Title: BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL SUPPORTS OBAMA Source:
CNN URL Source:[None] Published:May 2, 2008 Author:CNN Post Date:2008-05-02 18:28:55 by a vast rightwing conspirator Keywords:None Views:8558 Comments:534
First, he told Blitz that he can't endorse McCain.
Then, Blitz asked him which one he prefers, of the 2 Demos. RP said that he picks Obama because he's slightly better which is EXACTLY what I've been saying for quite a while.
The insincerity of the Obama protesters is palpable ... the hyper protest arises from one and only one reality ... and it ain't "elitism".
And what pray tell is that reality? Is everyone who doesn't vote for Obama now going to be called a racist? Whooptie-do.
I'm not voting for Obama because I don't vote for central planning collectivists. I have never voted for a central planning collectivist and I never will. On top of that, I believe Obama is a made member of the two party fraud, along with his two partners in crime, Hillary and McCain. Because he is a member of the two party fraud, I do not believe Obama will bring the troops home. I believe it to be an election ploy. If this makes me a racist, then so be it. I will vote for whoever the LP candidate is unless Chuck Baldwin is on the ballot in my state. I've always liked him. I'm through giving a rat's ass about who other people vote for.
But of course. There can be no other reason why people who have been fighting against big government for (in my case) decades would vote against Obama. Racism has to be the answer.
I've never said that Obama would expand the government more than Clinton or McCain.
Did the word implication sail unimpeded through your ocular orbs and out your ears?
In your own words ... There can be no other reason why people who have been fighting against big government for (in my case) decades would vote against Obama.
The last time I looked there were only three candidates remaining.
I would expect better from a well educated "political junkie".
I don't have to try again. My statement about Obama does not imply that I think him to be any better or worse than either Clinton or McCain. Especially when I specifically stated that I believe them all to be made members of the same cabal. May YOU would like to try again.
would like to try again mr. molester "mr. molester" .... hee hee ... your starting to lose it Mr. Pompous.
Your huffing and puffing usually gets a free pass here ... but next time don't bring a knife to a gunfight,
Night night.
I actually deleted it almost as soon as I posted it. But that's OK, it gives you an excuse to run away like the bitch you are. Anyone reading the thread will see that I never implied that Obama was worse than Clinton or McCain and that my statement put them all in the same boat.
would like to try again mr. molester "mr. molester" .... hee hee ... your starting to lose it Mr. Pompous. Your huffing and puffing usually gets a free pass here ... but next time don't bring a knife to a gunfight,
Night night.
I actually deleted it almost as soon as I posted it. But that's OK, it gives you an excuse to run away like the bitch you are. Anyone reading the thread will see that I never implied that Obama was worse than Clinton or McCain and that my statement put them all in the same boat.
I thought it was 'rock, paper, scissor night'.
Whoever is in charge of the weapons memo, is in deep guano.