See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Obama’s Change: More War and Premeditated Mass Murder
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/?p=2106
Published: May 13, 2008
Author: Kurt Nimmo
Post Date: 2008-05-13 19:18:55 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 1120
Comments: 72
In the video here, Barack Obama tells us he believes George Bush Senior “did an excellent job when it came to the Gulf War” and this serves as a “model for how we should be operating.” In addition to Obama’s praise for slaughter and untold suffering, the presidential candidate told his audience the first Bush administration had engaged in “incredible and hard diplomatic negotiation,” a declaration that is completely at odds with reality. In fact, the United States had long planned to attack Iraq, years before Saddam invaded Kuwait for stealing its oil by way of slant drilling and violating OPEC oil production agreements, thus undercutting the price of oil in order to destroy Iraq’s economy. In 1989, the Pentagon had drawn up plans to invade Iraq. Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr., colorfully known as “Stormin’ Norman” — “Mass Murdering Norman” works better — was named Commander of the so-called U.S. Central Command, which was the renamed version of the Rapid Deployment Force, and as commander he oversaw the plan to invade Iraq. During January of 1990, massive quantities of United States weapons, equipment, and supplies were sent to Saudi Arabia in order to prepare for the war against Iraq. CIA Director William Webster, writes Francis A. Boyle, “and the CIA assisted and directed Kuwait in its actions… in demanding immediate repayment of loans Kuwait had made to Iraq during the Iraq-Iran War… and in breaking off negotiations with Iraq over these disputes.” In doing this, the United States “intended to provoke Iraq into aggressive military actions against Kuwait that they knew could be used to justify U.S. military intervention into the Persian Gulf for the purpose of destroying Iraq and taking over Arab oil fields.” But if we listen to Obama, the United States was involved in sincere and “incredible and hard diplomatic negotiation,” a statement that reveals either Obama’s ignorance or disingenuousness. It is common historic knowledge that U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie tricked Saddam Hussein into invading Kuwait. Glaspie “assured him that the United States considered the dispute to be a regional concern, and that it would not intervene militarily. In other words, the United States government gave Saddam Hussein what amounted to a ‘green light’ to invade Kuwait.” Saddam, of course, was an easily fooled chump, as the U.S. had played a similar trick in 1980, when the Carter administration gave a “green light” urging Saddam to attack Iran, resulting in a catastrophically tragic war — 900,000 Iranians and 300,000 Iraqis were slaughtered. Obama, as a stand-up for the likes of Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, both Rockefeller operatives, does not bother to mention in his speech that Bush Senior violated the Constitution and lied to the American people in order to invade Iraq. He said the act of moving 40,000 U.S. military personnel into the Gulf was “defensive.” From the outset, Bush “deliberately misled, deceived, concealed and made false representations to the Congress to prevent its free deliberation and informed exercise of legislative power,” as Boyle explains. Moreover, Bush intentionally usurped Congressional power, ignored its authority, and failed and refused to consult with the Congress. He instituted a naval blockade of Iraq — an overt act of war, no matter who writes the history books — without approval of Congress or the neolib lapdog organization, the United Nations. He sent an additional 200,000 troops without consulting Congress or acquiring its approval. Soon enough, Bush turned these “defensive” forces into offensive forces. He “strong-armed legislation through Congress that approved enforcement of U.N. resolutions vesting absolute discretion in any nation, providing no guidelines, and requiring no reporting to the United Nations.” Bush “knew full well that he intended to destroy the armed forces and civilian infrastructure of Iraq. Those acts were undertaken to enable him to commit a Nuremberg Crime Against Peace and war crimes. This conduct violated the Constitution and Laws of the United States and especially the War Powers Clause found in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, the U.S. War Powers Act of 1973, 87 Stat. 555,” notes Boyle. “The United States is knowingly violating Article 54 of the Geneva Convention which prohibits any country from undermining ‘objects indispensable to the survival of (another country’s) civilian population,’ including drinking water installations and supplies, says Thomas Nagy, a business professor at George Washington University,” Stephen Gowans wrote in 2001. “During the Gulf War, coalition forces bombed Iraq’s eight multi-purpose dams, destroying flood control systems, irrigation, municipal and industrial water storage, and hydroelectric power. Major pumping stations were targeted, and municipal water and sewage facilities were destroyed.” But it was worse than this, far worse, according to Nagy. Nagy says that not only did the United States deliberately destroy drinking water and sanitation facilities, it knew sanctions would prevent Iraq from rebuilding, and that epidemics would ensue. One document, written soon after the bombing, warned that sanctions would prevent Iraq from importing “water treatment replacement parts and some essential chemicals” leading to “increased incidences, if not epidemics, of disease.” Another document lists the most likely diseases: “diarrheal diseases (particularly children); acute respiratory illnesses (colds and influenza); typhoid; hepatitis A (particularly children); measles, diphtheria, and pertussis (particularly children); meningitis, including meningococcal (particularly children); cholera (possible, but less likely.)” Then U.S. Navy Secretary John Lehman estimated that 200,000 Iraqis died in the Gulf War, but many more have died since. UNICEF estimates that well over a million Iraqis have died as a result of the U.S-led sanctions regime, in place for the last decade. Some 500,000 children have died, and an estimated 4,000 die from various preventable, sanctions-related diseases, every month, says the U.N. agency. Obama does not mention this tremendous and criminal loss of life. Instead, he concentrates on how much the invasion and medieval siege of Iraq cost. “You know how much that whole thing cost us?” Obama asks his audience. “20 billion dollars.” And then he takes the second Bush administration to task for spending $600 billion for the second invasion and occupation of Iraq, actually phase two of the original illegal and immoral attack. Not a single word on the million plus people who have so far lost their lives. Disgustingly, when Obama declares “that’s the kind of foreign policy I want to pursue,” the audience applauds. But then, as usual, the people are easily tricked, just like Saddam Hussein, and are bedazzled by cheap slogans and snake oil salesmen and enthusiastically offer up their plaudits. Dictators and tyrants have enjoyed this sort of support for centuries. If selected, Obama will usher in the next round of imperialistic mass murder under the Kissinger-Brzezinski banner, that is to say the bloody oriflamme of the neolibs. Naturally, the hoodwinked masses will see this as “change,” as the in-your-face neocons will be obliged to step aside, that is to say retire to their “think-tanks,” teaching positions, and memoirs. Of course, none of these criminals actually step aside, they simply step out of the public spotlight and continue their work in the shadows. It is not a mistake the neolib and neocon organizations are interlocking. It’s a shell game and there really is not much disagreement at the top.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-31) not displayed.
.
.
.
#32. To: Pissed Off Janitor, ALL (#14)
The Desert Storm Glock This was a 1991 series of 1000 Glock 17s which had special engraving on it. A list of names of all the coalition countries is engraved down the top of the slide; "Operation Desert Storm/January 16-February 27, 1991" is engraved on the right side. On the left side is "New World Order/Commemorative". The first 15 Desert Storm Glocks were special presentation models and had the special "bright black" finish. The special engraving on these was also slightly altered from the standard. These pistols were supposed to go to: UD000US: George Bush, Commander-in-Chief Part of the special engraving was these men's names and ranks engraved on the slide. In addition all of these special presentations along with the next 35 Desert Storm Glocks came with the Wooden Display case made specially for the Desert Storm Glocks. The remaining 950 Desert Storm Commemoratives came in the standard Glock Box, but with desert camoflage labels. Bush has followed it to a T. Interesting - Democrat plan - Republican execution. Although these ObamaCONs are dosed up on Kool Aid and unreachable, others lurking are paying close attention and they're getting the real picture...
They never make any sense, ever.
your opinions?
Is this the real arator? I have to tell you I am beyond stunned by your endorsement and campaigning for Obaba. This last answer was so convoluted as to defy reason. I have been one of your biggest fans ever since the fallulah uproar over at lp. Geez...
"HOLODOMOR" is Ukrainian word for "FAMINE-GENOCIDE"
Bend, Oregon is an interesting place, it is one of the largest growing cities in Oregon and consists of many extremely wealthy people, many of whom are living in their second or third home. When I would take the bus to go to drill with my Special Forces Guard unit in Utah from here in Eugene, the bus driver would point out Tom Selleck's and many other movers and shaker's coveted second home in the part of Oregon with crisp mountain air and the best water in the continental United States. It sounds like a very savvy stump speech for Bend, I don't think it would play as well in Eugene with is light years away politically then the Willamette Valley. Remember I said Southwestern and Eastern Oregon are much more Conservative? Bend is conservative on steroids, but it is a bipolar conservative with an air of Dr. Jekyll Hollywood refugees and Mr. Hyde ultra conservative fundie cowboys. I lived there a while and worked at Century Cycles one summer during my bicycle racing years. I lived right across the street from the Four Square Gospel Church, a Hagee like place and got into fist fights with cowboys who didn't like tight panted - to them - 'faggy' bicyclists' and would jump out of their pick ups to do this at intersections. (That never stopped me from flipping them the bird in traffic however. I am skilled at fighting and very very hard headed about expressing myself.) But to sum up my point here, there is Central Oregon pandering going on here, and I don't agree that Poppy's war was a justifiable one.
Nothing but gas...
Don't make me get out the nekkid Twister pic...
If you understand their language, they do. They know what's up and they know what they've bought. They know... The NWO souvenir pistol, Desert Storm (Gulf War I)
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
I agree with you.
Convoluted? What was convoluted was the author's claim that contrasting what was positive in the policy of the father (namely, not invading and occupying Iraq) with what is disastrous in the policy of the son is somehow an endorsement of everything Spookdaddy did visa vi Iraq. That's not what Obama said. But, Obama-bashers are determined to ignore Obama's positives and pretend he's nothing more than a Bush-Clinton clone when manifestly he is not. That's just plain dishonest. I endorse Obama because he is the perfect instrument to utterly destroy the GOP. And the GOP must be destroyed, because it is fascist, piratical, unabashedly traitorous and tyrannical, and a mortal threat to this Republic (and to humanity generally). Does that clear things up for ya?
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
That's one of the hazards of living in a welfare/warfare police-state. yep, that's been our point all along. there is no way that i believe that this isn't all staged. all three are puppets of the establishment. the globalist foreign policy agenda will go forward as planned years ago. stating again what we already know well, the only real candidate for change is/was Ron Paul.
It destroys nothing. The game continues, and a new enemy will be provided next round. Your hatred is focused on the wrong thing, imo... you are being used, and much worse will be ushered in as a result. But I know a lot of people that are strangled and tangled by the system.
Obama's position is crystal clear. It has no relationship to either of the Bushes. Bin Laden was/is a serious threat to our economic survival and a dangerous radical (for as long as we depend on ME oil). Saddam was a toothless old non-threat. Bush I's goal was simply to push Saddam back to his own border and maintain stability in the region, not to establish an imperial outpost in the ME (that was Junior's goal). Bush I achieved his goal and we came home. The article is an all-over-the place rant and does not warrant posting.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Hahahahaha Zbig-Kissinger bump
There is only one candidate that has truly addressed the domestic issues, and policies, with solutions. We have no input to the foreign policy.. none. And the people have been silenced on domestic policy, despite the polling. The murder of America will continue from within.
Yeah, a member in good standing of the Republocrat establishment is going to destroy one of the wings on the evil bird of prey. LOL! You have lost your mind.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. The only enemy Obama has singled out is the original enemy.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
Hahahahaha!! Good one.
You have surrendered to your own delusions.
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
You have surrendered to your own delusions. Good one. Thoughtful retort. What's your problem, laziness or ignorance?
Success is relative. It is what we can make of the mess we have made of things. T. S. Eliot
BeAChooser will be along shortly to holler ROTFLOL at you. You do know that, don't you? At least that is what he used to tell everyone on LP when they brought that up.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. What's your problem, laziness or ignorance? That's your forte'. Own it sweet cheeks.
Pay that two-timing Marxist Establishment bootlicker no mind...
"snake oil salesman." Is there a better description of any of the three left in the running on the D and R ticket? I haven't seen any better description than that.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. We really need a bug zapper.
"snake oil salesman." Is there a better description of any of the three left in the running on the D and R ticket? I haven't seen any better description than that. It's perfect!
Alright!!!
What "delusion" is that? I am not one of the people who keep saying, despite all evidence to the contrary, that establishment whores and clowns actually care about America and Americans. They used to put people who actually believed such nonsense in mental institutions.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Thank you. I think so too.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Yeah, it appears that a few of the posters on here have been drinking quite heavily from the Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. They certainly have a lot of nerve...
Actually, they don't. How hard is it to support the status quo and be free to openly spit on crackers?
Dear FOH. I am sorry for having to bring you the sad news but I am going to filter you out in a few minutes. I am not filtering you out because you are incredibly dumb, which you may very well be, but because you seem to be using whatever traces of intelligence you may possess to hurt other people. Guys who are rude to ladies are worth less than dirt in my book and it was brought to my attention that you are one of those. I avoid interacting with such scumbags both in real life and in cyberspace. I hope you learn and internalize good manners and that you apologize to those that you offended but, realistically, I can't see that happening any time soon. But, even a deathbed conversion would be preferable to spending time in this world and eventually leaving it as the near-subhuman bitch that you are now. I hope that you appreciate the fact that I am not dedicating a full thread to this little decision of mine. You're not worth that much but, if you work hard at self-improving, you may become worth something in a possible, distant future.
Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'
I sincerely want you to know what a ego maniacal chickensh*t you are and furthermore...adios ObamaCON !!
I sincerely want you to know what a ego maniacal chickensh*t you are and furthermore...adios ObamaCON !! LOL! DUCK DODGE HIDE! Do the ObamaCON dance!!
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition "Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx heheheheheheh. Hola mis amigo. "Pull my finger" 
pics:The NWO souvenir pistol, Desert Storm (Gulf War I) Glock commemorative gun,who got it
The Desert Storm (Gulf War I) Glock commemorative gun, given to NWO supporters...
Desert Storm Glock: A 1991 model Glock 17 pistol engraved on the right side with "Operation Desert Storm" and on the left side with "New World Order".
BUSH SENIOR WAS GIVEN FIRST GLOCK OF THE ISSUE, A LIST OF WHO GOT THEM IS BELOW. In the same year G. H. W. Bush's Speech to Congress, September 11, 1991, discusses his invasion of Iraq under the first United Nations 'authorization' for pre-emptive war:
"...what is at stake, is more [pauses, looks dismissive of this idea] than one small country. [Smiles.] It is a big idea. A new world order. Where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace, and security, freedom, and the rule of law.....out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, the new world order, can emerge....Now we can see a new world coming into view, a world in which there is a very real prospect of a new world order...."
UD001US: Gen. H. Norman Schwartzkopf III (Commander-in-Chief, CentCom)
UD002US: James Baker III (Secy of State)
UD003US: Gen. Colin Powell (Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff)
UD004US: Dick Cheney (Secy of Defense)
UD005US: Brent Scowcroft (National Security Advisor)
UD006US: Lt. Gen. Thomas Kelly
UD007US: Lt. Gen. Chuck Horner (Commander, Air Forces, CentCom)
UD008US: Maj. Gen. Robert B Johnston (Chief-of-Staff, CentCom)
UD009US: Lt. Gen. Calvin Waller (Dpty Commander-in-Chief, CentCom)
UD010US: Lt. Gen. Walter Boomer (Commander, I MEF)
UD011US: Vice Adm. Stanley Arthur (Commander, Naval Forces, CentCom)
UD012US: Maj. Gen. William "Gus" Pagonis (Chief of Logistics, CentCom)
UD013US: Brig. Gen. Richard Neal (Operations Ofcr., CentCom) 
#33. To: Arator (#15)
This excerpt ripped from its original context doesn't tell us much, but I can guess what Obama was getting at:
#34. To: Peppa (#18)
In the late 90's Brzenzinski gave his plan for how the US should dominate the world.
#35. To: FOH (#31)
The ObamaCONs are complete and utter frauds...
#36. To: ghostdogtxn, Ferret Mike (#0)
#37. To: Arator (#15)
(Edited)
#38. To: christine (#36)
"Only those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly." Robert F. Kennedy
#39. To: Christine, ferret mike (#36)
your opinions?
#40. To: Cynicom (#23)
More like twist, turn, squirm and spin.
#41. To: Peppa (#35)
They never make any sense, ever.
#42. To: christine (#0)
#43. To: FOH (#41)
If you understand their language, they do. They know what's up and they know what they've bought. They know...
#44. To: angle (#37)
(Edited)
Is this the real arator? I have to tell you I am beyond stunned by your endorsement and campaigning for Obaba. This last answer was so convoluted as to defy reason.
#45. To: ghostdogtxn (#42)
And if Hillary or McCain is selected, the same thing will happen.
#46. To: Arator (#44)
(Edited)
I endorse Obama because he is the perfect instrument to utterly destroy the GOP. And the GOP must be destroyed, because it is fascist, traitorous, unabashedly tyrannical, and a mortal threat to this Republic (and to humanity generally).
#47. To: mirage (#4)
Waiting for the apologists to arrive and say that more war is a good idea or that Obama has been "misunderstood"....
#48. To: iconoclast (#47)
The article is an all-over-the place rant and does not warrant posting.
#49. To: christine (#45)
the globalist foreign policy agenda will go forward as planned years ago.
#50. To: Arator (#44)
I endorse Obama because he is the perfect instrument to utterly destroy the GOP. And the GOP must be destroyed, because it is fascist, piratical, unabashedly traitorous and tyrannical, and a mortal threat to this Republic (and to humanity generally).
Lord Acton
#51. To: Peppa (#46)
and a new enemy will be provided next round.
#52. To: iconoclast (#51)
The only enemy Obama has singled out is the original enemy.
#53. To: James Deffenbach, Arator (#50)
You have lost your mind.
#54. To: iconoclast, James Deffenbach, Arator (#53)
You have lost your mind.
#55. To: Peppa (#52)
Hahahahaha!!
#56. To: christine (#0)
It is common historic knowledge that U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie tricked Saddam Hussein into invading Kuwait. Glaspie “assured him that the United States considered the dispute to be a regional concern, and that it would not intervene militarily. In other words, the United States government gave Saddam Hussein what amounted to a ‘green light’ to invade Kuwait.”
Lord Acton
#57. To: iconoclast (#55)
Thoughtful retort.
#58. To: Peppa, iconoclast (#57)
What's your problem, laziness or ignorance?
#59. To: christine (#0)
But then, as usual, the people are easily tricked, just like Saddam Hussein, and are bedazzled by cheap slogans and snake oil salesmen and enthusiastically offer up their plaudits. Dictators and tyrants have enjoyed this sort of support for centuries.
Lord Acton
#60. To: FOH (#58)
Pay that two-timing Marxist Establishment bootlicker no mind...
#61. To: James Deffenbach (#59)
But then, as usual, the people are easily tricked, just like Saddam Hussein, and are bedazzled by cheap slogans and snake oil salesmen and enthusiastically offer up their plaudits. Dictators and tyrants have enjoyed this sort of support for centuries.
#62. To: Peppa (#60)
We really need a bug zapper.
#63. To: FOH (#62)
#64. To: iconoclast (#53)
You have surrendered to your own delusions.
Lord Acton
#65. To: Peppa (#61)
It's perfect!
Lord Acton
#66. To: FOH, iconoclast (#54)
Kook Kool Aid container
Lord Acton
#67. To: James Deffenbach (#66)
Yeah, it appears that a few of the posters on here have been drinking quite heavily from the
Kook Kool Aid container
#68. To: FOH (#67)
They certainly have a lot of nerve...
#69. To: FOH (#62)
#70. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#69)
#71. To: FOH (#70)
To: a vast rightwing conspirator
"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx
#72. To: IndieTX (#71)
LOL! DUCK DODGE HIDE! Do the ObamaCON dance!!
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest