See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Obama Backs U.N. Bill to Disarm Americans
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/?p=1992
Published: May 10, 2008
Author: FourWinds 10
Post Date: 2008-05-10 05:42:39 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3731
Comments: 195
This is just in from Sen. Coburn’s office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. No one in the media has brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here. Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM Subject: RE: Obama’s bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate Senator Coburn is blocking this bill. Patrick Guinn Obama’s bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations. The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation. The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.’s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol. http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2433.html Detailed Summary Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs. Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports. Defines specified terms. Status of the Legislation Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718. http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-on-barack-obama-s2433-global.html More on Barack Obama’s S.2433 : Global Poverty Act We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama’s bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me) The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending. "It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said. Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable." Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance." "In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning ’small arms and light weapons’ and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said. Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims. Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas. And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes. On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK) This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama’s office and the others who support this bill….No comments. See Obama’s Global Tax Bill (S.2433) Change Obama can believe in: Socialism?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 121.
#9. To: christine (#0)
(Edited)
S. 2433 (whose 15 cosponsors include 4 Republicans, Lugar, Smith, Snowe, and Hagel) would do no such thing. All that it would require the executive branch to do is to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide , between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day, and to file a report on the strategy with Congress. Everything else in the bill (which makes no mention of Kyoto, the ICC, or firearms, as far as I can see) is hortatory, without legal effect. If it were so controversial, do you think Lugar would have signed on as a cosponsor?
yeah, it's controversial, but not for the globalist treasonous anti-america establishment politicians Rs and Ds. in case i haven't stressed this to you enough, i see them as the same. it's controversial alright, for WE THE PEOPLE.
Your title says the bill is to "disarm Americans." I see nothing like that in the bill. And the fact that it has 4 Republican cosponsors confirms that there's nothing like that in it.
Really? Perhaps you can show me one gun control bill any of those four voted against.
Hagel scores A by NRA on pro-gun rights policies. You can read about Hagel's record on gun bills here: Chuck Hagel on Gun Control. That record includes: Stands to reason for a Republican senator from Nebraska.
You can read about Hagel's record on gun bills here: Chuck Hagel on Gun Control. That record includes: Stands to reason for a Republican senator from Nebraska. Nebraska is slipping into the stew quickly now but still there are enough patriots there that when push comes to shove they will kick your ass to the curb if you mess with the 'basics'...Hagel's certainly no dummy. A bright and strongly deluded quisling, yes. Dummy, no.
Gun control is pretty much 95% effective now. Next it's word control. What will Chuck Hegel do with Senate Bill 1959?
H.R. 1955...Senate version? Why, of course it is. You wascally 'domestic terrorist' you...
Another Jewish Protection Racket.
The quisling class has covered every single base possible on the way to finishing US off with North American (EU-like) integration...you will like it, shut up or be dealt with. It's the LAW !
Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration.
Paul is rather tough on immigration, and I support Ron Paul because of his core integrity as a Constitutionalist, in spite of where we disagree. I appreciate an honest candidate with courage who will stand up for the Constitution. ;-D
It's unclear. He's tougher than the top three candidates, but he steadfastly refused to admit that conservative politics, first having been infiltrated by Zionists, are now being completely undermined by the pro-immigration lobby.
We have has such dishonest and compromised presidents so long, sometimes I feel like Diogenes of Sinope who used to wander Athens when it was a city state looking for one honest man when contemplating presidential candidate. I have been hoping to see buyer's regret help the Republicans avoid the train wreck a McCain presidency would be to them. Ron Paul by far is the best choice for the top of the ticket, and if he can get on the ticket, even for the VP slot, I would support it in November.
What's intellectually vacuous on your part is to assume that there could be a significant improvement from one party to the other. They pursue the attachment of different fetters, using the rules of the Hegelian dialectic, with each swing of the political pendulum. You're a leftist tool, just like the Falwell caricatures you snub on the right.
The same can be said about any human to some degree. The observation does not bother me. I support Barack Obama essentially for two reasons, he is the only one of the three in contention who has the potential to break from any constraints others might seek to put on him, which I believe was something John Kennedy did ultimately compelling the shadow government to kill him. I also am extremely cynical about the honesty of the vote and know it has been compromised in a way to control outcome. I want to see people not give up on the democratic participation of voting because any thievery like this going on long enough is going to get decisively exposed. And an actively voting public who believes in the process is the one that will act with the right amount of rage and action to make those who steal fear for their very lives. You are free to call that wishful thinking on my part, but that is why I am participating and watching this process in this manner.
#123. To: Ferret Mike (#121)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.’s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol.
#23. To: aristeides (#9)
(whose 15 cosponsors include 4 Republicans, Lugar, Smith, Snowe, and Hagel)
#28. To: christine (#23)
#55. To: aristeides (#28)
And the fact that it has 4 Republican cosponsors confirms that there's nothing like that in it.
#59. To: orangedog (#55)
(Edited)
Rated A by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun rights voting record.
Voted NO on background checks at gun shows.
#71. To: aristeides (#59)
Hagel scores A by NRA on pro-gun rights policies.
Voted NO on background checks at gun shows.
#75. To: FOH (#71)
#78. To: buckeye (#75)
Senate Bill 1959?
#79. To: FOH (#78)
#81. To: buckeye (#79)
#82. To: FOH (#81)
#88. To: buckeye (#82)
"Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration."
#94. To: Ferret Mike (#88)
... Paul is rather tough on immigration
#106. To: buckeye (#94)
"It's unclear. He's tougher than the top three candidates, but he steadfastly refused to admit that conservative politics, first having been infiltrated by Zionists, are now being completely undermined by the pro-immigration lobby."
#110. To: Ferret Mike (#106)
I have been hoping to see buyer's regret help the Republicans avoid the train wreck a McCain presidency would be to them.
#121. To: buckeye (#110)
"You're a leftist tool, just like the Falwell caricatures you snub on the right."
Replies to Comment # 121. 
End Trace Mode for Comment # 121.