See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Alex Jones Smacks Down a 9/11 Kool-Aid Drinker
Source:
.
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qMjgyzKoXy4
Published: May 12, 2008
Author: .
Post Date: 2008-05-12 22:12:16 by Artisan
Keywords: None
Views: 527
Comments: 40
Alex Jones Smacks Down a 9/11 Kool-Aid Drinker From The Alex Jones Show, February 24, 2008. Alex takes a call from a caller who finds it incredulous that the government could stage an attack against itself. The caller tries to talk down to Alex, but Alex schools him on the basics of false flag terror. A must-watch for all 9/11 Kool-Aid drinkers and those who love to see them smacked down. For even more reasons to doubt the official story, visit Alex's sites, including: http://www.infowars.com Or visit other truth sites, such as: http://www.corbettreport.com
Poster Comment: funny
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
ALEX JONES: QUESTION YOUR REALITY You Tube Censors Hugely Popular "Question Your Reality" Video Prison Planet Friday, March 7, 2008 After receiving over 50,000 views in a few hours and on its way to shoot to the top of the most viewed chart, You Tube brazenly pulled a popular video from their rankings system Friday in an act of wanton censorship. "Question Your Reality," a stirring and well put together video montage featuring talk show host Alex Jones was rocketing up the charts, already having reached number 2 most viewed on News and Politics and soaring up the general most discussed and most viewed categories. A moment later, it was nowhere to be seen as You Tube cleared the slate and prevented the clip from going completely viral. You Tube is owned by Google, who have pulled this trick many times before, but by spreading the video far and wide you can help offset their censorship and wake people up.
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist." I wish he hadn't called him a "moron". A lot of people have problems believing our .gov would do this to us. They know nothing of false flag operations. If anything, call him "ignorant" and show him where he is wrong. Listening to the tape, the man was asking questions. There is nothing wrong with giving straight answers and without attacking him personally.
http://policestateusa.net/
Those that "know" have a duty to share the truth effectively. This may require that they shock others out of the mental fog that prevents them from seeing what's happening to them. I don't always agree with Alex Jones' methods, but no one I'm aware of has done more to awaken America from the comatose state it's been in for 100 years than he has.
"The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation". Vladimir Lenin
I agree. I can't say that he woke me up, because he didn't. But when I started to question things, he did a great job at providing info. But in RTT for example, the 1st one I saw, he didn't call his viewers names, he just laid out the info. That was more than enough shock.
http://policestateusa.net/
Some people "sleep" lighter than others.
"The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation". Vladimir Lenin
I agree. His reach is evident by the number of celebrities he has brought up to speed. It's a huge accomplishment.
When Alex is "on" and has his instant recall working, there's no one that can compete with his rapid firing of facts, dates and publications responsible for reporting the events etc., He probably is threatened occasionally by the turds ruining the country ... but it's too late, he's way out there and his videos will outlive him no matter what situation develops in the future.
"The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation". Vladimir Lenin
Amen to that.
Alex talks about the no-planers. Calls them cointelpro. LF was a hotbed for those disinfo maggots, but I haven't looked at the site in months.
Re that last video -- it's made by no-planers. Watch the disinfosexual enjoy making the plane go in and out of the building at around 3:45. As if people are impressed that a seemingly windowless building appears to partially heal itself around the wings. It's like the cointelprosexual is actually getting off on it. See, if they were ziosexuals it would be a more graphic snuff film, so it's obviously cointelprosexuals. My guess is it's red-diaper old-world cointelprosexuals.
I don't know, N.B. When has a moment in history ever been this much disseminated in video form? The more we watch of it, the less we seem to agree on what happened. I think there is a significance to this. I focus my attention on the what Peter Dale Scott says about the changes in June of 2001 regarding rogue aircraft escort laws (these were rolled back after 9/11). Intentional incompetence seems to be the mode used at Pearl Harbor, and I think it works here. However, questioning AJ is not necessarily tantamount to CoIntelPro.
That's a funny video, but Alex at his own conference in L.A. had Jimmy Walter, (a no planer) and Jim Fetzer (a no planer) on his panel., and has interviewed Morgan Reynolds, (a no planer) on his show probably several times. I do understand why he now wants to disassociate with no planers though. But he did not in the past.
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist." Truly fascinating. I don't listen to his show. When is it live? Thanks for the info.
There is a lot of finger-pointing going on. Some of it could be COINTELPRO, but much of it relates to the informal nature of dissent. I think we have to be very careful about these accusations. Facts and rational analysis are the only friends we have.
They could be "look at meeee!"-type abjectly stupidersexuals, or just complete assholesexuals, you are correct. It's a fine line between a complete assholesexual and the typical zogosexual, though, and I don't think people can be that stupidestsexual merely by lacking enough gray matter.
Alex has never advocated the no plane theories that I know of. But to say he never associated with the no planers, well, when Jimmy Walter was at Alex's conference in LA in June 2006 I spoke with him briefly, and he was saying he believes they were holograms. But he did not say it onstage, . Jim Fetzer , who is on the C-SPAN program as one of Alex's panelists, also did not mention the no planes theory at all, at that point.. On the vid nobody posted, alex says that the no-planers talked about credible things for a few years and then started on the no planes to discredit the movement. thats possible, or i suppose its also possible that they really could believe it. A lot of people bash dave von kleist and his pod footage, but i still think that in plane site is one of the best 911 videos there is. the pod footage is only a small part of it. the film is not too long, its simple , shows a lot of footage of the bombs and people talking about bombs, and also has a half hour segment on OKC. Have you seen 911 IN PLANE SITE?
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist." I think it runs 11am-2pm central., live.
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist." I thought that was a no-planer thing. Something about it I didn't like. Can't recall what it was exactly, so maybe I'll watch it again.
I've seen in Plane Sight, and I've also read some criticism. Bottom line: discussion is good. I don't believe that it's the lack of consensus about what really happened that's keeping us from using the doubts effectively in a political context. There is one incontrovertible fact that is typically not discussed in the media: reaction to 9/11 was misdirected for the benefit of the Likud's Clean Break policy. Period. Going after Saddam's WMD was always about defending Israel, and never, never, never was about preventing another 9/11. We'd have stopped illegal immigration if we were really serious about that. That leaves a lot of questions, and they're all worth media attention that they're not getting by the Jewish-influenced press.
Not always. Would you want bible-nuts interrupting a forensics lab because discussion is good?
The press (and the blogosphere) should stand and fall based on the quality of its ideas. If a no planer has a point to make in public, it'll either work or it won't from a logical perspective. Law enforcement is a separate sphere.
They get the publicity. The media uses them to smear the movement. Is anyone surprised? Is that not predictable?
Wasn't really deputizing you, I'm just a civilian, but to the unbiased bystander in you I would ask how long are you going to encourage idiocy as if it's dialogue when you could just say nothing and be glad someone's finally saying it's idiotic for you?
Agree.
Are you 100% positive that a plane hit the Pentagon?
The "No-planer" stuff is implicitly all about the WTC. Was waiting for someone to suggest otherwise, though. Okay. It's back to calling them "WTC-no-planers" then, I guess. Maybe "no-planes-at-all-ers, zippy, nada" is better.
And, he's just added a fourth hour which can be heard on the internet. He's also been doing a Sunday afternoon show on KLBJ am here in Austin and over the internet.
Most here are 100 percent positive that a 757 did NOT hit the P'gon.
Not an airliner. By all evidence available to me it was a smaller jet-powered aircraft, in all likelihood un-manned. If it had wings as opposed to fins, then they apparently weren't very wide wings. So, many, if not all, of the light- pole knockdowns were apparently rigged, which is a disturbing thought even at this point.
Not an airliner. By all evidence available to me it was a smaller jet-powered aircraft, in all likelihood un-manned. If it had wings as opposed to fins, then they apparently weren't very wide wings. Why do you think the Government is lying?
I think other people have covered the most obvious motives pretty well for me. They all merge at money, prestige and power.
I noticed someone accusing you of being a disinfo agent right here the other day. I reacted against it for the same reason that I'm taking my current position. I don't have time or the background to fully analyze all of this stuff. Facts that I can understand are all I have to use. I work from those basics I mentioned above.
I do not want to get sucked up into some group gambit designated good-guy ploy, which is what can happen if I play favorites. This is how I like to thank my occasional (or otherwise) rhetorical supporters: with no favors. I hope you appreciate it.
I try to take the same approach. You're just a series of ideas to me.
Oh, I do it here all the time. I think he'll be able to handle my individual take.
My ultimate assessment of the purpose of COINTELPRO would be to have it waste our time by tying us down to endless bickering when the important matter is how America reacted to 9/11, and why. Nothing matters more than that. The event occurred. It matters who did it, but who benefited from our national response to it matters most. The rest can, and often becomes, a distraction.
That's what it is.
The preferential poster issue is highly counter to the purpose of an open forum in a world of censorship. I would not want to censor myself because I thought that it would diminish my friendship value to others online. I disagree with plenty of people here on a regular basis. If they can't accept that, then what they need can't be delivered via an Internet forum. This notion has a strong basis in leaderless resistance, a notion proposed by Colonel Ulius L. Amoss in his dire predictions that our country would someday be communized by force, and how we could react against it most effectively.
It's like passengers heckling the pilot in-flight because he's methed out after screwing the co-pilot. We're all happy someone knows how to fly the thing, we're mostly looking for more booze before landing. Got a cig? The 9/11 truth movement wants people to know the truth about 9/11. It doesn't want to run the world. I hope.
I've always liked the idea of decentralized resistance.never felt the need to be a 'joiner' and in the sphere that we're discussing, leaders can be co-opted or compromised, or even worse, be flat out double agents. But I had never read or even heard about this term you mentioned- 'leaderless resistance'. Thanks, I learned something new today. I think that govt would not like this idea because they cant infiltrate it and steer its course. This is the way the 911 truths groups and to a lesser degree, ron paul groups operated,. I saw one very bad example of centralized control of a ron paul meetup group, and it was disgusting,. MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist."
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#2. To: Artisan (#1)
(Edited)
#3. To: PSUSA (#2)
#4. To: noone222 (#3)
I don't always agree with Alex Jones' methods, but no one I'm aware of has done more to awaken America from the comatose state it's been in for 100 years than he has.
#5. To: PSUSA (#4)
That was more than enough shock.
#6. To: noone222, AJ people, All (#3)
#7. To: Jethro Tull (#6)
#8. To: noone222 (#3)
I don't always agree with Alex Jones' methods, but no one I'm aware of has done more to awaken America from the comatose state it's been in for 100 years than he has.
#9. To: Artisan (#0)
#10. To: All (#9)
(Edited)
#11. To: nobody (#10)
Conversations With History - Peter Dale Scott
#12. To: nobody (#9)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#13. To: Artisan (#12)
I do understand why he now wants to disassociate with no planers though. But he did not in the past.
#14. To: Artisan (#12)
#15. To: buckeye (#14)
(Edited)
#16. To: buckeye, nobody (#14)
There is a lot of finger-pointing going on. Some of it could be COINTELPRO, but much of it relates to the informal nature of dissent. I think we have to be very careful about these accusations. Facts and rational analysis are the only friends we have.
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#17. To: nobody (#13)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#18. To: Artisan (#16)
IN PLANE SITE
#19. To: Artisan (#16)
#20. To: buckeye (#19)
discussion is good
#21. To: nobody (#20)
#22. To: buckeye (#21)
(Edited)
If a no planer has a point to make in public, it'll either work or it won't from a logical perspective.
#23. To: buckeye (#21)
(Edited)
Law enforcement is a separate sphere.
#24. To: PSUSA (#2)
There is nothing wrong with giving straight answers and without attacking him personally.
#25. To: nobody (#23)
#26. To: buckeye (#25)
(Edited)
#27. To: Artisan, nobody, all (#17)
I think it runs 11am-2pm central., live.
#28. To: buckeye (#25)
Are you 100% positive that a plane hit the Pentagon?
#29. To: buckeye (#25)
(Edited)
a plane hit the Pentagon?
#30. To: nobody (#29)
a plane hit the Pentagon?
#31. To: TwentyTwelve (#30)
#32. To: nobody (#26)
#33. To: buckeye (#32)
#34. To: nobody (#33)
#35. To: buckeye (#11)
(Edited)
questioning AJ is not necessarily tantamount to CoIntelPro
#36. To: nobody, TwentyTwelve (#33)
#37. To: buckeye (#34)
You're just a series of ideas to me.
#38. To: nobody (#37)
#39. To: buckeye (#36)
(Edited)
#40. To: buckeye (#38)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaderless_resistance History of the idea The concept of leaderless resistance was reportedly developed by Col. Ulius Louis Amoss, an alleged U.S. intelligence officer, in the early 1960s. An anti- communist, Amoss saw leaderless resistance as a backup for the possibility of a Communist seizure of the United States. The concept was revived and popularized in an essay published by the anti- government Ku Klux Klan member Louis Beam in 1983 and again in 1992. Beam advocated leaderless resistance as a technique for white nationalists to continue the struggle against the U.S. government despite an overwhelming imbalance in power and resources. In the same year the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) was formed as an eco-resistance movement.
Beam argued that conventional hierarchical pyramidal organizations are extremely dangerous for their participants, when employed in a resistance movement against government, because of the ease of disclosing the chain of command. A more workable approach would be to convince the like-minded individuals to form independent cells, without close communication between each other, but generally operating in the same direction
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest