See other 4play Articles
Title: My Bozo number just went up. Any guesses?
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 4, 2008
Author: Hmmmmmm
Post Date: 2008-05-04 12:59:45 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 3016
Comments: 157
The Os are incapable of rational debate, so it could be any of them :)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-109) not displayed.
.
.
.
#110. To: Jethro Tull (#109)
So says logic and reason.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
I hadn't seen that, but I'm happy to find the company. As for the neo-con status quo bots, it's possible they are employees of Oil Companies. Anything to make it not look like war, so long as we stay there... forever. We have plenty of oil here at home to end the genocide. However, the pipeline to Israel must be built and protected.
Yours left the building long ago.
So says logic and reason. "To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn robin posted on 2008-05-04 15:51:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply STOP IT ALREADY !!! LOLOLOLOL Yer killun me over here !
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahaha!! Oh God, this is hilarious, and sad at the same time.
Although I am no doubt on your filter, I find it intellectually dishonest to have you represent that 14 filtered people have bothered you with vile, disgusting person insults. I know I haven't.
Anyone can follow the logic here. You refuse to allow the same amount of fairness for Obama that you dispense to Catholics. Obama's pastor Wright may have done something wrong. Catholics have priests who may have done something wrong. No one blames the Catholics. Only you blame Obama (and as you just said, Wright's entire congregation). This is a double-standard, the one you like to complain about. This makes you a hypocrite.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
You nailed it...it's a freak show, and what do the sheeple love better than a reality freak show?
You refuse to allow the same amount of fairness for Obama that you dispense to Catholics. Obama's pastor Wright may have done something wrong. Catholics have priests who may have done something wrong. No one blames the Catholics. Only you blame Obama (and as you just said, Wright's entire congregation). This is a double-standard, the one you like to complain about. This makes you a hypocrite. If they sat and listened to a Priest knowing full well he was an abuser, then why the hell didn't they deal with the Priest. You people are bat shit crazy...
Let me explain your confusion in other words. The catholics, upon learning of their priest's wickedness, want to throw them out on their asses. Catholics who support their priest after knowing what he is deserve the criticism they get. The Wright church people support their pastor because of what he peaches...open racial hatred. His character is also revealed by the NYP story. Obama went to this church for 20 years and Wright preached the same racial hatred for 20 years. Obama supported hs pastor knowing what he is. Obama deserves the criticsm he is getting. But, it's beside the point. He's a part of the dog and pony show designed to distract from the important issues of the day.
The difference you aren't capable of grasping is that one is a crime, committed in private, and settled out of public view, while Wright's racism is played out publicly, in the pulpit and the media - at his request. I find you the hypocrite; decrying the Youtube string, while ignoring Wright's unedited, live media hate blitz last week. If the blacks Wright preached to were Illegals, complete with a Mexican Mariachi Band as a chorus, you'd still be the old robin.
According to the book of dreams, guano is white.
None of that has anything to do with the comparison that was asked of you. The thread you posted was not about what Wright believed or spoke about. It was about a rumor that he had stolen another man's wife. If it is wrong to blame Catholics for the wrong some of their priests did, then it is wrong to blame Wright's congregation for the wrong that Wright did. It's that simple.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The point missing in the LOGIC, is that the Priest wasn't preaching pedophilia (sp), nor was same priest asked to marry and baptize the children in the name of a pedophilia theology.. ANDDD... asked to be an advisor........ANDDDDD promoted on a candidates website . This is a test to see how much utter crap people will swallow.. Are these small details or not? Wright is Obama's millstone.. and furthermore, it's been known for over a year.. but he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO? Answer that, and you can see the puppet strings here. frickenfrackendirtyrotten..................
Rumors cease to be rumors when a complaint steps up, identifies himself, offers a time and place, hires an attorney and advances a charge.
Fine, take out the word rumor, although it is just an allegation at this point. The logic still holds.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Apples and oranges. Peppa said it better than I can: The point missing in the LOGIC, is that the Priest wasn't preaching pedophilia (sp), nor was same priest asked to marry and baptize the children in the name of a pedophilia theology.. ANDDD... asked to be an advisor........ANDDDDD promoted on a candidates website . This is a test to see how much utter crap people will swallow.. Are these small details or not? Wright is Obama's millstone.. and furthermore, it's been known for over a year.. but he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO? Answer that, and you can see the puppet strings here. frickenfrackendirtyrotten.................. Peppa posted on 2008-05-04 16:14:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit
Thanks JT. Are these 9 people worth all this trouble?
They're bat shit crazy if they think anyone's buying it...
No it is apples and apples. You keep trying to interject what was being taught from the pulpit. That has NOTHING to do with the logic of the argument. You posted a thread about the BEHAVIOR (supposedly stealing another man's wife) of Rev. Wright - NOT about what he said. Let's try again. If it is wrong to blame Catholics for what some of their priests DID (not said or believed). Then it is wrong to blame Rev. Wright's congregation for what Rev. Wright DID (not said or believed). It is very simple logic here.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
They're on a MISSION FROM MARX. How far are they from banging tamborines at the airport?
By the small donors who love "freedom"? /s
/s Sure! And help by the media, Mika Zbig's 3 hours of active defense... Honestly, if it hadn't been for Sat. Night Live blowing the charade, Obama could've been crowned by now.
My friend, the rationale has been provided to you, more than once: the alternatives to Dr. O are Hillary or McCain. If you (and it's a generic 'you') insist on being so intellectually lazy or derelict as to being unable or unwilling to see any difference between the three of then, that's the way you see things or rather imagine them and it's not worth trying to correct your views. I shall point out to you that even Dr. Paul saw a difference between the 3 and expressed a preference for Dr. Obama but you all showed extreme obtuseness, dogmatism, lack of imagination and an inablity to accept facts on a recent thread discussing that topic. Some of you or rather all of you (still that generic 'you') keep throwing the "there's not one dime worth of difference between the three", to which I reply: remove the dogmatic blinders and look around. Yes, Dr. O is a bit of a socialist because he is a democrat but, remember, presidents don't get to appropriate one dollar, it's the congress that appropriates funds and there will be no socialism unless the congress funds it. However, presidents do have the power to bring our troops back home and avoid wasting trillions on ruinous military adventuresd and it is likely that Dr. O would ease our foreign wars burden if elected president. So, help save America. Get Obama in the WH so we don't get Hillary or McCain. There's trillions of dollars worth of difference between them. And, if you are concerned about socialist spending, help elect fiscally conservative reps and senators.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
the two thread subjects are being crossed. I think it's gotten lost that JT categorized the other under 4Play.
I'm on seven, all apparently lovers of the buffoon Obama.
As near as I can tell, you're in slot #2 behind yours truly with 9 (NINE)...you could take me by midnight if you get after it.
I was trying to get more by calling Obama a buffoon, the yellow-skinned half- breed. Cher sang a song about him, you know.
I've got 6:46pm Eastern...is that what you have?
5:47 in the Ozarks somewhere.
Alright I'll give you the extra hour.
too funny ;P
LOL! Good one.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. I think other intelligent people have plenty of reason to filter your posts.
Defending the Bible IS shilling for the Establishment, by the way, you old hippy-clothes-wearing person. I'm also not going to call "peak oil" a scam and I don't think there's 200 years worth of oil in alaska, especially not with russia's side-drilling skills. Probably more like 20.
I don't get it. I don't like what you have to say so I'm going to put you on bozo? It just doesn't make sense to me. How boring to live life in a vanilla world where everyone agrees and all the discussion is the same!
LOL! I actually have that albumn!
My language was supposed to be unexpected. I really was caught by surprise myself when I suddenly found myself surrounded, on 4um, by people who apparently were all to happy to continue promoting the death of innocent people if that was the only cost to promoting "rights" for themselves. Yes, such people bring out the worst in me. Big time. Thankfully, I found such people were in the strong minority here.
Based on my own experience, I don't think that's out of the question.
Yes, such people bring out the worst in me. Big time. Thankfully, I found such people were in the strong minority here. D.Q.
Mine went up to 3 recently. I really think that people should not be able to place anonymous bozos. If they are such sissies, their identity should be known to the bozoee.
Tagline space for rent.
Comments (151 - 157) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#111. To: angle (#106)
actually neo-cons...keeping the two-fraud lie a spinning Observed as such by others here.
#112. To: robin (#110)
So says logic and reason.
#113. To: robin (#110)
#110. To: Jethro Tull (#109)
#114. To: robin (#110)
So says logic and reason.
#115. To: robin (#86)
How is it shallow or intellectually dishonest to not want to bothered by nothing but a string of vile, disgusting personal insults?
#116. To: Jethro Tull (#112)
#117. To: nobody (#93)
Race, politics, and religion, all wrapped up one one major media package. It's like heaven on earth.
#118. To: robin (#116)
Anyone can follow the logic here.
#119. To: robin (#110)
So says logic and reason.
#120. To: robin (#116)
You refuse to allow the same amount of fairness for Obama that you dispense to Catholics.
#121. To: FOH (#118)
#122. To: Jethro Tull (#120)
#123. To: FOH (#118)
#124. To: robin (#122)
It was about a rumor that he had stolen another man's wife.
#125. To: Jethro Tull (#124)
#126. To: robin, Peppa, Timothy Leary (#122)
If it is wrong to blame Catholics for the wrong some of their priests did, then it is wrong to blame Wright's congregation for the wrong that Wright did.
#127. To: Jethro Tull (#126)
#128. To: Peppa, Jethro Tull (#123)
#129. To: Jethro Tull (#126)
Apples and oranges.
#130. To: FOH (#128)
They're bat shit crazy if they think anyone's buying it...
#131. To: Peppa (#123)
he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO?
#132. To: angle (#131)
he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO? By the small donors who love "freedom"?
#133. To: Jethro Tull (#39)
(Edited)
I still stand by my statement; most Os have yet to put together a rational argument for his candidacy, save white guilt.
#134. To: robin, Jethro Tull (#122)
#135. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
#136. To: Turtle (#135)
I'm on seven, all apparently lovers of the buffoon Obama.
#137. To: FOH (#136)
#138. To: Turtle (#137)
#139. To: FOH (#138)
#140. To: Turtle (#139)
(Edited)
#141. To: FOH, Turtle (#140)
#142. To: Peppa (#130)
They're on a MISSION FROM MARX. How far are they from banging tamborines at the airport?
Lord Acton
#143. To: Turtle (#135)
I'm on seven, all apparently lovers of the buffoon Obama.
#144. To: FOH (#18)
shilling for the Establishment
#145. To: FOH, Turtle (#136)
As near as I can tell, you're in slot #2 behind yours truly with 9 (NINE)...
Thought for the day:
Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'
#146. To: Turtle, FOH (#137)
Cher sang a song about him, you know.
Thought for the day:
Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'
#147. To: Cynicom (#89)
You had a chance to cleanse your soul and be a gentleman at the same time, but decided otherwise. Your language was unexpected and offensive, from there it was downhill.
#148. To: angle (#115)
Although I am no doubt on your filter, I find it intellectually dishonest to have you represent that 14 filtered people have bothered you with vile, disgusting person insults.
#149. To: Pinguinite (#147)
My language was supposed to be unexpected. I really was caught by surprise myself when I suddenly found myself surrounded, on 4um, by people who apparently were all to happy to continue promoting the death of innocent people if that was the only cost to promoting "rights" for themselves.
#150. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
(Edited)
.
.
.