[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.

Debt jumps $366B in one day.

Proof that Israel Has Lost the War: Sizable Portion of Military, Intelligence, Energy, and R&D facilities Destroyed

French police raid offices of Marine Le Pens far-right Rassemblement National


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama recovers his momentum (FINANCIAL TIMES REITERATES ENDORSEMENT OF OBAMA)
Source: Financial Times (via Euro2day)
URL Source: http://www.euro2day.gr/ftcom_en/126/articles/320902/ArticleFTen.aspx
Published: May 8, 2008
Author: Financial Times Editorial Board
Post Date: 2008-05-08 13:47:01 by aristeides
Keywords: None
Views: 250
Comments: 16

Obama recovers his momentum

This week's Democratic primaries in Indiana and North Carolina may not have been the knockout blow Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama were seeking. But both contenders are now so bloodied that it is time for the referee to stop the fight and declare the winner. By any reasonable yardstick, that is Mr Obama.

The young senator from Illinois won a thumping victory in North Carolina and held Mrs Clinton to a very small advantage in Indiana. Her recovery has now been checked, and was partly illusory anyway: even in the trough of "Bittergate" and with the Rev Jeremiah Wright around his neck like an albatross, Mr Obama was still widening his lead in delegates. He has now demonstrably recovered his élan. Mrs Clinton, by contrast, is beginning to look as though she would need about three-quarters of the remaining uncommitted super-delegates to come within hailing distance of victory. Her campaign, moreover, is running out of money and she is again having to raid her own funds to keep it alive.

From the point of view of the Democrats' prospects in November, this campaign is now getting dangerously dirty, with both sides en­trenching themselves within almost tribalised constituencies: white, working-class voters, women and the elderly for Mrs Clinton, black voters , the college-educated and the politically awakened young for Mr Obama. It is not just the animosity that is growing visibly between them and significant groups of their rival coalitions – some of whom are indicating they will not close ranks and turn out to vote for the eventual victor – that should tell the party the contest is over. Nor is it just the strident attack advertising that is building up an arsenal of ammunition for John McCain, their Republican opponent, to use.

The Clinton camp is resorting to tactics intended to delegitimise Mr Obama: casting him as merely another black candidate, who has built his lead in party caucuses rather than on clear wins in the big states the Democrats will need to carry in November. This is bogus.

Indiana, a state sociologically not unlike Pennsylvania or Ohio, was practically a dead heat. Mr Obama won by 14 points in North Carolina, a state that elected Senator Jesse Helms – an arch-conservative Republican – for 30 years until his retirement in 2002. Mr Obama is not gaming the system; he is winning.

He has been severely and usefully tested against the formidable Mrs Clinton. The super-delegates should now exercise their judgment. Mr Obama, bruised as he is, looks much the best bet. And it is high time to put Mr McCain to the test.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: aristeides, *Racist 2008* (#0)

By any reasonable yardstick, that is Mr Obama.

That's Mr. Racist, please get it right.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-08   14:12:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: aristeides (#0)

Suppose they gave an election and no one came...

Lod  posted on  2008-05-08   14:13:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: lodwick (#2)

Suppose they gave an election and no one came...

Perhaps you didn't notice how high the turnout was in Tuesday's primaries.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-08   14:16:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: aristeides (#3)

I'm not sure that will be the case for the general.

It may depend on just how dirty things get.

Lod  posted on  2008-05-08   14:23:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: aristeides (#3)

Perhaps you didn't notice how high the turnout was in Tuesday's primaries.

Yes there are a lot of racists out there.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-08   14:28:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: aristeides (#0)

Financial Times Editorial Board

The voice of the Banksters/Rothschilds/NWO has spoken.

You vill elect Oh'bummer und you vill like it.

Your masters have spoken.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-05-08   14:36:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Original_Intent (#6)

The voice of the Banksters/Rothschilds/NWO has spoken.

McCain Backed by Rothschilds -- Washington Post.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-08   14:41:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: aristeides (#7)

That may well be true AS WELL but then the Rothschilds have a history of backing both sides in a conflict. How do you think they made all that money?

The key point someone should take away from this is that ALL of the candidates that have been allowed to get to this point are firmly under control.

That McInsane has Rothschild backing should not be surprising, but that Oh'bummer is being supported by them as well should be equally unsurprising. Either way the Banksters win because they OWN All of the remaining candidates.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-05-08   14:57:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Original_Intent (#8)

I'm afraid you'll have to remind me what the connection is between the Rothschilds and the Financial Times.

To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-08   14:58:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: RickyJ (#1)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-05-08   15:33:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: lodwick (#4)

"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡

ghostdogtxn  posted on  2008-05-08   15:34:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: lodwick (#2)

Suppose they gave an election and no one came...

thats a good one.

All I can see is that Obama seems better able to get votes than Clinton. and I think the only way he can lose the nomination is if its stolen from him. The Democrats have yet to decide what they'll do about Michigan & Florida. The ruling on that issue may be done in Clinton's favor. and the super-delegates also could go in Clinton's favor. Between these 2 the nomination might be taken from him IMHO.

Revelation 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and [see] thou hurt not the oil and the wine.

Red Jones  posted on  2008-05-08   15:47:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Red Jones. the thread (#12)

I will wander in, show my gov ID, and see if there's anyway to vote for Dr.Paul, and await the voting machines results.

Were I a betting person, I'd have to go with the Oreo.

(Who's really a double-fudge.)

Lod  posted on  2008-05-08   22:01:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Original_Intent (#6)

Coincidentally, that was the stance Soros was taking on the Diane Rehm show this morning.

The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2008-05-08   22:37:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: aristeides (#9)

I'm afraid you'll have to remind me what the connection is between the Rothschilds and the Financial Times.

I did not assert one - other than the unstated obvious that the Financial Times is the voice of the UK financial elite of which the Rothschilds are the top dog. They are the pre-eminent financial power in the UK Banking industry and control directly and indirectly much of the top tier of British and American Bankster operations. They are the largest shareholder in the Federal Reserve, control the Bank of England etc., .... If a Rothschild sneezes the Financial Times reports it - if they are allowed to.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-05-09   1:25:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: DeaconBenjamin, aristeides (#14)

Coincidentally, that was the stance Soros was taking on the Diane Rehm show this morning.

Thank you. Interesting datum and validation of my analysis. Soros is connected and knows the inside.

"The difference between an honorable man and a moral man is that an honorable man regrets a discreditable act even when it has worked and he is in no danger of being caught." ~ H. L. Mencken

Original_Intent  posted on  2008-05-09   1:30:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]