[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama Remark ‘Elitist,’ McCain Says
Source: New York Times
URL Source: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/ ... remark-elitist-mccain-says/?hp
Published: Apr 14, 2008
Author: Ariel Alexovich
Post Date: 2008-04-14 14:36:12 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 937
Comments: 56

Obama Remark ‘Elitist,’ McCain Says

April 14, 2008, 12:35 pm

By Ariel Alexovich

WASHINGTON — John McCain called Barack Obama’s recent comments that Pennsylvanians are “bitter” an “elitist” remark but stopped short of calling Mr. Obama himself elitist.

“I don’t know Senator Obama very well,” Senator McCain said, addressing a packed crowd of journalists at a newspaper editors’ conference on Monday. Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, spoke at length about how small town Americans in places like Pennsylvania are the backbone of America. Those folks don’t support the Second Amendment because of recent economic hardships, Mr. McCain said, they do it because that’s been part of their values system for generations.

“These are the people that produced a generation that made the world safe for democracy,” Mr. McCain said. “These are the people that have fundamental cultural, spiritual, and other values that in my view have very little to do with their economic condition.”

To suggest otherwise, Mr. McCain said, is “a fundamental contradiction to what I believe America is all about.”

Senator McCain also denied flip-flopping on the mortgage issue. He has been criticized for initially being against government aid to homeowners struggling under the weight of their hefty mortgages.

Now, Mr. McCain has said he supports limited bailouts because “Americans are hurting.”

But he warned against too much government intervention. “Massive bailouts puts debt on future generations,” he said.

The chummy question-and-answer portion of Monday’s event began with a mutual peace offering. The panel hosts gave guest speaker John McCain a coffee with cream and sugar, and several Dunkin’ donuts — with sprinkles.

“My favorite!” he said.

In return, he told the packed auditorium of journalists that he supports a shield law — which allows reporters to protect their sources — albeit narrowly. He doesn’t support the shield law if it infringes upon national security, specifically citing The New York Times’s decision to disclose a government wiretapping program “too close to crossing that line.” “It is, frankly, a license to do harm, perhaps serious harm,” Mr. McCain said in his opening remarks. “But it is also a license to do good; to disclose injustice and unlawfulness and inequities; and to encourage their swift correction.”

Mr. McCain didn’t give up the names of people he’s considering for vice president, only that he hopes to make a decision “sooner rather than later.” During the casual Q-and-A, he also joked that he’d fall into a “deep depression” if he loses the general election.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#3. To: aristeides (#0)

McCain still has not released his taxes. It has been reported that John and Cindy own 8 homes, and through her, they live a lavish lifestyle, well beyond what most in the Senate live; certainly well beyond the way most Americans live.

So who is the elitist again?

robin  posted on  2008-04-14   16:31:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: robin (#3) (Edited)

So who is the elitist again?

They're ALL elitists...that what we're trying to tell you.

angle  posted on  2008-04-14   16:35:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: angle, robin (#4)

They're ALL elitists...that what we're trying to tell you.

Amazing that some people still can't grasp that. It's like George Carlin says: It's a big elitist club, and you ain't in it...

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-04-14   17:23:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vitamin Z (#7)

Amazing that some people still can't grasp that. It's like George Carlin says: It's a big elitist club, and you ain't in it...

Doesn't really matter if they are elitists or not. What does matter are their voting records. That alone is enough to oppose all of them. Voting for the lesser of two evils still gives you evil. That's the game the real elite want you to keep on playing. I will never play that game again. Never.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-04-14   17:27:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: RickyJ (#9)

Voting for the lesser of two evils still gives you evil

So you wouldn't have voted for Kerensky against Lenin? You wouldn't have voted for German democrats (many of whom were socialists) against Hitler?

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-14   18:46:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: aristeides (#11)

Voting for evil gives you evil. The German democrats could have been just as bad or worse than Hitler. We will never know becasue they didn't win. If Obama wins someday people may look back and say McCain would have been the lesser of the two evils. It's easy to be an armchair quarterback after the game has already been played. I refuse to play their game. I will vote for the person who stands for what I believe in. If no such person is running or exists then I will vote for myself. Feeling good about who you vote for is something very few people can do. If more people said to heck with the media-picked candidates and voted for who they really liked then we would have true democracy. What we have now is really an illusion of democracy which is in reality a mainstream media controlled autocracy.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-04-14   19:18:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: RickyJ (#12)

The German democrats could have been just as bad or worse than Hitler.

Only they weren't, for the nearly 15 years that they ruled Germany.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-14   19:20:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: aristeides (#13)

Only they weren't, for the nearly 15 years that they ruled Germany.

That is one mans opinion Ari. Having had friends from Eastern Germany for many years, they did not and would not mow agree with you.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-04-14   19:22:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom (#14)

That is one mans opinion Ari. Having had friends from Eastern Germany for many years, they did not and would not mow agree with you.

Ari's little Oxford profs prolly forgot to teach him about Weimar's decadence and corruption. That prolly explains why ari appears to be a good little Marxist NWO lapdog.

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-04-14   20:08:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Vitamin Z (#19)

Ari's little Oxford profs prolly forgot to teach him about Weimar's decadence and corruption.

Ari has an obsession about Hitler.

My friends were there before Hitler, after Hitler, but left after the "communists" liberated them.

One, his Godfather was thrown in Dachau, another her Father was thrown in prison several times by the Gestapo. When the German Jews and their Russian friends arrived, thousands fled. Ari never mentions Marcus Wolf and his Stasi friends but he recalls Hitler vividly.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-04-14   20:17:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

#23. To: Cynicom (#22)

My friends were there before Hitler, after Hitler, but left after the "communists" liberated them.

Funny how the commies are always trying to "liberate" people. Obama and his commie friends are trying to do the same damn thing now!

Vitamin Z  posted on  2008-04-14 20:19:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Cynicom (#22)

But what has that to do with Weimar? Who here thinks Weimar was worse than Nazi Germany?

robin  posted on  2008-04-14 20:20:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: Cynicom, RickyJ (#22)

Ari has an obsession about Hitler.

You seem not to have noticed that my first question to RickyJ was whether he would really not have voted for Kerensky against Lenin. That question he -- conveniently -- did not answer.

Maybe you would not vote for the German democrats against Hitler, even with hindsight about what Hitler ended up doing, presumably because of some obsession with not voting for the left, or out of some hidden sympathy for fascism.

But it's hard to imagine a person with such views also not voting for Kerensky against Lenin.

Unless he just happens to sympathize with -- or at least regard as acceptable -- tyranny of both the Bolshevik and National Socialist varieties.

And that makes my point: it is utterly absurd to think that it is never right to vote for the lesser of two evils.

aristeides  posted on  2008-04-16 10:37:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]