[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande! Lightning Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge Mister Roberts (1965) WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread] I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden... Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything. How Romans Built Domes My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today. They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029] Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean The Siege (1998) Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger Skateboarding Dog Israel's Plans for Jordan Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging: Hepatitis E Virus in Pork Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: News Flash: Hillary leads in popular vote so far
Source: realclearpolitics
URL Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep ... ent/democratic_vote_count.html
Published: Apr 23, 2008
Author: realclearpolitics
Post Date: 2008-04-23 23:52:30 by RickyJ
Keywords: None
Views: 120
Comments: 8

2008 Democratic Popular Vote

State	Date		Obama		Clinton					Spread
Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)**			14,993,348	47.4%	15,116,076	47.8%				Clinton +122,728	+0.4%

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0) (Edited)

How can this be? Obama supporters have been telling all of us how far ahead their man is in popular votes compared to Clinton, yet when all votes are taken into consideration Hillary is actually ahead.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-04-23   23:54:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

News Flash: Hillary leads in popular vote so far

How can this be?

By invoking nonsense.

You must count FL where there was no campaign because the state was violating the rules and was told by the Dem party that no delegates would be recognized. The GOP vote total exceeded that of the Dems, in stark contrast to the other, real primary contests.

You must count MI where Obama and Edwards were not on the ballot.

For the most part in Michigan, Democrats stayed home, knowing no delegates were at stake. The GOP vote more than doubled the Dem vote total, in stark contrast to the other, real primary contests.

This also must include estimates where accurate vote totals are not known.

In the real world, Clinton remains behind in popular vote, states won, and delegates won.

At the link: www.realclearpolitics.com...emocratic_vote_count.html

*(Iowa, Nevada, Washington & Maine Have Not Released Popular Vote Totals. RealClearPolitics has estimated the popular vote totals for Senator Obama and Clinton in these four states. RCP uses the WA Caucus results from February 9 in this estimate because the Caucuses on February 9 were the "official" contest recognized by the DNC to determine delegates to the Democratic convention. The estimate from these four Caucus states where there are not official popular vote numbers increases Senator Obama’s popular vote margin by 110,224. This number would be about 50,000 less if the Washington primary results from February 19th were used instead of the Washington Caucus results.)

**(Senator Obama was not on the Michigan Ballot and thus received zero votes. Uncommitted was on the ballot and received 238,168 votes as compared to 328,309 for Senator Clinton.)

MICHIGAN

Clinton ....... 328,151 - 87.73%
Kucinich ....... 21,708 - 05.80%
Dodd ............ 3,853 - 01.03%
Gravel .......... 2,363 - 00.63%

............... 356,075

-----

Romney ....... 337,847 - 39.75%
McCain ....... 257,521 - 30.30%
Huckabee ..... 139,699 - 16.44%
Paul ........... 54,434 - 06.40%
Thompson ....... 32,135 - 03.78%
Giuliani ....... 24,706 - 02.91%
Hunter .......... 2,823 - 00.33%
Tancredo .......... 458 - 00.05%

............... 849,623

FLORIDA

Clinton ....... 857,208 - 49.69%
Obama ......... 569,041 - 32.98%
Edwards ....... 248,604 - 14.41%
Biden .......... 15,429 - 00.89%
Richardson ..... 14,782 - 00.86%
Kucinich ........ 9,537 - 00.55%
Dodd ............ 5,402 - 00.31%
Gravel .......... 5,261 - 00.30%

............. 1,725,264

McCain ........ 693,508 - 36.01%
Romney ........ 598,188 - 31.06%
Giuliani ...... 281,781 - 14.63%
Huckabee ...... 259,735 - 13.49%
Paul ........... 62,063 - 03.22%
Thompson ....... 22,288 - 01.16%
Hunter .......... 2,787 - 00.14%
Tancredo ........ 1,556 - 00.08%

............. 1,921,906

nolu_chan  posted on  2008-04-24   0:42:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The analysts say the non-campaigns of FL and MI will not sway the superdelegates, they understand fully what to make of those results.

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-04-24   1:00:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

FL where there was no campaign

Wrong. Obama campaigned there for three weeks, Hillary zero weeks, yet Obama still got his ass handed to him. He and Edwards took their name off of Michigan's ballot for a very good reason, they knew they would do badly there and knew that no delegates were going to be committed from Michigan.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-04-24   1:01:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Wrong. Obama campaigned there for three weeks, Hillary zero weeks, yet Obama still got his ass handed to him.

If you say so. In the real world, Obama has the delegates and Hillary has the excuses.

nolu_chan  posted on  2008-04-24   1:06:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A crazy bitch, a crazy asshole and a black Caspar Milquetoast aren't much of a choice.

---

"Abe Foxman, my good friend and partner." - John Negroponte

Read New History

---

JiminyC  posted on  2008-04-24   1:09:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

www.anonymousliberal.com/2008/04/pennsylvania.html

[comment to article]

Popular Vote: Listen Up, Obama Surrogates

by PocketNines

Tue Apr 22, 2008 at 10:00:27 PM PDT

Dear Obama Surrogate,

You are going to be on cable news shows in the next two weeks, and you are going to be confronted with the notion of the popular vote being a legitimate measuring stick.

I must say that thus far I have been generally very unimpressed with you as a group. You flub around, you let yourself get bullied by giant assholes like Joe Scarborough and you never make super-easy points.

So listen up, I am going to make this easy for you. Do not screw this up. Use the three obvious points, and use concrete examples, which I have helpfully provided for you. If you do not say these three things, you are a total failure as a surrogate.

Point Number 1: If the popular vote determined the nominee, no candidate would ever go to Iowa or New Hampshire. They'd spend all their time in big urban areas all over the country from the outset of the campaign, racking up raw numbers. What would be the point of even visiting New Hampshire if you could camp out in Brooklyn?

Concrete Example: Barack Obama would not have spent only a day and a half in California before the Feb 5 primary. He would have never gone to Idaho. Duh.

Point Number 2: If the popular vote determined the nominee, no state in its right mind would ever hold a caucus, instantly disenfranchising itself.

Concrete example: Minnesota-Missouri. Minnesota gets credit for 214K votes, and Missouri gets 822K votes, but they each get 72 delegates. Is Missouri's voice 4 times more important than Minnesota's?

Point Number 3: The arbitrary distinction between who gets to vote in these primaries is nothing like the general election, where everyone registered gets to vote. In the primaries, sometimes it's just Dems, sometimes Dems and Indies, sometimes anyone.

Concrete example: Texas gets a million more votes than similar overall population New York (2.8M to 1.8M), even though New York is far more Democratic, simply due to this arbitrary restriction on who can vote (NY = closed, Texas = open).

Overall point: regardless of the fact that Obama will win the popular vote, it is completely illegitimate in this race. THIS IS NOT LIKE POPULAR VOTE IN THE GENERAL ELECTION.

Think you can remember this, Obama surrogates? I mean, re-read it if you have to. Rehearse in front of a mirror. Get a buddy to critique you.

I heard Chuck Todd say that superdelegates think popular vote is the real measuring stick. That is so unbelievably asinine that if it's true, it only demonstrates how badly you, the Obama Surrogates, have failed.

Get your shit together and start making these points.

You're welcome.

I FORGOT:
I am waiting for the first Obama surrogate to say, with mockery dripping, that (even in its dishonest spasms of stupidity for including Florida and Michigan where the candidates for office did not even campaign but had a name recognition buzzpoll) the Clinton argument requires that Obama gets zero votes in Michigan. Then demand that an opposing Clinton surrogate own that intellectual point implicit in their argument.

Update (rewritten for clarity):
In the spirit of stating your opponents' best argument for them up front, then dismantling it, lay it out this way:

When the Clintons and their surrogates deceptively argue for the popular vote, they appear at first glance to be making a simple, moral, populist argument, that all votes are equal. Right? That's the implication, and why it rolls off their tongues so easily.

But where is the inherent morality in open versus closed primaries that arbitrarily limit turnout and whether Republicans and independents get to pick the Democratic nominee in some states but not others?

Are caucuses inherently immoral? Many states chose them as their form of selecting a nominee.

Is it moral to alter the game strategy only after the fact?

Make the opposing Clinton surrogate make a moral case that Minnesota = 1/4 of Missouri, because their argument insists that it should. Make them argue from a principle standpoint that Minnesota = 1/4 of Missouri. Make them argue that. Put them in that position. It'll expose this whole can of worms.

10:54 AM

nolu_chan  posted on  2008-04-24   1:37:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Obama said he didn't want a redo of FL and Michigan because he knows what the results would be. You can't write off FL and Michigan and still win the presidency. The Dems can say they don't count, but I can assure you they count in the general election.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-04-24   15:37:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]