[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Netflix as Jewish Daycare for Women

Warning America About Palantir: Richie From Boston

I'm not done asking questions about the killing of Charlie Kirk.

6 reasons the stock market bubble is worse than anyone expected.

Elon Musk: Charlie Kirk was killed because his words made a difference.

Try It For 5 Days! - The Most EFFICIENT Way To LOSE FAT

Number Of US Student Visas Issued To Asians Tumbles

Range than U.S HIMARS, Russia Unveils New Variant of 300mm Rocket Launcher on KamAZ-63501 Chassis

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops


War, War, War
See other War, War, War Articles

Title: We'd Go Nuts
Source: Lew Rockwell
URL Source: http://www.lewrockwell.com/reese/reese458.html
Published: May 20, 2008
Author: Charley Reese
Post Date: 2008-05-20 06:56:21 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 130
Comments: 7

I wonder how we would react if 50,000 of us got killed in one whack, as apparently has happened in the China earthquake. Or, God forbid, 121,000, which is the high estimate for the number of dead in the Myanmar cyclone.

Judging from our reaction to the terror attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, which claimed 3,000 lives, I suspect we would go nuts. Back in 2001, it became Terror Week on television, so that we got to see the damage endless numbers of times. Politicians were scrambling for flag pins and trying to remember the words of the national anthem. Hardly a family pet could be buried without the TV cameras and the mayor showing up.

The president said it was our patriotic duty to spend money and then declared world war on terrorists everywhere, even though the 9/11 attackers had nothing to do with the others.

I infuriated one of the TV talkie boys one night. I accused him of being fearmonger because he was ranting about the ever-present menace of terrorism. I pointed out that while terrorists had killed 3,000 Americans, 17,000 had killed themselves in falls, 15,000 had been murdered by homegrown criminals and 109,000 died in accidents. He shouted and hung up.

Never let the news media set your priorities for things to worry about. They will be hopelessly wrong. Any one American's chances of being killed by a terrorist is minuscule. The only thing you have to do to protect yourself from a bomb is be somewhere else, and in a country of 3 million square miles, the odds are that most of us will be somewhere else.

There is no worldwide network of terrorists. Al-Qaida is the only group we have to worry about, and it is small and not very influential. Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad have no quarrel with us. Their quarrel is with Israel. Colombia's terrorists are trying to overthrow the Colombian government, and that goes for most guerrilla organizations in the world.

A sensible administration would have taken out Osama bin Laden a long time ago. It's pretty embarrassing when you can't find a guy who is 6 feet 6 inches tall in a country where most people are short.

We need to develop some stoicism, because it is possible that we could lose a large number of people. A powerful earthquake in Los Angeles or San Francisco at rush hour could kill a good number of people. We're 30 minutes from 150 million people dead as long as nuclear missiles sit in silos in Russia and China. The most stupidly dangerous thing this administration has done is allow our relations with Russia to deteriorate. When the Russians needed our help, we tried to exploit them instead. Now they have become an energy superpower and have little or no use for us.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin proved to be a smarter man and a better leader than George W. Bush. Russia's economy is booming; ours is in decline. Russia is energy-independent; we are desperately dependent on energy imports. Russia's power and influence are on the rise; ours are in decline. That's what happens when we vote jovial dullards into office who surround themselves with ideologues. Other than throw out a couple of baseballs, what has Bush done right? I can't think of anything.

I'm not excited about any of the possible replacements. I just pray that whichever one it is will have more brains and less arrogance than the present occupant. Forgive me for sounding cynical, but I've been listening to politicians promise to solve these same problems for 40 years, and the problems have all gotten worse, not better.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ada (#0)

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin proved to be a smarter man and a better leader than George W. Bush.

I bet Putin worked REAL HARD to make himself a better and smarter leader than bush.

If I was Putin, I'd be insulted by the comparison. It's like saying that Putin is smarter than a 5 year old.

policestateusa.net/

PSUSA  posted on  2008-05-20   9:04:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Ada (#0)

that while terrorists had killed 3,000 Americans, 17,000 had killed themselves in falls, 15,000 had been murdered by homegrown criminals and 109,000 died in accidents.

I've made the same observation before.

It's nice for getting a rise out of people, but is just a little disingenuous. Some manners of death are worse than others; some risks cost more to prevent or avoid, and so a higher death rate may be perfectly acceptable for those risks; and some lives are worth more than others.

Not in any cosmic sense, of course. But indeed some kid in Africa may be starving because I choose to pay for private school for my child.

If you will go along with me we'll travel with the tide
And I will always keep you on the sheltered side

Tauzero  posted on  2008-05-20   10:58:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Ada (#0)

Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad have no quarrel with us. Their quarrel is with Israel.

… and that’s none of our concern. I wish that particular news item would scroll continually under every TV news screen.

karelian  posted on  2008-05-20   14:27:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tauzero (#2) (Edited)

But indeed some kid in Africa may be starving because I choose to pay for private school for my child.

No he isn't.

Africa is the richest continent on the planet. Its countries are also corrupt. Their own governments are responsible because they use food and aid as a weapon against their own people and to line their own pockets.

policestateusa.net/

PSUSA  posted on  2008-05-20   14:32:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: PSUSA (#4)

No he isn't.

Yes he is. It's simple cause and effect, and this business about his government sounds like a rationalization to my ears. Well-meaning people like to say to themselves that of course it would be horrible not to subsidize the kid's food rather than buying X for me and mine. If the kid lived under a better government, perhaps he wouldn't starve; but there's not much I can do about that. I can easily part with the price of a cup of coffee per day.

But where do you stop? If you give to every good cause, you'll be one.

In reality it's not wrong to prefer one's own; and contrary to the well-meaning sympathy of the giver, the cup-of-coffee subsidy will actually make the problem worse in the long run. Assuming one is concerned about the problem, and not just a moral exhibitionist.

Which is all just another way of saying that the book of ethics is written by survivors.

If you will go along with me we'll travel with the tide
And I will always keep you on the sheltered side

Tauzero  posted on  2008-05-20   18:26:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tauzero (#5)

Sorry, Tau, but I dont see where we disagree, even if I am confused by your post.

I never said it was wrong to prefer ones own. If their governments preferred to help their own citizens, they wouldnt be starving. Instead, the "leaders" help themselves to what we send to be used for relief. They get Swiss bank accounts, their citizens get mass graves.

But your post seems inconsistent when you say this: "Yes he is. It's simple cause and effect, and this business about his government sounds like a rationalization to my ears."

How then do you explain the starvation and disease rampant in that continent? It's not all weather related. How is this rationalization? What is, is.

And then you say this: "Well-meaning people like to say to themselves that of course it would be horrible not to subsidize the kid's food rather than buying X for me and mine. If the kid lived under a better government, perhaps he wouldn't starve; but there's not much I can do about that. I can easily part with the price of a cup of coffee per day. "

Subsidizing that kids food doesnt do any good when that kid does not get that food that was already sent and it wound up on the black market where only the rich minority can buy it.

If countries promoted their own citizens general welfare, then it would not be up to private charities to prey on peoples consciences to "give up that 1 cup of coffee per day and save a life." But they do not promote their own citizens general welfare, because they are corrupt.

policestateusa.net/

PSUSA  posted on  2008-05-20   18:54:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: PSUSA (#6)

Well there's not just one contingency here.

Suppose a storm knocks down a tree which then blocks the road in front of me. Did the storm or the fallen tree cause the blockage? And will my client accept my excuse that the tree prevented me from meeting him if an easy detour exists one block away?

Western aid does help reduce acute famine, in Zimbabwe most recently for example, despite bad government. The corrupt governments of Africa do not steal all of the aid, and never have.

So, despite the bad governments, aid can be provided. The bad governments reduce the acute efficacy of aid, but they do not to reduce it to zero. The proof of this is that people who literally starve do not survive to have more children.

What about five cups of coffee per day, given the overhead?

How then do you explain the starvation and disease rampant in that continent?

The trees are Africans themselves, who are largely incapable, on their own, of civilization; the storm was contact with Europe and the introduction of Western technology and ideas, first through colonialism, later with foreign aid and Western "development" efforts.

If you will go along with me we'll travel with the tide
And I will always keep you on the sheltered side

Tauzero  posted on  2008-05-21   11:39:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]