4um: I’m beginning to think McCain will be less dangerous to my freedom than Obama

Title: I’m beginning to think McCain will be less dangerous to my freedom than Obama
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 8, 2008
Author: Me
Post Date: 2008-05-08 07:57:19 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 7756
Comments: 195

As a realist I know either McCain or Obama will be the next president, and although I won’t be voting, I’m coming to the conclusion that McCain will be less of a train wreck to my personal freedom than Obama.

Obama, like McCain, offers endless war, so their foreign policy is a draw. In fact I give points to McCain for his honest 100 year comment. Obama’s nutty obsession to hunt down al Qaeda, a creation of the US government, was all I needed to know about his foreign policy. His speech to AIPAC was the cap stone.

On the domestic front, both are awful, but Obama is much worse on guns. His dalliance with Black Theology is equally bad news. One look at the over animated Jeremiah Wright should be enough to convince white America that an influence like him will bring us additional layers of affirmative action, political correctness and slavery reparations. And did I mention Michelle Obama? She reeks of nasty and racism. The only plus Obama would bring is a potential white backlash, which is long over due.

Tell me what's your point. This is entertainment for you? Are you then a McCain supporter? Why post a thread of this nature? Is this productive? Talk about driving the wedge in deeper...this furthers a rift that will never be healed.

Just for my edification without rhetoric or bluster please tell me, what's your intent?

My intent is to use my 1st Amendment right to express my thoughts. Nothing more.

I'm not disputing your rights. I'm questioning your intentions. So then, you are affirming your support for McCain?

Support? I'm not voting. What I said is that the selection is out of my hands and IMO, McCain will be less destructive to my personal freedom than Obama would be.

Now, you're again circling around the Ping's dilemma of personal comfort vs. the price others may be paying for it.

Remember Mad Albright's (allegedly the daughter of Hollowcast survivors or at least related to some), completely untroubled by the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi kids, stating that it was 'worth it'? Then, the Bots' bragging that the benefits of sending 150,000 Americans to kill 1,000,000 Iraqis and have 4,000 of them die in the process and maybe 50,000 crippled was that there were no significant terroristic disturbances on the homeland? That and the one trillion borrowed from commies and Arabs were found to be a worthy 'sacrifice'?

So, McCain is likely to continue the good works of Clinton/Reno/Clark/Mad Albbright/Olmert/Bush/Netanyahu. Does this trouble you at all? Or maybe it troubles you but it troubless you less?

The guy said that he WOULD use force to advance OUR national interest. He also stated that he would hunt down and strike at those who were responsible for the killing of Americans on 9/11. Is this surprising?

As for Obama promising to 'invade' Pakistan... of course he never said that. He was discussing the kind of strikes are currently launched against targets in Paki and Somalia. I always suggested that the 'war on terror' would have been a lot more effective if 'we' sent out 1000 or 10,000 armed drones in the air rather than 200,000 GI's on the ground. Those things flying at 50,000 ft. would not recruit Al Queda new members like GI's patrolling the streets of Fallujah do.

Kucinich Says Clinton and Obama Continue to Vote for War Funding, They and Edwards Refuse to Oppose a Bush-Cheney Attack on Iran.

NEW YORK CITY, April 16 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Congressman and Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich is challenging his fellow candidates' votes to authorize and fund the war in Iraq, and their positions on Iran.

"Clinton, Edwards, and Obama share responsibility for wasting hundreds of billions of dollars in an unnecessary war. And the American tax payers on this day need to remember that," Kucinich charged. Hillary Clinton and John Edwards voted to authorize the war. Clinton and Barack Obama continue to vote to fund it.

At a New Hampshire town meeting yesterday, someone asked Clinton about her vote to authorize the war, and asked if she had read the intelligence reports prior to her vote. Senator Clinton is reported to have said that if she had known then what she knows now, she never would have voted to give the President the authority to go to war.

"If Senator Clinton and the others had done their job they would have known, and they would have voted correctly as I did,"declared Kucinich, who campaigned yesterday in New Hampshire and Connecticut and appeared live on CNN's night show from New York City.

"I didn't just vote against the war, I shared an in depth analysis with Members of Congress that I wrote in October 2002, after reviewing intelligence reports," Kucinich said.