Title: BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL SUPPORTS OBAMA Source:
CNN URL Source:[None] Published:May 2, 2008 Author:CNN Post Date:2008-05-02 18:28:55 by a vast rightwing conspirator Keywords:None Views:8328 Comments:534
First, he told Blitz that he can't endorse McCain.
Then, Blitz asked him which one he prefers, of the 2 Demos. RP said that he picks Obama because he's slightly better which is EXACTLY what I've been saying for quite a while.
My friend, when asked, Ron Paul named Obama as his choice. He didn't call him 'evil'. He stated that he rejects McCain and, between Hill and Obama he prefers Obama.
10 minutes ago, on CNN. Wolfie interviewed him. He was careful to say that it's not 'an endorsement' (because he's still in the running) so he called it a 'preference'.
It's strange that he didn't mention Barr. He noted that both Hillary and Obama voted to fund the troops in Iraq but, on balance, he found Obama 'better'.
I will have to hear it myself, and even then won't say oh, becasue Ron Paul said this I am now going to throw out everything I know about the racist Obama and vote for him. Nope, not going to happen. Just like Ron Paul thinks the towers were brought down by planes doesn't in any way make me think that is true. Ron Paul is a good guy I think, but sometimes he is just plain wrong. If he said this then this is one of those times.
I would like to see the transcript myself. Of course, you should not change your views just because Ron Paul's are different from yours now but it's interesting that someone both of us respect seems to be in total agreement with me. Even to the 'nuances' level.
#17. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, *Obama 2008*, aristeides, iconoclast (#0)
Isn't the lesser of 3 evils what we've been saying here?
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years, Maybe a hundred ... ... thatd be fine with me, McCain responds Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
Ron Paul On CNN's Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer Friday, May 2nd, 2008
CNN's Wolf Blitzer had Ron Paul in the Situation Room today via satellite to talk to him about Paul's new book, the Republican and Democratic Parties, why Paul is hasn't dropped out of the presidential race, and more. Blitzer said that Paul's Revolution: A Manifesto is already a huge best-seller. Paul mentioned the voting records of John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama; but when Wolf asked if Ron Paul had to pick one of those three candidates for President, he said "I would think the one who would most likely keep us from expanding the war is probably Obama."
No, it wasn't an endorsement; Paul adds he's shaky about Obama's voting record and where Obama might spend the money instead. And when asked why he hasn't dropped out of the race, Paul responds, "The race is still on."
"A lot of your main ideas are certainly very popular with your base, and you've got thousands, millions of people out there who love your ideas," Blitzer said.
For the third day in a row, The Revolution: A Manifesto is currently number one on Amazon.com's Top 100.
So it boils down to: how did the mainstream media get away with Paul's shortened speaking times at the debates and lack of coverage in the press?? Maybe it's in the book...we're still eagerly awaiting the arrival of ours!
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years, Maybe a hundred ... ... thatd be fine with me, McCain responds Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
Let's see the transcript but, based on my imperfect recollection, RP called Obama 'slightly better' than Hillary. Not 'less evil'. This is exactly my view. He's a minor positive which is A LOT, when compared to the past few presidents and the 2 monsters he needs to defeat to get the job.
Dr. Paul said it is not an endorsement but that Obama is slightly better than Hillary.
He also said that he will not be endorsing McCain.
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years, Maybe a hundred ... ... thatd be fine with me, McCain responds Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
This is as good as an endorsement from someone still running for the same job.
You're over-dosing on goofy pills ... besides, he's senile.
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
In Ron Paul's words, Obama would be 'slightly better' in foreign policy. His main concern: where would Obama spend the money he would save from stopping the wars. I have the same concern myself but... let's get the wars stopped first.
I have the same concern myself but... let's get the wars stopped first.
Amen!
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years, Maybe a hundred ... ... thatd be fine with me, McCain responds Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
I didn't say that Obama is better than Barr or Baldwin. In fact, I didn't even promise to vote for Obama in November. I definitely support Obama in the Obama vs. Hillary race. Hillary is very dangerous and she has to be eliminated.
As far as the November contest... let's get rid of Hillary first, shall we?
It's either that or this election campaign business has torched him ... Obama ain't said shit about shit ... so those falling all over themselves should admit that they like following for the sheer pleasure of following.
I wouldn't call Bush or McCain.
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
He's not Ron Paul. But Obama will get us out of Iraq, I believe. Plus he doesn't use the word "obliterate" when it comes to Iran.
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years, Maybe a hundred ... ... thatd be fine with me, McCain responds Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
It's either that or this election campaign business has torched him ... Obama ain't said shit about shit ... so those falling all over themselves should admit that they like following for the sheer pleasure of following.
No one is following anyone. The problem we're facing now is not picking the proper 'leader' to 'follow' but to prevent those who would be digging us even deeper into the hole from being in the position of digging us even deeper into the hole. That's why Ron Paul is supporting Obama.
For those who insist that voting is some civic duty, how is Obama better than Barr or Baldwin?
Better? I wish they could show me how he is even fit to tie Baldwin's shoes! And if Barr has gotten it through his head that the choices people make about what they inject and ingest into their own bodies is their own business--absent subsequently harming others and they can be punished for the actual harm they do, not what they "might do"--they can't show Obama is as good as him either.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
You're goofy ... he thought Blitzer said "OSAMA" !
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
No, it's funny as hell to watch you folks grovel for RP votes.
Ron Paul is to Obama as Iraq is to 9/11. If you repeat it enough times, no matter how unrelated they are, in the same sentence then soon people will draw a connection between the two.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me.
"If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
The problem we're facing now is not picking the proper 'leader'
That's a non-problem in my world. They're all shit eating parasites and deserve what I give them ... not a fucking thing !
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs."
"I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale."
Then, Blitz asked him which one he prefers, of the 2 Demos. RP said that he picks Obama because he's slightly better which is EXACTLY what I've been saying for quite a while.
Ron Paul is to Obama as Iraq is to 9/11. If you repeat it enough times, no matter how unrelated they are, in the same sentence then soon people will draw a connection between the two.
HA!!!!
It will not work. But for all the bashing the stealth crew did to RP, to try and AGAIN browbeat them to Opharma will not work.