See other All is Vanity Articles
Title: Three Cheers for Barak Obama! Hurrah! Hurrah! Hurrah!
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 7, 2008
Author: Arator
Post Date: 2008-05-07 19:38:37 by Arator
Keywords: Obama, Beats, BushClinton
Views: 11502
Comments: 328
He's done what no one expected or thought possible - he's driven a stake through the heart of the Clinton machine. One crime family down, one to go. Bush-family proxy and crazed neocon Armageddonist, Senator John McCain, should be easy pickens. Now, what's this I've heard about RP+Obama supporters no longer being entirely welcome by some 4um posters? Say it ain't so! ;^) Tactical differences should not divide freedom-lovers. We share the same goals. So what if we disagree on how to get there? Purist non-voters like JT and chrissy would never vote for Obama, even if their abstention results in the neo-fascist GOP remaining unpunished and in power. Others (like me), find Obama to be an acceptable instrument for unleashing destructive wrath on the contemptable GOP (and their ranks of McCainiacal neo-con apocolypse-lusters). Such disagreements shouldn't split this good forum. What unites us is far greater than what divides us, right?
Poster Comment: I love a good schismatic forum fight....only without the schism. ;^)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-109) not displayed.
.
.
.
#110. To: Old Fud (#105)
I thought so too, but commies are sneaky buggers.
Tagline space for rent.
I will. Only assholes knowingly support marxists and fascists.
Tagline space for rent.
In his defense, Obama has not lied. He's very truthful about his nation building expansionist desires. It's his supporters that cast him as an peace loving isolationist.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me. "If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
don't worry. by election time I'll find an excuse to vote for Obama.
Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
Please refrain from calling it O4um as this greatly saddens Miss Christine...=)
POJ, since Vast here, has me proudly bozo'd, could you ask him what that means?
So the assholes bought GWB's lies and now they are buying Obama's lies. From everything I can tell (this ain't my 1st rodeo), 99% of the 4umOphiles that 'supported' RP's campaign are from the Liberal/Lefty/Progressive/Socialist/Communist world utopian roots of the CFR Party...
Good point. Did any candidate other than Ron Paul oppose ethanol subsidies? With Iowa being the first caucus state, I bet they all sold out to that insanity. I support Obama not because he is perfect (he's far from it). I support Obama because he and his party are slightly more sane than McCain and the GOP. McCain (and the party who voted for him) are crazy, potentially world- nuking/freedom- extinguishing/economy-collapsing crazy. When one candidate (and party) are that crazy, even a little bit more sanity can mean the difference between the survival of mankind and eminent globe-wide apocolypse. Hence, I cannot risk voting third party this time. The stakes are just too high.
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
When you have a cancer, you cut it out or kill it; you don't try and live with it, hoping it will just go away. If you don't, it kills you. Bang-o-rama there phant2000.
That's what threads like these remind me of. LOL!
it is perfectly logical & rational to vote for Obama as you described it. I don't blame people for choosing to vote for Obama or for choosing to not vote for any of those 3.
Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
I believe McCain didn't like the ethanol subsidy. He said it while in Iowa.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I will. Only assholes knowingly support marxists and fascists. I'm up to 15 filters as of this moment, primarily because I absolutely can not will not and shall not act as though these traitors in our midst are not complete flipping assholes, but have at it... (what's really funny is the chickensh*t Establishment Lefty tools think it hurts my feelings - bwahahahaha)
thank you, FOH. ;)
Even a broken clock is right twice a day. ;^)
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
You expect someone like me, who's read your posts for approximately a decade, to believe you when you say that the CFR "Ds" are different from the CFR "Rs" ? I believe it's you ObamaCONs' intellectual dishonesty in globbing onto the most Liberal CFR stoolie ever put forth...with all of these b.s. rationales that irks me the most.
I think you are a great debater. Don't let anyone else tell you otherwise.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
My feelings are hurt cuz I used to be bozoed 3 times, and now it's only 2. I must be slacking.
Tagline space for rent.
it's not for lack of trying. we're talking 3+ yrs here too.
I vehemently disagree, Hussein Obama and the Dems who control that party have PROMISED to destroy the Second Amendment. Dismantling any portion of the Bill of Rights is absolute insanity.
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson
Don't mention it patriot babe ! :0
Christine: Spent some time the last couple nights reading about how things have changed on 4um and what you are considering for solution. My history on the net lends me to believe it is "just the season" (election season, that is). However, as a result of the foul-mouthed participants and obvious moles, I could NOT help but explain what is so evident to me (and others who are here) to those who have not arrived at the same conclusion. Ignorance is NOT bliss. If my statement can get just ONE person to commence thinking on his or her own, then I have planted a seed that may well grow.
Your a closet bushbot, yes? Xtine - see? Their countable.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
See, that's your problem. It's also generally the first thing you cranks do because by getting off into mental masturbation land, you think it diminishes the FACTS. You support a: Establishment Puppet Infanticider Gun Grabber Racist Marxist Liberal World Orderist whose campaign is steered by Zbig (might as well be Kissinger). What else is there to talk about ? All of your insulting rationalizations ? You're all a bunch of losers, liars and punks. I just point it out and mock you all...and laugh as my filter # climbs up !!!
In the last election, the Dems got smart and ran pro-2nd amendment candidates in red states...and they won. I don't think the national Dem party is gonna attempt to impose an urban ethos on rural America ever again. They know it is political suicide. They have wised up (while the GOP has dramatically dumbed down).
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
Because someone understands that only NeoComms, like your guy BHO, make NeoCons possible...that's all you have is that anyone who calls things how they really are is a partisan for the other side of the cabal's National Party. Are you REALLY this stupid ? *REALLY* ?? Y'all have embraced the curse...fools.
Bite your tongue: "To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Spin cycle!
I am sorry, but I will NEVER bozolize you. When I wrote that your a great debater I mean it. I love how everything is logical even though intransigent. One thing always leads to another - amazing! - and, overall, I found your writing to be humorous, well-thought, principled, factful and varied. That's what makes you such a great debater and such a pleasure to read. You never been a bushbot. Yes?
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
Obama hasn't wised-up considering he's never owned a firearm, shot a firearm, gone hunting, or done anything except spit on gun-owners the whole time he was an Illinois state politician. "Obama's Web site says: "He will protect the rights of hunters and other law- abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport and use guns for the purposes of hunting and target shooting" (emphasis ours). Not, apparently, for you to protect your wife and children." Source: Obama Misfires On Concealed Carry, 4/4/2008, http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp? secid=1501&status=article&id=292204370724337
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson
Spin cycle + Koolaid = one fucked up voter ;-)
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson
The Manifesto is divided into an introduction, three substantive sections, and a conclusion. The introduction begins with the notable comparison of communism to a "spectre," claiming that across Europe communism is feared, but not understood, and thus communists ought to make their views known with a manifesto: The first section, "Bourgeois and Proletarians", puts forward Marx's historical materialism, claiming that The section goes on to argue that the class struggle under capitalism is between those who own the means of production, the ruling class or bourgeoisie, and those who labor for a wage, the working class or proletariat. Though the bourgeoisie has played a progressive role in destroying feudalism, according to Marx and Engels, it has also brought about the conditions for its own impending downfall by creating a contradiction within capitalism between the forces of production and the relations of production: However: The second section, "Proletarians and Communists," starts by outlining the relationship of conscious communists to the rest of the working class: It goes on to defend communism from various objections, such as the claim that communists advocate "free love," and the claim that people will not perform labor in a communist society because they have no incentive to work. The section ends by outlining a set of short-term demands. These included, among others, the abolition of both land ownership and of the right to inheritance, a progressive income tax, universal education, centralization of the means of communication and transport under state management, and the expansion of the means of production owned by the state. The implementation of these policies, would, the authors believed, be a precursor to the stateless and classless society. One particularly controversial passage deals with this transitional period: It is this concept of the transition from socialism to communism which many critics of the Manifesto, particularly during and after the Soviet era, have highlighted. Anarchists, liberals, and conservatives have all asked how an organization such as the revolutionary state could ever (as Engels put it elsewhere) "wither away." In a related dispute, later Marxists make a separation between "socialism," a society ruled by workers, and "communism," a classless society. Engels wrote little and Marx wrote less on the specifics of the transition to communism, so the authenticity of this distinction remains a matter of dispute. According to the Communist Manifesto, all these were prior conditions for a transition from capitalism to communism (but Marx and Engels later expressed a desire to modernize this passage[5]). The third section, "Socialist and Communist Literature," distinguishes communism from other socialist doctrines prevalent at the time the Manifesto was written. While the harshness of Marx's and Engels' attacks varies, and their debt to "utopian socialists" such as Fourier, Proudhon, and Owen is acknowledged[citation needed], all rival views are eventually dismissed for advocating reformism and failing to recognize the key role of the working class. Partly because of Marx's critique, most of the specific ideologies described in this section became politically negligible by the end of the nineteenth century. The concluding section, "Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Existing Opposition Parties," briefly discusses the communist position on struggles in specific countries in the mid-nineteenth century. It then ends with a call to action: 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto According to the Communist Manifesto, all these were prior conditions for a transition from capitalism to communism (but Marx and Engels later expressed a desire to modernize this passage[5]). Please tell me which of the 10 planks you reject and why...
Yeah, my firearms are all for hunting and target shooting. /s
Spin cycle + Koolaid = one fucked up voter Obama's eliminating the Clinton was a good thing. If he succeeds in getting us out of Iraq alone, it's at least $100 billion that we don't have saved every year and maybe 10,000 young and productive workers who won't die but pay taxes instead and consume like crazy to stimulate the economy. If 'we' get out of the Middle East during your lifetime, then that was part of the plan. The CFR chose this war, they chose McHillObama and they have Globalist wars to fight as long as the people of America continue to play their stupid game. Every time I read someone saying "they're all the same" I think of unbelievable intellectual laziness, lack of imagination and curiosity and/or willing surrender to worthless cliches. Yeah, you ObamaCONs have so much intellectual power harnessed that you've fallen for an Establishment Zbig Marxist Globalist Tool...GENIUS !! Obama has many qualities, of which his best is his not being a Clinton or a freaking Bush. He is intelligent, he seems to be a gentleman and he is not evil. We should always prefer non-evil people to the evil ones. If you're approved by the CFR/Trilats, then you ARE pure evil. Your comments as such make you look stooooopidly-eeeevil...
I'll add that I believe you said you were 'kicked out of' a Marxist nation...which means you of all people should friggin know better.
I am asking because you managed to 'read' my post and then write and post your reply in 57 (FIFTY-SEVEN) seconds - look at the time of my posting and the time your reply was ready - 57 seconds later. buckeye puts you ObamaCONs to shame in the intellect, honesty and comprehension Depts...
No sale, most that I know here have been holding back for festivities should another lucky pretzel get REALLY lodged in the Chimperor's breathing passage...
Buckeye was very polite to wait 57 seconds to call BS ;-)
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson
With all the mexicons using Bush's throat for prison-style target practice it'll take a large pretzel to close up that gaping hole...
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson
I do find it fascinating how the Establishment operates as I can this time sit back and watch it all from afar...the CFR brands this year are nothing short of bald faced World Socialists and that's being conservative in my description.
Comments (151 - 328) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI thought they hated Jr. for reasons from the right.
#111. To: X-15 (#108)
I won't call anybody who contemplates voting for Hussein Obama an asshole
#112. To: Critter (#104)
So the assholes bought GWB's lies and now they are buying Obama's lies.
#113. To: Critter (#106)
Wise choice in not buying Obama's lies
#114. To: IndieTX, christine (#76)
And the CULT is taking over the 4UM. Limiting bozos isn't going to save it.
#115. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Pissed Off Janitor (#42)
Israel as our #1 ally in the ME is the current baseline. It's a statement of fact not a forward-looking statement.
#116. To: Critter (#104)
Ron Paul is fond of quoting GWB's campaign promises when he ran in 2000, and reminding us that he ran on a HUMBLE foreign policy, NO nation building, and NOT being the policeman of the world.
#117. To: Red Jones (#101)
(Edited)
Here's my latest thought that to me is key on Obama. He supports the ethanol subsidies and he supports their expansion as well. The ethanol subsidies are nothing but evil. Richard posted a story about them just a couple of days ago. The ethanol subsidies are going to kill tens of millions of people and that is obvious to anyone who looks carefully at them. As obama supports them, I don't see how I can vote for him.
#118. To: Phant2000 (#85)
And the CULT is taking over the 4UM. Limiting bozos isn't going to save it.
#119. To: Critter (#99)
In the background, he'd always play a parody of a hospital pa system announcement, "Dr. Camerada, please report to surgery, people are puking..."
#120. To: Arator (#117)
#121. To: Arator (#117)
#122. To: Critter (#111)
I won't call anybody who contemplates voting for Hussein Obama an asshole
#123. To: FOH (#114)
#124. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#121)
I believe McCain didn't like the ethanol subsidy. He said it while in Iowa.
#125. To: Arator (#117)
I support Obama because he and his party are slightly more sane than McCain and the GOP.
#126. To: FOH (#122)
#127. To: FOH (#122)
#128. To: X-15 (#108)
I genuinely feel sorry for them because Freedom4um has failed
#129. To: Arator (#117)
I support Obama because he and his party are slightly more sane than McCain and the GOP.
#130. To: christine (#123)
thank you, FOH. ;)
#131. To: christine (#96)
(Edited)
#132. To: X-15, Christine (#129)
I vehemently disagree, Hussein Obama and the Dems who control that party have PROMISED
#133. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#126)
I think you are a great debater. Don't let anyone else tell you otherwise.
#134. To: X-15 (#129)
(Edited)
I vehemently disagree, Hussein Obama and the Dems who control that party have PROMISED to destroy the Second Amendment. Dismantling any portion of the Bill of Rights is absolute insanity.
#135. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#132)
Your a closet bushbot, yes?
#136. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#132)
Your a closet bushbot, yes?
#137. To: Arator (#134)
. I don't think the national Dem party is gonna attempt to impose an urban ethos on rural America ever again. They know it is political suicide. They have wised up
#138. To: FOH (#133)
#139. To: Arator (#134)
In the last election, the Dems got smart and ran pro-2nd amendment candidates in red states...and they won. I don't think the national Dem party is gonna attempt to impose an urban ethos on rural America ever again. They know it is political suicide. They have wised up (while the GOP has dramatically dumbed down).
#140. To: Peppa (#137)
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Spin cycle!
#141. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#138)
Contents
Preamble
I. Bourgeois and Proletarians
II. Proletarians and Communists
10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto
III. Socialist and Communist Literature
IV. Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Existing Opposition Parties
#142. To: X-15 (#139)
"Obama's Web site says: "He will protect the rights of hunters and other law- abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport and use guns for the purposes of hunting and target shooting" (emphasis ours).
#143. To: X-15, Peppa (#140)
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Spin cycle!
#144. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)
#145. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#8)
#146. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#12)
Did you even READ what I wrote before replying to it? Did you THINK about about what I wrote? Have you MEDITATED and ANALYZED the deep wisdom emanating from my writing.
#147. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#22)
It would be interesting to count how many of the current Obamophobes continue to be Bushbots at heart.
#148. To: FOH, buckeye (#146)
#149. To: FOH (#147)
#150. To: TwentyTwelve (#32)
Obama, Clinton, and McCain are all part of the same agenda.
.
.
.