See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: 2 4um members join TLBSHOW and B Yeltsin on my s__tlist - what took me so long?
Source:
Me
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 11, 2008
Author: Me, Me, Me
Post Date: 2008-04-11 06:55:52 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 3296
Comments: 99
This has been my favorite site for a couple of years now, maybe longer and, until recently, I found just about every one here to be honest, intellectually curious and generally open to debate. I value the most people who refuse to wear ideological straight jackets and are willing to overcome the inevitable intellectual and moral inhibitions imposed by life within any social structure. Not everyone or probably no one can do this all the time but there is a difference between those who open themselves to the new and fresh even infrequently and those who choose to never leave their dogmatic cocoon or are always the follower of some 'movement' or leader. I don't find 'followers' to be interesting. I noticed the recent emergence at this site of a number of uninteresting, moronic, dogmatic, brutally stupid 'posters' whose only purpose seems to be that of screaming their 'views' and to attack (in an uninteresting, moronic, dogmatic and brutally stupid way) anyone who does not buy into their propagandistic nonsense. The specimen calling himself or herself "_______" is a perfect case. The other one that comes to mind now is the "Peppa". I don't remember the history of "_______" and I couldn't care less of what his/her whereabouts were or may be because I'm not interested in stupids. In the case of Peppa, I remember that she used to be a Ron Paul supporter (so was I and I still am in the sense that I agree with many of his views) but she was of the aggressive/possessive type, screaming and hysterically imploring everyone to believe that reality was something other than any normal person could see. And, of course, attacking anyone who stayed rational and objective. Well... I've never done it until now at this site but I am doing it now. I am banning these 2 because I find their contributions to be boring and worthless. They are joining the ranks of the late TLBSHOW and Boris Yeltsin who are my bannees at the LP site so they are in good company - deep, loudly proclaimed stupidity seems to be what they have in common. I can't say that seeing their moronic, worthless 'thoughts' published at this site bothered me a lot. It's just that I can't spend a lot of time here and, if it's easy to prevent worthless trash from invading my 4um browsing experience, I see no reason not to do it. I hope that _______ and Peppa are not offended by this. They can still talk to each other. I just don't care what they do so it's fair for me to place them on the Bozo list. _______ is at #1 and Peppa is at #2.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-3) not displayed.
.
.
.
#4. To: Itisa1mosttoolate (#3)
Yes, from my p.o.v. they are banned, because they are no longer part of my 4um experience. I am not suggesting that they are banned from this site because some may find their contributions valuable or entertaining.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Fill my name in because my mind is a blank (________) is the sort of goober that encouraged me to use my current signature. I am not very excited by any candidate, feel the last two elections were fraudulent and don't have too much hope for this one, but if people want to substitute discussion and the sharing of ideas and views on people and events, I'll defend the least objectionable candidate I want to see defeat the Hilda beast. I never was fond of the FReeper central premise that if you suppress beliefs and views you hate things will be alright. They don't want to see others they disagree with in their myopic and delusionary forum, and this attitude is useful only because they want the dumbest suckers possible to be able to extract the most money from them without questions come fund raiser time. If people come out and support a candidate on this forum, they probably are survivors of worse in forum intolerance then ________ or anyone else joining in can dish out. So they are welcome to continue deploying their fleet of paper airplanes and hot air to try to insult and belittle people away as if that will work here. But I am here to tell you that that is delusional on their part and a lost cause.
Who the fukk cares who you have on your filter? You yourself have been on my filter numerous times. This newsbreaking vanity requires a thread? Get a life.
"Hello Rothschild's cattle!" ~ Deek Jackson
:)))) if you don't care about this topic, there are several things that you can do. Firstly, it WAS posted under 'vanity' so you knew what this was about. Fair enough?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Obama is for killing babies. That makes him unqualified to be president. I don't get people like him. Killing people in Iraq is wrong. But killing babies by ripping them apart in the womb is fine and dandy. He has a silver tongue which has you hypnotized. Unless you consider killing babies by tearing them apart ok too.
Abortion is something that troubles me. This is something that I never had to face because both me and my wife are strongly pro-life. However, abortion, like murder, incest, polygamy and child molestation are regulated by the values that the society at large displays. While laws and the social values are never in perfect harmony, the law tends to follow the social consensus on what is good, acceptable, bad and intolerable. The social consensus in the case of abortion, right now, in OUR society seems to be that abortion is 'bad' but, under certain circumstances, it is 'acceptable'. It seems that the social consensus is moving toward making abortion less acceptable than it was 30 years ago but values tend to change slowly. You should not expect a president - the head of the US gov't's executive branch - to be a preacher and a prophet. That should be the preachers' and prophets' job. When a social consensus is reached that abortion is intolerable or when that consensus is near, legislation will follow. That's the way it usually works.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
It can be helpful to others to see how someone else defines who rates being included in someone's kill file/bozo folder. I don't have anyone on it now, as I have been scrolling on by people since I started posting on forums in the mid- nineties, and don't need the software to do this for me. I found your elpee bozo list interesting as Showboat actually hurt the forum with his unrestrained diarrhea of vanity threads and posts, while Boris is only an amusing haiku sideshow who uses pictures over and over and over. I've grown to like that wing nut, even though he usually is a scroll by for me. But Todd can keep staying away from these forums if he wishes, he is just a vain shrill, stupid pain in the ass who's biggest on line success is conning money from Fred Mertz. I thought about bozoing him, but he ultimately isolated himself so thoroughly at elpee he was so outrageous I would of missed out on seeing the way he did this and would not have learned interesting things from this verbal self emulation. I learn from the bad movies as well as the good, so I watch both, and in forums it is the same with people and so I bozo nobody longer then a short while to take a break from them.
I'll boil it down to this. The declaration talked about LIFE liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The constitution said it was to "establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the BLESSINGS of liberty to ourselves and our POSTERITY. So the protection of life is a central government purpose. The constitution talks about passing on the BLESSING of liberty to our POSTERITY. How can we pass on that blessing when people are killing them. It is one of the constitutions purposes to protect life and ensure justice. Well the illegitimate ROE VS WADE decision doesn't do that. In fact it does the opposite and makes the government the enforcer of letting certain people murder our fellow citizens, their offspring. I wont go on so that I don't change the subject of your post. I just saw the OBAMA banner and had to comment on it.
This may be troubling, and it is, but writings such as the Holy Bible, the US Constitution or the Declaration of Independence are always open to interpretation - or we wouldn't have a million different Christian denominations today. They are usually interpreted in ways that are suitable to the society at large and the interpretation changes as the circumstances change. Under the same constitution that talked about passing the blessings of liberty to our posterity, somehow slavery continued, and slavery is not 'liberty' by any stretch of imagination - can't say that the darkies 'axed for it' - it was the dominant section of society that found slavery while 'bad' to be 'acceptable', at least for a while. Eventually, slavery disappeared but it's possible that we are still living the consequences of eradicating it via violent means rather than simply allowing it to fade away, as it did in other parts of the world. As for 'abortion', very few women kill their babies because they are killers and enjoy doing it. Some teens are afraid of what would happen to them if their parents found out - some parents would kill their daughters or severely punish them or maybe kill the girl's boyfriend or force them to marry. Post-teen to-be mothers may simply not imagine their life with a baby to raise, which would probably prevent them from continuing their education or keeping their job. Is giving the baby away to be raised by someone unrelated a good option? Maybe it's not always such a good thing. In the past, there was the grandma or maybe an older sister who would take care of the baby or maybe the church would arrange for some good Christians to take him but... I've read Dickens. Life for abandoned or orphan kids in the 19th Century wasn't exactly Heaven on Earth. Life and death issues are VERY difficult to decide and ending a life that is just about to begin is the most troubling decision to make because there is absolutely no indication whether the baby to be born is about to live a life worth living or is about to begin serving a life sentence in a living Hell. Like I said, I am pro-life myself, I don't believe that babies should be killed but I also believe that, in the end, it's the society at large that collectively decides on this issues, not the government through its punishing arm.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I have heard that hyperbole, but that angle of attack on him is overblown. Look at protect those stem cells Bush. He is a man who speaks to God but never goes to church and has no Pastor, will kill and mutilate the bodies and lives of Iraqi civilians to get at a dictator who had the nerve to try to get a hit on his dad together, and waste the lives and well being of our Armed Forces to fight war to advance ideology rather then remember they are making the sacrifice of military service to defend this country, not advance the faction in power in Washington's political agenda. He too postures as anti-abortion. But he is a blood thirsty bastard who laughed at and mocked the very people he let be executed as a Texas governor. If you take the solemn and serious responsibility of deciding to take the creator's prerogative to end existence and kill someone, you should have a heavy heart about it, regardless of how evil or wrong the person being executed may be. I don't support abortion, but because an overall view of a candidate is more useful to determining whether they are truly compassionate and respectful of human life, I would rather have the man making an honest mistake on abortion rather then a gangster like McCain who is also for abortion as well as neocon wars to advance factional political agendas even though they bankrupt us and destroy our reputation as a nation. I do not support is view on abortion, but he is a far better man and leader then the disaster Bush is, or the other two current candidates are, so he has my support. I am not changing back to being a Democrat to vote for him in the primary, so I wouldn't get too excited over my support. It is well thought out and tempered by the realities we fact in the political world of the United States in the 21st Century. Your point is noted and thank you mentioning it, but that doesn't change my opinion concerning my support for Obama.
Democrats kill children in the womb; Republicans kill children wherever they wage war in pursuit of the almighty dollar...that is why I have no use for either party.
It is refreshing to know that you are against abortion. I assumed the opposite about you. What you said about Bush and McCain is pretty accurate. Except I don't think McCain is for abortion. I don't think he has a strong pro life record on abortion . I think he is mildly against it but really don't give a shit. Having said that I don't think any president is going to do anything about abortion. It will take more than a president. Back to Obama. His support of abortion tells me a great deal about his character. I will say this also. I think Obama will not bring the troops home. I think he would support a war against Iran.
That is a broad brush but mostly accurate in my opinion.
I always tell my wife that there are exceptions to every broad-brush statement; as there are in this case. :-)
What is this about the "late" TLBSHOW. Is TLBSHOW deceased? TLBSHOW is ok too. I agree.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. ROFLMAO!
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
Thanks OF. You're okay in mine too!
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
I agree. Thanks JD!
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
vast's loss! vast, you may have personal disagreements with Pep, but she brings a lot of good and researched information to the forum.
Thanks Christine, I wish fluffy bunnies and sunshine to vast all the rest of his days. :) Poor little thing.
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
The Os are taking this selection way too seriously. You'd think after all the education we've received over the years about the American government, and both branches of the national party, they'd agree with us the Agenda will move forward regardless of who is chosen. I'm thinking deep down they know this but are in some sort of denial.
What ever happened to coral snake? He's vanished too. Pretty soon there won't be any kooks on the net the way things are going.
.
RE: the O's. Who am I to quash their dreams? I sure don't see it that way, but I voted for the idiot in 2000, so I surely was duped.
"Hello Rothschild's cattle!" ~ Deek Jackson
I'm guessing the basement of the Vatican where they store lots of statues.
Well said. Maybe a Freeper gene kicked in.
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
Right on the money christine.
Son, you are toooo light in the loafers to even carry Peppas books. I recall you not too long ago running up and down the sidelines with those encouraging words, " Paul cant win" "Paul cant win". We wont forget that.
Thanks Lac.
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
I recall you not too long ago running up and down the sidelines with those encouraging words, " Paul cant win" "Paul cant win". We wont forget that. Thanks Cyni.. and yes Vast did that. There were quite a few busy little bees with him on that. Oh well. It's not about Ron Paul anymore. So, staying focused on the jewels selected for us, is job number 1!
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
We do have our share of "Fifth Columnists" here.
Actually, I am not taking it very seriously. I find it to be more interesting than others even though, Buchanan's struggle to take over Ross Perot's loot and his instant re-morph into 'pundit' the day after 'election day' was more entertaining. I believe we were both with Buchanan those days. Is this upcoming a 'selection'? Sure it is. You are inside the 2-party system and all you get to choose from is from the menu the 2-parties so generously offer you. In the case of the GOP, I believe that McCain if the perfect representative of what that party is today - and today's GOP party is ugly. Both Obama and Hillary are good approximations of the Demo party but Hillary is a deeply flawed person who should be prevented from reaching the White House. I disagree with the Demo party's agenda as much as I loath the GOP's but the only way to prevent either McCain or Hillary from getting the WH job is to support Obama. As an intelligent and principled person with some sense of humor, I appreciate his intelligence, moral qualities and his sense of humor. Of course, I disagree with a lot of his agenda. Now, if anyone can come forward with any other way of preventing McCain or Hillary from installing themselves into the WH, please come forward and brief me on the plan. And, please, stating that there is no difference between Obama (a flawed human) and the 2 monsters opposing him is well... naive.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
And? Was I right or was I right? You can't seem to stand reality. Or... tell me. Did he win????? :)
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
You say it nicer than I do.
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
It is a dream. Or to use Os word, it's about hope. Either way, the mess we're in will continue to roll forward unimpeded. We could post material about vote fraud all day long and it wont have an impact on his believers. And as someone noted a few days back, until Obama came on the scene, there was no conspiracy they rejected. I don't get the disconnect myself. The question that can't be ignored is who, in the course of history, was the last politician to alter the downward spiral of an empire? Answer, it hasn't happened.
I can't say that I have disagreements because I can't recall any actual 'discussion' (a rational exchange of views). I simply don't find it worth my time 'discussing' anything with individuals who jump into the gutter at the first hint that someone may disagree with them. They may do so but I'm not interested in watching them cover themselves in mud and splashing some on others.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I see my civil and polite discourse with you at the time was in vain. However I will do it one more time. "No one here ever entertained the notion that Paul could win". If you rethink this thing and use this as a basis of thought, things may appear a little more clear to you.
Really? That's not what I recall. Let me see... primaries hijacking theory... does it ring bells? Like RP's supporters are 10 times more likely to show up and therefore they would win... Shall I continue?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
If you rethink this thing and use this as a basis of thought, things may appear a little more clear to you. Do you have any idea who he's having an argument with yet?
"The truth that makes men free is for the most part the truth which men prefer not to hear." -- Herbert Sebastien Agar (1897-1980) Source: The Time for Greatness, 1942
Yep, I was with Buchanan and yep, his '00 run was the end of my personal political participation. About Obama? I hope he wins. Looking at Hillary sickens me and McKooK is mental. That said, I can't understand the enthusiasm some are showing for him. He clearly has differing positions on all the major issues and I've caught heat (bozo'd) by some for simply pointing it out. I don't understand how some think Obama, if elected, would be allowed to alter the Agenda of the MIC. We're talking about an investment of trillions of dollars in our Iraqi venture alone. We want their land, oil and access to other points in the Middle East. But mostly our effort is a joint effort w/Israel. The plan to partition Iraq was hatched back in '82 and brought to this forum by Horse, only to be ignored in favor of 'hope.' As I said, I'm confused.
My 2c: The fact that you're posting a thread about your impressions of these 2 people says more about you than them. If you don't care for them, fine. Just bozo them and move on. No big deal.
Comments (44 - 99) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#5. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#2)
(Edited)
Obama for president 2008
#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Me, Me, Me
#7. To: angle (#6)
Secondly, the subject further described what it was about.
Thirdly, if you could see who the author was (Me, Me, Me) so you could have elected not to open the thread.
Fourthly, you are free to place me back on your own 'bozo' filter, I am not discouraging you from doing so.
#8. To: Ferret Mike (#5)
#9. To: Old Friend (#8)
#10. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#7)
Obama for president 2008
#11. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#9)
#12. To: Old Friend (#11)
(Edited)
#13. To: Old Friend (#8)
Obama for president 2008
#14. To: Old Friend (#11)
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#15. To: Ferret Mike (#13)
#16. To: who knows what evil (#14)
#17. To: Old Friend (#16)
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org
#18. To: Old Friend, Peppa (#1)
I have talked to peppa on a few occasions. Peppa is ok in my book.
Lord Acton
#19. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#20. To: Old Friend (#1)
I have talked to peppa on a few occasions. Peppa is ok in my book.
#21. To: James Deffenbach (#18)
To: Old Friend, Peppa
#22. To: Peppa, a vast rightwing conspirator (#20)
(Edited)
#23. To: christine (#22)
vast's loss! vast, you may have personal disagreements with Pep, but she brings a lot of good and researched information to the forum.
#24. To: Peppa, Os (#19)
#25. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
TLBSHOW
#26. To: Jethro Tull (#24)
#27. To: ... (#25)
#28. To: Jethro Tull (#24)
The Os are taking this selection way too seriously. You'd think after all the education we've received over the years about the American government, and both branches of the national party, they'd agree with us the Agenda will move forward regardless of who is chosen. I'm thinking deep down they know this but are in some sort of denial.
#29. To: christine, Peppa (#22)
vast's loss! vast, you may have personal disagreements with Pep, but she brings a lot of good and researched information to the forum
#30. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Peppa, Christine (#0)
#31. To: LACUMO (#29)
Right on the money christine.
#32. To: Cynicom (#30)
(Edited)
Son, you are toooo light in the loafers to even carry Peppas books.
#33. To: Peppa (#32)
#34. To: Jethro Tull (#24)
#35. To: Cynicom (#30)
I recall you not too long ago running up and down the sidelines with those encouraging words, " Paul cant win" "Paul cant win". We wont forget that.
#36. To: Cynicom (#33)
We do have our share of "Fifth Columnists" here.
#37. To: angle (#26)
#38. To: christine (#22)
vast's loss! vast, you may have personal disagreements with Pep, but she brings a lot of good and researched information to the forum.
#39. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Peppa (#35)
And? Was I right or was I right?
#40. To: Cynicom (#39)
#41. To: Cynicom (#39)
"No one here ever entertained the notion that Paul could win".
#42. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#34)
#43. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
.
.
.