[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

"Gestapo" Müller - Hunting Hitler's Secret Police Chief

How Michelle Obama Could Become Democrats' Nominee after Biden's Terrible Debate, with Steve Bannon

Was This Lethal Spitfire Ace Killed by His Own Tactics?

Welsh Police Pay Home Visit To Man For Displaying Reform UK Political Sign

Liz Harrington Drops a BOMBSHELL on How Georgia Was Stolen

Trudeau govt to make all bathrooms in Parliament buildings GENDER NEUTRAL

French official admits censorship is needed for government to control public opinion

Bill Maher Predicts Trump Victory: The Left Is Aggressively Anti-Common Sense

Google is suppressing Blaze Media. Heres how you can help.

Large-scale prisons being secretly erected in all 50 states will they be used to house illegals or force Americans into concentration camps?

Hezbollah is ready to confront Israels military, with Jon Elmer

Balloons Land in Southern Lebanon, Warning Locals the Land Belongs to Jews

German Politician Hit With Hate Crime Investigation For Demanding Migrant Criminals Be Deported

DNC Caught Funneling Millions to Law Firms Involved in Unprecedented Lawfare Campaign Against Trump

Here Are The 20 Biggest Whoppers Biden Told During His Debate With Trump

NYC to ban cellphones in public schools.

New York Times Columnists Turn On Biden After Disastrous Debate Performance

8 Armed Men With Venezuelan Accents Violently Rob Denver Jewelry Store

Uvalde Police School Chief Indicted, Arrested Over Response To 2022 Shooting

Greetings from the Horse

Tonight confirmed every Democrats worst fear.

Five Women Soon To Die In 1928

How Trump Can Lose The Debate

Tucker Carlson Savagely Dismantles ‘Dumb’ and ‘Stupid’ Far-Left Reporter at Australian Freedom Conference

James Clapper, Mr. October Surprise: How Obama's Intel Czar Rigged 2016 And 2020 Debates Against Trump

Biden Campaign Balks Wont Commit to Drug Test

S-500 Prometheus: Designed To Kill Stealth Jets, ICBMs

The US military chases shiny new things and the ranks suffer

USS Dwight D. Eisenhower Now in the Med, USS Theodore Roosevelt Heads to the Middle East

Lefties losing it: Rita Panahi mocks Democrat judge acting like a ‘confused simpleton’


Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: John Bolton escapes citizen's arrest at Hay Festival
Source: Telegraph (UK)
URL Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor ... 7s-arrest-at-Hay-Festival.html
Published: May 28, 2008
Author: Stephen Adams
Post Date: 2008-05-29 02:21:25 by X-15
Keywords: None
Views: 314
Comments: 16

Security guards blocked the path of columnist and activist George Monbiot, who tried to make the arrest as Mr Bolton left the stage.

The former ambassador - a key advisor to President George W Bush who argued strongly in favour of invading Iraq - had been giving a talk on international relations to more than 600 people at the literary festival.

Mr Monbiot was blocked by two heavily-built security guards at the end of the one-and-a-half hour appearance, before he could serve a "charge sheet" on him.

After being released by the guards the columnist - a fierce critic of the 2003 American-led invasion - made a dash through the rain-soaked tented village in a failed attempt to catch up with Mr Bolton.

A crowd of about 20 protestors, one dressed in a latex George Bush mask, chanted "war criminal" as Mr Bolton was ushered away.

Mr Monbiot said moments later he was "disappointed" that he had been blocked from making the citizen's arrest.

"This was a serious attempt to bring one of the perpetrators of the Iraq war to justice, for what is described under the Nuremberg Principles as an international crime," he said.

During Mr Bolton's talk, to a packed-out audience, Mr Monbiot had asked Mr Bolton what difference there was between him and a Nazi war criminal.

Mr Bolton said the war was legal, partly because Iraq had failed to comply with a key and binding UN resolution after the end of the Gulf War in 1991.

On the war's legality, he added: "This is not my personal opinion, this is the opinion of the entire legal apparatus of the US government."

A citizen's arrest can be carried out under certain circumstances by a member of the public, if they believe a person had carried out a crime, under the Serious and Organised Crime and Police Act 2005.

Earlier, festival director Peter Florence had said they had sought legal advice and been told carrying out such an arrest would be "completely unlawful" given the circumstances.

He said: ""The Hay Festival encourages visitors to voice their opinions, but also requires that, in their expression, they respect both the law and the speaker."

A spokesman for The Guardian, for which Mr Monbiot writes a regular column, said he was acting in a "personal capacity".

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

#7. To: X-15 (#0)

During Mr Bolton's talk, to a packed-out audience, Mr Monbiot had asked Mr Bolton what difference there was between him and a Nazi war criminal.

Mr Bolton said the war was legal, partly because Iraq had failed to comply with a key and binding UN resolution after the end of the Gulf War in 1991.

On the war's legality, he added: "This is not my personal opinion, this is the opinion of the entire legal apparatus of the US government."

I don't think that's a difference between Bolton and a Nazi war criminal. After all, I'm sure the entire legal apparatus of Hitler's government also viewed Hitler's war as legal.

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-29   11:07:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: aristeides (#7)

I don't think that's a difference between Bolton and a Nazi war criminal. After all, I'm sure the entire legal apparatus of Hitler's government also viewed Hitler's war as legal.

I started to write that several hours ago but hesitated because I can't recall Hitler or his peeps ever citing a single legal authority in support of a single thing! According to my American sources (which may have had a slight taint of bias) Hitler was the supreme legal authority who never felt the need to seek legal opinions! Since there were no separate but equal branches of govt serving as balance to each other, what would have been the point other than courtesy and deference to some source who would also see it for what it was and wisely sustain the Führer's opinion?

And, it's my understanding that "non Christians" had come to dominate all of the degreed professions (through nepotism and their cultural penchant for and attraction to education in well compensated fields of endeavor and enterprise) and, considering the consequences for having been so labeled it could be argued that no "good German" would dare to offer a dissenting opinion (about the invasion of Poland or, the forced labor camps for instance) lest his racial purity and/or party loyalty be called into question....

But, even without Hitler for support it can be stated (with no contrary empirical evidence likely to surface) that Bush chose his entire cabinet, not the least of which were his flak AGs because they'd reliably heave up legal opinions that would survive the challenges and appeals until the pardons are granted and the questions are moot.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-29   12:52:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: HOUNDDAWG (#8) (Edited)

Actually, for his declarations of war -- starting with Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, but going all the way to the declaration of war on the U.S. a couple of days after Pearl Harbor -- Hitler made sure to get authorization from the Reichstag.

And German judges did occasionally do things of which Hitler disapproved. It wasn't too good for their careers, but some of them had the courage to do it. However, it was generally on relatively minor things. Never on something as momentous as the legality of Hitler's war.

Like the criminal that he was, Hitler hated the law, and lawyers. So he seldom sought their advice. As a matter of fact, the last meeting of the Reichstag -- I forget whether it was in 1942 or '43 -- was to give Hitler supreme power to overrule judges. (His power to do that had been limited up to that point.)

aristeides  posted on  2008-05-29   14:19:32 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 11.

#16. To: aristeides (#11)

Very good and thank you.

HOUNDDAWG  posted on  2008-05-30 05:15:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]