[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Senior Trump Official Declares War On Far-Left NGOs Sowing Chaos Nationwide

White House Plans Security Boost On Civil Terrorism Fears

Visualizing The Number Of Farms In Each US State

Let her cry

The Secret Version of the Bible You’re Never Taught - Secret History

Rocker defames Charlie Kirk threatens free speech

Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion South Park Problem

European Warmongers Angry That Trump Did Not Buy Into the ‘Drone Attack in Poland’

Grassley Unveils Declassified Documents From FBI's Alleged 'Political Hit Job' On Trump

2 In 5 Young Adults Are Taking On Debt For Social Image, To Impress Peers, Study Finds

Visualizing Global Gold Production By Region

RFK Jr. About to DROP the Tylenol–Autism BOMBSHELL & Trump tweets cryptic vaccine message

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March

Something BIG is happening (One Assassination Changed Everything)

The Truth About This Piece Of Sh*t

Breaking: 18,000 Epstein emails just dropped.

Memphis: FOUR CHILDREN shot inside a home (National Guard Inbound)

Elon Musk gives CHILLING WARNING after Charlie Kirk's DEATH...

ActBlue Lawyers Subpoenaed As House GOP Investigation Into Donor Fraud Intensifies

Cash Jordan: Gangs EMPTY Chicago Plaza... as Mayor's "LET THEM LOOT" Plan IMPLODES

Trump to send troops to Memphis

Who really commands China’s military? (Xi Jinping on his way out)

Ghee: Is It Better Than Butter?

What Is Butyric Acid? 6 Benefits (Dr Horse says eat butter, not margarine!)

Illegal Alien Released by Biden Admin Beheads Motel Manager In Dallas,

Israel Wants to Unite Itself by Breaking the World -

Leavitt Castigates Journalists To Their Faces Over Lack Of Iryna Zarutska Killing Coverage

Aussie Students Spend The Most Time In School, Polish Kids The Least

Tyler Robinson, 22, Named As Suspect In Charlie Kirk Assassination

How They Control the World and Their Secret Weapon


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Oregon: 85% of the white vote goes to Hillary
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 20, 2008
Author: MSNBC
Post Date: 2008-05-20 21:33:13 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 1111
Comments: 71

Wow. The nation is fractured.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Oregon, is 90% white, I heard. Are you saying that Hillary beat Obama 75% to 25% in Oregon?

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   21:34:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#1)

Think white vote and turn on MSNBC. Have you cable, or do you still use a B&W w/rabbit ears?

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   21:37:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Jethro Tull (#2)

I don't have MSNBC. I suppose this is another one of your misunderstandings.

I remember you posted a similar thread with false data in it some time ago during another primary vote. Your source was MSNBC.

But, you better answer the question. Is Hillary beating Obama in Oregon by 75-25, because if she doesn't she can't be getting 85% of the vote.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-20   21:40:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#4)

Sorry you haven't cable, but MSNBC reported Hillary has disproportionate numbers of white votes in both KY and OR. Lets put numbers on it when it's finalized, but the bigger problem your guy has is this; the white working class (read, small town, gun owners) aren't buying his brand of redistributionism.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-05-20   21:46:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Jethro Tull (#7)

his brand of redistributionism

Great phraseology.

angle  posted on  2008-05-21   6:44:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: angle (#30)

LOL. I did not notice that.

Yesterday morning, JT was demanded that someone picked between opposing distributionism and Obama. Now, that we all understand how JT himself is a beneficiary of distributionism, he PIVOTED (I love the word) to Obama's BRAND of distributionism.

The distributionism that benefits JT is good but Obama's BRAND... Oy! Vey!!!

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-21   6:53:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#32)

At least you see that Obaba is all about redistributing wealth from middle to lower and beyond.

angle  posted on  2008-05-21   6:58:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: angle (#34)

I don't know how wealth is 'redistributed' to the 'lower and beyond'. Is Obama eager to put everyone on welfare and on food stamps? I don't think so. The lower income people already don't pay taxes and most middle income pay relatively low taxes, at least at the federal level. So, how is Obama going to redistribute 'wealth' to the lower income?

This is what he might do:

- Expanding gov't paid health coverage to low income people.
- More gov't help with low income kids' education, including more support for ghetto schools.
- Eliminating the Social Security tax for the lower income but that would be hard because there's already the 'earned income' tax credit that is meant to eliminate it.

Can you think of any other way in which Obama may benefit our enemy, 'the lazy and the poor'?

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-21   7:08:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#35)

Can you think of any other way in which Obama may benefit our enemy, 'the lazy and the poor'?

Your enemy is the lazy and the poor? They aren't my enemy, they're the manifestation of a non workable society of which Obama, McCain and Rodham promise you more.

angle  posted on  2008-05-21   7:59:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: angle (#37)

If the government forces redistributions unto undeserving others then they could be viewed as the enemies of the self-sustained because they are the friends of our true enemy, the welfare state.

My question was, how is Obama going to channel our hard-earned wealth to the enemy other than in the modest ways I outlined above?

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-21   8:05:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#38)

If the government forces redistributions unto undeserving others then they could be viewed as the enemies of the self-sustained

One of the biggest ways the gov't does this is by its expansion. Non producing government workers are the way the gov't (Obama included) cultivates parasites on the working class.

angle  posted on  2008-05-21   8:16:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 40.

#42. To: angle (#40)

One of the biggest ways the gov't does this is by its expansion. Non producing government workers are the way the gov't (Obama included) cultivates parasites on the working class.

Then, do we all agree that W was the biggest redistributionist of all times - with his asking for and enacting the largest expansion of the US government since... ever?

It IS possible that Obama or McCain would grow the gov't even bigger but they are going to be under big pressure to stop borrowing us into bankruptcy. They may both try to raise taxes but we are not in an environment where people have a lot of disposable income to give away to the government.

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-05-21 08:26:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]