See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Obama Backs U.N. Bill to Disarm Americans
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/?p=1992
Published: May 10, 2008
Author: FourWinds 10
Post Date: 2008-05-10 05:42:39 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3750
Comments: 195
This is just in from Sen. Coburn’s office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. No one in the media has brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here. Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM Subject: RE: Obama’s bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate Senator Coburn is blocking this bill. Patrick Guinn Obama’s bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations. The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation. The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.’s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol. http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2433.html Detailed Summary Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs. Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports. Defines specified terms. Status of the Legislation Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718. http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-on-barack-obama-s2433-global.html More on Barack Obama’s S.2433 : Global Poverty Act We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama’s bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me) The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending. "It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said. Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable." Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance." "In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning ’small arms and light weapons’ and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said. Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims. Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas. And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes. On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK) This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama’s office and the others who support this bill….No comments. See Obama’s Global Tax Bill (S.2433) Change Obama can believe in: Socialism?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-108) not displayed.
.
.
.
#109. To: aristeides (#37)
IIRC, as I note below, there is every reason to be scared or concerned. The USSC looks at bills and the underlying paperwork when they prepare to rule on cases--they look for the 'intent' of the congresscowards when they pass legislation. Surely, someone who went thru law school and taught law read something of this when they studied about the USSC.......surely, they did do that, didn't they? BY putting all the bullshit in about the united nations, it allows the USSC to interpret that we go along with these bastards and their desire to eliminate weapons in the hands of the peons so they can stick their hands deeper and deeper into the pockets of said peons. And as to that USSC, I can't recall the exact words your candidate used as it regards selecting them, but it was to the effect that he wanted ones who know what it was like to be on the short end of the stick, so to speak. I do believe there will be at least two retirees...Stevens and Ginsberg, and a possible Kennedy, which would tilt the court in a new direction probably. Besides, you can't even count on the alleged 'conservative' ones, or should I say the "R" ones--can't really do that cause they're all over the place, too. As an aside--the comment regarding 4 Rs signing the legislation.........BFD. Lugar is an internationalist--he could give a rats' patootie about the united states. Snow is a NE liberal. Hagel is all over the place. And Smith--I presume is Gordon, and if so, nuff said.
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
What's intellectually vacuous on your part is to assume that there could be a significant improvement from one party to the other. They pursue the attachment of different fetters, using the rules of the Hegelian dialectic, with each swing of the political pendulum. You're a leftist tool, just like the Falwell caricatures you snub on the right.
There have been articles describing the preparations for such. And if the miliary balks, as with NKorea, they will shrink belt sizes.
We're running out of time. I'm assuming you can think for yourself, and that eventually you'll realize that by 1994, the Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto's "blades of grass" were decayed tinder, and the patriot movement was a hollowed out FBI operation. The last frontier is freedom of speech. But we've always known that.
And if the miliary balks, as with NKorea, they will need shrink belt sizes. Yup, and so far it's all been on their terms...but they've gotten all their ducks in a row for when/if enough Americans wake up. It's a race right now and not a marathon but a sprint. The long revolution's end is in sight for them...lots of US see it too.
Is that the Law of the Sea Treaty? They've been pushing that since the Carter Administration, haven't they?
The U.S. Constitution is no impediment to our form of government.--PJ O'Rourke
Once again, brilliant spot on post.
Yes, exceptional.
Is that the Law of the Sea Treaty? They've been pushing that since the Carter Administration, haven't they? You are correct. Lugar's been the 'mover' on this along with his reptilian colleagues: Richard G. Lugar, United States Senator for Indiana - U.S. ... I believe they currently profit from the status quo, where victimology is the weapon to silence protest. When they cease to profit, and that time will come, they are as expendable as anyone. The ends justifies the means sort of 'law'. Often accusing others of being unenlightened, they are well aware of history, and can see where this is leading, yet, they cheer it on. Happy little bat- bearing bastards.
I respectfully disagree. The NRA doesn't give a tinkers damn about the militia or the possibility that we will have to fight our own government one day soon just so we can restore what has been stolen from us. All they care about is "sporting firearms", and feathering their own nest, and protecting their precious perks. Fuck the NRA. Fuck them. The way I see it, if 1 in 100 firearms owner resists, that will be more than enough. I see it as closer to 10% that will actively resist, and another X% that will help.
http://policestateusa.net/
The same can be said about any human to some degree. The observation does not bother me. I support Barack Obama essentially for two reasons, he is the only one of the three in contention who has the potential to break from any constraints others might seek to put on him, which I believe was something John Kennedy did ultimately compelling the shadow government to kill him. I also am extremely cynical about the honesty of the vote and know it has been compromised in a way to control outcome. I want to see people not give up on the democratic participation of voting because any thievery like this going on long enough is going to get decisively exposed. And an actively voting public who believes in the process is the one that will act with the right amount of rage and action to make those who steal fear for their very lives. You are free to call that wishful thinking on my part, but that is why I am participating and watching this process in this manner.
I'm simply astounded that on 4, where criticism of Israel is rife, the very same people would turn around and adopt Jewish-championed ideologies like Marxism, feminism, anti-tradition/religion, and environmentalism. This is the biggest irony. These people are basically under the control of Jewish intellectual systems.
Stop thinking of Chuckie the Cheese Baldwhine's hairy little ass, gay licker.
This is the biggest irony. These people are basically under the control of Jewish intellectual systems. World Government loving MultiCulti political correctors...they're in this deconstruction up to their eyeballs and have been since the 60s.
Jesus loves you Corn Flake Girl...
Another Jewish protection racket.
"Hi, I'm Chuckie the cheese Baldwhine, and my Friend FullOfHeadcheese (FOH) is a serious poster who approaches political efficacy with the same enthusiasm he tends to my ass to with his split little talented tongue of his. He's welcome to use my picture in his posts as long as he plants his man post up my rump." This message is approved by Chuckie the Cheese Baldwhine.
The last frontier is freedom of speech. But we've always known that. Perhaps. But, in the absence of any historical precedent I just don't understand how any mere mortal can be so damned sure of anything. At least not certain enough to hurl insults at folks with different points of view. Some of these folks whose rhetoric is a disappointment now may surprise you when the time comes. It doesn't benefit us to be remembered as angry reactionaries, and to squander bandwidth on rancor when we could be educating and planting ideas for them to ponder. This may be pissing on the altar but I for one would not want to be ruled by a know-it-all like the now deceased Bill Cooper. His rigidity of personality actually precluded any possibility of him revising his views, and he'd stick by them right into Hell before admitting he may have been mistaken. We can't win anything with that type of thinking, and in fact too many of the self appointed leaders of today suffer from the same disability.
You're situation is getting worse by the post...
I'm thinking history is already on my side of this argument, but I hope you're right. Remember, a huge proportion of those gun toting patriots watch TV. It will tell them what to do if the balloon goes up. And most will believe it.
Mikey ol' buddy, I think you've made your point and a little bit of that goes a loooong way. Okay? Thanks.
Stop thinking about corn holing, corn pone. I know the added pictures just get you hornier making it harder to post as your side activity here of flogging your man tool becomes more important then making your little old keyboard sticky. Here is one of two Cuntstitution Party men caucusing. They are the sort Chuck Baldwin likes to pay to shave their legs. Don't orgasm too hard over it now.
When you 'come out', you come out big...gotta give ya that Corn Flake Girl ! He's letting his freak flag fly. You know, the 68ers fought for and won so much for us... NOT.
Okay? Thanks." You mean my point that his constantly calling me a communist and Marx lover to harrass and belittle anything I have to say? That point? You don't mention this so of course I would appreciate you mentioning him to shut the hell up. Post the same message to him about his spam as you do here to me, I will back off for now. Because you ask and I'm sure you are not alone in your setiments. I am not a fucking communist, and I don't appreciate this fuckwit dogging my ass with his baiting. Send him the same message in regards to what annoys me, I will grant a cease fire from my end of things.
Now you know me. I would only vote for Obama if it means keeping psycho McCain out. What we are hearing is just more neocon propaganda. Gotta keep the Hegelian dialectic active ya know LOL. Here is the analysis of the bill. S. 2433 would require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to reduce global poverty. The strategy should include, among other things, more effective forms of development assistance, coordination of efforts with other countries and international organizations, and continuation of existing initiatives to reduce poverty and disease in developing countries. The bill also would require the State Department to prepare several reports describing the strategy, its implementation, and the progress made on achieving the objectives for reducing global poverty. Based on information from the State Department, CBO estimates that implementing S. 2433 would cost less than $1 million per year, assuming the availability of appropriated funds. Enacting the bill would not affect direct spending or receipts. S. 2433 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Michelle S. Patterson. This estimate was approved by Peter H. Fontaine, Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.
I have a room full of family and friends over and I'm shooting my monitor picture up on the digital projector for everyone to see. Needless to say, we're having a great time...LOLOL
Damn right.
This is the biggest irony. These people are basically under the control of Jewish intellectual systems. Well, afaic, they are under control of the darkside through it's many faces.
In 1968 you could fill up your tank in a car with 400 HP engine, and drive across the USA for about a $100. And now they ridicule you because you want to drive an SUV. That's freedom? These people welcome the chains being put on us.
What this rump ranger omits is that this is a room full of men only, all horny, with their hands on each other's penises. He also omits the fact he is not showing a projection of this forum, they are watching child porn at the diaper level. Old enough to bleed, old enough to butcher, right FOH?
Nation-destroying ideologies...
In my darker moments I agree with that. But, 30 years ago the Ruskies made fun of us because unlike them most Americans actually believed American news broadcasts. But, that isn't such a certainty since the Big Three lost their monopoly. And, once those couch potatoes have lost their creature comforts because filling up at the pump is cost prohibitive and every other activity is either mandatory or forbidden, they'll become the sidelined ninety percentile who neither hurt nor help while five percent fight for freedom and five percent oppose us. And, then they'll go along with whoever wins. And, for the record, I never include those NRA life member wabbit hunters in my calculations. Most of them will be absolutely worthless when the time comes, and they'll probably be preoccupied with abolishing the 22nd amendment so they can bring Bush back....
(ROFLOLOL!!!) You just put on the knee pads every day for them... These people are the tools of the enemy. They're the face you see...
When you do this little Cuntstitutional Party boy, do you suck in your gut to hide the extra pounds your age has hung on your carcass? Just curious, mind you.
I still call the NRA on its gate keeping role. They tout "America's first freedom," claiming it's the one that defends all others. So being a part of the NRA can make people believe that they're doing their part, even when pointedly they are not. By the way, the elite is smart enough to know better than to permit a confrontation. Slowly boiling the frog is working much too well.
I hate to interrupt your demon-inspired spew, Wiccan Marxist racist Corn Flake L-I-A-R, but it's time to serve lunch here. Take care now, ya hear !!
Comments (150 - 195) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestI point out that it's not scary
#110. To: Ferret Mike (#106)
I have been hoping to see buyer's regret help the Republicans avoid the train wreck a McCain presidency would be to them.
#111. To: FOH (#57)
(Edited)
As is coming soon to Amerika, only the Police State class/UP will be assured of having their/families' needs met in the artificially-induced chaos and misery that's been charted for US...
#112. To: rowdee (#109)
bump
Obama on Supreme Court Judges - TheFiringLine Forums
www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2847211 - 42k - 
#113. To: HOUNDDAWG (#107)
Why don't you try offering some intelligent points that we can discuss?
#114. To: Peppa (#111)
There have been articles describing the preparations for such.
#115. To: FOH (#100)
are you aware of Lugar's L.O.S.T. ?
#116. To: HOUNDDAWG (#70)
#117. To: HOUNDDAWG, Peppa (#116)
#118. To: DeaconBenjamin (#115)
are you aware of Lugar's L.O.S.T. ?
lugar.senate.gov/sfrc/sea.html - 23k -
#119. To: buckeye (#82)
#120. To: buckeye (#99)
The dream is carefully maintained by gatekeeper organizations like the NRA.
#121. To: buckeye (#110)
"You're a leftist tool, just like the Falwell caricatures you snub on the right."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#122. To: Peppa, FOH (#119)
#123. To: Ferret Mike (#121)
#124. To: FOH (#114)
"The long revolution's end is in sight for them...lots of US see it too."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#125. To: buckeye (#122)
I'm simply astounded that on 4, where criticism of Israel is rife, the very same people would turn around and adopt Jewish-championed ideologies like Marxism, feminism, anti-tradition/religion, and environmentalism.
#126. To: Ferret Mike (#124)
#127. To: FOH (#125)
World Government loving MultiCulti political correctors...
#128. To: FOH (#125)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#129. To: buckeye (#113)
....and the patriot movement was a hollowed out FBI operation.
#130. To: Ferret Mike (#128)
#131. To: HOUNDDAWG (#129)
#132. To: Ferret Mike (#124)
Stop thinking of Chuckie the Cheese Baldwhine's hairy little ass, gay licker.
#133. To: FOH (#126)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#134. To: Ferret Mike (#133)
#135. To: FOH (#134)
#136. To: HOUNDDAWG (#132)
"Mikey ol' buddy, I think you've made your point and a little bit of that goes a loooong way.
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#137. To: buckeye (#36)
#138. To: buckeye (#135)
He's letting his freak flag fly. You know, the 68ers fought for and won so much for us... NOT.
#139. To: buckeye (#135)
"He's letting his freak flag fly."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#140. To: buckeye (#122)
I'm simply astounded that on 4, where criticism of Israel is rife, the very same people would turn around and adopt Jewish-championed ideologies like Marxism, feminism, anti-tradition/religion, and environmentalism.
#141. To: FOH (#138)
#142. To: FOH (#138)
"I have a room full of family and friends over and I'm shooting my monitor picture up on the digital projector for everyone to see."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#143. To: Peppa (#140)
Well, afaic, they are under control of the darkside through it's many faces.
#144. To: buckeye (#131)
I'm thinking history is already on my side of this argument, but I hope you're right. Remember, a huge proportion of those gun toting patriots watch TV. It will tell them what to do if the balloon goes up. And most will believe it.
#145. To: Ferret Mike (#136)
I am not a fucking communist ~ Corn Flake L-I-A-R
#146. To: buckeye (#141)
In 1968 you could fill up your tank in a car with 400 HP engine, and drive across the USA for about a $100. And now they ridicule you because you want to drive an SUV. That's freedom? These people welcome the chains being put on us.
#147. To: FOH (#145)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#148. To: HOUNDDAWG, FOH (#144)
Most of them will be absolutely worthless when the time comes, and they'll probably be preoccupied with abolishing the 22nd amendment so they can bring Bush back....
#149. To: Ferret Mike (#147)
.
.
.