See other Editorial Articles
Title: WHEN WILL WE ADMIT THE TRUTH ABOUT BARACK OBAMA?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Duke/selwyn90.htm
Published: Apr 28, 2008
Author: Selwyn Duke
Post Date: 2008-04-29 10:37:08 by IndieTX
Keywords: OBAMA THE, MAGIC, HUSTLER
Views: 1626
Comments: 204
If you interview someone for a job, you’ll expect him to tell you what you want to hear. There’ll be a façade, and his darker side will remain well-hidden. Now, let’s say a requirement for the job is that the applicant likes children, and he does his best Captain Kangaroo. But then you find out he has a job history of indifference to and perhaps even abuse of them and that, during unguarded moments, he has expressed disdain for them. What will you believe, what he tries to sell you or history and hair-down revelations? Remember this when evaluating the profound discrepancy between Barack Obama’s damage-control denials and flowery rhetoric, and his long track record. Understand that he, like the other candidates, is interviewing for the job of president with you, the interviewer. His job is to bend the truth; your job is to discern it. The only question is: Who will do a better job, he or you? Either Obama really is a savior for the third millennium, or the answer is that he is, thus far, besting many of you. Millions flock to him, registering oohs and ahs, fainting and fawning. Even critics and watchdogs heap praise upon him; Bill O’Reilly said he likes Obama and Sean Hannity proclaimed him a “good man.” But what is the truth about this applicant? Let me tell you a story. In 2002, President Bush signed into law a bill titled the “Born Alive Infants Protection Act” (BAIPA). This law was necessary because, believe it or not, infants were being born alive during attempted abortions and then, ancient Spartan style, left to die. Jill Stanek wrote about this last year, saying: “As a nurse at an Illinois hospital in 1999, I discovered babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in soiled utility rooms. I discovered infanticide.” The act was so vile that even staunch abortion advocates would not oppose BAIPA. Stanek tells us that it passed the Senate by unanimous vote, garnering the support of senators Kerry, Kennedy and Clinton. She then pointed out: “The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme.” But the state version of BAIPA failed for years in Illinois. Any guesses as to why? Stanek goes on to explain: I testified in 2001 and 2002 before a committee of which Obama was a member. Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights. Obama's clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. I was naive back then. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed. In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics. If asked about this, I’m sure Obama would be a very effective interviewee; he is good with words. (Of course, one is better with words when they’re managed by a sympathetic media.) Yet, when you look beyond the rhetoric, a picture of Obama starts to emerge. There are his damnable associations. We know about William Ayers, the college professor and “education advisor” who, as a Weather Underground terrorist in the 1970s, planted bombs in a campaign against our government. You might point out that this was three decades ago, but know that Ayers is unrepentant and wishes that he had planted more bombs. What does this piece of history teach us? For starters, it is one thing to understand something is wrong; it is another to feel it. Emotion is a stronger motivator than logic (Captain Kirk had the passion, not Mr. Spock). My point is, given Obama’s cordial dealings with Ayers – a man with whom many wouldn’t break bread – I’m left to wonder how much terrorism really bothers the senator on a visceral level. If his tolerance for the Weatherman is any indication, we have to ask: As president, would his zeal match that of our Islamist foes? Or will Osama bin Laden be a department chair in the Ivy League? Then there is the now infamous Reverend Wright, the man of the cloth poised to move into a house with a 10-million-dollar line of credit. His bigoted, virulently anti-American bile has received enough press so that I don’t have to provide a complete run-down, but this is a man who equated America with al-Qaeda, said we deserved 9/11, made anti-white statements, and called our nation “the US of KKKA.” This prompted, as you know, a well-crafted and rendered speech on race by the interviewee (as the infanticide story, should it receive enough play, may inspire a speech on the sanctity of life), but, again, what is the reality behind the words? Advertisement Obama called Wright a friend, mentor and uncle; he had a 20-year relationship with him, during which time he attended Wright’s church; he was married and had his child baptized by the reverend; and last year he donated $26,000 to the church. Yet some would give Obama credit for not casting his friend to the winds. After all, the interviewee said that he “cannot disown him.” But my question is: Why, Mr. Obama, did you ever own him in the first place? So we again have to wonder about his emotional constitution, his heart. Even if he doesn’t share Wright’s passion for the hate, he certainly was tolerant of it – and I suspect sympathetic to it. And a man is known by the company he keeps. The woman he marries is some indication, too. Michelle Obama vigorously advocated partial-birth abortion (which is also infanticide) in 2004, and we all know about her notorious pronouncement: “For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of my country.” As for the comment, it has caused many to question her patriotism and apologists to counsel against rash judgment. But the truth is plain. As I’m sure Jesse Lee Peterson – a black minister and the president of B.O.N.D. – would tell you, anti-American sentiment typifies leftist blacks (it’s quite common among leftist whites, too). Think about it: How many blacks on the left can you think of who don’t fit that mold? It’s a consequence of imbibing the philosophy of hatred and bitterness dispensed by Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other racial hustlers. Then we have Obama’s moment of honesty in San Francisco. As a refresher, here is what he said: “You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years . . . . And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” Many have labeled these comments elitist, and Obama has been trying to explain them away. But, again, the truth is plain. Apologists have asserted that Bill Clinton expressed the same sentiments in 1992; in other words, the best they can muster is that Obama is just like Clinton. And that is the point. Obama is a leftist, Clinton is a leftist, and that’s what leftists believe about “flyover country,” just as Michelle Obama’s statement reflects what they believe about the whole country. You needn’t be a clairvoyant to discern it. To understand what is most striking about those comments, though, you have to look more deeply. Notice he mentioned “religion” in the same breath as “guns” and “antipathy to people,” sandwiched right in-between the two. It’s hard to escape the conclusion that he draws an equivalency among those things, which speaks volumes. If you’re a person of faith, you understand that we’re supposed to cling to religion. After all, if you are serious about your faith, you must believe it is the Truth and that it is God’s will that you should practice it. And why wouldn’t you have the Truth at the center of your life? The only kind of person who wouldn’t have this perspective is one who has little or no faith. That certainly wouldn’t make Obama unique, but remember that he has often masqueraded as a man of faith, just as he now touts his support for second-amendment rights (in 1999 he supported a law that would have eliminated gun stores from virtually the whole country). But this bespeaks of a reality: There is Obama the myth, and Obama the man. If you want to know the former, listen to what he says; if you want to know the latter, accept what he is. And what is he? What is the truth about Barack Obama? You won’t hear it from the Sean Hannitys of the world, who will tell us that he is a “good man” with bad ideology. Such people are simple telling you what they’re supposed to believe; it’s what “fair and balanced” commentators do, the stuff of “acceptable” conservatives. The truth about Obama is that he is not a good man. He is a bad man. Good men don’t turn a blind eye to unrepentant ex-terrorists; support vile, anti-American bigots; lie about their core beliefs; and look down on traditional Americans. Most significantly, good men don’t allow beautiful babies – the least among us – to be discarded like refuse and die miserable, lonely deaths in dark utility rooms. In fact, if we cannot call Obama a bad man, there is no such thing as a bad man. And calling him a good man doesn’t just strain credulity, it puts it in the hospital in traction. Ah, yes, hope, change, unity, infanticide, bigotry, terrorism, Obama . . . good? We all know what is wrong with this picture. © 2008 Selwyn Duke - All Rights Reserve
Poster Comment: Here's some more red meat.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-58) not displayed.
.
.
.
#59. To: Jethro Tull (#58)
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
You RAT Commie Lying Shills are Pussies to boot !!
The D shills had it good on 4um until they made a break for Marxist BHO...
Got your number and you know it...you had it good, dintya?
F*_ck the Establishment's McHillObama selections. What is it about Marxism that you think will benefit you (forget America, I don't believe any of you Ophiles when it comes to the Constitution)? Government healthcare? More Welfare? ????
I don't believe that these Ophiles don't understand the Establishment's game, resurrecting candidates from the dead and setting them up as Nominee's of their Cabal Party...these liars watched BHO get positioned by the Establishment at the 2004 RAT Convention. I'll be most of them pulled the lever for the Establishment last round as well.
Headline: Israel's security is sacrosanct, Obama declares at Democrat debate Byline: AP and Jerusalem Post staff Edition; Daily Section: News Page: 07 Thursday, February 28, 2008 -- Senator Barack Obama voiced unreserved support for Israel on Tuesday night, but he clashed with Senator Hillary Clinton over campaign tactics and the war in Iraq during a crackling debate one week before a pivotal group of primaries. While discussing issues of anti-Semitism, Obama said: "One of the reasons why so many of my supporters come from the Jewish community...is that I have been a stalwart friend of Israel and supported the special relationship we enjoy with it... They are among our most important allies and their security is sacrosanct." Invisible ink; Ophiles can't see it...
All the planning for the big jump. The brow beating strategies, the lies, the smears, the attempted demoralization of RP supporters. So sure that if beaten down enough, the only place to go would be BabyDoc-ville. And still they are dishonest about getting out of Iraq. You can not make the jump from RP to Obama and expect that to look logical or accidental. 100% jumped at the same time.. They waited for their first opportunity, and jammed. Well most are exposed..
FOH, like most Zionist agitprop disrupter's, has diarrhea of the brain. What's drooling from from its mouth unto its keyboard is stinking up our forum.
Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think.
Well most are exposed.. Couldn't have said it better...
Still too chickenshit to ping me? You lap up the commie drippings with the same spoon bluedog/robin/ari/all other Ophiles do. I've found that most (not all) posters throwing around "ziothis" and "ziothat" are muhammadans and/or Commie RATS. Care to share?
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Who in their proper Constitutional mind would ever want anything to do with you Marxist "D" Ophiles? You're betrayers, liars, agents of dissension and much worse...
No, it's not old at all.. As for "jumping ship", as I recall, it was Cynicom who led that particular charge, with his demanding his beer money back and talk of Ron Paul giving up on us and all that. Granted, a lot of us fell into the trap of thinking that Ron Paul must be finished, since that was the prevailing tone around here, and started looking at what was left, but that hardly makes us "moles". Many were more than happy to use that situation to pile on and then try to convert others to Obama. Cyni, did not jump to Baby Doc. Look, you guys knew what you were doing and still I look for anything rational to explain how you folks could even consider Obama. When a reason was finally pryed out, they were easily and factually retired as other than legitimate. But still you guys hung on to this radical. I don't care what train you are on. You folks have fought valiantly for the golbalists, and tried to beat others down. Now you're going to infiltrate RP support groups and pretend you understand what he stands for? Yeah, that's cool. Operation chaos from within. Thats how to destroy the whole thing. Isn't that how a couple of you operated to begin with. I hope they throw your asses out. Relationships here?? Oh please GDT.. why cry now?? You folks did it to yourselfs, and in fact are still blaming us for catching on. Tell it someone else.. In fact, take your new re-borned self and go to another forum and try to convert them to Paul or whoever you want. People have wondered beyond partisanship what the hell was going on, and I think we are pretty close to seeing it.
Have you joined the ObamaNation, Tex? Regards...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Great Post bump
You're the 4um Pubbie neocon Establishment bootlicker who will vote for left wingers like Mitt Romney, but we have plenty of 4um Rats that will pull the lever for Stalinists-Marxists of the Establishment as well...
Yep...Mitt was my anti-Establishment vote...LOL!! For the record, I talked to George Allen Saturday afternoon and told him to his face, "YOU will be elected President of the US in 2016!!" His response, "Cool, send me an e-mail with details!!" Heh heh heh...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States, Am I the only one? LOL...MUD
Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States,
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Am I the only one? LOL...MUD The only one that's admitted it thus far !! I stopped drinking the Kool Aid when I got to peek behind the curtain...
Ask him why he supports the merger on all levels of America, Mexico and Canada...
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
I still think he's a lousy candidate who will make a lousy president. Of course, Mitt Romney was always the worst of them all. I'm a Paulite. You're a two-faced liar. At least MUDBOT is an honest Establishment guy, for the most part...
More Welfare? Dig your head out of the sand pal. We're already well on our way to a socialist/fascist state. As long as politicians can promise a free lunch and use debt creation to create the money to pay for it, it's a done deal. "Rebate" checks stated going out yesterday.
So why are you supporting one of the Establishment's 3 warmongering Global Orderists' Socialist/Commie/Fascist stoolies?
The very thought of having to listen to Hillary Clinton for the next 4 (8) years makes me want to vomit.
this is the arete i've always known. why then your sudden support of and belief in obama as a wild card who can upset the apple cart?
Gdt, Justin is blind in one eye. That you and he can not come to terms with the facts of Iraq, the agreements that have been made to stay, the larger plans for a wider war.. tells me, either you CAN'T UNDERSTAND IT, or you rather ignore it to get your lefty radical in the job. Or in other words, NOT HILLARY OR MCCAIN. This is not a lesser of 3 game. None of the 3 are acceptable. Peoples lives are at stake, and this is not a game.. I know you know that, and if your kid was there, maybe you have family there, what you want is the TRUTH about the situation.. not phony promises and wishes, or fairytails, or BS boldface pandering to the rubes. Follow your heart.. if you think a communist and a racist is your cup of tea, and can see how lovely communists and racists treat their dissenters... then sure, pretend that Obama will not deliver a New Plantation. I'm sure he will respect the voice of the people like all globalists. In fact.. go turn in your weapons to show your faith should Obama be seated upon the pedestal. Seriously... If justin thinks Obama is the answer, he's as much a shill for the status quo as Fox news. Herding folks to a bad choice is what globalists do. We lose they win. Repeat cycle every 4 years. Playing both sides of the street is what the PTB do! Sorry, Baby Doc is not the lesser of the 3, he is one of the 3.
Deduction from the way the corporate media, Hillary and the GOP is now attacking him. Definitely a red flag that the extablishment (business as usual) doen't want him. If "they" don't want him, I do. You see what they did to Ron Paul?
Then don't listen. That's no reason to go with ANY of the quislings...
Intellectual dishonesty or stark stupidity. They're too informed to claim the latter...
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
They're too informed to claim the latter... I totally agree with that. And there's more to it. We'll get there.
Maybe, in their slits for eyes, the Clintons...of the Bush Crime Family...weren't quite the neocommies like these folks like...they're neocons in their eyes. What they don't get is that neocons ARE neocommies and neocommies ARE neocons...or maybe they DO get it! Hillary is "attacking" him becasue he is her opponent. The GOP is "attacking" him becasue he is the likely Dem nominee. The main stream media has given Obama a free ride for a long time. They have managed to keep secret his 8 year employment by Ayers until now. They are still keeping secret his opposition to the born alive infants protection bill. How any good person can support such an evil person is beyond me. Even Hillary was not in opposition to this bill.
God is always good!
That's probably what Ron Paul is thinking too. /s
Or the greater puppet to usher in more fascism. Since we have scrutinized his record, we have been called racists. When we say, why not ask him the same questions as you harped should be asked of RP, we heard silence. Then, well, he'd get his head shot off if he did. Why the double standard then... when you know............ Point for point, any standard layed at the foot of RP, was ignored as one that should apply to Obama. Using those as multiple examples of dishonesty right here in this forum... you really can't tell me that having Obama as president would not deliver the same sort of insanity on a national scale, with the media decrying every question to him as coming from those GD clingy relgionista's and gun goobers. Every thing will be viewed through the prism of racism. WE've been living with that crap for 30 years or more. Now Rev Wright just confirms that is their truth. This was pumped into Baby Docs head for 20 years, not counting his influences prior to that 'madrassa'. Stick to your guns.. You've just turned yourself around again to reveal, you really aren't quite able to decide who you are. What your principles are, and which of those are most important to our own survival. Actually, I do think you benefit from globalist policies, with helping illegals stay in the country. Take a hard look at Zbig and his bookend Kissenger...if you care to see where we are being herded. As Zbig stated, the war has to stop--- it's giving a bad face to imperialism. Not that imperialism should stop, but we need someone to put a new face on it. And you guys fell head over heels for the tripe.
Hmmmmmmmmm.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Comments (100 - 204) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#60. To: ghostdogtxn (#52)
bye.
#61. To: Peppa (#50)
Zero credibility. All shot to shiit for the status quo puppet show.
#62. To: ghostdogtxn (#51)
I don't think that gives anyone license to come after me as some kind of "traitor" or "Ophile" or "white guilter" or whatever, and I'm damned if I'll put up with it from the likes of an intellectually vapid lightweight like FOH.
#63. To: Arete (#54)
#64. To: christine (#55)
(Edited)
he wouldn't be a presidential candidate otherwise.
#65. To: Jethro Tull (#58)
02-28-2008
#66. To: FOH (#61)
The D shills had it good on 4um until they made a break for Marxist BHO...
#67. To: ghostdogtxn (#47)
#68. To: Peppa, *Obama Reality Check* (#66)
All the planning for the big jump. The brow beating strategies, the lies, the smears, the attempted demoralization of RP supporters. So sure that if beaten down enough, the only place to go would be BabyDoc-ville. And still they are dishonest about getting out of Iraq. You can not make the jump from RP to Obama and expect that to look logical or accidental. 100% jumped at the same time.. They waited for their first opportunity, and jammed.
#69. To: Zoroaster (#67)
(Edited)
#70. To: Zoroaster (#67)
#71. To: Peppa (#66)
#72. To: ghostdogtxn (#71)
Maybe now that we see he hasn't, we can start to mend those bridges between us? I'd like to see that happen.
#73. To: ghostdogtxn (#71)
Don't you think that gets a bit old?
#74. To: ghostdogtxn (#47)
"...all of you sad sack O'philes."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#75. To: Peppa (#73)
#76. To: Mudboy Slim (#74)
#77. To: FOH (#76)
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#78. To: FOH, all (#76)
"You're the 4um Pubbie neocon Establishment bootlicker who will vote for left wingers like Mitt Romney..."
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!
#79. To: Peppa (#73)
#80. To: Mudboy Slim (#78)
"You're the 4um Pubbie neocon Establishment bootlicker who will vote for left wingers like Mitt Romney..."
#81. To: Mudboy Slim (#77)
For the record, I talked to George Allen Saturday afternoon and told him to his face, "YOU will be elected President of the US in 2016!!"
#82. To: Mudboy Slim (#74)
#83. To: ghostdogtxn (#82)
Naw. I only think he's the least bad out of McCain, Clinton, Obama.
#84. To: FOH (#63)
Government healthcare?
#85. To: Arete (#84)
#86. To: FOH (#85)
(Edited)
#87. To: Arete (#84)
We're already well on our way to a socialist/fascist state. As long as politicians can promise a free lunch and use debt creation to create the money to pay for it, it's a done deal. "Rebate" checks stated going out yesterday.
#88. To: ghostdogtxn (#79)
#89. To: christine (#87)
(Edited)
this is the arete i've always known. why then your sudden support of and belief in obama as a wild card who can upset the apple cart?
#90. To: Arete (#86)
The very thought of having to listened to Hillary Clinton for the next 4 (8) years makes me want to vomit.
#91. To: Peppa (#88)
This is not a lesser of 3 game. None of the 3 are acceptable.
#92. To: Peppa (#88)
#93. To: FOH (#91)
Intellectual dishonesty or stark stupidity.
#94. To: Peppa (#93)
And there's more to it. We'll get there.
#95. To: Arete (#89)
Deduction from the way the corporate media, Hillary and the GOP is now attacking him.
#96. To: ghostdogtxn (#92)
Do I think Obama will do a good job as president? Categorically the answer is a resounding NO. I think he'll probably be hobbled and remarkably ineffective. That makes him the least dangerous of the dangerous 3.
#97. To: ghostdogtxn (#92)
Do I think Obama will do a good job as president? Categorically the answer is a resounding NO. I think he'll probably be hobbled and remarkably ineffective. That makes him the least dangerous of the dangerous 3.
#98. To: FOH (#94)
...or maybe they DO get it!
#99. To: Peppa (#97)
.
.
.