[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Methylene Blue Benefits

Another Mossad War Crime

80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina

When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform

The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class

Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks

Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files

In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed

Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln

Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks

Digital Prison in the Making?

In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine

Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station

Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA

6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history

First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet

I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA

Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike

I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣

Jimmy Dore: What’s Being Said On Israeli TV Will BLOW YOUR MIND!

Tucker Carlson: Douglas Macgregor- Elites will be overthrown

🎵Breakin' rocks in the hot sun!🎵

Musk & Andreessen Predict A Robot Revolution


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: I’m beginning to think McCain will be less dangerous to my freedom than Obama
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 8, 2008
Author: Me
Post Date: 2008-05-08 07:57:19 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 7381
Comments: 195

As a realist I know either McCain or Obama will be the next president, and although I won’t be voting, I’m coming to the conclusion that McCain will be less of a train wreck to my personal freedom than Obama.

Obama, like McCain, offers endless war, so their foreign policy is a draw. In fact I give points to McCain for his honest 100 year comment. Obama’s nutty obsession to hunt down al Qaeda, a creation of the US government, was all I needed to know about his foreign policy. His speech to AIPAC was the cap stone.

On the domestic front, both are awful, but Obama is much worse on guns. His dalliance with Black Theology is equally bad news. One look at the over animated Jeremiah Wright should be enough to convince white America that an influence like him will bring us additional layers of affirmative action, political correctness and slavery reparations. And did I mention Michelle Obama? She reeks of nasty and racism. The only plus Obama would bring is a potential white backlash, which is long over due.

There's lots more, but this is a starting point.

Let the discussion begin.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#22. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

There's lots more, but this is a starting point.

It's not a starting point for me. This thread is beyond disgusting.

angle  posted on  2008-05-08   8:33:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: angle (#22)

Sorry....

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-08   8:36:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Jethro Tull (#24)

Tell me what's your point. This is entertainment for you? Are you then a McCain supporter? Why post a thread of this nature? Is this productive? Talk about driving the wedge in deeper...this furthers a rift that will never be healed.

Just for my edification without rhetoric or bluster please tell me, what's your intent?

angle  posted on  2008-05-08   8:41:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: angle (#25)

My intent is to use my 1st Amendment right to express my thoughts. Nothing more.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-08   8:46:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Jethro Tull (#26)

I'm not disputing your rights. I'm questioning your intentions. So then, you are affirming your support for McCain?

angle  posted on  2008-05-08   8:48:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: angle (#28)

Support? I'm not voting. What I said is that the selection is out of my hands and IMO, McCain will be less destructive to my personal freedom than Obama would be.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-08   8:52:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Jethro Tull (#30) (Edited)

Now, you're again circling around the Ping's dilemma of personal comfort vs. the price others may be paying for it.

Remember Mad Albright's (allegedly the daughter of Hollowcast survivors or at least related to some), completely untroubled by the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi kids, stating that it was 'worth it'? Then, the Bots' bragging that the benefits of sending 150,000 Americans to kill 1,000,000 Iraqis and have 4,000 of them die in the process and maybe 50,000 crippled was that there were no significant terroristic disturbances on the homeland? That and the one trillion borrowed from commies and Arabs were found to be a worthy 'sacrifice'?

So, McCain is likely to continue the good works of Clinton/Reno/Clark/Mad Albbright/Olmert/Bush/Netanyahu. Does this trouble you at all? Or maybe it troubles you but it troubless you less?

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-08   9:00:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator, All (#31)

Sure McCain bothers me. But Obama is no different. As I've shown in this thread, all he offers is a new battlefield. How many men, and at what cost will Obama's foreign policy folly cost us?

Obama willing to invade Pakistan in al-Qaeda hunt

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-08   9:29:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#40. To: Jethro Tull (#39)

The guy said that he WOULD use force to advance OUR national interest. He also stated that he would hunt down and strike at those who were responsible for the killing of Americans on 9/11. Is this surprising?

As for Obama promising to 'invade' Pakistan... of course he never said that. He was discussing the kind of strikes are currently launched against targets in Paki and Somalia. I always suggested that the 'war on terror' would have been a lot more effective if 'we' sent out 1000 or 10,000 armed drones in the air rather than 200,000 GI's on the ground. Those things flying at 50,000 ft. would not recruit Al Queda new members like GI's patrolling the streets of Fallujah do.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-08 09:34:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]