See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: McCain's YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare
Source:
You Tube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEtZlR3zp4c
Published: May 18, 2008
Author: bravenewfilms
Post Date: 2008-05-18 23:11:46 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 559
Comments: 39
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
bttt
I shall not vote for evil, lesser or otherwise.
he looks as dopey bush in all those clips.
Cancer cometh, Parkin's son saith...
If you're going to have a party filled with child molesters and perverts, you need a clueless simpleton at the head of it, right? We all know what the Genuinely Odious Pederast party is made up of, so is it really such a surprise that they consistently select the most brain-damaged morons they can find to be their ostensible "leader"? Someone who could walk in on the middle of a bunch of Republicans gang-raping a nursery school picnic outing, and not have a CLUE what was going on? Someone who could slap them on the back as they're violating some four-year old and say "you're doing a HECKUVA JOB there!" That's all McCain is, the next clueless simpleton who can turn a blind eye to the preferred pastimes of the vile monsters who are the GOP.
#2. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
#3. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
Grim Reaper bump
#4. To: christine (#2)
 | Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#5. To: christine (#2)
whorege arbusto - juan mcturkey he looks as dopey bush in all those clips.
#6. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
bttt
#7. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
Funny!
#8. To: Elliott Jackalope, christine, Ferret Mike, Jethro Tull, rowdee, Peppa (#4)
Speaking of vile monsters who are the GOP, we'd be better off with anyone but some unknown quantity like GOP-by-another-label-Chuck Baldwin. (his image of the typical squeaky clean family man conservative Christian means he probably likes little boys' asses-we know that all Republicans (especially the closet ones) laugh at us gullible rubes and use traditional values as punchlines in private-and, at least McCain likes pussy!) The same people who are trying to ram Baldwin down...or up...into us, are the same know-it-all assholes who told us that Bush was the only man for the job. They don't believe in Baldwin so much, they're just trying to save the GOP so they can continue the swindle for Halliburton and other corporate friendlies of the GOP, and to prevail at any cost against their mirror value adversaries, "them God-cursed Dimmicratz!" Since Republicans (even one who supposedly changed his spots in 2000) are incapable of honesty and they regard integrity as a weakness and a fairie tale for kids, the only way to win is to run an unknown and to distance themselves from Bush. Some shills will attack Bush (only because no one will buy any of their crap, like "Bush is a super smart Yale grad and the best president since Reagan!" Remember that line of shit? They said that with straight faces, too) but they won't attack the same "values" we can expect from any "mainstreamed" Republican. Look at who's pushing Baldwin here at 4. What more do you need to know? He's one of those psycho butch boys who likes to "beat them dirty queers up" before he rapes them just to prove to himself and his victims that he's "straight." A vote for Baldwin is a vote for closet Christian homos. Don't be fooled.
If you're going to have a party filled with child molesters and perverts, you need a clueless simpleton at the head of it, right? We all know what the Genuinely Odious Pederast party is made up of, so is it really such a surprise that they consistently select the most brain-damaged morons they can find to be their ostensible "leader"? Someone who could walk in on the middle of a bunch of Republicans gang-raping a nursery school picnic outing, and not have a CLUE what was going on? Someone who could slap them on the back as they're violating some four-year old and say "you're doing a HECKUVA JOB there!" That's all McCain is, the next clueless simpleton who can turn a blind eye to the preferred pastimes of the vile monsters who are the GOP.
#9. To: christine (#2)
Here's Baldwin's cryptic confession! First he admits that the Christian Right is dishonest (who knows that better than Mr. Cheerleader for The Moral Majority?) and then he tells us that the way to win is to "understand the issues"! (Translation: Lie to the rubes so we can retain control!) He did not repudiate any of the immoral things that the GOP and their cronies did! He only criticizes their poor judgment and suggests that they "honestly face" the political reality", and because they're all incapable of changing their globalist powermonger thinking, what does that mean, exactly? "Why, let's get back in and polish this turd up so we can swindle smaller, less conspicuous chunks of the nation's treasury and natural resources! The Christian Jihad movement still has lots of good miles left before the wheels come off America, INC! And, I'm the man to make the tax cuts permanent and to persecute the queers until we finally plunge over that final precipice!"
Unfortunately, it has been the Christian Right's blind support for President Bush in particular and the Republican Party in general that has precipitated a glaring and perhaps fatal defect: the Christian Right cannot, or will not, honestly face the real danger confronting these United States. The reason for this blindness is due, in part, to political partisanship or personal aggrandizement. Regardless, the Christian Right is currently devoid of genuine sagacity. On the whole, they fail to understand the issues that are critical to our nation's--and their own--survival.
#10. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)
You and Jackelope are full of shit. You both accuse people of the worst crimes without proof. Just because there are a few fags in the GOP hardly makes them all child molesters. Ridiculous.
#11. To: Old Friend (#10)
Until the GOP outs them they're no better than the entire priesthood from the Vatican on down-they're either suspect or complicit in the coverup. Would you like to tell us which are the bad ones? How about the "good ones"? I didn't think so. Which ones are you defending? The straight ones or the discreet ones who don't get caught? Is there a difference? Prove it. Get them to out the pervs and maybe we can believe them and you again someday. (feeling stoopid yet?)
#12. To: HOUNDDAWG (#11)
You slander innocent people. Maybe we should assume you like little boys too. Since there are pedophiles that hang out on the web. Maybe we should assume you are one until you prove otherwise. You get the point?
#13. To: Old Friend (#10) (Edited)
Well lets see....Craig, Foley, Hatch is on my suspect list, as is David Dreier, Bill Paxon who retired immediately after the gay Sandy Hume turned up dead, John Kyl, Duke Cunningham, and the beat goes on.
You and Jackelope are full of shit. You both accuse people of the worst crimes without proof.
#14. To: Old Friend (#12)
Which "innocent" are you defending? Which of those "innocents" have introduced any "House resolutions" to strengthen the ethics rules and to remove offenders before the dirt goes public? Remember Foley in FLA? They all knew about him and if it hadn't gone public he'd still be in office and trying to date teen age pages. Those who allow that are by no stretch of the term, "innocent". So, until you can give me a single example there is "no exception that proves the rule" and therefore no "innocent people".
#15. To: Jethro Tull (#13)
HAH! Here we have Old Fruit demanding privacy for the same politicians that took away every bit of privacy from every American. Most Americans don't live on exorbitant govt salaries with 100% lifetime healthcare by pretending to be "GAWD fearin' family men!" When they run for office and seek a position of public trust they should be held to a higher standard. But, what does their blinded-by-partisan-love weasel supporter do to defend them? He implies that someone who attempts to hold them accountable must be gay. (It's only shameful for non-Republicans, obviously! HAH!) I have to wonder about him now. Just how badly does he want to know? ;)
#16. To: HOUNDDAWG, jethro tull (#14)
Sure there are rotten apples. There are a lot of rotten apples. The 5 or 6 examples you mentioned. Doesn't meant EVERY person in the GOP is some kind of sex pervert. There are many more on the internet. I'm just saying not to use such a wide brush that's all.
#17. To: HOUNDDAWG (#14)
Damn straight! Testify! AMEN! And it took the PAGES(?!?!?!?!) to bring this to light!!!! worthess mf'n republiscum knew and they didnt do anything about it. But at least some of them took the time to warn the pages to keep away from him. How kind of them to do that.
Remember Foley in FLA? They all knew about him and if it hadn't gone public he'd still be in office and trying to date teen age pages. Those who allow that are by no stretch of the term, "innocent".
#18. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8)
I've had questions in my mind simply because of some of 'those' who are pushing CB as God #3. The tactics used by 'those' are such that immediately raised questions about who 'those' JBT support. Saw that bullying bullshit at TOS1 when the current liar in chief was being promoted as God #2, which caused the same reaction--only with the liar in chief, I knew he was lying from the get/go and when trying to educate the others on the board as to what they were promoting, the tactics were the tactics of 'those'. Folks are always saying things like 'I'll cover your back' or words to that effect--but you know what, there's a whole bunch of them I frankly wouldn't want at my back for any reason. Instead of attempting to prove their point(s) as adult human beings with the give and take of debate, they act more like knuckledraggers with only the most basic cranial instincts.
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
#19. To: Old Friend (#16)
Riiiiight, because after all, the Republicans were SO careful and SO precise in THEIR attacks on anyone and anything that opposed their agenda over the last 28 years. As far as I'm concerned, they'd better be building the world's largest chicken coop, because they have a LOT of chickens coming home to roost. Oh yes, after listening to the screeds of people like Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh over the last 28 years, I'm just SO VERY worried about being TOTALLY FAIR and TOTALLY PRECISE in launching any attacks against the Republicans. Um.... no. Sorry. Don't like seeing their own tactics being used against them? Bummer. My heart just freakin' BLEEDS. Really it does.
There are many more on the internet. I'm just saying not to use such a wide brush that's all.
| Gold and silver are REAL money, paper is but a promise. |
#20. To: Hayek Fan (#0)
beyond pathetic bump
#21. To: Old Friend (#16) (Edited)
If a member of your family commits a crime and comes to your house and you knowingly assist that person, that same GOP that you seem to adore would agree with you being charged with conspiracy and accessory after the fact. I'll type this slowly so you can understand it. ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOP KNEW THEN AND THEY KNOW NOW WHICH MEMBERS ARE SWINDLERS, MOLESTERS, CONSPIRATORS, ETC. AND THEIR OATH OF OFFICE OR OBLIGATIONS TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND THEIR COUNTRY DON'T MEAN SHIT TO THEM! ONLY THEIR ENFORCED PARTY LOYALTY MATTERS! THAT'S WHY THE CONGRESS CAN BE COERCED TO VOTE FOR THE PATRIOT ACT WITHOUT EVEN READING IT! PEOPLE WHO DEFEND THAT AND THEM ARE EQUALLY CORRUPT, AND ARE THE MORAL EQUIVALENT OF A KGB SNITCH IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION! AND, THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS LECTURING ME, BECAUSE I STAND FOR PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY. IT TAKES NO COURAGE OR INTELLIGENCE TO AGREE WITH POLITICAL TYRANTS. SO, BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS, OKAY?
Sure there are rotten apples. There are a lot of rotten apples. The 5 or 6 examples you mentioned. Doesn't meant EVERY person in the GOP is some kind of sex pervert. There are many more on the internet. I'm just saying not to use such a wide brush that's all.
#22. To: HOUNDDAWG (#21)
As highly as you think of yourself, and as many as you have sucked in, you really are quite a large loser in the final rinse...
#23. To: rowdee (#18)
Yeah, they're just polishing it up, and they will fool millions with their "new and improved" product. And some bullies and brownshirts will always be on hand to explain the finer points and qualifications to any skeptics or critics of their new deity. Remember under Hitler and Mussolini and Bush and Christian Jihadists there was no loyal opposition. If you disagree with their stated (or actual) goals then you're somehow flawed at a fundamental, spiritual, moral, racial, political or intellectual level, and you should be A) shot, B) deported, C) converted to some alien religion and/or sexual orientation for having disagreed with the "jackbooted army of lock stepped (but rational and logical) free thinking political analysts". When you see the GOP back someone like Bob Dole for instance, you'll know that there's absolutely no truth to the ugly rumors about backroom deals and top down rule. In fact every hardcore PUB searched her/his soul and decided that Dole was the best candidate for America, and their support (offered after highly intelligent introspection by every party member completely independent of any outside influence) was a matter of principle and therefore above and beyond any possibility of shabby political compromises. And when people with daddy complexes tell you what's good for you, don't argue!
#24. To: HOUNDDAWG, all (#8) (Edited)
I'm not pushing anything down anyone's throat. I posted videos about Chuck Baldwin because I believe his message of small government and thought others might be interested. I know it might be hard for you to believe, but not everyone on f4um is interested in licking the ass of government in order to get handouts as you Obama voters are. If you don't like the videos I posted, that's just too damn bad. This isn't the Obama forum. Others have opinions as well. As for telling anyone Bush was the man for the job, you're talking about someone else pal. I haven't voted for the GOP since 1984. They don't believe in Baldwin so much, they're just trying to save the GOP so they can continue the swindle for Halliburton and other corporate friendlies of the GOP, and to prevail at any cost against their mirror value adversaries, "them God-cursed Dimmicratz!" Ah. So on top of being a racist, now anyone who doesn't vote for Obama is a closet GOPpher. You fucking DP ideologues are the same as the stupid fucking RP ideologues. You sound just like the stupid fuckers on TOS1 and TOS2 who berated those of us who refused to vote for baby Bush. I'll tell you the same as I told them. Fuck you. It's my vote and I'll cast it the way I want to cast it. If you don't like it you can kiss my ass.
The same people who are trying to ram Baldwin down...or up...into us, are the same know-it-all assholes who told us that Bush was the only man for the job.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
#25. To: rowdee, all (#18)
Who's pushing anything? All I did was post some videos of Baldwin making speeches on various subjects. Three or four posts out of the all day non-stop worship Obama threads and I'm pushing someone? And posting these videos is a JBT tactic? As for pushing a god, that would be you Obama-worshippers not me. I don't believe in god, human or otherwise. Unlike you Obamaphiles, I believe government is the problem not the solution and I damn sure don't think a politician is anyone's savior. That would be you Obama voters. Instead of attempting to prove their point(s) as adult human beings with the give and take of debate, they act more like knuckledraggers with only the most basic cranial instincts. Oh, you mean like calling anyone who doesn't worship at the throme of Obama racists and closet GOP supporters? Pot meet kettle.
I've had questions in my mind simply because of some of 'those' who are pushing CB as God #3. The tactics used by 'those' are such that immediately raised questions about who 'those' JBT support
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
#26. To: Hayek Fan (#25) (Edited)
Now, now........did you see where I have called anyone names? Or named names? Do you feel guilty, or something..........? Seriously, calm down. You've not seen me trying to nail your ass to the wall, so to speak. Have you been a total asswipe when discussing the merits/demerits of various candidates with those who support those candidates? Have you been trying to convince all that CB is God #3? For the record, exactly where did you find that I support anyone, and I mean anyone, other than Ron Paul? The last time I was for a candidate was back in 2000......and hello, I was promoting the other black guy! That is, until his ideas about the Constitution began conflicting with what I see the Constitution saying. Psssst! Methinks you are trying to place moi somewhere that it just don't work. :) For the record, I don't recall having a problem with what you've posted, opined, or whatever--that I can recall. However, we surely must disagree on something-- what color is the sky at this very minute? Hmmmmmm?
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
#27. To: HOUNDDAWG (#21)
PEOPLE WHO DEFEND THAT AND THEM ARE EQUALLY CORRUPT, AND ARE THE MORAL EQUIVALENT OF A KGB SNITCH IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION! AND, THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS LECTURING ME, BECAUSE I STAND FOR PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL INTEGRITY. IT TAKES NO COURAGE OR INTELLIGENCE TO AGREE WITH POLITICAL TYRANTS. SO, BLOW IT OUT YOUR ASS, OKAY? Ron Paul doesn't appreciate your attacking him like that.
ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOP KNEW THEN AND THEY KNOW NOW WHICH MEMBERS ARE SWINDLERS, MOLESTERS, CONSPIRATORS, ETC. AND THEIR OATH OF OFFICE OR OBLIGATIONS TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS AND THEIR COUNTRY DON'T MEAN SHIT TO THEM! ONLY THEIR ENFORCED PARTY LOYALTY MATTERS! THAT'S WHY THE CONGRESS CAN BE COERCED TO VOTE FOR THE PATRIOT ACT WITHOUT EVEN READING IT!
#28. To: Hayek Fan (#24)
The dog is an Obama supporter. Well that explains a lot. Hey dog fuck off you moron.
licking the ass of government in order to get handouts as you Obama voters are.
#29. To: rowdee (#26)
Where did he say Chuck Baldwin is god number 3? Or what did he say that you can equate to that>?
Have you been trying to convince all that CB is God #3?
#30. To: rowdee (#26)
I am perfectly calm. It appeared to me that you were jumping on the Hounddawg "paint all Chuck Baldwin supporters with a broad brush" bandwagon. Of course I personalized both yours and Hounddawg's posts. I posted three or four videos concerning Chuck Baldwin which are still on the side bar and now I see these posts slamming Chuck Baldwin supporters as closet GOPhers and JBT's. What would you think if you were in my shoes? Especially since there have been relatively few articles concerning Chuck Baldwin. Have you been a total asswipe when discussing the merits/demerits of various candidates with those who support those candidates? If someone is an asshole towards me then I am am an asshole right back...in spades. But overall, I try not to be. I sometimes fail. For the record, exactly where did you find that I support anyone, and I mean anyone, other than Ron Paul? The last time I was for a candidate was back in 2000......and hello, I was promoting the other black guy! That is, until his ideas about the Constitution began conflicting with what I see the Constitution saying. I was a Ron Paul supporter as well and voted for him in my states primary. He is a done deal though and it's time to move on. Hell, I like Baldwin but I'm not even sure if he'll be on the ballot in my state. Since my states rules prevent me from writing in a candidate, then if the CP isn't on the ballot I will have no choice but to vote for the LP candidate - again. The Democratic Party is a non-starter.
Now, now........did you see where I have called anyone names? Or named names? Do you feel guilty, or something..........? Seriously, calm down. You've not seen me trying to nail your ass to the wall, so to speak
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
#31. To: Old Friend (#28) (Edited)
Well that explains a lot. Hey dog fuck off you moron. I don't know if he is or not. I am assuming. Another f4um Obama supporter has begun calling me and everyone else who refuses to vote for Obama racists, so I am assuming it is the Obama supporter M.O. to paint non-Obama voters with being closet GOPhers. Just like the GOPhers on TOS1 and TOS2 called us non-Bush voters liberals and democrats in 2000 and 2004. I am painting him with the same broad brush he painted me with.
The dog is an Obama supporter.
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
#32. To: Old Friend, Hayak Fan, Other Chuck Baldwin defenders (#29)
"cuse me, old friend.......but who the hell said that Hayek Fan was doing anything? I do believe that quote marks (" ") were used around the word THOSE.....which would indicate that Hayak Fan was not the one under discussion. I was asking him if he had, in fact, said that or tried to promote CB as that.... Geeze.......eeryone is so friggin uptight, with shorts just twisted so badly that brains are being oxygen deprived lately.
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
#33. To: Hayek Fan (#30)
You obviously missed the " " marks around the word THOSE, Hayak..... I asked you those questions so you could look at yourself and realize right away that I wasn't referring to you. :) I've seen a JBT, pisspoor excuse for a redneck, promoting CB all over the place, while prior to and even now, this same JBT, pisspoor excuse for a redneck has treated other people with the utmost villification bullshit. I have to ask myself---why is the MF supporting CB? Do I want my vote anywhere near that guy, if the obvious JBT, pisspoor excuse for a redneck is so all over him. Excuse my language.......but this prick, this sorry assed excuse for a human being believes by throwing his 'weight' around, he can force everyone to swallow his bullshit......he and his actions hurt the guy he's trying to build up. And having a reverse psychological reaction in people that he wants to convince/bully into 'hating everyone' that doesn't walk, talk, and think as he, the knuckledragger does. The knuckledragger wants to eliminate or toss off 4- um island anyone that don't march to his drumbeat. Guess what.......that knuckledragger can't even beat the drum in a rhythm to get others to march with him. PS, my apologies to any rednecks out there that might be offended by my remarks regarding the pisspoor excuse--I reckon the word 'wannabe' should have been stuck in there somewhere.
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
#34. To: HOUNDDAWG (#9)
You sound much more fanatical than Baldwin. You actually seem to be letting people like FOH push you into a corner, and that worries me because I know you're much too clever to let that happen accidentally.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
#35. To: rowdee (#33)
It needed to be said, I've never been big fan of Atwater-Rove either.
my apologies to any rednecks out there that might be offended by my remarks
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
#36. To: rowdee (#33)
I asked you those questions so you could look at yourself and realize right away that I wasn't referring to you. :) I've seen a JBT, pisspoor excuse for a redneck, promoting CB all over the place, while prior to and even now, this same JBT, pisspoor excuse for a redneck has treated other people with the utmost villification bullshit. I have to ask myself---why is the MF supporting CB? Do I want my vote anywhere near that guy, if the obvious JBT, pisspoor excuse for a redneck is so all over him. Excuse my language.......but this prick, this sorry assed excuse for a human being believes by throwing his 'weight' around, he can force everyone to swallow his bullshit......he and his actions hurt the guy he's trying to build up. And having a reverse psychological reaction in people that he wants to convince/bully into 'hating everyone' that doesn't walk, talk, and think as he, the knuckledragger does. The knuckledragger wants to eliminate or toss off 4- um island anyone that don't march to his drumbeat. Guess what.......that knuckledragger can't even beat the drum in a rhythm to get others to march with him. PS, my apologies to any rednecks out there that might be offended by my remarks regarding the pisspoor excuse--I reckon the word 'wannabe' should have been stuck in there somewhere. No harm, no foul. I was mistaken.
You obviously missed the " " marks around the word THOSE, Hayak.....
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976
#37. To: Hayek Fan, artisan, *9-11* (#0)
Senator John McCain Speaks to Dan Rather on 9/11/01, regarding State Sponsored Terrorism: "I have felt that there's been involvement" Rather: But is it true or untrue that in the past over the last decade that there's been occasion when evidence pointed to certain states.. and that for one reason or another, neither the executive nor legislative branch of our US Govt wanted to attend to that. The decision was made to look the other way. McCain: I don't know if the intention, uh, if the action was to just look the other way, but I think there were indications, whether there was conclusive proof or not, was a judgement that made by, uuuhh, our leaders both in the executive and legislative branch. Uh, I have felt that.. that there's been involvement, but, uh , I- I'm .. be honest with ya, Dan, I never thought that an operation of this sophistication and size would take place. I.. I just never did. click here for video Dan Rather & Sen McCain on 9/11/01-state sponsored terrorism McCain Loses It and Flees After 9/11 Truth Questions Saturday, June 23, 2007
John McCain poses for pictures with 9/11 Truth activists
MY REPLY TO ZEITGEIST: 1John Chapter 2: "21 I write to you not because you do not know the truth but because you do, and because every lie is alien to the truth. 22 Who is the liar? Whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Whoever denies the Father and the Son, this is the antichrist."
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#38. To: rowdee (#32)
I guess my comment was more towards hounddog then you. I thought you said the same thing. Sorry.
#39. To: Old Friend (#38)
No problem...... :)
Turn your back on the sun and you only see the shadows.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest