[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
The Floodgates Are Breaking In Germany's Welfare State
“The government wants to make sure that that does not come out. A huge part of our political system is predicated on blackmail,”
You Know What Happens Next
Cash Jordan: Half-Built Tower Abandoned… as ICE Deports Entire ‘Migrant Workforce’
Heavy rainfall causes flash flooding Tuesday night, some cars stuck in high water on Chicago's West
Biden Doctor PLEADS THE FIFTH, Refuses To Testify To Congress, Biden Pardons ARE VOID
Joe Rogan says FBI director Kash Patel played him for a fool and maga for fools with the Jeff Epstein files
Elon's AI System "Grok" Went Rogue And Has Been SHUT DOWN in an Emergency!
Earthquake Swarms at One of the MOST DANGEROUS Volcanoes in the USA
Ben Shapiro Declares Epstein Case CLOSED: ‘Facts on the Ground Have Changed’
Iran receives 40 Chinese J10-C Fighter Jets
China’s Railgun Is Now Battle-Ready, Thanks to Nuclear Power
Chinese Hypersonic Advancements! Deadly new missile could decimate entire US fleet in 20 minutes
Iran Confirms Massive Chinese HQ 9 B Missile Deal
Why Is Europe Hitting 114°F And Still Rising?
The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue
The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia
Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas
What is quantum computing?
12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein
TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads
Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks
Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine
Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations
Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis
Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'
Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!
'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe
Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose
Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats
Title: Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy Source: Naked Emperor News URL Source: http://www.nakedemperornews.com/ Published: May 19, 2008 Author: Naked Emperor News Post Date: 2008-05-19 22:09:48 by RickyJ Keywords: NoneViews: 2301 Comments: 62
It’s The Theology Stupid!!! Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church * Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy * Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
It’s The Theology Stupid!!!
Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM
* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.
#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0) RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #3. To: RickyJ (#1) Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3) You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground? Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #7. To: Arator (#4) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #9. To: Jethro Tull (#7) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink. Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #10. To: Arator (#9) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #19. To: Jethro Tull (#10) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator (#19) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 20. #21. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) 'Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget.' - were the last words of Socrates. The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution. So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut. As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 07:51:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #22. To: Jethro Tull (#20) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office. F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 07:52:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #41. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative. Arator posted on 2008-05-20 09:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 20. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please.
Yes or no please.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?
Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad.
Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born.
We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes.
Yes.
I've read nothing else.
You're a fraud.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes?
Holy farting cows!!!
The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers.
Yes?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#21. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) 'Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget.' - were the last words of Socrates. The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution. So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut. As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 07:51:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #22. To: Jethro Tull (#20) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office. F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 07:52:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #41. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative. Arator posted on 2008-05-20 09:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 20. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
'Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget.' - were the last words of Socrates. The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution. So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut. As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal.
The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution.
So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut.
As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal.
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 07:51:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office.
I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office.
F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 07:52:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.
I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference.
It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)?
Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America.
My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back.
Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.
Arator posted on 2008-05-20 09:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest