[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
(s)Elections See other (s)Elections Articles Title: Michelle Obama’s Writings Display Disturbing Racism Michelle Obama’s Writings Display Disturbing Racism Americans must ask: ‘Do we really want this woman in the White House’? 32; By Pat Shannan Just what kind of “change” is Barack Obama offering and just how much influence has his wife, Michelle had over him in their married life the past two decades? It appears that Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people, eternally conflicted with one another. In her senior thesis at Princeton University, Michelle LaVaughn, the future wife of the Democratic presidential candidate, stated that America was a nation founded on “crime and hatred.” Moreover, she stated that whites in America were “ineradicably racist.” The 1985 thesis, entitled Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community, was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn. Michelle Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her “further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society, never becoming a full participant.” Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America, but emphatically elevates black over white in her world. As first lady, would she insist the White House be painted black? That’s been a standard joke in this venue since the civil rights movement of the 1960s, but this next ominous quote from her thesis suggests that she would in fact urge her husband toward just such an extreme position. “There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.” She seems to justify those feelings with what she claims to see on the other side of the issue: “Predominantly white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students, comprising the bulk of their enrollments.” Michelle added in her thesis that to “whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, [I] will always be black first.” However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, “if those ‘whites at Princeton ‘ really saw Michelle as one who always would ‘be black first,’ it seems that she gave them that impression.” Michelle Obama’s poll of black alumni concludes that other black former students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skins. “I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility,” she wrote. Most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire. Only 89 students responded, out of 400 who were asked for input. The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama’s thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. For a potential first lady, this is a very divisive view that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Hussein Obama administration. During this presidential election year in which the term “transparency” has been frequently bandied about, candidates have buried a number of potentially revealing documents and papers. In Hillary Rodham Clinton’s case, there’s been a clamoring for tax records, White House memos and other material the candidate’s team has chosen to keep from release. The 96-page, 1985 Princeton thesis, restricted from release by the school’s Mudd Library, has also been the subject of recent scrutiny. Commentator Jonah Goldberg remarked on National Review Online, “A reader in the know informs me that Michelle Obama’s thesis is unavailable until Nov. 5, 2008, at the Princeton library. I wonder why.” “Why a restricted thesis?” asked Pastor Louis Lapides on his website, Thinking Outside the Blog. “Is the concern based on what’s in the thesis? Will Michelle Obama appear to be too black for white America or not black enough for black America?” Will an Obama administration really offer constructive “change” or just an intellectually refined racism? Pat Shannan is the assistant editor of American Free Press. He has been working in the alternative news business for more than 30 years.
Poster Comment: The more you give some people.......
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 98.
#24. To: Jethro Tull (#0)
(Edited)
Rush, the sponsor of the "Barack the Magic Negro" song, was howling about the racism of Obama's wife today. So doesn't Reverent Wright scare the goobers anymore?
Are you supporting Obama?
I'll vote for him over McCain, but I'm not ape shit over the guy. But I have this crushing sense of guilt that has gnawed at me since birth. I feel that I may be free of it if I do my part in electing a coon to the office of President.
You'll "vote" for him. Same thing. This explains your anti-Constitution party posts.
Is that the one running fundie preacher loon? I'd vote Bush a third term over that guy.
Dots, you're an Obama supporter. Doesn't that embarrass you at all?
No, and you're playing a very shallow posturing game here. Doesn't that embarrass you at all? I've been very clear on why I think the way I do and nobody has given me a rational reason to think otherwise. And your gassing on about what you and the mouse in your pocket think about it is a non starter.
No worries. I really just wanted to clarify that you were an Obama supporter. Thanks.
Yes, I know. Button holing, pigeon holing and Enemies lists - and all that. And it's not just McCain. It goes all the way back to Nixon droids. Way before Freepers started snapping pictures of people. Well, when AM Radio speaks, what are you going to do? Oh, I know, you don't let AM Radio influence you, you just robotically spew the talking points ... on cue - and then shut out any contrary information. We understand, almost everyone here has spent considerable time on FR.
I guess you're not familiar with FDR's enemies list.
There are no replies to Comment # 98. End Trace Mode for Comment # 98.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||