See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Why Not Anarchy? Why Not Chaos?
Source:
ghostdogtxn
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 29, 2008
Author: ghostdogtxn
Post Date: 2008-04-29 10:56:59 by ghostdogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 1036
Comments: 50
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
#4. To: ghostdogtxn, IndieTX (#0)
The worst kind of Ophile...
At the end of the day, you're still a RAT...
Says the Establishment's Ophile mouthpiece...you're not fooling me
Which of the other two establishment candidates would you be the least upset with becoming the next president, given that you consider Obama as the worst of 3 evils? p.s. Chuck Baldwin is NOT going to be the next president.
Correct, I'm registering my disgust with the Establishment. Do you actually believe that voters control, dictate or otherwise have a say in electing the POTUS? That's what the Establishment wants you to believe, to get you to play along and rubber stamp the fraud. You're an Obamacon? You've been sucked in...
No I don't. In fact I'm strongly considering not voting this November. That's why you should lighten up on people who merely consider Obama the least scary candidate of the 3. They're not going to be the ones who decide who the next POTUS will be. I really really want to know who YOU consider to be the least scary candidate is. It HAS to be one of them no matter how much contempt you have for them all. Surely the election of one over the other will determine how it affects your personal life decisions from there, no? Are you really that incapable of looking at it from that perspective? Or are you afraid that if the answer was either Hillary or McCain that someone with your sensibilities will brand you as a supporter of them? I could certainly understand your concern if that is the case.
I would suggest you register your displeasure by voting for ANY non-Establishment candidate...but that's your call obviously. What we have here, though, is NOT a 'lesser of three evils' campaign. These folks are too informed. What we have here is outright shilling for an Establishment racist Marxist, right here on FREEEDOM4um, and they're trying to get lurkers to follow along with them. It's either intellectual dishonesty or stark stupidity. These folks are too informed for it to be the latter...
I think your perceptions of their motives are incorrect. Many of them have posted here long before this election cycle or you posting here. goastdogtxn's posts have been elequent and substantive, while all you do is hurl epithets calling him and other posters traitors. Not a good way to win friends and influence people.
I'm right on the money. I know all of these traitors from TOS1 and TOS2 and have their number.
Big fucking deal. You sound like one of them yourself.
Be proud to be an Ophile. I believe I saw your handle at elpee shilling for the racist Marxist Establishment tool, correct?
I believe I saw your handle at elpee shilling for the racist Marxist Establishment tool, correct? I post at LP but the rest of your post is incorrect as usual.
Oh that's right. You shill in a subtle way in an attempt to maintain your credibility...
Whatever. You sound like BeALooser, Sentry Over America, or even one of the stupider ones like yukon. Your ignorance of me and my politics is almost hilarious.
What are you? 13 years old? Be a grown up and admit what you are and which lesser of 3 evils Establishment selection you're humping the Net for...
I think you support McCain/Hillary. Here is a nifty bumper sticker for you to put on your car grandpa. I obviously can't vote since you've pegged me at being only 13.
There are no replies to Comment # 44. End Trace Mode for Comment # 44.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestIt is true that among the 3 lousy candidates of, Obama, Clinton and McCain, I would reluctantly choose Obama.
#6. To: FOH (#4)
#8. To: ghostdogtxn (#6)
#11. To: FOH (#8)
#13. To: ghostdogtxn (#11)
And you're still a treasonous piece of shit.
#17. To: FOH (#13)
#19. To: PnbC (#17)
p.s. Chuck Baldwin is NOT going to be the next president.
#24. To: FOH (#19)
(Edited)
Do you actually believe that voters control, dictate or otherwise have a say in electing the POTUS?
#27. To: PnbC (#24)
#30. To: FOH (#27)
(Edited)
#31. To: PnbC (#30)
I think your perceptions of their motives are incorrect. Many of them have posted here long before you showed up.
#33. To: FOH (#31)
I know all of these traitors from TOS1 and TOS2 and have their number.
#35. To: PnbC (#33)
Big fucking deal. You sound like one of them yourself.
#36. To: FOH (#35)
(Edited)
Be proud to be an Ophile.
#38. To: PnbC (#36)
I post at LP but the rest of your post is incorrect as usual.
#40. To: FOH (#38)
#42. To: PnbC (#40)
Whatever.
#44. To: FOH (#42)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 44.