Title: My Bozo number just went up. Any guesses? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:May 4, 2008 Author:Hmmmmmm Post Date:2008-05-04 12:59:45 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:1551 Comments:157
The Os are incapable of rational debate, so it could be any of them :)
actually neo-cons...keeping the two-fraud lie a spinning Observed as such by others here.
I hadn't seen that, but I'm happy to find the company. As for the neo-con status quo bots, it's possible they are employees of Oil Companies. Anything to make it not look like war, so long as we stay there... forever. We have plenty of oil here at home to end the genocide. However, the pipeline to Israel must be built and protected.
How is it shallow or intellectually dishonest to not want to bothered by nothing but a string of vile, disgusting personal insults?
Although I am no doubt on your filter, I find it intellectually dishonest to have you represent that 14 filtered people have bothered you with vile, disgusting person insults. I know I haven't.
The catholics, upon learning of their priest's wickedness, want to throw them out on their asses. Catholics who support their priest after knowing what he is deserve the criticism they get.
The Wright church people support their pastor because of what he peaches...open racial hatred. His character is also revealed by the NYP story. Obama went to this church for 20 years and Wright preached the same racial hatred for 20 years. Obama supported hs pastor knowing what he is.
Obama deserves the criticsm he is getting.
But, it's beside the point. He's a part of the dog and pony show designed to distract from the important issues of the day.
You refuse to allow the same amount of fairness for Obama that you dispense to Catholics.
The difference you aren't capable of grasping is that one is a crime, committed in private, and settled out of public view, while Wright's racism is played out publicly, in the pulpit and the media - at his request.
I find you the hypocrite; decrying the Youtube string, while ignoring Wright's unedited, live media hate blitz last week.
If the blacks Wright preached to were Illegals, complete with a Mexican Mariachi Band as a chorus, you'd still be the old robin.
None of that has anything to do with the comparison that was asked of you.
The thread you posted was not about what Wright believed or spoke about. It was about a rumor that he had stolen another man's wife.
If it is wrong to blame Catholics for the wrong some of their priests did, then it is wrong to blame Wright's congregation for the wrong that Wright did.
It's that simple.
"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The point missing in the LOGIC, is that the Priest wasn't preaching pedophilia (sp), nor was same priest asked to marry and baptize the children in the name of a pedophilia theology.. ANDDD... asked to be an advisor........ANDDDDD promoted on a candidates website .
This is a test to see how much utter crap people will swallow..
Are these small details or not? Wright is Obama's millstone.. and furthermore, it's been known for over a year.. but he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO?
Answer that, and you can see the puppet strings here.
If it is wrong to blame Catholics for the wrong some of their priests did, then it is wrong to blame Wright's congregation for the wrong that Wright did.
Apples and oranges.
Peppa said it better than I can:
The point missing in the LOGIC, is that the Priest wasn't preaching pedophilia (sp), nor was same priest asked to marry and baptize the children in the name of a pedophilia theology.. ANDDD... asked to be an advisor........ANDDDDD promoted on a candidates website .
This is a test to see how much utter crap people will swallow..
Are these small details or not? Wright is Obama's millstone.. and furthermore, it's been known for over a year.. but he was 'placed' into frontrunner status, early by WHO?
Answer that, and you can see the puppet strings here.
frickenfrackendirtyrotten..................
Peppa posted on 2008-05-04 16:14:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit
I still stand by my statement; most Os have yet to put together a rational argument for his candidacy, save white guilt.
My friend, the rationale has been provided to you, more than once: the alternatives to Dr. O are Hillary or McCain.
If you (and it's a generic 'you') insist on being so intellectually lazy or derelict as to being unable or unwilling to see any difference between the three of then, that's the way you see things or rather imagine them and it's not worth trying to correct your views. I shall point out to you that even Dr. Paul saw a difference between the 3 and expressed a preference for Dr. Obama but you all showed extreme obtuseness, dogmatism, lack of imagination and an inablity to accept facts on a recent thread discussing that topic.
Some of you or rather all of you (still that generic 'you') keep throwing the "there's not one dime worth of difference between the three", to which I reply: remove the dogmatic blinders and look around. Yes, Dr. O is a bit of a socialist because he is a democrat but, remember, presidents don't get to appropriate one dollar, it's the congress that appropriates funds and there will be no socialism unless the congress funds it. However, presidents do have the power to bring our troops back home and avoid wasting trillions on ruinous military adventuresd and it is likely that Dr. O would ease our foreign wars burden if elected president.
So, help save America. Get Obama in the WH so we don't get Hillary or McCain. There's trillions of dollars worth of difference between them. And, if you are concerned about socialist spending, help elect fiscally conservative reps and senators.