See other Ron Paul Articles
Title: BREAKING HARD: RON PAUL SUPPORTS OBAMA
Source:
CNN
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 2, 2008
Author: CNN
Post Date: 2008-05-02 18:28:55 by a vast rightwing conspirator
Keywords: None
Views: 8430
Comments: 534
First, he told Blitz that he can't endorse McCain.
Then, Blitz asked him which one he prefers, of the 2 Demos. RP said that he picks Obama because he's slightly better which is EXACTLY what I've been saying for quite a while.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-45) not displayed.
.
.
.
#46. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
Your title is Bullshit. You say in your own post that he was asked who of the two democrats he preferred. He said Obama. That is a far cry from making the claim that Rep. Paul supports Obama for president as your title implies
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
Good for you no one. At least you've got the balls to leave your sheet on the bed.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
<8?
I must agree. I never would have dreamed that this election season would brought this kind of divisiveness to 4um. Can't say I've avoided partaking it it either, albeit somewhat indirectly. The people to object to some preference to Obama over the other two also seem to claim that all 3 candidates are the same. That's not too bad but then they get rather hotheaded about it and some start flinging the "commie" and "white guilt" term around. I mean, if they really are all the same, what difference does it make? One of the 3 will win.
Real cowboys don't go shootin' innocent girls for the "greater good". ...one "sacrifice" you are already on record as being willing to make. That's ain't my definition of a 2nd Amendment.
He's referring to the vote to continue sending funds for equipment for the troops. What would a presidential candidate look like who does not support the troops once deployed overseas? Ron Paul's position on this probably cost him votes. Yes, we want out of Iraq. No we do not want our troops to be without what they need.
“President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds Obama/Paul '08
It is. Ron Paul just said Obama is "slightly better" than Hillary. Good, and that's a true statement. A McCain WH is likely to make me hysterical.
“President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds That is what I have been wondering. I think most of us who have made a couple of trips around the block know that the establishment is happy enough with any one of those three. Knowing that, why would anyone believe there is all that much difference in them (other than the obvious racial and gender differences)?
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I hear SouthPark need a new Kenny......;)
On this we agree !
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." "I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale." Thomas Jefferson
facts and sound logic will be of no value to you here...you've entered the obamazone
On this we agree ! Very good! :)
“President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds facts and sound logic will be of no value to you here...you've entered the obamazone Distressing, ain't it?
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Why not use race to elevate the Far Lefty Liberal Marxist Gun Grabbing Establishment selection up to the point of social upheaval !? This was, as always, a set up by the CFR on both sides. That we see obamanation going on is like taking a blunt instrument and clubbing the last freedom puppy to death with it . . .
Then why did you put up a title that is a lie? Just like bush/cheney and the rest of the neocons. I'll excuse you if you claim you can't read or that you have attention deficit disorder.
This was, as always, a set up by the CFR on both sides. That we see obamanation going on is like taking a blunt instrument and clubbing the last freedom puppy to death with it . . . So, if I understand it you think maybe we should figure out--how exactly I am not sure--which one is the worst and vote for that one so we can just go ahead and get it over with? You might be surprised how many people think that.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. And what pray tell is that reality? Is everyone who doesn't vote for Obama now going to be called a racist? Whooptie-do. I'm not voting for Obama because I don't vote for central planning collectivists. I have never voted for a central planning collectivist and I never will. On top of that, I believe Obama is a made member of the two party fraud, along with his two partners in crime, Hillary and McCain. Because he is a member of the two party fraud, I do not believe Obama will bring the troops home. I believe it to be an election ploy. If this makes me a racist, then so be it. I will vote for whoever the LP candidate is unless Chuck Baldwin is on the ballot in my state. I've always liked him. I'm through giving a rat's ass about who other people vote for.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
The Revolution was a lovely dream and I chucked a few bucks at it and touted it loudly here. But it's nut cutting time now and past time to get serious about the next four years.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Congratulations VRWC!! you win the pissing contest. I'm glad Paul said that. He's a patriot. I don't like Obama, but the others are worse (I think). If Obama's name is on the ballot in November I might actually vote for him.
Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
He posted what he heard on live television. It's easy to miss a sentence or two. After I posted the video, he realized he overstated what Dr. Paul said and corrected it in the posts that followed.
“President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds ROFL!!!! Poor Kenny.
yes, but only if you're white.
Would you like the title corrected to something more accurate? If so what would you like it to say? Perhaps "Ron Paul says Obama is "slightly better" than Hillary"
“President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years,” “Maybe a hundred ... ... that’d be fine with me,” McCain responds But of course. There can be no other reason why people who have been fighting against big government for (in my case) decades would vote against Obama. Racism has to be the answer.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
I'm not voting for Obama because I don't vote for central planning collectivists. I have never voted for a central planning collectivist and I never will. On top of that, I believe Obama is a made member of the two party fraud, along with his two partners in crime, Hillary and McCain. Because he is a member of the two party fraud, I do not believe Obama will bring the troops home. I believe it to be an election ploy. If this makes me a racist, then so be it. I will vote for whoever the LP candidate is unless Chuck Baldwin is on the ballot in my state. I've always liked him. I'm through giving a rat's ass about who other people vote for. Well articulated...
How about, Ron Paul says Obama's name while talking.
Let's start a rumor. Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin are going to team up after the Republican Convention in Minnesota this summer. See how fun that is?
I don't see any correction in any thing he posted. Let him speak for himself.
Thanx. I'm about done with this thread. I'm through arguing with people over who they are going to vote for. It's never worked in the past when I attempted to talk small government republicans against voting for the lessor of two evils and it's not going to work now. People are going to vote for who they are going to vote for.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
Pay it no mind. There's probably a very rational answer to why poor and ill educated whites are doing their best to swamp him. The race this time apparently will be decided by rabid feminists and little old ladies or morons.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin are going to team up after the Republican Convention in Minnesota this summer. See how fun that is? LOL! I'm enjoying the suspense as it is. Media mentioned Evan Bayh is a contenter for a Hillary VP today.
Obama/Bloomberg 2008?
Sounds like a blue plate special at Tahoe Joes.
Sounds like a blue plate special at Tahoe Joes. LOLOL !
The race this time apparently will be decided by rabid feminists and little old ladies or morons. I'm confused. Your post appeared to be about the anti-Obama people on f4um. Was I mistaken or are you of the opinion that the people on this site are poor and ill educated? I can asure you that I am neither, and as to the other folk on this site, while I cannot attest to their financial status, most are hard core political junkies and can be called just about anything BUT ill educated in regards to politics.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
That there poster smells like an elitist-wannabe...get invited to all the cool local social events.
Comments (86 - 534) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#47. To: noone222 (#42)
Do you mean like child support. That's nothing new. White people have been supporting blacks for 400 years. I hear Obama is half white.
#48. To: RickyJ (#12)
"Whoa! What a year this has been. And what achievements we have had. If I may quote Trotsky of all people, this Revolution is permanent."
"If I may quote Trotsky of all people..." ~ Ron Paul 2008 
#49. To: iconoclast (#44)
The hysteria here, and on other forums, over the possibility of Obama's election is stunning.
The insincerity of the Obama protesters is palpable ... the hyper protest arises from one and only one reality ... and it ain't "elitism".
#50. To: Jethro Tull (#45)
Cowboy speak from a guy who'd trade off our 2nd Amendment for a politician's promise of global peace?
#51. To: Hayek Fan (#46)
Your title is Bullshit. You say in your own post that he was asked who of the two democrats he preferred. He said Obama. That is a far cry from making the claim that Rep. Paul supports Obama for president as your title implies
#52. To: christine (#43)
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#53. To: All (#48)
#54. To: iconoclast (#44)
The hysteria here, and on other forums, over the possibility of Obama's election is stunning.
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#55. To: Pinguinite (#49)
I mean, if they really are all the same, what difference does it make?
Lord Acton
#56. To: FOH (#53)
Obama/Paul '08
#57. To: robin (#54)
A McCain WH is likely to make me hysterical.
#58. To: James Deffenbach (#55)
#59. To: noone222 (#57)
A McCain WH is likely to make me hysterical.
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#60. To: Peppa (#56)
#61. To: FOH (#58)
Lord Acton
#62. To: James Deffenbach (#55)
That is what I have been wondering. I think most of us who have made a couple of trips around the block know that the establishment is happy enough with any one of those three. Knowing that, why would anyone believe there is all that much difference in them (other than the obvious racial and gender differences)?
#63. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#6)
He was careful to say that it's not 'an endorsement' (
#64. To: FOH (#62)
Why not use race to elevate the Far Lefty Liberal Marxist Gun Grabbing Establishment selection up to the point of social upheaval !?
Lord Acton
#65. To: iconoclast (#44)
The insincerity of the Obama protesters is palpable ... the hyper protest arises from one and only one reality ... and it ain't "elitism".
#66. To: robin (#33)
He's not Ron Paul.
#67. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#0)
#68. To: LACUMO (#63)
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#69. To: FOH (#60)
#70. To: Hayek Fan (#65)
And what pray tell is that reality? Is everyone who doesn't vote for Obama now going to be called a racist?
#71. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#68)
Hillary: "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran in the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them."
#72. To: christine (#70)
yes, but only if you're white.
#73. To: Hayek Fan, Post of the Day, , *Chuck Baldwin President 2008* (#65)
And what pray tell is that reality? Is everyone who doesn't vote for Obama now going to be called a racist? Whooptie-do.
#74. To: robin (#71)
Would you like the title corrected to something more accurate? If so what would you like it to say? Perhaps "Ron Paul says Obama is "slightly better" than Hillary"
#75. To: Peppa (#74)
How about, Ron Paul says Obama's name while talking.
#76. To: robin (#68)
, he realized he overstated what Dr. Paul said and corrected it in the posts that followed.
#77. To: FOH (#73)
Well articulated...
#78. To: Hayek Fan (#72)
Racism has to be the answer.
#79. To: FOH (#75)
Let's start a rumor.
#80. To: Peppa (#79)
Media mentioned Evan Bayh is a contenter for a Hillary VP today.
#81. To: FOH (#80)
Obama/Bloomberg 2008?
#82. To: Peppa (#81)
Obama/Bloomberg 2008?
#83. To: iconoclast (#78)
There's probably a very rational answer to why poor and ill educated whites are doing their best to swamp him.
#84. To: All (#82)
#85. To: Hayek Fan (#83)
.
.
.