[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: McCain courts right wing McCain courts right wing By Alexander Bolton Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) will launch a new push Tuesday to ingratiate himself with social conservatives who mistrust him but whose support is vital to his hopes of winning the White House. Right-wing leaders, who know he needs their backing, are working on a list of demands to pin him down on choosing judges with a conservative philosophy. The two sides are engaged in a minuet that will determine the shape of this year’s Republican presidential platform. Seeking to overcome the right’s persistent mistrust, McCain will speak Tuesday on the importance of nominating conservative jurists to the federal courts, including the Supreme Court. Along with abortion, this is one of the few areas where the candidate agrees with leading social conservatives. These leaders are coalescing around the idea that the GOP should pledge in its official platform that the president should nominate only judges with clear conservative records. This demand is a response to President Bush’s Supreme Court nomination of former White House counsel Harriet Miers, a loyalist with scant experience of constitutional jurisprudence. Conservative opposition derailed her nomination. Conservative leaders also want the party to embrace language that would instruct Senate leaders to make the confirmation of nominees a higher priority. Conservatives say Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) must press Democrats harder to confirm several controversial nominees, such as D.C. Circuit Court nominee Peter Keisler and 4th Circuit Court nominee Robert Conrad Jr. Manuel Miranda, a former aide to ex-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), circulated a draft Monday of principles for the GOP platform committee to consider. Several conservative leaders quickly endorsed it. Paul Weyrich, chairman of the conservative Free Congress Foundation, said he supports including the language on judicial nominees in the party platform. “I think the more we particularize that whole issue, the more people focus on the topic,” Weyrich said. Making detailed guidelines on judicial nominees part of the platform would also help social conservatives hold McCain to account if he is elected president. “You can compare what the party says with any subsequent action by its nominees,” said Weyrich. The proposed language differs from what Republicans adopted at their 2004 convention in important ways. The 2004 platform mostly listed conservatives’ grievances with the decisions of liberal judges, such as a federal court ruling that barred reference to God in the Pledge of Allegiance. The new language instead offers guidelines for the next president to follow in selecting nominees. Conservatives want to avoid nominees, such as Miers, who do not have an extensive conservative record. The guidelines also put greater pressure on Senate Republican leaders to treat confirmation of conservative nominees as a matter of urgency. “Whether in the leadership of the majority or minority, Senate leadership must press for floor time debate and votes, and give judicial nominations their proper due,” a draft of the proposed platform language states. Conservative activists believe the time is right to press McCain and other party leaders. Although McCain became the party’s unofficial but certain candidate when former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney dropped out of the presidential race on Feb. 7, many conservatives have yet to rally to his campaign. McCain won only 73 percent of the vote in Pennsylvania’s Republican primary despite widespread recognition he will serve as the party’s nominee. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, a darling among social conservatives, won 11 percent of the vote even though he withdrew from the race in March. McCain has problems with socially conservative Republicans in other pivotal states. Prominent social conservatives say McCain would lose Ohio if the vote were held now. “He’s still got a long way to go,” said Phil Burress, chairman of Citizens for Community Values Action, an Ohio-based public policy group founded on Judeo-Christian principles. “He’s lost Ohio right now and he’s not going to win the election without Ohio.” Conservative leaders say judicial nominees offer one of the few issues on which McCain can rally their support. “It’s one of the most important things for him to talk about,” said Mort Blackwell, a conservative leader and Republican national committeeman. “I once had a group of 25 leaders of conservative organizations in a room. I asked how many of them felt that they would be adversely affected by a left-wing judiciary and every hand shot up. “Conservatives are aware of the importance of having constitutionalist, original-intent judges appointed. It’s prudent and wise for McCain to stress.” McCain will deliver his speech at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C.; the state will host its primary the same day. By addressing the importance of nominating conservative, strict-constructionist judges to the courts, McCain may hope to rally social conservatives and win a higher percentage of the vote than he did in Pennsylvania. Republican National Committee officials have invited social conservative leaders based in and around Washington, D.C., to attend a meeting Tuesday morning where former Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) will give them a preview of McCain’s remarks. “That is the one issue where conservatives could hold their nose and get behind his candidacy,” said Connie Mackey, vice president of Family Research Council Action Fund, a group that advocates Christian values. “It is the main issue upon which conservatives rally for McCain.” Conservatives still hold grudges against McCain for several slights. Burress cited McCain’s support of embryonic stem cell research and campaign finance legislation, as well as his opposition to a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. They are also upset over his role in the bipartisan Gang of 14 senators who struck a deal in 2005 that was seen on the right to preserve Democrats’ power to filibuster judicial nominees.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: aristeides (#0)
Bush promised the same thing. And who was his first pick for a "strict constructionist" and "constitutionalist" judge? His family pal Harriet Meyers. Mad Mac is the sort of politician who'll promise to overturn Roe v. Wade when talking to a Fundamentalist Christian audience, and the next day go out and say how he's a RvW supporter when trying to win crossover Democrat voters.
LOL!! One can make all the demands they want of such puppets; but, the stark reality of the situation is that one will probably not even be in competition with the puppeteers who will certainly burn any puppet that does not perform as directed by them.
You know how you can tell a politician, in this case John McCain, is lying to you??
"Surrender means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy, that our youth will be trained by Northern school teachers; learn from Northern school books their version of the war; and taught to regard our gallant dead as traitors and our maimed veterans as fit subjects of derision." Gen. Patrick Cleburne, C.S.A.
Today, McCain's people say he's going to launch this effort to reconcile himself with conservatives. Yesterday, the Cinco de Mayo, he reaffirmed his support for comprehensive immigration reform.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Once a whore, always a whore.
Oh yeah, the judges thing. The last twitch in the tail of the 'conservative' dying dragon. Yeah, his coservative credentials suck, but he he says he'll appoint 'strict constitutionalists'. Any noise in support of McAnus is just more "go team." Eff the teams.
Barry Obama -- In your heart, you know he's wrong.
|
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||