[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution See other Dead Constitution Articles Title: CNN, FOX, CBS, ABC, NBC and MSNBC decline PBS’ interview request over the “Military Generals’ scandal PBS did an excellent report on the explosive NY Times story which says: the Pentagon may influence the analysis of some retired military personnel who appear on television news programs. Oh, really? Wow, I never would have guessed. Ive covered this scandal at length already, but since Network News refuses to comment on this report, Ill keep pushing it. And I thank PBS for also not sticking their heads in the sand. Woodruff: And for the record, we invited Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and NBC to participate, but they declined our offer or did not respond. Weve been talking to the Pentagon since Monday about participating in this segment. But when we finally scheduled it today, they were unable to supply a guest on short notice. Bob Zelnick admirably plays the medias chief apologist for this segment. Its not surprising that someone that works in the media defends them to the end. The Pentagon and the Networks thank you. JUDY WOODRUFF: How surprised were you to see this report? BOB ZELNICK: I wasnt surprised at all. In fact, when I covered the Pentagon, I often sought information from retired generals and admirals and colonels because I knew they were well-informed. I knew they kept in touch. I knew they had drinks at the Army-Navy Club. I know they went to Army-Navy football games on special trains together. I knew that many of them were serving as what we called Beltway bandits or consultants. So I wasnt surprised at all, except by the amount of space devoted to this piece by the New York Times. JUDY WOODRUFF: Since the months leading up to the start of the Iraq war in March 2003, dozens of retired military officers served as analysts on cable and network television. JUDY WOODRUFF: These former generals and colonels have been a mainstay of commentary and analysis. And the networks paid them for their appearances. Now, a lengthy New York Times investigation, published on Sunday, revealed the Pentagon targeted many of these analysts as part of an information apparatus to generate favorable news coverage of the administrations wartime performance. (transcript below the fold) Pentagon officials organized hundreds of private meetings with senior military leaders and the military analysts. They included talks with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. According to the Times, analysts were also taken on tours of Iraq and given access to classified intelligence. In turn, members of this group have echoed administration talking points, sometimes even when they suspected the information was false or inflated. It was also disclosed that most of the analysts have ties to military contractors
read on Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: robin (#0)
...And tomorrow, the sun will rise, the earth will rotate and college students in fraternities will consume more alcohol than those not in fraternities. Is anyone surprised? They all probably still have active security clearances.
It isn't often that a PsyOp is revealed, and then the later the media's complicity is exposed further by its refusal to comment.
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years, Maybe a hundred ... ... thatd be fine with me, McCain responds Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
|
||
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|