See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Obama Backs U.N. Bill to Disarm Americans
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/?p=1992
Published: May 10, 2008
Author: FourWinds 10
Post Date: 2008-05-10 05:42:39 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3794
Comments: 195
This is just in from Sen. Coburn’s office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. No one in the media has brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here. Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM Subject: RE: Obama’s bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate Senator Coburn is blocking this bill. Patrick Guinn Obama’s bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations. The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation. The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.’s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol. http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2433.html Detailed Summary Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs. Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports. Defines specified terms. Status of the Legislation Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718. http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-on-barack-obama-s2433-global.html More on Barack Obama’s S.2433 : Global Poverty Act We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama’s bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me) The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending. "It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said. Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable." Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance." "In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning ’small arms and light weapons’ and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said. Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims. Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas. And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes. On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK) This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama’s office and the others who support this bill….No comments. See Obama’s Global Tax Bill (S.2433) Change Obama can believe in: Socialism?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-61) not displayed.
.
.
.
#62. To: buckeye (#31)
We HAVE NO CHOICE but to politically oppose every one of these candidates. I don't recall ever having 3 (THREE) such CFR-One World Monopolists selections as this...people right here on this 4um are moles working to these ends right in front of our eyes.
If you bothered to read the NRA site you so much dislike, perhaps you would see that it provides an answer to your question.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
They're just weak-minded. This is the result of the demoralization that Bezmenov talks about in the video I just posted. It's plain to see. These people live in kaleidescope world of self-made morals, artificial rules of physics, and twisted treatment of human language -- letting words mean whatever they want.
Of course, if some other gun organization of which you approve has also rated Hagel, nothing is preventing you from giving the rest of us a link to such a rating.
To reason, indeed, he was not in the habit of attending. His mode of arguing, if it is to be so called, was one not uncommon among dull and stubborn persons, who are accustomed to be surrounded by their inferiors. He asserted a proposition; and, as often as wiser people ventured respectfully to show that it was erroneous, he asserted it again, in exactly the same words, and conceived that, by doing so, he at once disposed of all objections. - Macaulay, "History of England," Vol. 1, Chapter 6, on James II.
Thank all that is good for Christine and 4um...I say. Anything pro-CFR puppet is anti-American.
I could care less about these ratings. The important thing here is that you're stumping for a gun control proponent. We won't be distracted by that. You condone gun control by doing so. It's very clear.
Yes. And some are very STRONG minded, working tirelessly their whole lives for a moment like this...an opening where under cover of "You're a racist!" they can pass off their most despicable creatures yet. They are Global-Liberal Utopians...Progressives/Socialists/Communists that love such things as the United luciferian Nations and utterly hate what made America great...especially God, they really hate Him.
It's not strong minded to be a useful idiot.
Well, the bill makes many references to the United Nations Millennium Declaration and incorporates it in the intent of the bill in multiple sections. And, the United Nations Millennium Declaration reads as follows: "• To take concerted action to end illicit traffic in small arms and light weapons, especially by making arms transfers more transparent and supporting regional disarmament measures, taking account of all the recommendations of the forthcoming United Nations Conference on Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons." Now, the language appears to limit any gun grabs to illicit weapons, but it doesn't say that and no such limitation would exist upon adoption of this bill. It is very clear that the presence of some illegal guns (in our inner cities for instance) could be used to not only seize those weapons, but to attempt to close off the source of those guns, the law abiding suburbanites and gun dealers who legally purchased them and had them stolen from us or purchased through straw man transactions then supplied to criminals. We gun owners are well aware that the 2nd amendment is the final obstacle to their global banker govt, and, just as govt lawyers can "reinterpret" language including the bill of rights to mean something entirely contrary to its original intent, this type of ambiguous language would be elevated to "The Word Of The Almighty" in the wrong hands, while similar language regarding nuclear treaty/monitoring/disarmament would be ignored just as it is in Israel and the US today. Even though this is a report from Alex Jones (a profiteering scare monger) it has been interpreted and reported by other more reliable sources as a back door threat to our liberties and the means to protect them. When in doubt all bills should be suspect. We know that all proposed legislation should be viewed in its worst possible light, because history has taught us that this is the likely outcome.
You can read about Hagel's record on gun bills here: Chuck Hagel on Gun Control. That record includes: Stands to reason for a Republican senator from Nebraska. Nebraska is slipping into the stew quickly now but still there are enough patriots there that when push comes to shove they will kick your ass to the curb if you mess with the 'basics'...Hagel's certainly no dummy. A bright and strongly deluded quisling, yes. Dummy, no.
O-K !! lolol Some of these ARE long term lefty activists/moles here on 4um...
"Hi, I'm Chuckie The Cheese Baldwhine and FOH sucks my rod as well as my little son Timothy did when he was teething as a baby. I let this studmuffin sport my picture in his posts to show my gratitude and thanks because of this dedication by head bobbing he has done so many times for me." I am Chuckie the Cheeze Baldwhine and I approved this message.
Now what does that mean? Could mean anything, they don't specify. The North American regional disarmament has been well underway for some time...
Gun control is pretty much 95% effective now. Next it's word control. What will Chuck Hegel do with Senate Bill 1959?
Keep up the good work, O'turd. I'm actually starting to feel sorry for you and what remains of your credibility on the Internet goes up in smoke... They reveal their inspirations with the filth they spew.
H.R. 1955...Senate version? Why, of course it is. You wascally 'domestic terrorist' you...
Another Jewish Protection Racket.
They've been pretty well outed on 4um now though...it won't be long.
The quisling class has covered every single base possible on the way to finishing US off with North American (EU-like) integration...you will like it, shut up or be dealt with. It's the LAW !
Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration.
Of course you like it, you like it a lot in fact. If you're an American, you're a traitor of the highest odor. But then we knew that already, didn't we O'ari...?
You stay on message and I'll stay on message about your homosexuality, sport. So far all you have done is slander me or do baitings about abortion inferring my anti-abortion stand is a lie. Keep calling me a commie, I know that you do it to promote the homosexual agenda you and your boy Baldie enjoy so much. As long as you are secretly sucking the dick and loosing the Kingdom, I will be here exposing this sorry game you play as a conspiratorial butt pirate. You assed for it, snuggles, you got it.
This you call "freedom." It's no wonder we're enslaved.
...and decrim. IMO Hey, smoke'm if ya got'em ! Although as we can see some people are not chemically/emotionally positioned to be able to cope with use/abuse of THC. The 60's clowns 'have come home to roost !' lolol
My work with you is done. And before long, you on 4um will be done. Keep up the good work.
Paul is rather tough on immigration, and I support Ron Paul because of his core integrity as a Constitutionalist, in spite of where we disagree. I appreciate an honest candidate with courage who will stand up for the Constitution. ;-D
This country is being destroyed by 68er intellectual vacuity.
Seems like the UN-types (Progressive/Socialist/Communist) could be partly described as 'metros'...
And you keep it up when you are poking it up Baldwhine's fat hairy white ass boy, my work with you is not done. As long as a homosexual mole like you is around, I will expose you to the light of day, gayboy. ;-D
I get a kick out of the bass turds saying "I supported Ron Paul because he was a Constitutionalist, except for where we disagreed" and now they support the Marxist racist Gun Grabbing baby infanticidal maniac Establishment candidate...heheheh
YEEHAW, got ya good there Corn Flake L-I-A-R. Calculate THAT and spin it !!! Better light up another one, the effects seem to be wearing off...
It's unclear. He's tougher than the top three candidates, but he steadfastly refused to admit that conservative politics, first having been infiltrated by Zionists, are now being completely undermined by the pro-immigration lobby.
I respectfully disagree. He/she/it knows it and has been working for this day for a LONG long time...Marxist revolutionary mole.
You fuck bass up the ass too? Do you do this as part of your perverted foreplay with Baldie the penis gulper when the two of you fish? What a sick lifestyle the two of you enjoy together. Let me guess, you do it for the kids, because you two did it to Baldie's kids when they were toddlers. What a sick faggot fuck you and he are boy, you are truly disgusting.
He's out in the open in that regard. He's addled to think it's not transparent. But one has to be in a mentally weakened state to adopt and maintain Marxist ideologies, by definition.
Keep in mind that the American people make up the largest standing army in the world. So, these shadow masters wouldn't dare try to take our guns by brute force. They keep trying to sell the people on different measures that they hope we'll swallow, and in the process they keep pushing toward international treaties that pre-empt our constitution. It is their fond hope that they can sneak some language through that the American people will feel is binding on us, or at least that enough people will accept to divide and demoralize us. Then the news media will show blue helmets and local police swarming on some enclave of drug dealers, and the years of conditioning to accept anything that bears the appearance of lawful conduct will hopefully result in mass resignation and acceptance that the war is indeed lost. Remember, we were told after the WACO hearings that the ATF would never again pull a SWAT-style raid, and the agency came very close to being abolished by congress. (But none of the other federal agencies would agree to hire the disgraced ATF agents) But, as we've seen the ATF is well on their way to recovery, and the enemies of the 2nd amendment have time on their side.... We have to win every battle, but they only have to win once. My friend Red Beckman said that it's a race between the collapse of the economy and the grabbing of the guns, and which comes first will determine who controls America. I wouldn't worry too much about a gun grab. I believe that the federal reserve will go tits up first, and then we'll have to settle other issues such as what land is ours and what type of govt will we (and "they", the blacks, Hispanics and state worshiping multi cultis) adopt.
You sir, are dreaming. The dream is carefully maintained by gatekeeper organizations like the NRA. Disillusion yourself as soon as possible.
Lugar has always been a leading New World Order/One World Government proponent in Congress. The problem is that the CFR is deep into every area of America; military, economic, goobermint, media, etc. they have changed the definitions to the point that they try to sell us these 'pubbie' OWMs as "not Ds"...are you aware of Lugar's L.O.S.T. ?
heheheheh BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You must have gotten one of his goats.
Comments (103 - 195) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThis is Obama, unvarnished. If anyone thinks McCain or Clinton would not support these "goals," think again.
#63. To: buckeye (#61)
Perhaps you can show me one gun control bill any of those four voted against.
#64. To: FOH (#62)
#65. To: buckeye (#61)
#66. To: buckeye, christine, JamesDeffenbach, TwentyTwelve, Peppa (#60)
We've seen it all. It's disgusting. The only relief I get is by looking at the TOSses to see just how much more deep into the chaos they have fallen than 4. Pro-McCain commentary is akin to our pro-Obama commentary.
#67. To: aristeides (#65)
Of course, if some other gun organization of which you approve has also rated Hagel, nothing is preventing you from giving the rest of us a link to such a rating.
#68. To: buckeye (#64)
They're just weak-minded. This is the result of the demoralization that Bezmenov talks about in the video I just posted. It's plain to see. These people live in kaleidescope world of self-made morals, artificial rules of physics, and twisted treatment of human language -- letting words mean whatever they want.
#69. To: FOH (#68)
#70. To: aristeides (#51)
Perhaps you can point to the anti-gun provision in Obama's bill. I don't see it.
#71. To: aristeides (#59)
Hagel scores A by NRA on pro-gun rights policies.
Voted NO on background checks at gun shows.
#72. To: buckeye (#69)
It's not strong minded to be a useful idiot.
#73. To: FOH (#66)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#74. To: Dakmar (#32)
supporting regional disarmament measures
#75. To: FOH (#71)
#76. To: Ferret Mike (#73)
#77. To: FOH (#76)
#78. To: buckeye (#75)
Senate Bill 1959?
#79. To: FOH (#78)
#80. To: buckeye (#77)
They reveal their inspirations with the filth they spew.
#81. To: buckeye (#79)
#82. To: FOH (#81)
#83. To: aristeides (#37)
This article is about how scary Obama's bill allegedly is. I point out that it's not scary. So you tell me it doesn't matter what Obama's bill says.
#84. To: FOH (#76)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#85. To: Ferret Mike (#84)
#86. To: buckeye (#82)
Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration.
#87. To: Ferret Mike (#84)
#88. To: buckeye (#82)
"Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#89. To: FOH (#86)
#90. To: PSUSA (#38)
The "men" in this country have already, imo, been emasculated and dominated. There aren't that many real men out there. They can act against us at any time.
#91. To: FOH (#87)
"Keep up the good work."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#92. To: buckeye (#89)
(Edited)
This country is being destroyed by 68er intellectual vacuity.
#93. To: Ferret Mike (#91)
#94. To: Ferret Mike (#88)
... Paul is rather tough on immigration
#95. To: buckeye (#42)
Ari is too brain-damaged and addled to recognize that we're moving past another point of no return here.
#96. To: FOH (#92)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#97. To: FOH (#95)
#98. To: buckeye (#75)
Gun control is pretty much 95% effective now. Next it's word control. What will Chuck Hegel do with Senate Bill 1959?
#99. To: HOUNDDAWG (#98)
Keep in mind that the American people make up the largest standing army in the world.
#100. To: DeaconBenjamin (#47)
If it were so controversial, do you think Lugar would have signed on as a cosponsor?
#101. To: Ferret Mike (#96)
#102. To: FOH (#101)
.
.
.