[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet

I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA

Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike

I heard libs might block some streets. 🤣

Jimmy Dore: What’s Being Said On Israeli TV Will BLOW YOUR MIND!

Tucker Carlson: Douglas Macgregor- Elites will be overthrown

🎵Breakin' rocks in the hot sun!🎵

Musk & Andreessen Predict A Robot Revolution

Comedian sentenced to 8 years in prison for jokes — judge allegedly cites Wikipedia during conviction

BBC report finds Gaza Humanitarian Foundation hesitant to answer questions

DHS nabbed 1,500 illegal aliens in MA—

The Day After: Trump 'Not Interested' In Talking As Musk Continues To Make Case Against BBB

Biden Judge Issues Absurd Ruling Against Trump and Gives the Boulder Terrorist a Win

Alan Dershowitz Pushing for Trump to Pardon Ghislaine Maxwell

Signs Of The Tremendous Economic Suffering That Is Quickly Spreading All Around Us

Joe Biden Used Autopen to Sign All Pardons During His Final Weeks In Office

BREAKING NEWS: Kilmar Abrego Garcia Coming Back To U.S. For Criminal Prosecution, Report Says

he BEST GEN X & Millennials Memes | Ep 79 - Nostalgia 60s 70s 80s #akornzstash

Paul Joseph Watson They Did Something Horrific

Romantic walk under Eiffel Tower in conquered Paris

srael's Attorney General orders draft for 50,000 Haredim amid Knesset turmoil

Elon Musk If America goes broke, nothing else matters

US disabilities from BLS broke out to a new high in May adding 739k.


All is Vanity
See other All is Vanity Articles

Title: One Possible Solution to 4um's Bozo Controversy
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 10, 2008
Author: Me
Post Date: 2008-05-10 17:58:01 by Arator
Keywords: Bozos, Controversy, Solution
Views: 5517
Comments: 136

I have recently become aware of a recent 4um controversy that has apparently caused a schism in the forum and I would like to offer one possible solution to the problem for the forum to consider.

On the one hand, bozoing inhibits exchanges between posters (and might be abused via registration of fake ID's just to run up the bozo count on targeted posters and make them think that they are more generally disliked than they really are).

On the other hand, bozoing allow users to disassociate themselves from posters who they would rather not be associated with (for whatever reason).

Christine recently opted to balance these two goods by lowering the per-poster bozo count to 10 (believing that this would encourage more interaction and discourage bozo abuses via fake IDs, while still allowing a reasonable freedom to disassociate). Unfortunately, posters who had had more than 10 posters bozo'ed could no long disassociate with the number of posters that they wished to as a result and opted instead to disassociate themselves from the forum entirely.

So, the basic problem is this: can the forum allow users to disassociate themselves from other posters as they like while, at the same time, serve its purpose, which is to foster free and open exchanges between posters who do not necessarily agree politically?

I think the answer might be yes, if, that is, the forum's poster-to-poster interactions were more like real life.

As it stands now, the forums' interactions are not like real life because bozoing is cheap for the bozoer and of weak effect on the bozoed. This is so because, unlike real life, the persons being bozoed do not know who is bozoing them. This fact greatly diminishes the social repercussions of bozoing and being bozoed.

In real life, on the other hand, if someone choose to not speak to (or associate with) someone else, both parties know it. Hence, for the bozoer, there are social consequences (or costs) to disassociating that must be considered (as well as the benefits). And for the bozoed, the costs of being disassociated from are fully known and weighed against the benefits of continuing their present mode of social interaction, allowing them to adjust their behavior accordingly (or not).

If 4um operated more like a real life, posters would know exactly who was bozoing them. This would eliminate the incentive for some to inflate bozo-counts via the registration of fake IDs, since the bozoed would then know that they were being falsely bozoed. This would also result in an optimal level of disassociation (and forum interaction) because:

1) the bozoers would bear the full social costs (as well as receive the benefits) of disassociation, and

2) the bozoed would know the full social costs (as well as the benefits) of their own posting behavior, and could moderate their behavior accordingly.

In sum, I suggest that the number of bozos be unlimited but that the bozo'd know not just the bozo count but also exactly who has bozoed them. I would also keep PM communications open between the bozoer and the bozoed, because, in real life, even those who have disassociated have the possibility of changing their mode of relating and reassociating later on a better basis. These changes I believe would lead to an optimal level of forum interaction (and disassociation).


Poster Comment:

What do ya think?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.

#18. To: Arator (#0)

Let's call it "ignore" instead of "bozo." That way there will no hurt feelings. :)

About 50 or so should be enough for anyone. Anyone that ignores more than 20 should be publicly listed as doing so, maybe an asterisk by their name or something.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-10   18:26:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: RickyJ (#18)

About 50 or so should be enough for anyone. Anyone that ignores more than 20 should be publicly listed as doing so, maybe an asterisk by their name or something.

Interesting suggestion.

Perhaps, poster names should be color-coded:

Pink - sensitive/effete/snob, has put more than 20 posters on ignore

Black - normal

Grey - maladjusted/buzzkill/pariah, has been put on ignore by more than 20 posters

Arator  posted on  2008-05-10   18:37:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Arator (#34)

Pink - sensitive/effete/snob, has put more than 20 posters on ignore

No, no, no...that's obviously the color that should be given to every single last one of you ObamaCONs...

FOH  posted on  2008-05-10   18:40:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 41.

        There are no replies to Comment # 41.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 41.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]