See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: Why Not Anarchy? Why Not Chaos?
Source:
ghostdogtxn
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 29, 2008
Author: ghostdogtxn
Post Date: 2008-04-29 10:56:59 by ghostdogtxn
Keywords: None
Views: 475
Comments: 50
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: ghostdogtxn (#0)
A positive and energizing thought. Here's a good thread on NV with video... “President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds “President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds And buy his books, too! Nicely written, Mr. Ghostdog. And so is Dr. Paul's "The Revolution, A Manifesto". Those gutsy Nevada delegates have given me a renewed purpose, and I can't wait to get to Houston in June with the rest of the Paultards from around the Lone Star state. Anyone else here going?
The worst kind of Ophile...
Outstanding article and reminder to us all. Thanks.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
At the end of the day, you're still a RAT...
Yes, many times. I dislike that hell-hole quite a bit, but Motel 6 has AC.
No matter what happens, the entire (s)election process is going to be chaos. The demobratic whorefest I can see being like the '68 convention. And all over again, I am going to wonder if they are going to go thru this charade, or just say "the hell with it" and "suspend" all (s)elections. One of these times, that is what they will do, imo.
------They may look intimidating, that's by design; but they aren't bulletproof. -------
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Says the Establishment's Ophile mouthpiece...you're not fooling me
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
These are the same kinds of people that in South Africa are surprised when the domestic help turns on them. They are of no consequence; they'll get theirs.
The old baboon by the light of the moon was combing his auburn hair.
So you would willingly give up your Second Amendment rights if President Obama said the change would be good for America???? Just askin.....
"The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862
Which of the other two establishment candidates would you be the least upset with becoming the next president, given that you consider Obama as the worst of 3 evils? p.s. Chuck Baldwin is NOT going to be the next president.
I will not recognize any of the illegal shadow government's Chimperors...I stopped being a slave in my own country long ago. The Establishment is warring on America/ns and that means they are at war with ME.
Correct, I'm registering my disgust with the Establishment. Do you actually believe that voters control, dictate or otherwise have a say in electing the POTUS? That's what the Establishment wants you to believe, to get you to play along and rubber stamp the fraud. You're an Obamacon? You've been sucked in...
These are the same kinds of people that in South Africa are surprised when the domestic help turns on them. They are of no consequence; they'll get theirs. Great observation...however they are of consequence because they're support of the Establishment is the same support for the North American Union...which dissolved our nation once and for all.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
The nation is fine. It's just no longer congruent with the government or territory of the United States.
“Murder, thieving, lying, violence — I sometimes suspect the Negro doesn’t regard these as crimes or sins, or even as regrettable circumstances. He commits them casually, with no apparent feeling of guilt. White men similarly delinquent become soiled or embittered or brutalized. Negroes are as charming after as before a crime. Committing criminal acts, they seem never to be criminals. The gentle devoted creature who is your baby’s nurse can carve her boy-friend from ear to ear at midnight and by seven a.m. will be changing the baby’s diaper while she sings ‘Hear the Lambs a-calling.’”
It's just no longer congruent with the government or territory of the United States. Touché
No I don't. In fact I'm strongly considering not voting this November. That's why you should lighten up on people who merely consider Obama the least scary candidate of the 3. They're not going to be the ones who decide who the next POTUS will be. I really really want to know who YOU consider to be the least scary candidate is. It HAS to be one of them no matter how much contempt you have for them all. Surely the election of one over the other will determine how it affects your personal life decisions from there, no? Are you really that incapable of looking at it from that perspective? Or are you afraid that if the answer was either Hillary or McCain that someone with your sensibilities will brand you as a supporter of them? I could certainly understand your concern if that is the case.
I will NOT vote for any of the three stooge under ANY circumstances. They are not the best leaders in this country. I would like to see a bloody revolt at the Republican convention where the RNC leaders get their just rewards.
"The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
I would suggest you register your displeasure by voting for ANY non-Establishment candidate...but that's your call obviously. What we have here, though, is NOT a 'lesser of three evils' campaign. These folks are too informed. What we have here is outright shilling for an Establishment racist Marxist, right here on FREEEDOM4um, and they're trying to get lurkers to follow along with them. It's either intellectual dishonesty or stark stupidity. These folks are too informed for it to be the latter...
Bogus, flawed premise in your question and you KNOW it OBL-dog...ALL 3 will do their Global Orderists-masters' bidding. But you know that Mr. Ron Paul RAT...
All 3 of them will gleefully reign over the coming North American Union. They will ALL fight the Globalists' wars. They are ALL horrifically scary. So why rubber stamp this bogus process? You can NO EFFECT other than to be part of another record voter turnout that certifies this fraud...but see, some on here WANT a racist Black Nationalist MARXIST.
I think your perceptions of their motives are incorrect. Many of them have posted here long before this election cycle or you posting here. goastdogtxn's posts have been elequent and substantive, while all you do is hurl epithets calling him and other posters traitors. Not a good way to win friends and influence people.
I'm right on the money. I know all of these traitors from TOS1 and TOS2 and have their number.
All three have the capacity, and intent, to harm this country to the extent that they can dupe Congress (easy to do) to go along with their schemes. The Mulatto from Chicago and Hitlery the gun-grabbing-marxist-leninist-abortionist are just flat-out stupid human beings, McCain is a megalomaniac who is hell- bent on opening the border with mexico. It's like Socrates being offered three choices of poison instead of one.
"The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862
Big fucking deal. You sound like one of them yourself.
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Be proud to be an Ophile. I believe I saw your handle at elpee shilling for the racist Marxist Establishment tool, correct?
I believe I saw your handle at elpee shilling for the racist Marxist Establishment tool, correct? I post at LP but the rest of your post is incorrect as usual.
I categorically reject all three, they couldn't manage a hot-dog stand on their best day without screwing it up. I'm writing in Ron Paul.
"The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862
Oh that's right. You shill in a subtle way in an attempt to maintain your credibility...
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Whatever. You sound like BeALooser, Sentry Over America, or even one of the stupider ones like yukon. Your ignorance of me and my politics is almost hilarious.
Comments (41 - 50) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe Ron Paul sponsored "chaos and anarchy" (from John McCain's viewpoint) that happened in Nevada over the weekend really opened my eyes. For a month or so I've been saying, "Look, Ron Paul isn't an option. We have to choose from the remaining 3 losers." This is not yet true. McCain could still have a stroke or a sudden re-emergence of melanoma, or maybe even some devastating revelation might surface about him that makes him unpalatable to the GOP. Even if he doesn't, Ron Paul supporters can cause him as much chaos and anarchy as possible to make his nomination/election as rocky as possible.
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#2. To: All, *Ron Paul for President 2008* (#1)
(Edited)
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#3. To: ghostdogtxn (#0)
And if Ron Paul drops out or dies or leaves the race behind, there is yet another choice, which is to just jack with them. Continue with anarchy (since after all, anarchy is pretty close to libertarianism); continue with chaos (because chaos will remind them that their treason doesn't go unnoticed).
#4. To: ghostdogtxn, IndieTX (#0)
It is true that among the 3 lousy candidates of, Obama, Clinton and McCain, I would reluctantly choose Obama.
#5. To: ghostdogtxn (#0)
#6. To: FOH (#4)
#7. To: CadetD (#3)
#8. To: ghostdogtxn (#6)
#9. To: ghostdogtxn (#7)
Houston in June? Feh. Have you BEEN to Houston in June?
#10. To: ghostdogtxn, all (#0)
#11. To: FOH (#8)
#12. To: CadetD (#9)
#13. To: ghostdogtxn (#11)
And you're still a treasonous piece of shit.
#14. To: PSUSA (#10)
#15. To: FOH (#13)
you're not fooling me
#16. To: ghostdogtxn (#0)
I would reluctantly choose Obama.
#17. To: FOH (#13)
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#18. To: PnbC (#17)
Which of the other two establishment candidates would you be the least upset with becoming the next president, given that you consider Obama as the worst of 3 evils?
#19. To: PnbC (#17)
p.s. Chuck Baldwin is NOT going to be the next president.
#20. To: Tauzero (#15)
you're not fooling me
#21. To: X-15 (#16)
#22. To: FOH (#20)
#23. To: Tauzero (#22)
The nation is fine.
#24. To: FOH (#19)
(Edited)
Do you actually believe that voters control, dictate or otherwise have a say in electing the POTUS?
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#25. To: ghostdogtxn (#21)
I've put a position out there on which one of the 3 losers I would pick, given no other options but those 3. Which one would you pick?
#26. To: X-15 (#25)
#27. To: PnbC (#24)
#28. To: ghostdogtxn (#26)
Out of the 3, which one do you think will do the least harm to the country, barring a bloody revolt?
#29. To: PnbC (#24)
I really really want to know who YOU consider to be the least scary candidate is. It HAS to be one of them no matter how much contempt you have for them all.
#30. To: FOH (#27)
(Edited)
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#31. To: PnbC (#30)
I think your perceptions of their motives are incorrect. Many of them have posted here long before you showed up.
#32. To: ghostdogtxn (#26)
#33. To: FOH (#31)
I know all of these traitors from TOS1 and TOS2 and have their number.
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#34. To: X-15 (#32)
#35. To: PnbC (#33)
Big fucking deal. You sound like one of them yourself.
#36. To: FOH (#35)
(Edited)
Be proud to be an Ophile.
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
#37. To: ghostdogtxn (#34)
You have still refused to tell me which one you'd prefer. Because come November, we're all most likely going to have to drink one or the other.
#38. To: PnbC (#36)
I post at LP but the rest of your post is incorrect as usual.
#39. To: X-15 (#37)
#40. To: FOH (#38)
From Two Party System... ...to Two Family System.
.
.
.