Title: My Bozo number just went up. Any guesses? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:May 4, 2008 Author:Hmmmmmm Post Date:2008-05-04 12:59:45 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1321 Comments:157
The Os are incapable of rational debate, so it could be any of them :)
Was your earlier "tenant" remark a pun? Some people hate puns.
I, for one, hail your efforts at fighting against the pernicious effects of "white guilt" on the collective "white consciousness," and for the constitution. "White guilt" should be declared unconstitutional hate speech. White people have a God- given right to not feel "white guilt." LOL.
I just remembered, though, God is a zionist, so might makes right. Good luck with your fight to eliminate "white guilt" from the consciousness of lesser people by raising it here, anyway. Neocons will be the ones annointed to part the sea of "white guilt" invokers at the appointed time, I suppose. No idea if vegas has a line on that, though. Have patience.
Maybe you declared that every drunken bastard on a street corner should be armed. No, wait, that can't be it. Too simple. Perhaps it was a pro-population-control stance lacking in universally agreeable specifics.
I did find the number "5", is that considered to be high or low????
Does that mean there are 5 sissies here that wet themselves when I post???
Anyway, I love all of 'em.
Yes, it would indicate that five people have you on their filter OR it could mean that one person entered you five times. I guess Christine or Neil could confirm that--I know that on LP people messed with other folks by entering their names numerous times on their filter and I am assuming that could be done here but don't know it for sure.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
I felt real bad when Neil decided not to be a gentleman, and all this time I thot he was. Now he has me convinced.
Just maybe a good webmaster would arrange to show with each post, how many people are bozoed by the poster.
Course maybe the webmaster might not like to have that shown.
I got a little perturbed at that bonehead in Socilist Ecuador, under strong delusion he must be, when he made a play for America's guns and then tried to defend the indefensible. That insults my intelligence...he put me on filter.
"The question, Red, is how a man (Obama) can be a member of a radical black church (Trinity) for 20 years, led by a full blown black racist (Wright), and not be a racist himself. I'm going to explore that issue whether folks approve or not." -JT
Did you suggest the Bible is a pile of crap? I hear that works.
Cyni surely won his rating by suggesting oh-so-politely that the contributions raised by Obaba may have been from other than individual donors food budgets.
I don't know if it was brilliant or not, just an educated guess knowing that Neil did the software for LP and here. But for all I know he could have tweaked it some so that it wouldn't show more than one bozo per person no matter how many times their name was entered. Purely an assumption on my part and why I pinged Neil and Christine.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
5 bozos. I have a suspicion there is an O with numerous IDs, which might account for one or more. I still stand by my statement; most Os have yet to put together a rational argument for his candidacy, save white guilt. If he weren't black, he'd have been rejected.
I felt real bad when Neil decided not to be a gentleman, and all this time I thot he was. Now he has me convinced.
Watch it, buster, or I'll push your bozo count to 60, just to show you how mean I can be.
Just maybe a good webmaster would arrange to show with each post, how many people are bozoed by the poster. Course maybe the webmaster might not like to have that shown.
I think publicizing everyone's bozo count like that would be a distraction. It would encourage false accounts being made just to artificially drive up bozo counts of adversaries. And yes, that would happen.
BTW, someone bozo'd me, but if it's who I think it is, that's fine with me.
Odd you should say that when you have failed to answer my last two posts to you on the subject.
No, there are posters here who were personally insulting to me, and also posters who were just very boring.
I enjoy discussing and debating with civilized posters. That's all. Why should I waste my time and energy on the rude and vile? Or even boring and dull trolls?
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Obamabots, O'Philes, Marshall Applewhite groupies, White Guilters, liberals, leftists, commies, Democrats, San Fran Freakos, or anyone named Margaret Cho, Ramsey Clark, Hillary Clinton, George Clooney, Juan Cole, John Dean, The Democratic Underground, Al Franken, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Linda Foley, Jesse Jackson, Eason Jordan, John Kerry & Teresa Kerry, Paul Krugman, Bill Maher, Moby, Michael Moore, Michael Newdow, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, Andrew Sullivan, Kayne West, Joe Wilson, James Wolcott.
I find your comment condescending, but that said, I didn't answer you b/c I was out jogging. I just returned. I'm showered and rested. Now, shall we start with your assertion that "social injustice" is at the root of reverse racism?
I don't know if it was brilliant or not, just an educated guess knowing that Neil did the software for LP and here. But for all I know he could have tweaked it some so that it wouldn't show more than one bozo per person no matter how many times their name was entered. Purely an assumption on my part and why I pinged Neil and Christine.
It was a problem in the past where listing the same name 4 times made their bozo count 4, but that was exploited and I remember it being one of the things I fixed. There were apparently coordinated crusades against one or two particularly unpopular people to skyrocket their bozo counts.
There are Americans here and a few disgruntled partisan O'Piles that will never see the light. Rather than show our disdain for them, we need to pity their lack of wisdom and show them kindness.
I recall one person whose screen name I won't mention here who said that she was on way over 100 filters. And I assume that was one of those cases because she was not/is not disagreeable and seems to like everyone. I doubt very much that her bozo count was anything like legitimate but I don't know that it bothered her either way.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
I think peppa's Me and Mrs. Jones put her over the top.
Nooo.. LOL.
In other news, I'm thinking the bozor's (bozores?, bozophiles?) are actually neo-cons. Keeping the two-fraud lie a spinning, and doing exactly what you are suggesting... distracting from issues that would prove such.
Now, shall we start with your assertion that "social injustice" is at the root of reverse racism?
That's not what I posted. I repeated a post ... made to you in regards to Rev. Wright supposedly stealing another man's woman, and then somehow making it an Obama issue.
"And by your reasoning, is everyone who attends a Catholic Church a fag and a child molester?"
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Obamabots, O'Philes, Marshall Applewhite groupies, White Guilters, liberals, leftists, commies, Democrats, San Fran Freakos, or anyone named Margaret Cho, Ramsey Clark, Hillary Clinton, George Clooney, Juan Cole, John Dean, The Democratic Underground, Al Franken, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Linda Foley, Jesse Jackson, Eason Jordan, John Kerry & Teresa Kerry, Paul Krugman, Bill Maher, Moby, Michael Moore, Michael Newdow, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, Andrew Sullivan, Kayne West, Joe Wilson, James Wolcott.
Obamabots, O'Philes, Marshall Applewhite groupies, White Guilters, liberals, leftists, commies, Democrats, San Fran Freakos, or anyone named Margaret Cho, Ramsey Clark, Hillary Clinton, George Clooney, Juan Cole, John Dean, The Democratic Underground, Al Franken, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Linda Foley, Jesse Jackson, Eason Jordan, John Kerry & Teresa Kerry, Paul Krugman, Bill Maher, Moby, Michael Moore, Michael Newdow, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, Andrew Sullivan, Kayne West, Joe Wilson, James Wolcott.
IOW
ALL McHillObama Establishment worshippers.
It's Obama vs Obama vs Obama vs Clinton vs Clinton vs Clinton vs McCain vs McCain vs McCain.
Only, the Ophiles broke for the racist Marxist warmonger when they had numbers for cover...they're very confident...and stooopid, a hallmark.
Isn't attempts to smear Obama b/c of Wright like an attempt to smear Catholics b/c of ?
Heavens, no.
One is a crime, whose victims are suffering and being compensated. The Catholics I know who still attend mass (why, I haven't a clue) are indignant, angry and demanding these sickos be rooted out and locked up. It seems that is exactly what is happening.
Wright, OTOH, is is a race huckster in the mold of Sharpton/Jackson. His racism, unlike the hidden crimes of the pedophile priests, is in his mission statement. How you choose to ignore it is beyond me.
You had a chance to cleanse your soul and be a gentleman at the same time, but decided otherwise. Your language was unexpected and offensive, from there it was downhill.
Delmer Reed, 59, confided to pals that he believed the minister moved in on his wife while Wright was counseling the couple at his Chicago church in the early 1980s, The Post has learned.
"That's exactly how he said it," Reed's divorce lawyer, Roosevelt Thomas, told The Post. "It looks like Delmer might have been right," he said, because after Delmer and Ramah Reed were divorced, she got remarried - to Wright. "Either that or this was the biggest coincidence in the world."
I don't much care where the Catholics sat, prayed, chanted, or broke wind. Anyone who is part of that, or any other 501 C-3 is a sheeple, my family members included.
Now, please note the above comment.
Why would Delmer Reed lie all over the WRIGHT Reverend?
It is unreasonable to blame Obama for his ex-pastor.
Not true.
Read his mission statement, and do my Word test challenge. Change out African for Northern European - White and read it aloud to your friends and neighbors. Then, stand back and watch their jaws drop. It's a sterling example of reverse racism, a hatred against whites you just admitted exists.
it is really better for the forum to get a diverse group on here.
Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
But the question had NOTHING to do with what the Rev. Wright believes, it had to do with whether or not he had "stolen another man's wife". That was the thread you posted where this question was asked, several times.
The behavior of pedophile priests is not blamed on the parishioners.
The behavior of Rev. Wright should not be blamed on the congregation either.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Thank-you nobody. If the Obama campaign does have a redeeming quality, it might be to get all this out in the open. It's time to saber the PC hordes, and bayonet their wounded.
The complete package that Rev. Wright brings to the pulpit, the theft of Delmer Reed's wife included, should cause any non-racist to flee that little pit called the Trinity Church as if their hair were on fire. So again, yes, Wright's congregants are guilty as charged.
actually neo-cons...keeping the two-fraud lie a spinning Observed as such by others here.
I hadn't seen that, but I'm happy to find the company. As for the neo-con status quo bots, it's possible they are employees of Oil Companies. Anything to make it not look like war, so long as we stay there... forever. We have plenty of oil here at home to end the genocide. However, the pipeline to Israel must be built and protected.
How is it shallow or intellectually dishonest to not want to bothered by nothing but a string of vile, disgusting personal insults?
Although I am no doubt on your filter, I find it intellectually dishonest to have you represent that 14 filtered people have bothered you with vile, disgusting person insults. I know I haven't.
The catholics, upon learning of their priest's wickedness, want to throw them out on their asses. Catholics who support their priest after knowing what he is deserve the criticism they get.
The Wright church people support their pastor because of what he peaches...open racial hatred. His character is also revealed by the NYP story. Obama went to this church for 20 years and Wright preached the same racial hatred for 20 years. Obama supported hs pastor knowing what he is.
Obama deserves the criticsm he is getting.
But, it's beside the point. He's a part of the dog and pony show designed to distract from the important issues of the day.
You refuse to allow the same amount of fairness for Obama that you dispense to Catholics.
The difference you aren't capable of grasping is that one is a crime, committed in private, and settled out of public view, while Wright's racism is played out publicly, in the pulpit and the media - at his request.
I find you the hypocrite; decrying the Youtube string, while ignoring Wright's unedited, live media hate blitz last week.
If the blacks Wright preached to were Illegals, complete with a Mexican Mariachi Band as a chorus, you'd still be the old robin.
None of that has anything to do with the comparison that was asked of you.
The thread you posted was not about what Wright believed or spoke about. It was about a rumor that he had stolen another man's wife.
If it is wrong to blame Catholics for the wrong some of their priests did, then it is wrong to blame Wright's congregation for the wrong that Wright did.
It's that simple.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The point missing in the LOGIC, is that the Priest wasn't preaching pedophilia (sp), nor was same priest asked to marry and baptize the children in the name of a pedophilia theology.. ANDDD... asked to be an advisor........ANDDDDD promoted on a candidates website .
This is a test to see how much utter crap people will swallow..
Are these small details or not? Wright is Obama's millstone.. and furthermore, it's been known for over a year.. but he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO?
Answer that, and you can see the puppet strings here.
If it is wrong to blame Catholics for the wrong some of their priests did, then it is wrong to blame Wright's congregation for the wrong that Wright did.
Apples and oranges.
Peppa said it better than I can:
The point missing in the LOGIC, is that the Priest wasn't preaching pedophilia (sp), nor was same priest asked to marry and baptize the children in the name of a pedophilia theology.. ANDDD... asked to be an advisor........ANDDDDD promoted on a candidates website .
This is a test to see how much utter crap people will swallow..
Are these small details or not? Wright is Obama's millstone.. and furthermore, it's been known for over a year.. but he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO?
Answer that, and you can see the puppet strings here.
frickenfrackendirtyrotten..................
Peppa posted on 2008-05-04 16:14:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit
I still stand by my statement; most Os have yet to put together a rational argument for his candidacy, save white guilt.
My friend, the rationale has been provided to you, more than once: the alternatives to Dr. O are Hillary or McCain.
If you (and it's a generic 'you') insist on being so intellectually lazy or derelict as to being unable or unwilling to see any difference between the three of then, that's the way you see things or rather imagine them and it's not worth trying to correct your views. I shall point out to you that even Dr. Paul saw a difference between the 3 and expressed a preference for Dr. Obama but you all showed extreme obtuseness, dogmatism, lack of imagination and an inablity to accept facts on a recent thread discussing that topic.
Some of you or rather all of you (still that generic 'you') keep throwing the "there's not one dime worth of difference between the three", to which I reply: remove the dogmatic blinders and look around. Yes, Dr. O is a bit of a socialist because he is a democrat but, remember, presidents don't get to appropriate one dollar, it's the congress that appropriates funds and there will be no socialism unless the congress funds it. However, presidents do have the power to bring our troops back home and avoid wasting trillions on ruinous military adventuresd and it is likely that Dr. O would ease our foreign wars burden if elected president.
So, help save America. Get Obama in the WH so we don't get Hillary or McCain. There's trillions of dollars worth of difference between them. And, if you are concerned about socialist spending, help elect fiscally conservative reps and senators.
Defending the Bible IS shilling for the Establishment, by the way, you old hippy-clothes-wearing person. I'm also not going to call "peak oil" a scam and I don't think there's 200 years worth of oil in alaska, especially not with russia's side-drilling skills. Probably more like 20.
As near as I can tell, you're in slot #2 behind yours truly with 9 (NINE)...
I don't get it. I don't like what you have to say so I'm going to put you on bozo? It just doesn't make sense to me. How boring to live life in a vanilla world where everyone agrees and all the discussion is the same!
Thought for the day: Calling an illegal alien an 'undocumented immigrant' is like calling a drug dealer an 'unlicensed pharmacist'
You had a chance to cleanse your soul and be a gentleman at the same time, but decided otherwise. Your language was unexpected and offensive, from there it was downhill.
My language was supposed to be unexpected. I really was caught by surprise myself when I suddenly found myself surrounded, on 4um, by people who apparently were all to happy to continue promoting the death of innocent people if that was the only cost to promoting "rights" for themselves.
Yes, such people bring out the worst in me. Big time.
Thankfully, I found such people were in the strong minority here.
Although I am no doubt on your filter, I find it intellectually dishonest to have you represent that 14 filtered people have bothered you with vile, disgusting person insults.
Based on my own experience, I don't think that's out of the question.
My language was supposed to be unexpected. I really was caught by surprise myself when I suddenly found myself surrounded, on 4um, by people who apparently were all to happy to continue promoting the death of innocent people if that was the only cost to promoting "rights" for themselves.
Yes, such people bring out the worst in me. Big time.
Thankfully, I found such people were in the strong minority here.
I wouldn't worry about what the Omaba supporters do. The fact they're supporting a double-talking racist says it all.
I happen to agree with the bozo filter..I DO BELIEVE IN IT..because my timeis valuable and if I don't want to sift through idiot posts I don't want to read, I shouldn't be forced to. This makes for a more peaceful and FASTER browsing experience.
To: Jethro Tull, CHRISTINE I wouldn't worry about what the Omaba supporters do. The fact they're supporting a double-talking racist says it all.
I happen to agree with the bozo filter..I DO BELIEVE IN IT..because my timeis valuable and if I don't want to sift through idiot posts I don't want to read, I shouldn't be forced to. This makes for a more peaceful and FASTER browsing experience.
FREEDOM OF CHOICE!!!!
FWIW,
I agree with the bozo feature as well. There are some threads I don't want to see, but there are posters, I just skip over and read on... that way I can understand the context of the conversation. Its not a big deal to scroll past their posts.
Neil it might be a good feature to list the screen names of the people that are bozoing you. This way you could avoid making a reply to someone that can't see it.