See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Clinton on Iran: We would "totally obliterate them". ("IF I'M THE PRESIDENT, WE WILL ATTACK IRAN")
Source:
Daily Kos
URL Source: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/21/19427/2083/25/500349
Published: Apr 21, 2008
Author: "turnover"
Post Date: 2008-04-21 19:19:58 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 428
Comments: 16
Clinton on Iran: We would "totally obliterate them". by turnover [Subscribe] I know that ABC News is incredibly unpopular these days, and rightly so. But I just took a cruise by their website and saw the following headline: Clinton on An Iran Attack: 'Obliterate Them' Uh...what? This comment seemed injudicious at best, so I read further: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president we will attack Iran," Clinton said. "In the next ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them." I have no idea what to say. I really don't. It's not that I don't recognize Iran as being a problem. Nor is it that I question our strategic alliance with Israel. But, I mean... This is just a batshit crazy thing to say! Even the current Cowboy-in-Chief has generally refrained from verbal saber-rattling to this degree. I'm at a loss. Just completely speechless.
Mon Apr 21, 2008 at 04:13:47 PM PDT Clinton further displayed tough talk in an interview airing on Good Morning America Tuesday, ABC News' Chris Cuomo asked Clinton what she would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: aristeides (#0)
(Edited)
That's reason enough to vote for her right there. McCain would sit on his ass and do nothing. Obama would also do nothing. We need a President with balls like Hillary. Obliterate them. Now that's the kind of president we need. No more of this nice guy stuff.
God is always good!
THE NEXT 10 YEARS??? Crimeny, how long are we going to be stuck with them?
As a country, the USA has deeply injured the world and it's a national obligation to right that wrong as much as possible. For us to try to safeguard our 2nd Amendment rights at the expense of lives of innocents worldwide doesn't fly in my book. -- Pinguinite http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=78060&Disp=44#C44
Forever evidently unless we get "lucky".
"Satan / Cheney in "08" I keep backing out responses. Can't come up with anything snappy or nice.
As a country, the USA has deeply injured the world and it's a national obligation to right that wrong as much as possible. For us to try to safeguard our 2nd Amendment rights at the expense of lives of innocents worldwide doesn't fly in my book. -- Pinguinite http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=78060&Disp=44#C44
Please tell me you're kidding. That was a satirical comment, right?
"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president we will attack Iran," Clinton said. "In the next ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#2. To: RickyJ (#1)
In the next ten years, during which they might
#3. To: Peppa (#2)
#4. To: tom007 (#3)
Forever evidently unless we get "lucky".
#5. To: RickyJ (#1)
We need a President with balls like Hillary. Obliterate them. Now that's the kind of president we need. No more of this nice guy stuff.
 | Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#6. To: Elliott Jackalope (#5)
I'm trying not to do personal labelling but, in this case, we see a typical case of an anti-American subject of Israel, posing as an American. It's quite disgusting, really.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
#7. To: aristeides (#0)
so many of the democrat rank & file just don't get it. He actually thinks that the Clintons are somehow sincere and trying to do the right thing etc. he buys the propaganda that Iran is a problem and that Israel is our friend. and he would think me an anti-semitic baffoon for not agreeing with him. who's more stupid? People who vote Republican or people who vote Democrat? Hard to say. When Clinton was president he sent the US military to attack a peaceful meeting in Mogadishu, Somalia of national leaders. With helicopters spraying metal they killed 80 people some of whom were national leaders. Leaders of factions that we were not at war with, not opposed to even. It was a completely unprovoked attack. The US said that they were trying to kill ONE MAN. and the one man was not present they found out in the end. They killed 80 people out of the blue from helicopters spraying death. you know he bombed those targets in Sudan completely by surprise with no justification at all. and he bombed Iraq, completely unprovoked as far as I'm concerned because they did not attack us. They flew some planes in a location that the US did not want them to fly, and so Clinton attacked. He also bombed Afghanistan. and if that's not bad enough he attacked Waco, TX too. But Clinton is not Bush and he likes sex. so I guess your typical democrat thinks he's a nice guy. The only thing stupider than a Republican voter is a Democrat voter. and the only thing stupider than a Democrat voter is a Republican voter.
It's not that I don't recognize Iran as being a problem. Nor is it that I question our strategic alliance with Israel.
Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
#8. To: Elliott Jackalope (#5)
I'm sure it is.
That was a satirical comment, right?
Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
#9. To: aristeides, *Iranian Conflict*, *Obama 2008* (#0)
'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz
#10. To: Red Jones (#7)
Excellent comment and truth/history reminder. Guess which party used nukes on a civilian population first?
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition "Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx 
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
#11. To: Red Jones (#7)
The bitch is crazy. She belongs in the nut house, not the White House
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.
#12. To: Elliott Jackalope, RickyJ (#5)
Please tell me you're kidding. That was a satirical comment, right? You must not have read many of l'il Ricky's posts, He's brain dead as well as dead wrong.
We need a President with balls like Hillary. Obliterate them. Now that's the kind of president we need. No more of this nice guy stuff.
I cling to hope of a 50 state repudiation of the traitorous, neocon Plutocrat Party
#13. To: aristeides (#0)
Why is Iran a problem when the much zanier, much more radical, much more unstable protector of bin Laden is just okey dokey with nukes? Sheesh! How the hell did we ever get here?
It's not that I don't recognize Iran as being a problem.
I cling to hope of a 50 state repudiation of the traitorous, neocon Plutocrat Party
#14. To: Red Jones (#7)
Hillary, if elected, will make Slick look like Mr.Rogers. And, she just won PA..
The only thing stupider than a Republican voter is a Democrat voter. and the only thing stupider than a Democrat voter is a Republican voter.
I cling to hope of a 50 state repudiation of the traitorous, neocon Plutocrat Party
#15. To: aristeides (#0)
Hitlery brags on her "connection" with the women and children of all the nations she and her entourage visited during the 90's and comes out with THIS blanket statement against the citizens of Iran??? She's obviously dancing to the tune of her Jewish overlords...
"What we do claim is that the northern European, and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But that is the full statement of the case. They came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it. We are determined that they shall not. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves." Rep. William Vaile, Colorado, 1924
#16. To: IndieTX (#10)
Must have been Iraq or Iran. Yeh, that's the ticket.
Guess which party used nukes on a civilian population first?
"Satan / Cheney in "08"
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest