[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: America: Ruled by Isolated, Sadistic, Ignorant Sociopaths
Source: The Daily Burkeman1
URL Source: http://thedailyburkeman1.blogspot.c ... uled-by-isolated-sadistic.html
Published: Apr 29, 2008
Author: Burkeman1
Post Date: 2008-05-02 23:25:04 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 113
Comments: 9

Every once in a while there is an event that perfectly encapsulates the nature of the people who rule over us from our Imperial Capital. There are pretty much glaring examples of this or that federal politician's maliciously evil nature every day in our corporate media and one could spend all day, every day, breaking down their sickening actions and statements and exposing them for the corrupt lying degenerates they are.

But occasionally one story appears that clearly shows how the entire lot of them, regardless of party affiliation, are a bunch of delusional criminal sociopaths.

The story that I think is a perfect snapshot in time that fully captures the evil that is our federal government is here.

"Opposition" to the war in Iraq? What is it? How does the "opposition" manifest their displeasure with a war that was started on lies, that is a robbery in progress, that has seen the codification of torture into our legal system, that has produced a million dead Iraqis, two million more (at least) displaced, and Iraqi city after Iraqi city reduced to rubble and a population living in raw sewage and brought to peonage universally wishing Saddam Hussein was back in power?

Here's what passes for "Antiwar" measures taken by our really real opposition party- the Democrats:

Congress’ frustration with the war in Iraq will come through loud and clear when the Senate Armed Services Committee begins writing its annual defense authorization bill on Tuesday.

Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are expected to endorse a provision that would demand that the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki foot more of the country’s reconstruction costs.

"Loud and Clear"! The "frustration" of Congress with the war is being expressed by calling for the Potemkin fraud government of Iraq to pony up money for the rebuilding of their country- destroyed by the United States.

It really boggles the mind. Nowhere in that article is anything approaching sympathy expressed for the Iraqi people. Nowhere is there even anything approaching self examination. They really can't get any more away from reality than this.

Let's forget for a moment the moral squalor this demand that Iraq pay for it's own rape represents. How about the fact that the Iraq government is powerless and can't explain where Iraq oil money even goes? How about the fact the US is stealing that oil? Is Congress even aware that this "government" doesn't do anything? That it has rebuilt nothing? That it literally is a fraud that doesn't even have the power to stop pork from being served in the Green Zone?

Oh they know. I know this. So then they know this. So then what is this "demand" all about? It is a staged produced play. It is meant to mimic debate on the war. Like every such bill has been.

Every single act of this government in Iraq is predicated and built upon lies. Thus nothing they do will ever "solve" anything. They fundamentally refuse to address anything in Iraq from a standpoint of reality and rather insist on operating from assumptions that are flatly and obviously false. And they know they are false!

Which is why I believe the intentions of the US in Iraq are far darker. They want more Iraqis to die. They want that country depopulated. What this government says are their intentions are so obviously not that one would be remiss to not assign them the worst of intentions and motivations.

Side point. I have written before on the almost total lack of foreign voices in our media despite the technology for enabling this never being cheaper or more affordable. Almost any "moderate" from the Moslem world who emerges or any significant critic from any country will invariably be impeached and dismissed by the usual suspects because they have expressed doubts about the US Government's 9/11 storyline.

Any skepticism about 9/11 is immediate grounds for dismissal in our media. So much as ask a question and you will never appear in American media again as anything but a 9/11 conspiracy kooker. Literally dozens of foreign academics, jouranlists, politicains, and others have been dismissed in our media in this way.

Well, maybe this is news to some people. But 9/11 Skpeticism isn't unacceptable pretty much anywhere in the world. Only in the US, Canada, and the UK does any expression of doubt make one not a "serious responsible" observer of events.

You know what the rest of the world sees when it comes to 9/11? They see a country that acts like it has something to hide. They see a country that has tried exactly one person for the biggest mass murder of American civilians in history - and he was half a retard with a history of mental illness who spoke in tongues during his trial. They see a country that has since hid the "masterminds" in dungeons for going on 7 years now and admitted to torturing them and they still hadn't seen a lawyer as of April of this year- not seen ANYONE not approved and vetted by the government. They see a country that won't hold public trials for these guys, that is going to allow "evidence" obtained under torture used against them violating the most basic of legal norms, and that has created a whole new special court system just for them!

In short they see a country that is too afraid to even put on public show trials of these guys!

Since having questions about 9/11 is an immediate blackball in our controlled media for any foreigner we get damn few foreign voices in our media. Sorry to tell you if you didn't know this- but half the world smells something rotten about 9/11 and not "kooks" either.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

#1. To: Hayek Fan (#0)

Senators Want Iraq to Shoulder Costs

By John M. Donnelly, CQ Staff

Congress’ frustration with the war in Iraq will come through loud and clear when the Senate Armed Services Committee begins writing its annual defense authorization bill on Tuesday.

Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are expected to endorse a provision that would demand that the Iraqi government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki foot more of the country’s reconstruction costs.

Defying President Bush, Democrats once again are likely to include language that would mandate a timeline for the withdrawal of most U.S. troops from Iraq. And in authorizing spending for a variety of weapons programs, the panel is expected to balance the war’s financial demands against investments in future military capabilities.

Carl Levin , D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said he hopes the bill, which sets policy and authorizes spending for Pentagon programs and nuclear-weapons initiatives at the Energy Department, will pass the Senate by the end of May.

Four Armed Services subcommittees — Emerging Threats, Personnel, Seapower and Readiness — are scheduled to consider their portions of the bill behind closed doors Tuesday, with the remaining two subcommittees marking up their portions Wednesday, also in closed sessions.

The full committee markup is expected to start Wednesday and run to the end of the week, followed by open markups in the House Armed Services subcommittees during the week of May 5.

Looking to Iraq to Pay More

The Senate bill’s details were still being finalized, with most lawmakers and aides declining to discuss them. Still, some of the bill’s elements are taking shape.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are the first order of business. With the costs of the conflicts rising and the U.S. economy taking a downturn, members from both parties are increasingly talking about the need for the Iraqis, now awash in oil wealth, to spend more to help their country rebound.

Several members of the Senate Armed Services panel would like to shift the burden of funding Iraq’s reconstruction to the Maliki government. Several also want A-Iraqis to pay the U.S. military’s fuel costs, as well as the salaries of former Sunni insurgents who are now helping U.S. forces fight al Qaeda in Iraq.

Those senators, who include Democrats Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Evan Bayh of Indiana and Republican Susan Collins of Maine, would like to see U.S. funds for such purposes be provided to the Iraqis in the form of loans instead of grants.

Levin has proposed a more limited and direct approach, which would simply ban the obligation of U.S. funds for the reconstruction of Iraq. He hopes that such a provision either will be a part of the Senate Armed Services bill or appended to it on the Senate floor. “We’re looking for the right place to introduce the right language,” said Levin.

The legislation also could end up attached to the emergency war supplemental spending measure that the Senate is likely to take up in the coming weeks. Having the provision in both bills would increase its chances for enactment, in what Nelson called a “belt and suspenders” strategy.

robin  posted on  2008-05-02   23:37:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: robin (#1)

The Pentagon’s fiscal 2009 budget request assumes $1.2 billion in savings in anticipation of those fees.

Yep. That's 1.2 billion dollars saved all right, and it comes right out of the pockets of the soldiers.... the ones who actually doing the fighting and the dying for the old-farts and the friends-of-the-old-farts in DC.

Some savings. Makes one wonder if and when those same soldiers will wake up to what is really going on.

richard9151  posted on  2008-05-02   23:45:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: richard9151 (#3)

link

robin  posted on  2008-05-02   23:59:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 4.

#6. To: robin (#4)

link

That's really sad. I wonder how many of those young men (and women -- I saw at least one) thought that enlistment bonus was a great deal? Probably most.

I hope that, at Judgement, some are called for a special viewing/condemnation as a lesson to all before they are dismissed forever..... and I hope that the Shrub is one of those. Oh, and ol Dicky as well, of course.

richard9151  posted on  2008-05-03 00:07:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]