See other Editorial Articles
Title: WHEN WILL WE ADMIT THE TRUTH ABOUT BARACK OBAMA?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Duke/selwyn90.htm
Published: Apr 28, 2008
Author: Selwyn Duke
Post Date: 2008-04-29 10:37:08 by IndieTX
Keywords: OBAMA THE, MAGIC, HUSTLER
Views: 1617
Comments: 204
If you interview someone for a job, you’ll expect him to tell you what you want to hear. There’ll be a façade, and his darker side will remain well-hidden. Now, let’s say a requirement for the job is that the applicant likes children, and he does his best Captain Kangaroo. But then you find out he has a job history of indifference to and perhaps even abuse of them and that, during unguarded moments, he has expressed disdain for them. What will you believe, what he tries to sell you or history and hair-down revelations? Remember this when evaluating the profound discrepancy between Barack Obama’s damage-control denials and flowery rhetoric, and his long track record. Understand that he, like the other candidates, is interviewing for the job of president with you, the interviewer. His job is to bend the truth; your job is to discern it. The only question is: Who will do a better job, he or you? Either Obama really is a savior for the third millennium, or the answer is that he is, thus far, besting many of you. Millions flock to him, registering oohs and ahs, fainting and fawning. Even critics and watchdogs heap praise upon him; Bill O’Reilly said he likes Obama and Sean Hannity proclaimed him a “good man.” But what is the truth about this applicant? Let me tell you a story. In 2002, President Bush signed into law a bill titled the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (BAIPA). This law was necessary because, believe it or not, infants were being born alive during attempted abortions and then, ancient Spartan style, left to die. Jill Stanek wrote about this last year, saying: “As a nurse at an Illinois hospital in 1999, I discovered babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in soiled utility rooms. I discovered infanticide.” The act was so vile that even staunch abortion advocates would not oppose BAIPA. Stanek tells us that it passed the Senate by unanimous vote, garnering the support of senators Kerry, Kennedy and Clinton. She then pointed out: “The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme.” But the state version of BAIPA failed for years in Illinois. Any guesses as to why? Stanek goes on to explain: I testified in 2001 and 2002 before a committee of which Obama was a member. Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights. Obama's clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. I was naive back then. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed. In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics. If asked about this, I’m sure Obama would be a very effective interviewee; he is good with words. (Of course, one is better with words when they’re managed by a sympathetic media.) Yet, when you look beyond the rhetoric, a picture of Obama starts to emerge. There are his damnable associations. We know about William Ayers, the college professor and “education advisor” who, as a Weather Underground terrorist in the 1970s, planted bombs in a campaign against our government. You might point out that this was three decades ago, but know that Ayers is unrepentant and wishes that he had planted more bombs. What does this piece of history teach us? For starters, it is one thing to understand something is wrong; it is another to feel it. Emotion is a stronger motivator than logic (Captain Kirk had the passion, not Mr. Spock). My point is, given Obama’s cordial dealings with Ayers – a man with whom many wouldn’t break bread – I’m left to wonder how much terrorism really bothers the senator on a visceral level. If his tolerance for the Weatherman is any indication, we have to ask: As president, would his zeal match that of our Islamist foes? Or will Osama bin Laden be a department chair in the Ivy League? Then there is the now infamous Reverend Wright, the man of the cloth poised to move into a house with a 10-million-dollar line of credit. His bigoted, virulently anti-American bile has received enough press so that I don’t have to provide a complete run-down, but this is a man who equated America with al-Qaeda, said we deserved 9/11, made anti-white statements, and called our nation “the US of KKKA.” This prompted, as you know, a well-crafted and rendered speech on race by the interviewee (as the infanticide story, should it receive enough play, may inspire a speech on the sanctity of life), but, again, what is the reality behind the words? Advertisement Obama called Wright a friend, mentor and uncle; he had a 20-year relationship with him, during which time he attended Wright’s church; he was married and had his child baptized by the reverend; and last year he donated $26,000 to the church. Yet some would give Obama credit for not casting his friend to the winds. After all, the interviewee said that he “cannot disown him.” But my question is: Why, Mr. Obama, did you ever own him in the first place? So we again have to wonder about his emotional constitution, his heart. Even if he doesn’t share Wright’s passion for the hate, he certainly was tolerant of it – and I suspect sympathetic to it. And a man is known by the company he keeps. The woman he marries is some indication, too. Michelle Obama vigorously advocated partial-birth abortion (which is also infanticide) in 2004, and we all know about her notorious pronouncement: “For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of my country.” As for the comment, it has caused many to question her patriotism and apologists to counsel against rash judgment. But the truth is plain. As I’m sure Jesse Lee Peterson – a black minister and the president of B.O.N.D. – would tell you, anti-American sentiment typifies leftist blacks (it’s quite common among leftist whites, too). Think about it: How many blacks on the left can you think of who don’t fit that mold? It’s a consequence of imbibing the philosophy of hatred and bitterness dispensed by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other racial hustlers. Then we have Obama’s moment of honesty in San Francisco. As a refresher, here is what he said: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years . . . . And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Many have labeled these comments elitist, and Obama has been trying to explain them away. But, again, the truth is plain. Apologists have asserted that Bill Clinton expressed the same sentiments in 1992; in other words, the best they can muster is that Obama is just like Clinton. And that is the point. Obama is a leftist, Clinton is a leftist, and that’s what leftists believe about “flyover country,” just as Michelle Obama’s statement reflects what they believe about the whole country. You needn’t be a clairvoyant to discern it. To understand what is most striking about those comments, though, you have to look more deeply. Notice he mentioned “religion” in the same breath as “guns” and “antipathy to people,” sandwiched right in-between the two. It’s hard to escape the conclusion that he draws an equivalency among those things, which speaks volumes. If you’re a person of faith, you understand that we’re supposed to cling to religion. After all, if you are serious about your faith, you must believe it is the Truth and that it is God’s will that you should practice it. And why wouldn’t you have the Truth at the center of your life? The only kind of person who wouldn’t have this perspective is one who has little or no faith. That certainly wouldn’t make Obama unique, but remember that he has often masqueraded as a man of faith, just as he now touts his support for second-amendment rights (in 1999 he supported a law that would have eliminated gun stores from virtually the whole country). But this bespeaks of a reality: There is Obama the myth, and Obama the man. If you want to know the former, listen to what he says; if you want to know the latter, accept what he is. And what is he? What is the truth about Barack Obama? You won’t hear it from the Sean Hannitys of the world, who will tell us that he is a “good man” with bad ideology. Such people are simple telling you what they’re supposed to believe; it’s what “fair and balanced” commentators do, the stuff of “acceptable” conservatives. The truth about Obama is that he is not a good man. He is a bad man. Good men don’t turn a blind eye to unrepentant ex-terrorists; support vile, anti-American bigots; lie about their core beliefs; and look down on traditional Americans. Most significantly, good men don’t allow beautiful babies – the least among us – to be discarded like refuse and die miserable, lonely deaths in dark utility rooms. In fact, if we cannot call Obama a bad man, there is no such thing as a bad man. And calling him a good man doesn’t just strain credulity, it puts it in the hospital in traction. Ah, yes, hope, change, unity, infanticide, bigotry, terrorism, Obama . . . good? We all know what is wrong with this picture. © 2008 Selwyn Duke - All Rights Reserve
Poster Comment: Here's some more red meat.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-34) not displayed.
.
.
.
#35. To: ghostdogtxn (#33)
www.breakthematrix.com/ Lyman's new website to help carry on the message and energy.
“President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds Wilson - No War against the Kaiser FDR - American boys will not set foot in Europe LBJ - No War in Indochina Nixon - I'll bring the troops home Bush Jr - Help is on the way. Bosnia is the EU's problem now. Obama? I'm not taking any bets. A canadate who comes out of no where preaching about humble foreign policy, unity, and bi-partisanship? My, that's sounds rather familiar. So do the talking points of his hard core supporters.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me. "If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
oh boy. hit pieces? how about many of them being factual? and how about they're being posted as a response to the Savoir Obama articles. let me remind you, there is no one here defending hillary or mcCain. no one. so there's no reason to waste time with them. what's being posted by many here is that obama is different from those two. maybe he is in his rhetoric, but he's not in his actions. that's what we're trying to illuminate. *Obama Reality Check*
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
J T or Peppa nailed his warmongering tripe somewhere around here...
Go screw yourself you POS, you're not fooling me.
Good to know that all the endless attacks on Obama aren't a backdoor method of promoting a Hillary vs McCain match up in the fall. LOL
Yeah, like supporting an Establishment racist Marxist RAT when Ron Paul gets marginalized by the very same Establishment? You went running back out to the Establishment mud puddle as soon as you could...
pInG
That pic is a hoot!
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
the one thing i did believe we were all united on is the reality of the two party fraud. seems that is not so.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Truth hurts, doesn't it you lying Open Borders-Marxist-loving-pussy-traitor! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
LOL!! Zero credibility. All shot to shiit for the status quo puppet show.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Exactly. Well said.
Obviously, the two party system knows exactly which buttons to push to keep the inside the beltway power structure in place. The want either McCain or Hillary in the White House - either is acceptable to them. We're doing their work for them by eliminating the only wild card that could upset their apple cart.
i'm not so sure that's even true. he has and will pay homage to Israel. foreign policy won't change, imo, with Obama. it's not the president who makes these decisions. obama, like the other two, will do the bidding of the masters. he wouldn't be a presidential candidate otherwise.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
there's our difference of opinion, arete, and it has nothing to do with his race. i don't believe he's the wild card that could upset their apple cart. i believe he's one apple in their cart.
To: ghostdogtxn AP and Jerusalem Post staff Jerusalem Post 02-28-2008 Headline: Israel's security is sacrosanct, Obama declares at Democrat debate Byline: AP and Jerusalem Post staff Edition; Daily Section: News Page: 07 Thursday, February 28, 2008 -- Senator Barack Obama voiced unreserved support for Israel on Tuesday night, but he clashed with Senator Hillary Clinton over campaign tactics and the war in Iraq during a crackling debate one week before a pivotal group of primaries. While discussing issues of anti-Semitism, Obama said: "One of the reasons why so many of my supporters come from the Jewish community...is that I have been a stalwart friend of Israel and supported the special relationship we enjoy with it... They are among our most important allies and their security is sacrosanct."
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
You RAT Commie Lying Shills are Pussies to boot !!
The D shills had it good on 4um until they made a break for Marxist BHO...
Got your number and you know it...you had it good, dintya?
F*_ck the Establishment's McHillObama selections. What is it about Marxism that you think will benefit you (forget America, I don't believe any of you Ophiles when it comes to the Constitution)? Government healthcare? More Welfare? ????
I don't believe that these Ophiles don't understand the Establishment's game, resurrecting candidates from the dead and setting them up as Nominee's of their Cabal Party...these liars watched BHO get positioned by the Establishment at the 2004 RAT Convention. I'll be most of them pulled the lever for the Establishment last round as well.
Headline: Israel's security is sacrosanct, Obama declares at Democrat debate Byline: AP and Jerusalem Post staff Edition; Daily Section: News Page: 07 Thursday, February 28, 2008 -- Senator Barack Obama voiced unreserved support for Israel on Tuesday night, but he clashed with Senator Hillary Clinton over campaign tactics and the war in Iraq during a crackling debate one week before a pivotal group of primaries. While discussing issues of anti-Semitism, Obama said: "One of the reasons why so many of my supporters come from the Jewish community...is that I have been a stalwart friend of Israel and supported the special relationship we enjoy with it... They are among our most important allies and their security is sacrosanct." Invisible ink; Ophiles can't see it...
All the planning for the big jump. The brow beating strategies, the lies, the smears, the attempted demoralization of RP supporters. So sure that if beaten down enough, the only place to go would be BabyDoc-ville. And still they are dishonest about getting out of Iraq. You can not make the jump from RP to Obama and expect that to look logical or accidental. 100% jumped at the same time.. They waited for their first opportunity, and jammed. Well most are exposed..
FOH, like most Zionist agitprop disrupter's, has diarrhea of the brain. What's drooling from from its mouth unto its keyboard is stinking up our forum.
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.
Well most are exposed.. Couldn't have said it better...
Still too chickenshit to ping me? You lap up the commie drippings with the same spoon bluedog/robin/ari/all other Ophiles do. I've found that most (not all) posters throwing around "ziothis" and "ziothat" are muhammadans and/or Commie RATS. Care to share?
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Who in their proper Constitutional mind would ever want anything to do with you Marxist "D" Ophiles? You're betrayers, liars, agents of dissension and much worse...
No, it's not old at all.. As for "jumping ship", as I recall, it was Cynicom who led that particular charge, with his demanding his beer money back and talk of Ron Paul giving up on us and all that. Granted, a lot of us fell into the trap of thinking that Ron Paul must be finished, since that was the prevailing tone around here, and started looking at what was left, but that hardly makes us "moles". Many were more than happy to use that situation to pile on and then try to convert others to Obama. Cyni, did not jump to Baby Doc. Look, you guys knew what you were doing and still I look for anything rational to explain how you folks could even consider Obama. When a reason was finally pryed out, they were easily and factually retired as other than legitimate. But still you guys hung on to this radical. I don't care what train you are on. You folks have fought valiantly for the golbalists, and tried to beat others down. Now you're going to infiltrate RP support groups and pretend you understand what he stands for? Yeah, that's cool. Operation chaos from within. Thats how to destroy the whole thing. Isn't that how a couple of you operated to begin with. I hope they throw your asses out. Relationships here?? Oh please GDT.. why cry now?? You folks did it to yourselfs, and in fact are still blaming us for catching on. Tell it someone else.. In fact, take your new re-borned self and go to another forum and try to convert them to Paul or whoever you want. People have wondered beyond partisanship what the hell was going on, and I think we are pretty close to seeing it.
Have you joined the ObamaNation, Tex? Regards...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Great Post bump
Comments (76 - 204) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#36. To: FOH (#27)
What about the RATS '06 mandate to 'bring them home'?
#37. To: ghostdogtxn (#22)
What I do see a lot of is posters here and at El Pee carrying water for Hillary or for McCain by posting an endless stream of what can be charitably described as "hit pieces" against Obama.
#38. To: FOH (#32)
#39. To: Pissed Off Janitor, Jethro Tull, Peppa (#36)
Obama? I'm not taking any bets. A canadate who comes out of no where preaching about humble foreign policy, unity, and bi-partisanship? My, that's sounds rather familiar. So do the talking points of his hard core supporters.
#40. To: ghostdogtxn (#38)
#41. To: christine (#37)
#42. To: ghostdogtxn (#38)
(Edited)
You don't join common cause with people in an endeavor and then as soon as things go wrong start accusing them of treason because they see a different way out than you do.
#43. To: christine, *Obama Reality Check* (#37)
oh boy. hit pieces? how about many of them being factual? and how about they're being posted as a response to the Savoir Obama articles. let me remind you, there is no one here defending hillary or mcCain. no one. so there's no reason to waste time with them. what's being posted by many here is that obama is different from those two. maybe he is in his rhetoric, but he's not in his actions. that's what we're trying to illuminate. *Obama Reality Check*
#44. To: Mudboy Slim (#23)
#45. To: robin (#35)
#46. To: Arete (#41)
#47. To: FOH (#31)
#48. To: FOH (#34)
#49. To: ghostdogtxn (#47)
Fuck off, douchebag.
#50. To: FOH (#29)
if they say the sky is blue, go outside and check.
#51. To: christine (#37)
#52. To: FOH (#49)
#53. To: christine (#37)
oh boy. hit pieces? how about many of them being factual? and how about they're being posted as a response to the Savoir Obama articles. let me remind you, there is no one here defending hillary or mcCain. no one. so there's no reason to waste time with them. what's being posted by many here is that obama is different from those two. maybe he is in his rhetoric, but he's not in his actions. that's what we're trying to illuminate. *Obama Reality Check*
#54. To: christine (#46)
the one thing i did believe we were all united on is the reality of the two party fraud. seems that is not so.
#55. To: ghostdogtxn (#51)
There's a difference between "savior Obama" pieces (which I don't think are being posted here much, frankly) and posts that say Obama is (or just might be) different from the other two. I don't know that he's different or any better than the other two, I just know that out of the 3 POSs who are considered "viable" at this point, he's the only one the Zios can't stand.
#56. To: christine (#55)
#57. To: Arete (#54)
We're doing their work for them by eliminating the only wild card that could upset their apple cart.
#58. To: ghostdogtxn (#51)
he's the only one the Zios can't stand
#59. To: Jethro Tull (#58)
#60. To: ghostdogtxn (#52)
bye.
#61. To: Peppa (#50)
Zero credibility. All shot to shiit for the status quo puppet show.
#62. To: ghostdogtxn (#51)
I don't think that gives anyone license to come after me as some kind of "traitor" or "Ophile" or "white guilter" or whatever, and I'm damned if I'll put up with it from the likes of an intellectually vapid lightweight like FOH.
#63. To: Arete (#54)
#64. To: christine (#55)
(Edited)
he wouldn't be a presidential candidate otherwise.
#65. To: Jethro Tull (#58)
02-28-2008
#66. To: FOH (#61)
The D shills had it good on 4um until they made a break for Marxist BHO...
#67. To: ghostdogtxn (#47)
#68. To: Peppa, *Obama Reality Check* (#66)
All the planning for the big jump. The brow beating strategies, the lies, the smears, the attempted demoralization of RP supporters. So sure that if beaten down enough, the only place to go would be BabyDoc-ville. And still they are dishonest about getting out of Iraq. You can not make the jump from RP to Obama and expect that to look logical or accidental. 100% jumped at the same time.. They waited for their first opportunity, and jammed.
#69. To: Zoroaster (#67)
(Edited)
#70. To: Zoroaster (#67)
#71. To: Peppa (#66)
#72. To: ghostdogtxn (#71)
Maybe now that we see he hasn't, we can start to mend those bridges between us? I'd like to see that happen.
#73. To: ghostdogtxn (#71)
Don't you think that gets a bit old?
#74. To: ghostdogtxn (#47)
"...all of you sad sack O'philes."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#75. To: Peppa (#73)
.
.
.