See other History Articles
Title: WHY I KNOW GOD EXISTS
Source:
youtube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGHGZfCKEYs
Published: May 15, 2008
Author: 3 year old
Post Date: 2008-05-15 16:49:27 by Uncle Bill
Keywords: Train, Up A, Child
Views: 178
Comments: 7
Francis Hopkinson, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, in his 1777 work “A Political Catechism”: Q. What is war? A. The curse of mankind; the mother of famine and pestilence; the source of complicated miseries; and the undistinguishing destroyer of the human species. Q. How is war divided? A. Into offensive and defensive. Q. What is the general object of an offensive war? . . . A. [F]or the most part, it is undertaken to gratify the ambition of a prince, who wishes to subject to his arbitrary will a people whom God created free, and to gain an uncontrolled dominion over their rights and property. . . . Q. What is defensive war? A. It is to take up arms in opposition to the invasions of usurped power and bravely suffer present hardships and encounter present dangers, to secure the rights of humanity and the blessings of freedom, to generations yet unborn. Q. Is even defensive war justifiable in a religious view? A. The foundation of war is laid in the wickedness of mankind . . . . God has given man wit to contrive, power to execute, and freedom of will to direct his conduct. It cannot be but that some, from a depravity of will, will abuse these privileges and exert these powers to the injury of others: and the oppressed would have no safety nor redress but by exerting the same powers in their defence: and it is our duty to set a proper value upon and defend to the utmost our just rights and the blessings of life: otherwise a few miscreants [unprincipled individuals] would tyrannize over the rest of mankind, and make the passive multitude the slaves of their power. Thus it is that defensive is not only justifiable, but an indispensable duty. Q. Is it upon these principles that the people of America are resisting the arms of Great Britain, and opposing force with force? A. Strictly so. . . . And may Heaven prosper their virtuous undertaking! Q. But it has often been said, that America is in a state of rebellion. Tell me, therefore, what is Rebellion? A. It is when a great number of people, headed by one or more factious leaders, aim at deposing their lawful prince without any just cause of complaint in order to place another on his throne. Q. Is this the case of the Americans? A. Far otherwise. [ Francis Hopkinson, The Miscellaneous Essays and Occasional Writings of Francis Hopkinson, Esq. (Philadelphia: T. Dobson, 1792), Vol. I, pp. 111-116.] James Wilson (a signer of the Declaration and the Constitution, an original Justice on the U. S. Supreme Court and the father of the first organized legal training in America), explained in to his law students more about defensive rights: "I here close my examination into those natural rights, which, in my humble opinion, it is the business of civil government to protect, and not to subvert, and the exercise of which it is the duty of civil government to enlarge, and not to restrain. . . . The defence of one’s self, justly called the primary law of nature, is not, nor can it be abrogated by any regulation of municipal law. This principle of defence is not confined merely to the person; it extends to the liberty and the property of a man: it is not confined merely to his own person; it extends to the persons of all those, to whom he bears a peculiar relation — of his wife, of his parent, of his child, of his master, of his servant: nay, it extends to the person of every one, who is in danger, perhaps, to the liberty of every one, whose liberty is unjustly and forcibly attacked. It becomes humanity as well as justice. . . . As a man is justified in defending, so he is justified in retaking, his property, or his peculiar relations, when from him they are unjustly taken and detained. . . . This long investigation concerning natural rights and natural remedies, I conclude by answering the question, with which I introduced it: Man does not exist for the sake of government, but government is instituted for the sake of man." [ James Wilson, The Works of the Honorable James Wilson, Bird Wilson, editor (Philadelphia: Bronson and Chuncey, 1804), Vol. II, pp. 495-497. ] "There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents... There is also an artificial aristocracy founded on wealth and birth, without either virtue or talents; for with these it would belong to the first class... The artificial aristocracy is a mischievous ingredient in government, and provision should be made to prevent its ascendency." "How soon the labor of men would make a paradise of the whole earth, were it not for misgovernment, and a diversion of all his energies from their proper object -- the happiness of man -- to the selfish interest of kings, nobles, and priests."
Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 1813. ME 13:396
Thomas Jefferson to Ellen W. Coolidge, 1825. ME 18:341 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#3. To: Uncle Bill (#0)
He may very well exist. The question is, is he a Christian, Jew, Islamic, Wiccan, Hindu, etc., etc., etc. He hasn't bothered to let us know one way or the other. it's all a guessing game with everyone basing their beliefs on nothing more than their opinions.
#5. To: Hayek Fan (#3)
(Edited)
He may very well exist. Affirmative to that. As to what follows, none of the above. The longer I live the more skeptical I have become towards religions of any type as they all appear made of, by and for man and are frequently subversed for political/financial motives by power hungry evil bastards preying upon the feeble minded among us.
If God is a Christian he both loves us and he will send most of us to burn in everlasting hell because he loves us. If he is a Christian God he is both all powerful but not so powerful because he needs our money. If he is a Christian God he requires that we believe and he refuses to give us any proof that he does exist.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWHY I KNOW GOD EXISTS
Replies to Comment # 3. He may very well exist. The question is, is he a Christian, Jew, Islamic, Wiccan, Hindu, etc., etc., etc.
#7. To: Hayek Fan (#3)
He may very well exist. The question is, is he a Christian, Jew, Islamic, Wiccan, Hindu, etc., etc., etc.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.