Title: BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL SUPPORTS OBAMA Source:
CNN URL Source:[None] Published:May 2, 2008 Author:CNN Post Date:2008-05-02 18:28:55 by a vast rightwing conspirator Keywords:None Views:8522 Comments:534
First, he told Blitz that he can't endorse McCain.
Then, Blitz asked him which one he prefers, of the 2 Demos. RP said that he picks Obama because he's slightly better which is EXACTLY what I've been saying for quite a while.
10 minutes ago, on CNN. Wolfie interviewed him. He was careful to say that it's not 'an endorsement' (because he's still in the running) so he called it a 'preference'.
He posted what he heard on live television. It's easy to miss a sentence or two. After I posted the video, he realized he overstated what Dr. Paul said and corrected it in the posts that followed.
, he realized he overstated what Dr. Paul said and corrected it in the posts that followed.
I don't see any correction in any thing he posted. Let him speak for himself.
Correction:
BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL WOULD LIKE TO SEE OBAMA U.S. PRESIDENT - that better?
Understand the context. Realistically, there are 3 people who can get the job and Ron Paul named ONE. He did not dodge the question and he did not say that it does not matter which one gets the job.
Ron Paul said the following:
1 - he OPPOSES McCain because he's a warmonger. 2 - between Hillary and Obama he, reluctantly, if you want, prefers Obama.
You can call this 'support' or you can call it 'preference'. RP said it was not an 'endorsement'. Do you prefer 'preference' over 'support', that's fine but, whatever you call it, Ron Paul named Obama as his favorite candidate for the U.S. presidency, OF THE THREE WHO ARE LIKELY TO GET THE JOB.
#110. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, robin.All (#97)
BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL WOULD LIKE TO SEE OBAMA U.S. PRESIDENT - that better?
Not much. You could have saved yourself alot of time by not muddying the water in the beginning. Your title would have been more honest had you posted it this way.
BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL STATES THAT OBAMA IS THE LESSER OF THE THREE EVIL CANDIDATES!
There are still six months to go before the General Election. Many things can happen between now and then. Bon Paul didn't quit the campaign yet. Had many of you wishy-washy supporters stayed HARD IN SUPPORT OF RON PAUL all along, there could be numerous senarios that could take place. For instance:
The Viet Nam vets, especially the POW could 'Swift Boat' Mcinsane. Mcinsane could get physically sick, the 'Keating Five' and the whole Silverado could re- emerge and destroy his candidacy. The Ron Paul Revolution could by election day have enough write-in votes to take the election overwhelmingly.
....and the worst nightmare of all is the possibility that the bushites and bushkie could declare martial law and suspend the elections, I could go on with even more,
Of course if we all continue bickering, have already thrown in the towel by sensless speculation nd posting lies and twisting the truth, we definitely will end up with one of the three evils, all foisted upon us by the establishment. I'm sure many around the country and on here really don't care. I do! HELL! It wouldn't cost a dime to get up a 'WRITE_IN' campaign going and we got 6 months to do it. No chicanery needed, no blimp, and no more FRN's needed to accomplish a successful write-in stampede for Ron Paul.
All it would take is for someone with a lot of leadership savvy and some great HTML skills to get it up and running on the net and around the country. If this opportunity passes us by, we can all talk about what could have been, once they have us all behind the barbedwire in one of their fema camps. But if we all sit on our lazy asses and are willing to settle for one of the thre three stooges (my apology to Larry, Curly, Moe), we have become what the establishment hopes we are.
Take a stand for decent government, stick with it til the election and maybe we can pull off a "MIRACLE".
Remember, " It ain't over til 'The Fat Lady' sings.
BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL STATES THAT OBAMA IS THE LESSER OF THE THREE EVIL CANDIDATES!
Now, THAT, my friend, would be a completely dishonest headline. It COMPLETELY distorts the fact that Ron Paul virtually endorsed Obama for U.S. president.
As far as the posted headline, while it could have been marginally improved, as I indicated, it very much summarizes what Ron Paul did, which was to support Obama in his match against Hillary and McCain.
Now, THAT, my friend, would be a completely dishonest headline. It COMPLETELY distorts the fact that Ron Paul virtually endorsed Obama for U.S. president.
No! That would be the truth! You are a pigheaded lie spreading bushbot who bought into the bushkie lies and promises back in the 2000 election, a close friend of the idiot Medved and wouldn't know the truth if it bit you in the ass.
Fruthermore you bought into bushkie's lying tactics to get us involved in the attack of Iraq. Guess you don't have enough sense to know that some of us haven't forgot your blind support of the little chimp.
Oh what a tangeled web we weave when we first practice to deceive. Medved is probably mighty proud of you for this lying thread title. What a fool you have made of yourself just like you did years ago on TOS.