconciliation among the Iraqis," Clinton said. "Well, he didn't really answer me."
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 27.
#1. To: christine (#0)
Too little, too late. If Hillary had been saying this kind of stuff two months ago, she might be in a position to get the nomination that is now virtually out of her grasp.
Does that mean that even tho she, like Paul, is for ending the war, you will not support her? Amazing how many "Americans" are voting and supporting more war. I do suspect a month in the front lines in Iraq would change many minds of people that have never seen blood and death.
If you trust someone with a history like Hillary's, you're a lot more trusting than me.
In other words, if Clinton assures us she will end the war in the ME, something that would end the bleeding and dying, you would not trust her, but rather support Obama and further war. You do however TRUST Obama to continue the war and expand in Afghanistan? Perverse thinking Ari, anything to justify white guilt, even at the expense of others blood.
You're forgetting Obama's record on civil liberties, I think. And, given the advisers he has chosen, and his record for a long time, I still believe Obama is a lot more likely to end the Iraq war than Hillary. Your constant harping on "white guilt" is getting tiresome. I dare you to find one posting of mine that supports that view of my motives.
I'm more concerned with Constitutional Rights than "civil liberties." He wants to bring back clinton's gun-ban...not a big fan of the 2nd amendment. He voted to renew the "patriot" act...guess he's not very fond of the 4th and 5th amendments, either. "Hate crime" legislation...so much for the 1st amendment. Abortion? 10th amendment...not so much. I'm trying to find some part of the Bill of Rights he is in favor of. Guess I'll have to wait and see what his position on quartering troops in people's homes is.
So very well said and impossible to spin.
There are no replies to Comment # 27. End Trace Mode for Comment # 27.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||