[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.
'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot
Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel
Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups
Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum
Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics
"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox
The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough
No place for hate apeech
America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country
Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.
Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC
Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES
Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught
America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980
Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide
White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears
Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State
Let her cry
The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History
Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech
Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem
European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’
Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump
2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds
Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region
RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message
Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March
Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)
The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t
Title: Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy Source: Naked Emperor News URL Source: http://www.nakedemperornews.com/ Published: May 19, 2008 Author: Naked Emperor News Post Date: 2008-05-19 22:09:48 by RickyJ Keywords: NoneViews: 2525 Comments: 62
It’s The Theology Stupid!!! Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church * Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy * Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
It’s The Theology Stupid!!!
Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM
* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.
#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0) RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #3. To: RickyJ (#1) Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3) You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground? Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #7. To: Arator (#4) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #9. To: Jethro Tull (#7) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink. Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #10. To: Arator (#9) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #19. To: Jethro Tull (#10) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator (#19) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #22. To: Jethro Tull (#20) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office. F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 7:52:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #23. To: Hayek Fan (#22) Bushthink, which is a form of Stalinthink, is when you say: "if it's not blue, then it MUST be yellow (blue=good, yellow=bad). a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 7:56:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #25. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#23) Bushthink, which is a form of Stalinthink, is when you say: "if it's not blue, then it MUST be yellow (blue=good, yellow=bad). It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure. By the way, unless you are talking about how the feds are using income redistribution to militarize law enforcement, valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. That dog don't hunt. F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 8:03:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 25. #28. To: Hayek Fan (#25) valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. 'valid'? So you are saying that there is 'valid' redistribution but there's also redistribution that you don't like. The valid redistribution is okay and is conservative but the redistribution that you don't like is liberal. Have you heard of Thoreau? He's a famous dead American. He spent some time in jail for refusing to fund a certain 'valid' redistribution program at the time. He had some most interesting life experiences, including his attempt to completely remove himself from human society. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 08:13:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #29. To: Hayek Fan (#25) It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure. What it appears to you, it appears. I am using the term to define inflexible, binary thinking where the desired conclusion is derived from false premises. Would you promise never to even smell alcohol or would you rather be a liver-diseased and brain-diseased alcoholic? Would you eat your veggies or would you rather starve to death? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 08:17:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 25. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please.
Yes or no please.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?
Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad.
Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born.
We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes.
Yes.
I've read nothing else.
You're a fraud.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes?
Holy farting cows!!!
The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers.
Yes?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office.
I find it interesting that speaking out against central planning collectivism and income redistribution is now called bushthink, even though you and others have been here and on other forums speaking out against this very same thing since before baby bush even took office.
F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 7:52:57 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Bushthink, which is a form of Stalinthink, is when you say: "if it's not blue, then it MUST be yellow (blue=good, yellow=bad).
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 7:56:02 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Bushthink, which is a form of Stalinthink, is when you say: "if it's not blue, then it MUST be yellow (blue=good, yellow=bad). It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure. By the way, unless you are talking about how the feds are using income redistribution to militarize law enforcement, valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. That dog don't hunt.
It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure.
By the way, unless you are talking about how the feds are using income redistribution to militarize law enforcement, valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. That dog don't hunt.
F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 8:03:35 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#28. To: Hayek Fan (#25) valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. 'valid'? So you are saying that there is 'valid' redistribution but there's also redistribution that you don't like. The valid redistribution is okay and is conservative but the redistribution that you don't like is liberal. Have you heard of Thoreau? He's a famous dead American. He spent some time in jail for refusing to fund a certain 'valid' redistribution program at the time. He had some most interesting life experiences, including his attempt to completely remove himself from human society. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 08:13:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #29. To: Hayek Fan (#25) It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure. What it appears to you, it appears. I am using the term to define inflexible, binary thinking where the desired conclusion is derived from false premises. Would you promise never to even smell alcohol or would you rather be a liver-diseased and brain-diseased alcoholic? Would you eat your veggies or would you rather starve to death? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 08:17:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 25. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning. 'valid'? So you are saying that there is 'valid' redistribution but there's also redistribution that you don't like. The valid redistribution is okay and is conservative but the redistribution that you don't like is liberal. Have you heard of Thoreau? He's a famous dead American. He spent some time in jail for refusing to fund a certain 'valid' redistribution program at the time. He had some most interesting life experiences, including his attempt to completely remove himself from human society.
valid local governmental services like law enforcement functions is apples and oranges with federal income redistribution and central planning.
'valid'? So you are saying that there is 'valid' redistribution but there's also redistribution that you don't like. The valid redistribution is okay and is conservative but the redistribution that you don't like is liberal.
Have you heard of Thoreau? He's a famous dead American. He spent some time in jail for refusing to fund a certain 'valid' redistribution program at the time. He had some most interesting life experiences, including his attempt to completely remove himself from human society.
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 08:13:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
It appears to me that you are using the term to describe anyone who believes that federal central planning and income redistribution is highly inefficient and doomed to failure. What it appears to you, it appears. I am using the term to define inflexible, binary thinking where the desired conclusion is derived from false premises. Would you promise never to even smell alcohol or would you rather be a liver-diseased and brain-diseased alcoholic? Would you eat your veggies or would you rather starve to death?
What it appears to you, it appears. I am using the term to define inflexible, binary thinking where the desired conclusion is derived from false premises.
Would you promise never to even smell alcohol or would you rather be a liver-diseased and brain-diseased alcoholic? Would you eat your veggies or would you rather starve to death?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 08:17:45 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest