[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine
Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State
One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032
These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State
Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,
China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap
Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm
Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz
The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence
Happy fourth of july
The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West
Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center
The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!
Lightning
Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building
Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge
Mister Roberts (1965)
WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]
I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump
This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back
MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE
RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism
FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...
Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam
Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN
McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.
How Romans Built Domes
My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.
They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]
Title: Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy Source: Naked Emperor News URL Source: http://www.nakedemperornews.com/ Published: May 19, 2008 Author: Naked Emperor News Post Date: 2008-05-19 22:09:48 by RickyJ Keywords: NoneViews: 2137 Comments: 62
It’s The Theology Stupid!!! Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM* Obama in 2007 admits Trinity is a Black Separatist Church * Reverend Otis Moss III calls white people the enemy * Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
It’s The Theology Stupid!!!
Watch the whole film to see the breaking news and completely understand Black Liberation Theology and How OBAMA embraces it!!!!BREAKING NEWS IN THIS FILM
* Obama says attacking everything white is a successful strategy* Obama warns of Quite Riot in Black Community* Farrakhan calls Barack Obama the Messiah* James Cone says white people cannot be Christians
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.
#1. To: All, *Racist 2008* (#0) RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #3. To: RickyJ (#1) Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #4. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#3) You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground? Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #7. To: Arator (#4) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #9. To: Jethro Tull (#7) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink. Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #10. To: Arator (#9) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #19. To: Jethro Tull (#10) (Edited) Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes? a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #20. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator (#19) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #41. To: Jethro Tull (#20) (Edited) There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative. Arator posted on 2008-05-20 9:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply Replies to Comment # 41. #43. To: Arator (#41) Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans. christine posted on 2008-05-20 09:45:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #45. To: Arator, stop the fraud, all (#41) The “lesser” conundrum is a ruse designed by the Elite and offered to the electorate in hopes they continue to “choose.” They do. I see your participation as bread and circus, nothing more. For two months now I’ve studied Obama’s foreign policy (his domestic policy is a disaster, complete with a major gun grabbing push). On FP, his differs ever so slightly from Hillary’s, and differs with that of McCain only in that Obama will change battlefields, shifting our resources to Afghanistan and perhaps the Pakistan border to hunt for our CIA asset, bin Laden. Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate. How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight. There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois. At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change. Thanks for nothing. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 09:58:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 41. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
RickyJ posted on 2008-05-19 22:10:08 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Ricky, shall I remind you that you predicted Obama's dropping off the prez. race end endorsing Hillary by the end of this month? You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-19 22:39:43 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
You advised me to 'watch and learn'. I am watching. What should I be learning? That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
That RickyJ doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground?
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 22:40:34 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?Yes or no please.
Yes or no please.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:04:03 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad. Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born. We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist?
Yes. I'm looking forward to him redistributing all the monies currently being shoveled into the coffers of Halliburton, Blackwater and other MIC/Homeland Security pirates towards something more socially beneficial. That wouldn't take much. Even the lamest social program would be a net gain, since the money would be spent on average people here rather than on well-connected corporate pirates here and abroad.
Socialism can be a benefit if it works to strip the sinew and bone from the proto- fascist police state currently trying to get born.
We can defund Socialism later after it has destroyed the instrumentalities of Fascism, because then at least some semblance of representative government might then have been preserved. Under Fascism, there is only a unitary Rogue Executive, its goon-squads, spies, and black-operators running game on imprisoned subjects. We dare not risk slipping past this point of no return. This is why I prefer Obama's socialism to McCain-Hillary's fascist Bush- Clintonism. It at least gives us the possibility of turning back from the brink.
Arator posted on 2008-05-19 23:26:13 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud.
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes.
Yes.
I've read nothing else.
You're a fraud.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-19 23:27:31 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Is Obama a big central government redistributionist? Yes. I've read nothing else. You're a fraud. Holy farting cows!!! The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers. Yes?
Holy farting cows!!!
The 'Bushthink' will never die. You're either with the Bushes or you're with the commies. Or the Muslums. Or the unpatriotic and separatistic Niggers.
Yes?
a vast rightwing conspirator posted on 2008-05-20 6:40:40 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 7:13:17 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
There was a time when Arator would never have supported a person, who he admits is a big central government redistributionist. Now that he acknowledges he does, it's clear he has changed hard left, as have the others who fled for a more enjoyable experience. I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference. It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)? Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America. My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back. Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.
I support him despite his leftism not because of his leftism. Big difference.
It is a tactical issue. How do we best get from where we are now (the edge of a fascist night) to where we want to be (freedom)?
Your answer is: Sit on our hands and wait for the perfect pro-freedom candidate to come along, even if, in the meantime, that allows the GOP to stay in power and complete its total Nazi-fication of America.
My answer is: Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation is not plunged past a point of no return into total tyranny. That way, the forces of freedom at least have a chance of staging a come back.
Our circumstance is too dire to allow ourselves to be paralyzed into inaction by the old false left-right divide. We must ju jitsu the establishment into making war on itself. If that means empowering the socialist left to make war on the fascist right, then so be it. It's better than the alternative.
Arator posted on 2008-05-20 9:31:10 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
#43. To: Arator (#41) Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans. christine posted on 2008-05-20 09:45:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply #45. To: Arator, stop the fraud, all (#41) The “lesser” conundrum is a ruse designed by the Elite and offered to the electorate in hopes they continue to “choose.” They do. I see your participation as bread and circus, nothing more. For two months now I’ve studied Obama’s foreign policy (his domestic policy is a disaster, complete with a major gun grabbing push). On FP, his differs ever so slightly from Hillary’s, and differs with that of McCain only in that Obama will change battlefields, shifting our resources to Afghanistan and perhaps the Pakistan border to hunt for our CIA asset, bin Laden. Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate. How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight. There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois. At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change. Thanks for nothing. Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 09:58:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply End Trace Mode for Comment # 41. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans.
Vote for the least fascist mainstream candidate to prevent the hard core fascists from keeping power, frustrate the Nazi-fiers and buy time so that the nation
did you listen to Tarpley? his opinion is that Obama and his team have their own brand of fascism that could be even more lethal for individual americans.
christine posted on 2008-05-20 09:45:07 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
The “lesser” conundrum is a ruse designed by the Elite and offered to the electorate in hopes they continue to “choose.” They do. I see your participation as bread and circus, nothing more. For two months now I’ve studied Obama’s foreign policy (his domestic policy is a disaster, complete with a major gun grabbing push). On FP, his differs ever so slightly from Hillary’s, and differs with that of McCain only in that Obama will change battlefields, shifting our resources to Afghanistan and perhaps the Pakistan border to hunt for our CIA asset, bin Laden. Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate. How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight. There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois. At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change. Thanks for nothing.
Your “lesser” strategy touches a real frustration many Americans have with the two-party system. We're left to pick the lesser of two evils, which has partly led to a nasty case of voter apathy. I and others refuse to participate.
How can just two parties reflect the political ideology of over 200 million voting-age Americans? Think about your own values and opinions. Your views about abortion and gay marriage might be "democrat," but "republican" on gun control and taxes. Or are these differences still germane? I tend to think they no longer are as as both wings of the national bird are needed for flight.
There are other ways of doing selections, of course, where multiple parties represent multiple interests. For example, the Canadian government is composed of members from the majority Liberal Party, the opposition Conservative Party, the socialist New Democratic Party and the separatist Bloc Quebecois.
At this point in our history, since nobody reflects my views, I’d be more than willing to try some form of mix and match. But it won’t happen because people like you continue to compromise your principles for promises of change.
Thanks for nothing.
Jethro Tull posted on 2008-05-20 09:58:19 ET Reply Untrace Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest