See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Obama Backs U.N. Bill to Disarm Americans
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/?p=1992
Published: May 10, 2008
Author: FourWinds 10
Post Date: 2008-05-10 05:42:39 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 3746
Comments: 195
This is just in from Sen. Coburn’s office. Obama has authored a bill, and it is now in the Senate, to give the UN .7% of our GNP to be used to feed hungry 3rd worlders, AND to use UN force to disarm you and me and all gun owners. No one in the media has brought this to the attention of the general sheeple out here. Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 12:48 PM Subject: RE: Obama’s bill S2433 passed the committee and going to the Senate Senator Coburn is blocking this bill. Patrick Guinn Obama’s bill S2433 would require the U.S. to initially direct .7 percent of our GNP into the United Nations coffers for distribution as they see fit, for "food" to third world nations. Under earlier agreements this would evolve into a national tax on the U.S. with the UN attempting to levy this on all first world nations. The U.N. would have the power to increase this rate of taxation. The U.S. would be required to surrender some of its sovereignty over foreign aid by putting it under UN control. The bill would force the U.S. to sign onto the U.N.’s Millennium Declaration, which would commit us not only to "banning small arms and light weapons" but also to adhere to the International Criminal Court Treaty and the Kyoto Protocol. http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_2433.html Detailed Summary Global Poverty Act of 2007 - Directs the President, through the Secretary of State, to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the U.S. foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the United Nations Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day. Requires the strategy to contain specific and measurable goals and to consist of specified components, including: (1) continued investment or involvement in existing U.S. initiatives related to international poverty reduction and trade preference programs for developing countries; (2) improving the effectiveness of development assistance and making available additional overall United States assistance levels as appropriate; (3) enhancing and expanding debt relief as appropriate; (4) mobilizing and leveraging the participation of businesses and public-private partnerships; (5) coordinating the goal of poverty reduction with other internationally recognized Millennium Development Goals; and (6) integrating principles of sustainable development and entrepreneurship into policies and programs. Sets forth specified reporting requirements. Directs the Secretary of State to designate a coordinator who will have primary responsibility for overseeing and drafting the reports, as well as responsibility for helping to implement recommendations contained in the reports. Defines specified terms. Status of the Legislation Latest Major Action: 4/24/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718. http://kilosparksitup.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-on-barack-obama-s2433-global.html More on Barack Obama’s S.2433 : Global Poverty Act We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama’s bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me) The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending. "It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said. Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable." Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance." "In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning ’small arms and light weapons’ and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said. Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims. Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas. And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes. On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK) This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama’s office and the others who support this bill….No comments. See Obama’s Global Tax Bill (S.2433) Change Obama can believe in: Socialism?
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-73) not displayed.
.
.
.
#74. To: Dakmar (#32)
Now what does that mean? Could mean anything, they don't specify. The North American regional disarmament has been well underway for some time...
Gun control is pretty much 95% effective now. Next it's word control. What will Chuck Hegel do with Senate Bill 1959?
Keep up the good work, O'turd. I'm actually starting to feel sorry for you and what remains of your credibility on the Internet goes up in smoke... They reveal their inspirations with the filth they spew.
H.R. 1955...Senate version? Why, of course it is. You wascally 'domestic terrorist' you...
Another Jewish Protection Racket.
They've been pretty well outed on 4um now though...it won't be long.
The quisling class has covered every single base possible on the way to finishing US off with North American (EU-like) integration...you will like it, shut up or be dealt with. It's the LAW !
Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration.
Of course you like it, you like it a lot in fact. If you're an American, you're a traitor of the highest odor. But then we knew that already, didn't we O'ari...?
You stay on message and I'll stay on message about your homosexuality, sport. So far all you have done is slander me or do baitings about abortion inferring my anti-abortion stand is a lie. Keep calling me a commie, I know that you do it to promote the homosexual agenda you and your boy Baldie enjoy so much. As long as you are secretly sucking the dick and loosing the Kingdom, I will be here exposing this sorry game you play as a conspiratorial butt pirate. You assed for it, snuggles, you got it.
This you call "freedom." It's no wonder we're enslaved.
...and decrim. IMO Hey, smoke'm if ya got'em ! Although as we can see some people are not chemically/emotionally positioned to be able to cope with use/abuse of THC. The 60's clowns 'have come home to roost !' lolol
My work with you is done. And before long, you on 4um will be done. Keep up the good work.
Paul is rather tough on immigration, and I support Ron Paul because of his core integrity as a Constitutionalist, in spite of where we disagree. I appreciate an honest candidate with courage who will stand up for the Constitution. ;-D
This country is being destroyed by 68er intellectual vacuity.
Seems like the UN-types (Progressive/Socialist/Communist) could be partly described as 'metros'...
And you keep it up when you are poking it up Baldwhine's fat hairy white ass boy, my work with you is not done. As long as a homosexual mole like you is around, I will expose you to the light of day, gayboy. ;-D
I get a kick out of the bass turds saying "I supported Ron Paul because he was a Constitutionalist, except for where we disagreed" and now they support the Marxist racist Gun Grabbing baby infanticidal maniac Establishment candidate...heheheh
YEEHAW, got ya good there Corn Flake L-I-A-R. Calculate THAT and spin it !!! Better light up another one, the effects seem to be wearing off...
It's unclear. He's tougher than the top three candidates, but he steadfastly refused to admit that conservative politics, first having been infiltrated by Zionists, are now being completely undermined by the pro-immigration lobby.
I respectfully disagree. He/she/it knows it and has been working for this day for a LONG long time...Marxist revolutionary mole.
You fuck bass up the ass too? Do you do this as part of your perverted foreplay with Baldie the penis gulper when the two of you fish? What a sick lifestyle the two of you enjoy together. Let me guess, you do it for the kids, because you two did it to Baldie's kids when they were toddlers. What a sick faggot fuck you and he are boy, you are truly disgusting.
He's out in the open in that regard. He's addled to think it's not transparent. But one has to be in a mentally weakened state to adopt and maintain Marxist ideologies, by definition.
Keep in mind that the American people make up the largest standing army in the world. So, these shadow masters wouldn't dare try to take our guns by brute force. They keep trying to sell the people on different measures that they hope we'll swallow, and in the process they keep pushing toward international treaties that pre-empt our constitution. It is their fond hope that they can sneak some language through that the American people will feel is binding on us, or at least that enough people will accept to divide and demoralize us. Then the news media will show blue helmets and local police swarming on some enclave of drug dealers, and the years of conditioning to accept anything that bears the appearance of lawful conduct will hopefully result in mass resignation and acceptance that the war is indeed lost. Remember, we were told after the WACO hearings that the ATF would never again pull a SWAT-style raid, and the agency came very close to being abolished by congress. (But none of the other federal agencies would agree to hire the disgraced ATF agents) But, as we've seen the ATF is well on their way to recovery, and the enemies of the 2nd amendment have time on their side.... We have to win every battle, but they only have to win once. My friend Red Beckman said that it's a race between the collapse of the economy and the grabbing of the guns, and which comes first will determine who controls America. I wouldn't worry too much about a gun grab. I believe that the federal reserve will go tits up first, and then we'll have to settle other issues such as what land is ours and what type of govt will we (and "they", the blacks, Hispanics and state worshiping multi cultis) adopt.
You sir, are dreaming. The dream is carefully maintained by gatekeeper organizations like the NRA. Disillusion yourself as soon as possible.
Lugar has always been a leading New World Order/One World Government proponent in Congress. The problem is that the CFR is deep into every area of America; military, economic, goobermint, media, etc. they have changed the definitions to the point that they try to sell us these 'pubbie' OWMs as "not Ds"...are you aware of Lugar's L.O.S.T. ?
heheheheh BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You must have gotten one of his goats.
There ya go. They get away with this crap on the sheeple, but not here on 4um...
At least. Now that they're out in the open I'm just having some fun...like a cat playing with a loopy mouse.
Exactly right. Great post...
We have has such dishonest and compromised presidents so long, sometimes I feel like Diogenes of Sinope who used to wander Athens when it was a city state looking for one honest man when contemplating presidential candidate. I have been hoping to see buyer's regret help the Republicans avoid the train wreck a McCain presidency would be to them. Ron Paul by far is the best choice for the top of the ticket, and if he can get on the ticket, even for the VP slot, I would support it in November.
You're long on insults and short on facts. Why don't you try offering some intelligent points that we can discuss? (I know why, but I want to show others that you can't do that) Keep in mind that in real world debates people like you sit on the sidelines with their mouths shut. There's no reason to assume that your lack of facts (or inability to present them intelligently) has any more legitimacy on the internet.
Quid pro quo, no matter what I say to him I'm a dirty commie, so I am exposing his hidden homosexual agenda making him lie so. The little butt pirate assed for it, so he's going to get grudge fucked.
IIRC, as I note below, there is every reason to be scared or concerned. The USSC looks at bills and the underlying paperwork when they prepare to rule on cases--they look for the 'intent' of the congresscowards when they pass legislation. Surely, someone who went thru law school and taught law read something of this when they studied about the USSC.......surely, they did do that, didn't they? BY putting all the bullshit in about the united nations, it allows the USSC to interpret that we go along with these bastards and their desire to eliminate weapons in the hands of the peons so they can stick their hands deeper and deeper into the pockets of said peons. And as to that USSC, I can't recall the exact words your candidate used as it regards selecting them, but it was to the effect that he wanted ones who know what it was like to be on the short end of the stick, so to speak. I do believe there will be at least two retirees...Stevens and Ginsberg, and a possible Kennedy, which would tilt the court in a new direction probably. Besides, you can't even count on the alleged 'conservative' ones, or should I say the "R" ones--can't really do that cause they're all over the place, too. As an aside--the comment regarding 4 Rs signing the legislation.........BFD. Lugar is an internationalist--he could give a rats' patootie about the united states. Snow is a NE liberal. Hagel is all over the place. And Smith--I presume is Gordon, and if so, nuff said.
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
What's intellectually vacuous on your part is to assume that there could be a significant improvement from one party to the other. They pursue the attachment of different fetters, using the rules of the Hegelian dialectic, with each swing of the political pendulum. You're a leftist tool, just like the Falwell caricatures you snub on the right.
There have been articles describing the preparations for such. And if the miliary balks, as with NKorea, they will shrink belt sizes.
We're running out of time. I'm assuming you can think for yourself, and that eventually you'll realize that by 1994, the Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto's "blades of grass" were decayed tinder, and the patriot movement was a hollowed out FBI operation. The last frontier is freedom of speech. But we've always known that.
And if the miliary balks, as with NKorea, they will need shrink belt sizes. Yup, and so far it's all been on their terms...but they've gotten all their ducks in a row for when/if enough Americans wake up. It's a race right now and not a marathon but a sprint. The long revolution's end is in sight for them...lots of US see it too.
Comments (115 - 195) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latestsupporting regional disarmament measures
#75. To: FOH (#71)
#76. To: Ferret Mike (#73)
#77. To: FOH (#76)
#78. To: buckeye (#75)
Senate Bill 1959?
#79. To: FOH (#78)
#80. To: buckeye (#77)
They reveal their inspirations with the filth they spew.
#81. To: buckeye (#79)
#82. To: FOH (#81)
#83. To: aristeides (#37)
This article is about how scary Obama's bill allegedly is. I point out that it's not scary. So you tell me it doesn't matter what Obama's bill says.
#84. To: FOH (#76)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#85. To: Ferret Mike (#84)
#86. To: buckeye (#82)
Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration.
#87. To: Ferret Mike (#84)
#88. To: buckeye (#82)
"Most of these 4 leftists were supporting Ron Paul because they thought he would be friendly to same-sex marriage and illegal immigration."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#89. To: FOH (#86)
#90. To: PSUSA (#38)
The "men" in this country have already, imo, been emasculated and dominated. There aren't that many real men out there. They can act against us at any time.
#91. To: FOH (#87)
"Keep up the good work."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#92. To: buckeye (#89)
(Edited)
This country is being destroyed by 68er intellectual vacuity.
#93. To: Ferret Mike (#91)
#94. To: Ferret Mike (#88)
... Paul is rather tough on immigration
#95. To: buckeye (#42)
Ari is too brain-damaged and addled to recognize that we're moving past another point of no return here.
#96. To: FOH (#92)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#97. To: FOH (#95)
#98. To: buckeye (#75)
Gun control is pretty much 95% effective now. Next it's word control. What will Chuck Hegel do with Senate Bill 1959?
#99. To: HOUNDDAWG (#98)
Keep in mind that the American people make up the largest standing army in the world.
#100. To: DeaconBenjamin (#47)
If it were so controversial, do you think Lugar would have signed on as a cosponsor?
#101. To: Ferret Mike (#96)
#102. To: FOH (#101)
#103. To: buckeye (#97)
He's out in the open in that regard. He's addled to think it's not transparent. But one has to be in a mentally weakened state to adopt and maintain Marxist ideologies, by definition.
#104. To: buckeye (#102)
You must have gotten one of his goats.
#105. To: HOUNDDAWG (#50)
#106. To: buckeye (#94)
"It's unclear. He's tougher than the top three candidates, but he steadfastly refused to admit that conservative politics, first having been infiltrated by Zionists, are now being completely undermined by the pro-immigration lobby."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#107. To: buckeye (#99)
#108. To: buckeye (#102)
"You must have gotten one of his goats."
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#109. To: aristeides (#37)
I point out that it's not scary
#110. To: Ferret Mike (#106)
I have been hoping to see buyer's regret help the Republicans avoid the train wreck a McCain presidency would be to them.
#111. To: FOH (#57)
(Edited)
As is coming soon to Amerika, only the Police State class/UP will be assured of having their/families' needs met in the artificially-induced chaos and misery that's been charted for US...
#112. To: rowdee (#109)
bump
Obama on Supreme Court Judges - TheFiringLine Forums
www.thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2847211 - 42k -
#113. To: HOUNDDAWG (#107)
Why don't you try offering some intelligent points that we can discuss?
#114. To: Peppa (#111)
There have been articles describing the preparations for such.
.
.
.