[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide
White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears
Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State
Let her cry
The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History
Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech
Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem
European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’
Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump
2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds
Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region
RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message
Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March
Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)
The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t
Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.
Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)
Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...
ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies
Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES
Trump to send troops to Memphis
Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)
Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?
What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)
Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,
Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -
Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage
Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least
Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination
How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon
Title: Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy Source: Naked Emperor News URL Source: http://www.nakedemperornews.com/ Published: May 19, 2008 Author: Naked Emperor News Post Date: 2008-05-19 22:09:48 by RickyJ Keywords: NoneViews: 2414 Comments: 62
It’s The Theology Stupid!!! Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church * Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy * Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
It’s The Theology Stupid!!!
Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM
* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0) RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #3. To: RickyJ (#1) Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3) You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground? Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #7. To: Arator (#4) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #9. To: Jethro Tull (#7) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink. Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #10. To: Arator (#9) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #19. To: Jethro Tull (#10) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator (#19) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #41. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative. Arator posted on 2008-05-20 9:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 41. #43. To: Arator (#41) Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans. christine posted on 2008-05-20 09:45:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #45. To: Arator, stop the fraud, all (#41) The “lesser” conundrum is a ruse designed by the Elite and offered to the electorate in hopes they continue to “choose.” They do. I see your participation as bread and circus, nothing more. For two months now I’ve studied Obama’s foreign policy (his domestic policy is a disaster, complete with a major gun grabbing push). On FP, his differs ever so slightly from Hillary’s, and differs with that of McCain only in that Obama will change battlefields, shifting our resources to Afghanistan and perhaps the Pakistan border to hunt for our CIA asset, bin Laden. Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate. How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight. There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois. At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change. Thanks for nothing. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 09:58:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 41. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please.
Yes or no please.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?
Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad.
Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born.
We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes.
Yes.
I've read nothing else.
You're a fraud.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes?
Holy farting cows!!!
The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers.
Yes?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.
I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference.
It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)?
Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America.
My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back.
Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.
Arator posted on 2008-05-20 9:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#43. To: Arator (#41) Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans. christine posted on 2008-05-20 09:45:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #45. To: Arator, stop the fraud, all (#41) The “lesser” conundrum is a ruse designed by the Elite and offered to the electorate in hopes they continue to “choose.” They do. I see your participation as bread and circus, nothing more. For two months now I’ve studied Obama’s foreign policy (his domestic policy is a disaster, complete with a major gun grabbing push). On FP, his differs ever so slightly from Hillary’s, and differs with that of McCain only in that Obama will change battlefields, shifting our resources to Afghanistan and perhaps the Pakistan border to hunt for our CIA asset, bin Laden. Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate. How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight. There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois. At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change. Thanks for nothing. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 09:58:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 41. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans.
Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation
did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans.
christine posted on 2008-05-20 09:45:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
The “lesser” conundrum is a ruse designed by the Elite and offered to the electorate in hopes they continue to “choose.” They do. I see your participation as bread and circus, nothing more. For two months now I’ve studied Obama’s foreign policy (his domestic policy is a disaster, complete with a major gun grabbing push). On FP, his differs ever so slightly from Hillary’s, and differs with that of McCain only in that Obama will change battlefields, shifting our resources to Afghanistan and perhaps the Pakistan border to hunt for our CIA asset, bin Laden. Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate. How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight. There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois. At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change. Thanks for nothing.
Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate.
How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight.
There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois.
At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change.
Thanks for nothing.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 09:58:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest