[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,
China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap
Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm
Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz
The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence
Happy fourth of july
The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West
Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center
The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!
Lightning
Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building
Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge
Mister Roberts (1965)
WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]
I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump
This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back
MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE
RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism
FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...
Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam
Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN
McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.
How Romans Built Domes
My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.
They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]
Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean
The Siege (1998)
Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED
Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger
Skateboarding Dog
Title: Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy Source: Naked Emperor News URL Source: http://www.nakedemperornews.com/ Published: May 19, 2008 Author: Naked Emperor News Post Date: 2008-05-19 22:09:48 by RickyJ Keywords: NoneViews: 2094 Comments: 62
It’s The Theology Stupid!!! Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church * Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy * Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
It’s The Theology Stupid!!!
Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM
* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.
#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0) RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #3. To: RickyJ (#1) Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3) You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground? Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #7. To: Arator (#4) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #9. To: Jethro Tull (#7) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink. Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #10. To: Arator (#9) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #19. To: Jethro Tull (#10) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator (#19) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #21. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) 'Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget.' - were the last words of Socrates. The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution. So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut. As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 7:51:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #24. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#21) My retirement plan is privately funded. Try again. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 8:01:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #27. To: Jethro Tull (#24) My retirement plan is privately funded. Try again. You refuse to face reality, my friend. You were paid by the state (or the city) with money they took from others, usually without their consent. I call that redistribution. Your 'private' retirement fund was also funded with moneys taken from others. The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck. Would you say that you support SOME forms of redistributions but not those that don't benefit you directly? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 8:09:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #30. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#27) The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck. One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing. I'm not shocked you ascribe to Obama welfare model. Your still wrong on my pension. Sorry. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 8:31:04 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #32. To: Jethro Tull (#30) (Edited) One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing. Really? What are city employees doing, other than polluting the air with their breathing? I remember when my Brooklyn (Bay Ridge) apartment was burglarized. One of my neighbors saw the perpetrators and he was willing and eager to provide the cops with a lot of information, including what they looked like, where they came from and where they went. The cops - 3 or 4 of them - came to my place, looked around, asked me what was missing and then left. They REFUSED to talk to my neighbor. That was tax money at work - redistribution at its worst. And, no, the perps were not negroes - if you are a New Yorker you know that there can be no negroes in Bay Ridge. You clearly support all kinds of redistributions but some of them, such as the LITTLE money that goes to help overweight welfare queens eat and breath, you oppose. You seem to be very confused and very biased but this is normal, given that you are yourself a small beneficiary of the government's redistributions. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 8:45:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #33. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#32) Jeez.....sorry you had a bad experience with the NYPD. You aren't alone. It's never too late to head back to Bay Ridge and make a formal complaint. 68th Pct? Yeah, I think so..... What do city workers do, as opposed to the welfare queens that you insist remain fully funded with tax dollars? Sorry, I can't do stooooopid this early. Come back later, perhaps tonight after 8PM when Madam Hillary will have exposed Obama's White problem in KY.OK? Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 8:53:26 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #35. To: Jethro Tull (#33) So, why don't you clarify yourself? You seem to be for the 'good' redistribution but against the 'bad' redistribution. Yes? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 9:01:15 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #36. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#35) Study up on production vs. non production and then come back to the argument armed with something more than a single digit IQ. Now scat! Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 9:04:39 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #37. To: Jethro Tull (#36) (Edited) Production? You still refuse to face the fact that you were and you continue to be paid with money taken BY FORCE from your fellow citizens who did not necessarily ask for and do not need your services. If you believe that the money that keeps coming into your bank account is given away by your fellow New Yorkers freely and voluntarily, I suggest that you do some research and see what happens to those who refuse to voluntarily finance your work. Maybe you arrested some of those yourself - which, indeed, is a most productive service to society. Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government? Your refusal to answer this important question - and I gave you 3 options, of which the one in the middle allows for an infinite number of degrees - will indicate your losing the argument and your admitting that, in fact, you are for redistribution, to the degree that it benefits you or to the degree that you 'like' it but that you firmly oppose the redistributions that don't benefit you or that you don't like. a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 9:10:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #39. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Jethro Tull (#37) Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government? There is an accepted definition of what income redistribution is and you are being intellectually dishonest by attempting to make it something it isn't and never has been. F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 9:18:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 39. There are no replies to Comment # 39. End Trace Mode for Comment # 39. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please.
Yes or no please.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?
Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad.
Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born.
We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes.
Yes.
I've read nothing else.
You're a fraud.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes?
Holy farting cows!!!
The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers.
Yes?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
'Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget.' - were the last words of Socrates. The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution. So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut. As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal.
The redistribution thing, as one of the compromises one makes for being a member of a human society, is a topic worth discussing. The whats and the how much one gives up in exchange for culture, civilization, safety, discovery have been discussed ever since (before) Socrates. Socrates, by the way, could have had 'exile' as his punishment but, apparently, he preferred death among his beloved Athenians. So, we live amongst other people and we 'belong' to a country of 300 million which is one specific human aggregation. As humans, we get language, good manners, laws, a state with armies and police that claims ownership over our bodies, children, thoughts and (what we believe it is) our personal possessions. The state takes a lot of our wealth, it keeps most of it to itself and it uses it to enhance its power and it redistributes some of it to others. Sometimes, some of us are the beneficiaries of redistribution.
So, yes, everyone who lives in a society is a beneficiary of redistribution because the state decides to perform certain services for the rest of us - such as making sure that we don't get sick by ingesting certain substances - and it takes resources from us to provide those benefits, after it takes its cut.
As a former New York City cop, you should be very familiar with redistribution because you were a beneficiary of the system and, if you are getting a retirement check, you still are. Were you for redistribution then? Are you for some form of redistribution now? How do you feel about the military? It's financed by redistribution because the state believes that it takes close to a trillion dollars to defend us from outside dangers so it takes that money from us and it redistributes it to achieve that goal.
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 7:51:22 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
My retirement plan is privately funded. Try again.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 8:01:47 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
My retirement plan is privately funded. Try again. You refuse to face reality, my friend. You were paid by the state (or the city) with money they took from others, usually without their consent. I call that redistribution. Your 'private' retirement fund was also funded with moneys taken from others. The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck. Would you say that you support SOME forms of redistributions but not those that don't benefit you directly?
You refuse to face reality, my friend. You were paid by the state (or the city) with money they took from others, usually without their consent. I call that redistribution. Your 'private' retirement fund was also funded with moneys taken from others.
The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck. Would you say that you support SOME forms of redistributions but not those that don't benefit you directly?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 8:09:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck. One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing. I'm not shocked you ascribe to Obama welfare model. Your still wrong on my pension. Sorry.
The source for your paycheck or retirement check is the same as that that funds a welfare queen's paycheck.
One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing. I'm not shocked you ascribe to Obama welfare model.
Your still wrong on my pension. Sorry.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 8:31:04 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing. Really? What are city employees doing, other than polluting the air with their breathing? I remember when my Brooklyn (Bay Ridge) apartment was burglarized. One of my neighbors saw the perpetrators and he was willing and eager to provide the cops with a lot of information, including what they looked like, where they came from and where they went. The cops - 3 or 4 of them - came to my place, looked around, asked me what was missing and then left. They REFUSED to talk to my neighbor. That was tax money at work - redistribution at its worst. And, no, the perps were not negroes - if you are a New Yorker you know that there can be no negroes in Bay Ridge. You clearly support all kinds of redistributions but some of them, such as the LITTLE money that goes to help overweight welfare queens eat and breath, you oppose. You seem to be very confused and very biased but this is normal, given that you are yourself a small beneficiary of the government's redistributions.
One requires a unit of production (city employees) while the other form of redistribution (Obama's model) rewards welfare queens for breathing.
Really? What are city employees doing, other than polluting the air with their breathing?
I remember when my Brooklyn (Bay Ridge) apartment was burglarized. One of my neighbors saw the perpetrators and he was willing and eager to provide the cops with a lot of information, including what they looked like, where they came from and where they went. The cops - 3 or 4 of them - came to my place, looked around, asked me what was missing and then left. They REFUSED to talk to my neighbor. That was tax money at work - redistribution at its worst. And, no, the perps were not negroes - if you are a New Yorker you know that there can be no negroes in Bay Ridge.
You clearly support all kinds of redistributions but some of them, such as the LITTLE money that goes to help overweight welfare queens eat and breath, you oppose. You seem to be very confused and very biased but this is normal, given that you are yourself a small beneficiary of the government's redistributions.
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 8:45:58 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Jeez.....sorry you had a bad experience with the NYPD. You aren't alone. It's never too late to head back to Bay Ridge and make a formal complaint. 68th Pct? Yeah, I think so..... What do city workers do, as opposed to the welfare queens that you insist remain fully funded with tax dollars? Sorry, I can't do stooooopid this early. Come back later, perhaps tonight after 8PM when Madam Hillary will have exposed Obama's White problem in KY.OK?
What do city workers do, as opposed to the welfare queens that you insist remain fully funded with tax dollars?
Sorry, I can't do stooooopid this early.
Come back later, perhaps tonight after 8PM when Madam Hillary will have exposed Obama's White problem in KY.
OK?
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 8:53:26 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
So, why don't you clarify yourself? You seem to be for the 'good' redistribution but against the 'bad' redistribution. Yes?
You seem to be for the 'good' redistribution but against the 'bad' redistribution. Yes?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 9:01:15 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Study up on production vs. non production and then come back to the argument armed with something more than a single digit IQ. Now scat!
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 9:04:39 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Production? You still refuse to face the fact that you were and you continue to be paid with money taken BY FORCE from your fellow citizens who did not necessarily ask for and do not need your services. If you believe that the money that keeps coming into your bank account is given away by your fellow New Yorkers freely and voluntarily, I suggest that you do some research and see what happens to those who refuse to voluntarily finance your work. Maybe you arrested some of those yourself - which, indeed, is a most productive service to society. Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government? Your refusal to answer this important question - and I gave you 3 options, of which the one in the middle allows for an infinite number of degrees - will indicate your losing the argument and your admitting that, in fact, you are for redistribution, to the degree that it benefits you or to the degree that you 'like' it but that you firmly oppose the redistributions that don't benefit you or that you don't like.
Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government? Your refusal to answer this important question - and I gave you 3 options, of which the one in the middle allows for an infinite number of degrees - will indicate your losing the argument and your admitting that, in fact, you are for redistribution, to the degree that it benefits you or to the degree that you 'like' it but that you firmly oppose the redistributions that don't benefit you or that you don't like.
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 9:10:59 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government? There is an accepted definition of what income redistribution is and you are being intellectually dishonest by attempting to make it something it isn't and never has been.
Therefore, let's hear. Are you for redistribution, are you for some redistribution or do you oppose all forms of redistribution via government?
There is an accepted definition of what income redistribution is and you are being intellectually dishonest by attempting to make it something it isn't and never has been.
F.A. Hayek Fan posted on 2008-05-20 9:18:52 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There are no replies to Comment # 39.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest