[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Conspiracy Connections

(Must Watch) Tucker Carlson David Collum

DeSantis sends Lt. Gov to bring illegal migrant back to Florida to face charges for crash killing 3

Authorities Hit White Man Who Was Savagely Beaten During Cincinnati Brawl with a Criminal Charge

Cash Jordan: Illegals PLUNDER Denver… Walgreens Shuts 13 Stores

2026 Year without a summer

Daniela Cambone: Marc Faber Weighs 100% All-In Gold Play

Trump ‘running circles’ around world leaders as weak Starmer in ‘spotlight’ for failing the UK

Trump Demands Fed Governor "Must Resign Now" Over Mortgage Fraud Probe

African Countries Can't Practice Maintenance

How a Fake Engineer DESTROYED South Africa’s Railway System

Israel DEMANDS X Remove Posts and X COMPLIES

Cash Jordan: 19 Supermarkets FLEE Washington... "It's WORSE Than Venezuela"

Capital faces federal probe after police accused of falsifying crime data

China’s Quantum Radar COULD EXPOSE Every U.S. Submarine on Earth

Coming soon

External Debt By Countries 2025 (MUST SEE)

Future Headline

A Palestinian beauty queen will take part in the Miss Universe pageant later this year

Mamdani's "Affordability" Agenda Could Be Extremely Costly

Restoring Law & Order In Crime-Ridden Cities May Be Key To Resolving Affordability Crisis

Cash Jordan: Moped 'Army' TERRORIZES DC... Trump ERASES 'Entire UBER Workforce' in 23 Hours

CAMPI FLEGREI SUPERVOLCANO. BUBBLING BEACH WATER

Aid To Ukraine Can Never Be Audited

Texas Vaccine Exemption Requests Spike 36 Percent

Cash Jordan: Angry Voters TRASH Migrant Shelter… ‘Forcibly Deporting’ Every Single Illegal

Bud Light Considers Tapping Sydney Sweeney To Rehab Tarnished Image

Are Environmental Toxins Lower in Wild-Caught or Farmed Fish?

British Army Colonel: Civil War Is Coming

New GPS Data Reveals Exactly Who Showed Up At White House Protests


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Quiz Time: (Hypothetical Question)
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 17, 2008
Author: Neil McIver
Post Date: 2008-04-17 21:33:40 by Pinguinite
Keywords: None
Views: 4343
Comments: 73

Okay, 4umers, quiz time.

I've got a hypothetical question for you. Suppose you were in a funny situation where you had the opportunity to reconstitute the 2nd Amendment, doing away with all 20,000 or so gun laws. The power was in your hands to make it so.

But there's one catch. In order to make this wish come true, you first had to pick up a gun, put it to the head of an innocent 7 year old girl, and pull the trigger, blowing her brains out. With that task completed, the 2nd Amendment would be restored all across America.

Would you do it? If your answer is "yes" then this quiz is over for you. You may resume your perusing of 4um and disregard the rest of the test.

If your answer is no, then we'll expand our hypothetical scenario.

After you refuse to kill this girl, someone else steps up and says "I am also interested in restoring the 2nd Amendment, and I am willing to do what must be done for you. If I am elected president, I will shoot this girl and then the 2nd Amendment will be restored".

Question: Do you vote for this man or not?

It would seem that some people here on 4um would happily endorse the death of this girl one way or another in order to restore 2nd Amendment rights. I am not one of those people, which is why a couple days ago I wrote the following:

For us to try to safeguard our 2nd Amendment rights at the expense of lives of innocents worldwide doesn't fly in my book.

This apparently earned me the label of "gun grabber" in the minds of a few here.

I honestly don't know why. Honestly. Does the phrase "expense of lives of innocents" mean something other than "murder" to people here?

I really feel like I've entered the twilight zone. You know, where the whole world changes but you don't. In this case, it's like learning suddenly that a bunch of 4umers would indeed blow the brains of of a little girl if it helped to secure some of their own "liberties". I am really amazed that a number of people here take exception to my statement.

As this hypothetical scenario applies to the real world, if there was a pres candidate promising to work to fully restore the 2nd Amendment in the USA while simultaneously promising to bomb the rest of the world into oblivion, I could not in good conscious vote for him. Call me crazy or call me a gun grabber if you want, but if not being willing to kill this way makes me a gun grabber, then I hope I'm a gun grabber for life. But I would not, could not support such a "pro 2nd Amendment" candidate. Never.

If I am truly in the minority on this point on 4um, then perhaps I should resign my account and leave you all.

Thank you for reading.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

#1. To: Pinguinite (#0)

I could not hurt her, and I would try to protect the little girl, who might someday grow up to write or say something that would move millions to support second amendment freedoms knowing that her life had been spared.

I do think this is a false dilemma. I saw the thread where you and another poster were having a discussion about this in a different form (related to Obama).

I don't believe he is what he seems, and even if he is, he would not be permitted to move to protect innocent young lives at the expense of the globalists' agenda.

I respect your concern and your desire to see the world improved by reforming American foreign policy. The down side of this false dilemma is that McCain and Rodham do not have better stances on gun control than Obama.

This is a false dilemma in both directions.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-17   21:40:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: buckeye (#1)

I do think this is a false dilemma. I saw the thread where you and another poster were having a discussion about this in a different form (related to Obama).

Thanks for replying.

You're right that Obama may very well keep the occupation going another 4 years. Politicians being what they are, he could do anything. But my statement was generic and not directed toward any particular candidate. Certainly my beatings the past 2 days were for being a gun grabber, not an Obama supporter.

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-04-17   22:18:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Pinguinite (#17)

Certainly my beatings the past 2 days were for being a gun grabber, not an Obama supporter.

I might have misunderstood, but I figured this was about support for any candidate who was in favor of draconian gun control, which they each are. I don't figure a vote for any one of them or another will make a difference.

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-17   22:24:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: buckeye (#20)

I might have misunderstood, but I figured this was about support for any candidate who was in favor of draconian gun control,

My original statement, which was really off the cuff (I didn't even make a showcase of it -- it was the second sentence in the second paragraph of a 3 paragraph post) was really comparing the right of one party to live vs the right of a second party to have a gun, as per the hypothetical.

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-04-17   22:59:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 26.

#28. To: Pinguinite (#26)

We're all worried about gun control, but meanwhile there's a push on for "Net Neutrality" again. We need the first amendment protected more than anything else. You don't have any hypothetical dilemmas to offer about that problem, do you?

buckeye  posted on  2008-04-17 23:06:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]