[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Its time to have a discussion about how black people are destroying Carnival Cruise Line Biden's Campaign Announces $50M Media Blitz In Battleground States Amid Health Questions Paul Joseph Watson Putin Responds to Trump Wanting to End the War in Ukraine! | Buddy Brown Candace Owens Talks on Israel Five Basic Holocaust Facts, Falkland tensions explode as Argentina 'rejects illegal British action' in the Islands Democrats Pull Plug on Joe Biden After Horrible Interview NYC tosses requirement to treat babies aborted at 24 weeks as 'human remains' for burial, cremation A Gang More Dangerous Than MS-13 Is Coming Into America [VIDEO] Bette Midler Suggests Biden Arrest Republicans, Allow FBI to Use Deadly Force to Regain Democrat House Majority Balcony with single mattress listed for nearly $1K a month Bidenomics: 27% of Americans Say They Skip Meals Due to Rising Cost of Food Moderate Pezeshkian wins Iran presidential election | REUTERS Israeli Generals, Low on Munitions, Want a Truce in Gaza An Israeli air base is a source of GPS spoofing attacks, researchers say. Etna volcano in Sicily has huge eruption! Stromboli volcano on Eolian Islands has red alert issued Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano Is Found Guilty of Schism and Is Excommunicated by Pope Francis Poll: Donald Trump Leads Kamala Harris By More than He Leads Joe Biden TREASON: Biden administration has been secretly flying previously deported migrants back into the U.S. Map of All Food Processing Plants That Have Burned Down, Blown Up or Been Destroyed Under Biden Report: Longtime Friends Of Biden Disturbed, Shocked He Didnt Remember Their Names New York City Giving Taxpayer-Funded Debit Cards To Over 7,000 Migrants Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker Opens More Migrant Shelters in Chicago Ahead of Democrat National Convention CNN doctor urges neurological testing for Biden Nashville Trans Shooter Left Over 100 GB Of Evidence, All To Be Kept Secret Who Turned Off The Gaslight? Head Of Chase Bank Warns Customers: Era Of Free Checking Is Likely Over Bob Dylan - Hurricane [Scotty mar10] Replacing Biden Won't Solve Democrats' Problems - Look Who Will Inherit His Campaign War Chest

All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: Attention 4um Members
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://none
Published: May 4, 2008
Author: me
Post Date: 2008-05-04 22:40:24 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 19187
Comments: 655

I have to be honest, I'm completely distressed at what's happened to this forum. The fighting and the distrust between those for and those against Obama has gotten to the point where, in my opinion, it's destroying the forum. What's the point of having an open free speech venue when everyone is bozo'ing everyone else?

When I read my mission statement and what Freedom4um was created to be, I don't even recognize the place anymore. There will be changes made in the near future as I decide what is best for the continued growth of this forum.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

If Christine wants to make the bozos expire after a while, that should be fine ..

That's sounds like a good way to handle it actually.

.

...  posted on  2008-05-06   16:30:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And the weather is quite nice here. About 65 degrees and quite sunny most of today thank you very much

Lord, break out the shawl....brrr...70s here in central Pennsylvania, USA.

Hey, here's a hypothetical for you, and any other O who hasn't got me on bozo:

Would Iran welcome a newly elected President Obama with a nuclear enrichment freeze or - more likely - by testing him by moving identifiable Iranian militia units into Basra province on a large scale?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-06   16:40:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why do you care about what Iran is doing anyway? I am looking at the map and Iran is nowhere near our borders. Do you see Iran anywhere near our borders?

On the other hand, the following nuclear powers are at or close to Iran's borders: Russia, Israel, China, Pakistan. And, right over the horizon: India, France, England.

Did I miss any?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-06   16:44:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

But it's Obama's declared willingness to engage in "aggressive personal diplomacy" with the Iranian leadership that has generated the most interest among senior officials in Tehran, since this would mark a sea-change in Washington's approach. "Obama is a man of engagement, a man of negotiations," one Iranian official told TIME. Amir Mohebbian, an analyst close to Iranian conservative politicians, argues that "the mentality of Iranian decision makers is ready for that." He adds: "I think that the coming of Obama — maybe, maybe — helps to solve this problem, but it needs bravery, from both sides."

How Iran Sees the US Primaries.

Sounds like they'd like to negotiate.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-06   16:44:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And I see it mostly from the democrats and Obamaphiles who've come out of the woodwork and retired to their true roosts.

I hear you IndieTX, we're in a very confusing time. It's apparent this forum has a hard political left, right and an agnostic/libertarian. RPs platform was the glue that kept us together. With him gone it's mind blowing to me some can opt for a socialist, but it is what it is. As long as we can have it out in the arena of ideas and keep the argument somewhat civil, we'll have the only forum on the net that allows and encourages heated debate. I just hope the left doesn't flee when their tails get scorched :)

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-06   16:54:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Certainly could be done but that's a software change, of course. It's a good idea.

alright, let's go ahead and do that. that takes care of bozos left by a member who has long left 4um, so i think that's a very good solution.

christine  posted on  2008-05-06   16:54:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Why do you care about what Iran is doing anyway? I am looking at the map and Iran is nowhere near our borders.

I care b/c Obama and McLame are internationalists. McLame loves war, and while Obama is a novice he has surrounded himself with a stable of war horses. He also plans on redeploying troops from Iraq, where we got our asses kicked, to Afghanistan, where we will get our asses kicked. So to answer your question why I care about Iran, it's b/c whether inadvertently, or by design, Iran, with it's neighbors all beat to shit, will be the big boy on the block.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-06   16:59:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Iran, with it's neighbors all beat to shit, will be the big boy on the block.

Which makes it all the more desirable to negotiate with her.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-06   17:01:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's quite possible.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-06   17:02:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A lot of time on your hands, I see.

Actually, yes. But looking that up didn't take much time. I just wouldn't want some unsuspecting person getting a fine or worse believing he had a valid legal argument which would hold up in court.

nolu_chan  posted on  2008-05-06   17:14:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Wait a damn minute here. FOH spams this forum incessantly. I portrayed him the way I see it. If he was "clearly only being sarcastic", it escaped my discernment.

Three dots is also a distruptor in my eyes, but certainly not as blatant.

If you have a point of view to share, calling me an idiot is not the most effective way to have a person view your input.

You're not the only one getting peeved here. And if you bothered to read a few of my posts, you would know beyond a doubt that your insinuation that I'm a democrat or Obamaphile is false.

angle  posted on  2008-05-06   17:24:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

ran, with it's neighbors all beat to shit, will be the big boy on the block.

Some of Iran's neighbors include: Russia, China, Israel, Pakistan. None of them was beat yet and some of them are getting stronger rather than weaker. I don't think even internationalists need to worry much about what's going on half a world away.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-06   17:37:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

With him gone it's mind blowing to me some can opt for a socialist, but it is what it is

Same here, but it's equally mind boggling to me how some former Ron Paul supporters could back a warmongering tool of the neocons like McCain.

I guess it's because there are lots of single issue voters around (Iraq/Iran for supporters of Obama, R2KBA or lower taxes for McCain). I refuse to vote for somebody who promises a little less of a warfare state abroad in exchange for a bigger welfare state at home, just as I'd never go for more wars abroad in exchange for a (slightly) smaller welfare state at home.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-05-06   17:54:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

how some former Ron Paul supporters could back a warmongering tool of the neocons like McCain.

Who?

angle  posted on  2008-05-06   18:09:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

A few popped up on the "Open letter to Obamaphobes" thread that vast started. I guess they aren't as vocal as the pro-Obama people.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-05-06   18:20:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Thank you. I'll check it out.

angle  posted on  2008-05-06   18:41:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hey, here's a hypothetical for you

Would Iran welcome a newly elected President Obama with a nuclear enrichment freeze or - more likely - by testing him by moving identifiable Iranian militia units into Basra province on a large scale?

Ummm.... that's not a hypothetical question. A hypothetical question usually presents some abstract circumstances and then asks what you would do in such a situation, not what someone else would do.

What you ask is more of a theoretical question, and in theory, Iran would not change their nuke program plans no matter who was elected. In theory, neither Iranian hardliners that want a confrontation with the west nor the Iranians that want peace would change their tune.

Pinguinite  posted on  2008-05-06   18:57:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

career politicians.

C'mon, like Obie isn't?

swarthyguy  posted on  2008-05-06   19:13:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Nope, still three...MUD

Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States,
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2008-05-06   19:51:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Nope, still three...MUD

I'm not going to tell you how I know what your bozo count is, but I'm surprised at this lack you integrity from even someone like you.

Mud, you are a bald faced liar. And I will remember this in all further dealings. Go check your bozo count and come back and tell me that it is less than three. I want to confirm that you are as dishonest as you seem here.

.

...  posted on  2008-05-06   20:08:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Nope. three it is, TripleDot.

Devolve Power Outta the Federal Leviathan and Back to the States,
Localities, and Individuals as Prescribed in the U.S. Constitution!!

Mudboy Slim  posted on  2008-05-07   7:40:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Thank you all for your comments.

Mr. aristeides,

While it's true that American gun ownership has served the nation well as a deterrent to foreign invasion (the Japanese considered and rejected the idea because of the 2nd amendment), a quick scan of gun and trade publications and websites will reveal that sadly, the majority of the writers and contributors are using the flag as a blindfold. And, too many accept govt propaganda (as relayed by the official stenos at FOX) at face value and many still believe (or refuse to admit error and admit otherwise) that we are keeping America safe by committing war crimes against other nations and people.

The fact that we have a 2nd amendment right does not mean that we are still morally entitled to it.

America is not the beacon of liberty we were taught to believe in as children, and through a slow but effective process (like water eroding granite) we have been fenced in and corrupted to conditions of intellectual bankruptcy and moral compromise.

Because there is no historical precedent (the conquering of a truly free nation with psychological manipulation instead of cannon fire, and control of everything we see, read and hear (and we on the net can certainly hear footsteps) instead of concentration camps, it remains to be seen if the enemies of liberty can succeed.

It is my belief that folks in other places who lost their freedoms long before us who scoff and attempt to shame and humiliate us are silent co-conspirators, and they cannot claim the moral high ground in their hope that the flame of liberty will be extinguished once and for all.

Some would rather see America fall than to witness it's salvation by gun owners.

But, with all of our problems, we'll never be ashamed to look those cowards in the eye.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-07   18:36:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It is my belief that folks in other places who lost their freedoms long before us who scoff and attempt to shame and humiliate us are silent co-conspirators

That's a keeper, Dawg.

Wicked laws cannot be administered impartially - and that is exactly what gun control is: wicked. When a politician or anybody else supports gun control, it is good cause to be afraid of them because they probably have something else up their sleeve. If politicians aren't doing things to law-abiding citizens they shouldn't be, they have no reason in the world to be afraid of them.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-07   19:13:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It wasn't to long ago that the British police didn't even carry guns.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-05-07   19:21:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It also wasn't long ago that Britain was a homogeneous nation. The birth nation of 'Free Trade' is now a multicultural wasteland. What Hitler couldn't destroy will bombings and blockades, will be taken down by from within by unfettered immigration.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-07   19:26:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The hordes came after all.

buckeye  posted on  2008-05-07   19:28:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Yep. They were invited, as they are here. The PTB have taken the principle of forced school busing and applied it to nations.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-07   19:34:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's no wonder they didn't want the John Birch society talking about Jewish influence.

buckeye  posted on  2008-05-07   19:36:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Some would rather see America fall than to witness it's salvation by gun owners.

Outstanding post Dawg.

I see gun-grabbers this way. They want us to forsake a right given to mankind. The right to self-defense.

It's not theirs to take.

Peppa  posted on  2008-05-07   19:55:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The seminal gun grabbers are mainly intending to disarm the holdovers from the culture they've already obliterated in other ways.

buckeye  posted on  2008-05-07   19:57:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

The seminal gun grabbers are mainly intending to disarm the holdovers from the culture they've already obliterated in other ways.

And we know where this leads.

Peppa  posted on  2008-05-07   20:22:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

So far it's just been the tragic deaths of innocents, such as Mrs. Weaver and her son.

buckeye  posted on  2008-05-07   20:27:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

If politicians aren't doing things to law-abiding citizens they shouldn't be, they have no reason in the world to be afraid of them.

And, there it is.

I have nothing to add to that.

Thanks, JT.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-08   4:25:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I see gun-grabbers this way. They want us to forsake a right given to mankind. The right to self-defense.

It's not theirs to take.

Roger that.

And to their cowardly collaborators I say, "It's not your right to forfeit for the rest of us".

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-08   4:27:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It wasn't to long ago that the British police didn't even carry guns.

That's right. They now know that they're about 20 years behind us, as their former colonials riot and murder police and civilians alike as immigrant syndicates cultivate sophisticated networks that traffic in illegal weapons, mainly from former Warsaw Pact countries. (The eastern bloc also had strict gun laws and they have millions of illegal weapons for sale to prove it.)

But, even when things were supposedly rosy in the UK they led the world in home invasions against homeowners who were known to be unarmed, (It's against the law to resist robberies or even sexual assaults, lest Brits think they have rights that govt and criminals are bound to respect like we, their missing link American cousins) and maiming with beer mugs kept re-constructive (plastic) surgeons in great demand then, and even forced a change to "less dangerous" beer mugs used in pubs. So, Brits were "more civilized" because their barroom brawlers blinded their weaker and less violent victims and left them resembling The Elephant Man, and the perps many of who are practiced in the art of destroying lives were secure in the knowledge that they wouldn't be shot for their trouble, and that they, the hairy knuckled goons ruled that country.

And, in England the frustration of living under oppressive govt manifested in the form of the pathologically violent, British soccer fan. Where else in the world do whites riot for no good reason and in general "ape" the behavior of those "hot-blooded other people"?

The effect of stripping Brits of their natural right to defense of life and property is, they're responding the way "equal" animals in over crowded cages do.

Welcome to ANIMAL FARM, where some are more equal than others.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-08   5:18:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

It's against the law to resist robberies or even sexual assaults

I don't believe that.

Maybe against the law to own a gun and shoot them.

But a lady being raped doesn't have to just sit there and say dammit I can't resist it's against the law.

Old Friend  posted on  2008-05-08   6:55:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't believe that.

Maybe against the law to own a gun and shoot them.

But a lady being raped doesn't have to just sit there and say dammit I can't resist it's against the law.

"Here are the basic rules for self-defense in Britain:

You are permitted to protect yourself with a briefcase, a handbag, or keys. You should shout “Call the Police” rather than “Help.” Bystanders are not to help. They have been taught to leave such matters to the professionals. If you manage to knock your attacker down, you must not hit him again or you risk being charged with assault.

A homeowner who discovered two robbers in his home held them with a toy gun while he telephoned the police. When the police arrived they arrested the two men, and also the homeowner, who was charged with putting someone in fear with a toy gun. An elderly woman who scared off a gang of youths by firing a cap pistol was charged with the same offense.

How did it come to this? How were the British lulled into giving up what Americans regard as an essential right? The Cato Institute identifies these steps in the process:

* 1920: Law introduced requiring certification every 3 years of necessity of owning a gun * 1937: “Necessity” redefined to discourage home or personal protection * 1953: Prevention of Crime Act passed - outlaws carrying any article for an “offensive purpose.” * 1964: “Necessity” redefined to exclude home or personal protection * 1967: Criminal law revised to allow only “reasonable” force in self-defense. Protection of property is considered unreasonable."

http://geoff82.wordpress.com/2006/11/27/the-right-to-self-defense/

You may not intimidate criminals with replica firearms, and there are cases where homeowners/victims of violence have been prosecuted for prevailing over their attackers.

Because weapons are the only reasonable way for all women (who should be guaranteed equal treatment and therefore equal protection under the law-the law cannot favor muscular Amazons with martial arts training) to resist attackers, it is clear that the rights of criminals have been elevated over the rights of victims in the UK.

Please do a little research before you post so that in the future you'll understand the difference between believing something is true, and knowing something is true.

Or, if you wish for me to educate you, then ask politely instead of issuing a surly challenge.

Bullies deserve no courtesy, and your ignorance is not my fault.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-08   8:16:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

And to their cowardly collaborators I say, "It's not your right to forfeit for the rest of us".

That's it right there! !!!!

Peppa  posted on  2008-05-08   9:58:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Hate to say this, but the last time a depression hit, government nannyism when into hyperdrive.

That's right. And this time will be no exception.

ratcat  posted on  2008-05-09   0:41:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

#347. To: Mudboy Slim (#341)

Nope...three bozos total...MUD You're a liar here. I know five who have you on Bozo and I know there are more.

.

... posted on 2008-05-05 17:07:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply Edit

Triple Dots:

How do you know how many bozo's -MUD- has?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-12   8:29:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  

Comments (609 - 655) not displayed.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]