[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog

Israel's Plans for Jordan

Daily Vitamin D Supplementation Slows Cellular Aging:

Hepatitis E Virus in Pork

Hospital Executives Arrested After Nurse Convicted of Killing Seven Newborns, Trying to Kill Eight More

The Explosion of Jewish Fatigue Syndrome

Tucker Carlson: RFK Jr's Mission to End Skyrocketing Autism, Declassifying Kennedy Files

Israel has killed 1,000 Palestinians in the West Bank since October 7, 2023

100m Americans live in areas with cancer-causing 'forever chemicals' in their water

Scientists discover cancer-fighting bacteria that "soak up" forever chemicals in the body

Israel limits entry of baby formula in Gaza as infants die of hunger

17 Ways mRNA Shots May CAUSE CANCER, According to Over 100 STUDIES

Report: Pentagon Halts Some Munitions Shipments To Ukraine Over Concerns That US Stockpiles Are Too Low

Locals Fear Demolitions as Israeli Troops Set Up New Base in Syrias Quneitra

Russian forces discover cache of Ukrainian chemical drone munitions FSB

Clarissa Ward: Gaza is what is turning people overseas against the US

What Parents Wish Their Children Could Grow Up Without

WHY SO MANY FOREIGN BASES IN AFRICA?

Trump called Candace Owens about Brigitte Macron's P*NIS?

New Mexico Is The Most-Dependent State On The Federal Govt, New Jersey The Least


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy
Source: Naked Emperor News
URL Source: http://www.nakedemperornews.com/
Published: May 19, 2008
Author: Naked Emperor News
Post Date: 2008-05-19 22:09:48 by RickyJ
Keywords: None
Views: 2000
Comments: 62

It’s The Theology Stupid!!!

Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand
Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!

BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM

* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church
* Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy

* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy
* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community
* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah
* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0)

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-19   22:10:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: RickyJ (#0)

TwentyTwelve  posted on  2008-05-19   22:15:11 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: RickyJ (#1)

Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month?

You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-19   22:39:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)

You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?

That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-19   22:40:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: TwentyTwelve (#2)

Obama doesn't feel very gulity about being half white. He should repent about that if he wants to stay in his black KKK "church."

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-19   22:57:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3)

You support a racist. So go fuck off.

God is always good!

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-19   22:58:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Arator (#4)

Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?

Yes or no please.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-19   23:04:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: RickyJ (#0)

I could only bear to watch about 1/3 of this crap. It's not that my attention span is short, I just cant stand listening to total crap for any length of time.

They seem to think that the Bible is some kind of code that only applies to them. That's not unusual, I guess. Other "christians" do the same thing.

The analogies just dont fit, as much as they try and make them fit.

policestateusa.net/

PSUSA  posted on  2008-05-19   23:19:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Jethro Tull (#7) (Edited)

Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?

Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad.

Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born.

We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-19   23:26:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Arator (#9)

Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?

Yes.

I've read nothing else.

You're a fraud.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-19   23:27:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Arator (#9)

We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism,

And, just who do you expect to be "in charge" of such defunding?

CadetD  posted on  2008-05-19   23:30:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Jethro Tull (#10)

I've read nothing else.

Then the nuances of my position have eluded you and your perfunctory condemnation, based as it is on willful ignorance, is meaningless.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-19   23:32:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Arator (#9)

We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat

buckeye  posted on  2008-05-19   23:34:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: CadetD (#11) (Edited)

And, just who do you expect to be "in charge" of such defunding?

An awakened people, eventually, so long as the institutions and processes of self-govenrment remain functioning and viable.

The GOP is racing to subvert (and destroy) these institutions and processes. They believe in the fuhrer princep, the unitary executive. If they succeed, we're toast. That's why they must be ousted ASAP, even if that means a temporary swing towards socialism. They have brought us as close to the point of no return as I care to get!

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-19   23:37:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Arator (#14)

An awakened people, eventually, so long as the institutions and processes of self-govenrment remain functioning and viable.

How can you possibly believe such institutions/processes are now functioning? Just wondering...

CadetD  posted on  2008-05-19   23:41:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Arator (#12)

Then the nuances of my position have eluded you and your perfunctory condemnation, based as it is on willful ignorance, is meaningless.

You're about as nuanced as a hammer and sickle. I'm ashamed to have called you a friend, given your hard left turn.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-19   23:42:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: RickyJ (#0)

Hey, Obama, here was a West Virginia post-election rally for Hillary Clinton:

“The best and first guarantor of our neutrality and our independent existence is the defensive will of the people…and the proverbial marksmanship of the Swiss shooter. Each soldier a good marksman! Each shot a hit!” Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941

X-15  posted on  2008-05-19   23:51:58 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: TwentyTwelve (#2)

* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church * Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy

* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy * Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community * Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah * James Cone says white people cannot be Christians

BTTT.

Law Enforcement Against Prohibition

"There is no 'legitimate' Corporation by virtue of it's very legal definition and purpose."
-- IndieTx

"Corporation: An entity created for the legal protection of its human parasites, whose sole purpose is profit and self-perpetuation." © IndieTx

IndieTX  posted on  2008-05-20   2:19:03 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Jethro Tull (#10) (Edited)

Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?

Yes.

I've read nothing else.

You're a fraud.

Holy farting cows!!!

The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers.

Yes?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   6:40:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator (#19)

There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   7:13:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited)

'Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget.' - were the last words of Socrates.

The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution.

So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut.

As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   7:51:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Jethro Tull (#20)

There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.

I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-05-20   7:52:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Hayek Fan (#22)

Bushthink, which is a form of Stalinthink, is when you say: "if it's not blue, then it MUST be yellow (blue=good, yellow=bad).

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   7:56:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#21)

My retirement plan is privately funded. Try again.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   8:01:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#23)

Bushthink, which is a form of Stalinthink, is when you say: "if it's not blue, then it MUST be yellow (blue=good, yellow=bad).

It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure.

By the way, unless you are talking about how the feds are using income redistribution to militarize law enforcement, valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. That dog don't hunt.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-05-20   8:03:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Hayek Fan (#22)

I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office.

This spat has been about the changing politics of the Os. They have tossed their principles to the curb in favor of a glimpse of their Saviour. All things considered, it's always best to know who people are. Leftists aren't to be trusted, on a political or personal basis.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   8:04:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Jethro Tull (#24)

My retirement plan is privately funded. Try again.

You refuse to face reality, my friend. You were paid by the state (or the city) with money they took from others, usually without their consent. I call that redistribution. Your 'private' retirement fund was also funded with moneys taken from others.

The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck. Would you say that you support SOME forms of redistributions but not those that don't benefit you directly?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   8:09:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Hayek Fan (#25)

valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning.

'valid'? So you are saying that there is 'valid' redistribution but there's also redistribution that you don't like. The valid redistribution is okay and is conservative but the redistribution that you don't like is liberal.

Have you heard of Thoreau? He's a famous dead American. He spent some time in jail for refusing to fund a certain 'valid' redistribution program at the time. He had some most interesting life experiences, including his attempt to completely remove himself from human society.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   8:13:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Hayek Fan (#25)

It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure.

What it appears to you, it appears. I am using the term to define inflexible, binary thinking where the desired conclusion is derived from false premises.

Would you promise never to even smell alcohol or would you rather be a liver-diseased and brain-diseased alcoholic? Would you eat your veggies or would you rather starve to death?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   8:17:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#27)

The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck.

One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing. I'm not shocked you ascribe to Obama welfare model.

Your still wrong on my pension. Sorry.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   8:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#28) (Edited)

So you are saying that there is 'valid' redistribution but there's also redistribution that you don't like.

No, you are distorting the accepted definition of income redistribution in order to to justify your support of a man who wants to not only continue but vastly expand federal income redistribution. The only question is are you distorting out of ignorance or are you twisting words in order to further your pro big government agenda.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-05-20   8:33:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Jethro Tull (#30) (Edited)

One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing.

Really? What are city employees doing, other than polluting the air with their breathing?

I remember when my Brooklyn (Bay Ridge) apartment was burglarized. One of my neighbors saw the perpetrators and he was willing and eager to provide the cops with a lot of information, including what they looked like, where they came from and where they went. The cops - 3 or 4 of them - came to my place, looked around, asked me what was missing and then left. They REFUSED to talk to my neighbor. That was tax money at work - redistribution at its worst. And, no, the perps were not negroes - if you are a New Yorker you know that there can be no negroes in Bay Ridge.

You clearly support all kinds of redistributions but some of them, such as the LITTLE money that goes to help overweight welfare queens eat and breath, you oppose. You seem to be very confused and very biased but this is normal, given that you are yourself a small beneficiary of the government's redistributions.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   8:45:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#32)

Jeez.....sorry you had a bad experience with the NYPD. You aren't alone. It's never too late to head back to Bay Ridge and make a formal complaint. 68th Pct? Yeah, I think so.....

What do city workers do, as opposed to the welfare queens that you insist remain fully funded with tax dollars?

Sorry, I can't do stooooopid this early.

Come back later, perhaps tonight after 8PM when Madam Hillary will have exposed Obama's White problem in KY.

OK?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   8:53:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

You know what the cops told me when I asked them why they refused to investigate and at least talk to my neighbor?

They told me that the stuff stolen - I came home early and they escaped through the window while I was entering through the front door and they didn't have time to steal a lot - was not worth their investigation.

Now, you tell me, would I prefer a welfare queen or a 3-4 city cops to work on this case? From a redistribution point of view, I'd take the welfare queen any time. Both 'teams' would do nothing or very little as far as catching the thieves but the welfare queen is a lot cheaper so there's less redistribution needed.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   9:00:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Jethro Tull (#33)

So, why don't you clarify yourself?

You seem to be for the 'good' redistribution but against the 'bad' redistribution. Yes?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   9:01:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#35)

Study up on production vs. non production and then come back to the argument armed with something more than a single digit IQ. Now scat!

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   9:04:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Jethro Tull (#36) (Edited)

Production? You still refuse to face the fact that you were and you continue to be paid with money taken BY FORCE from your fellow citizens who did not necessarily ask for and do not need your services. If you believe that the money that keeps coming into your bank account is given away by your fellow New Yorkers freely and voluntarily, I suggest that you do some research and see what happens to those who refuse to voluntarily finance your work. Maybe you arrested some of those yourself - which, indeed, is a most productive service to society.

Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government? Your refusal to answer this important question - and I gave you 3 options, of which the one in the middle allows for an infinite number of degrees - will indicate your losing the argument and your admitting that, in fact, you are for redistribution, to the degree that it benefits you or to the degree that you 'like' it but that you firmly oppose the redistributions that don't benefit you or that you don't like.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   9:10:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Christine, Jethro Tull (#37)

And you Opeople wonder why all that some have for you is utter mocking and disdain.

Then all you L-O-S-E-R-S run off to the People's Place and chatter like 7th grade girls, thinking your intellectual dishonesty exhibits on FREEDOM4um were cute.

Kill a Commie for Mommy


FOH  posted on  2008-05-20   9:14:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Jethro Tull (#37)

Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government?

There is an accepted definition of what income redistribution is and you are being intellectually dishonest by attempting to make it something it isn't and never has been.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Director, CIA 1973–1976

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2008-05-20   9:18:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#37)

You still refuse to face the fact that you were and you continue to be paid with money taken BY FORCE from your fellow citizens who did not necessarily ask for and do not need your services

What!!!!!!!!

Produce said citizen, citizen, I DEMAND it!

PS: Man, I loved the Hamilton House on 92st in the Ridge. I had a favorite window seat with a great view of the Verrazano Bridge. Their prime rib was like butter. They fed cops on the arm, as did Howe's Steak House, but you probably know that :P

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   9:19:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited)

There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.

I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference.

It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)?

Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America.

My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back.

Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-20   9:31:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (42 - 62) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]