Title: Who would destroy this nation faster, McKooK or Obama? Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:May 30, 2008 Author:moi Post Date:2008-05-30 18:10:18 by Jethro Tull Keywords:None Views:534 Comments:51
It's a tough call. As weary as I am of stewing slowly in the pot, I'm beginning to think the worst of two evils would be better than the lesser of two evils, if only to hope they go too quickly, waking a few frogs up in the process. Just a thought.
A lot of whites who sincerely might vote for Obama will eventually have the same feeling as when waking up next to an ugly woman and not being able to remember the previous night.
Now that's funny.
As I believe Obama is a closet racist, he might be the best choice for chaos domestically. If words are to be believed, McCain will get us nuked quicker.
They both pledged to destroy America by passing Amnesty for Illegal Aliens. They both did obeisance to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers before their conventions were held. They both have pledged to invade big Muslim nations who have militaries we cannot handle. It's a tie though Obama's affirmative action policies would drive me insane.
Obama is a mess domestically. His nasty wife would get under my skin in less than a week. Yeah, hate speech, affirmative action up the hole, and a PC- culture driven by high octane. Urp.
No question about it. The most dangerous man ever to run for president is the McCainiac, McKook. The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.
If, instead, we get four more years of it under McKook, it could kill the country.
Obama is not meant to wake any one up. He is meant for race riots. The elite chose him specifically for this purpose or they would have found a much better qualified black to run, if they were looking for a black president. Obama is a racist and the media has been covering for him. It is like a dream in process that you know is going be real nightmare and there is nothing you can do about it but pray. Martial law is coming to America soon. McCain or Hillary will both do pretty much the same with Hillary killing the economy and McCain killing the military. Either way the USA will fall. If Americans haven't already woken up by now then it doesn't matter if they wake up later becasue there will be nothing left of the USA to salvage.
I don't think he is a closet racist at all. He is very open about his feelings about whites in his book and the church he has chosen to go to for the last 20 years. The only reason people don't know about Obama being a racist is because the main stream media has been covering for him since day one.
You are wrong about that. There isn't a military in existence today in the world the USA military can't handle.
They can't even handle insurgents in Iraq, let alone a real standing army.
Iran hasn't been crippled by 10 years of sanctions and idiotic leadership like Iraq was. Instead Iran has been loading up on the best Russian weapons money can buy. Much like Vietnam and Yom Kippor war, the 'all weapons but ours are crap' crowd is going to be for a rude awakening.
The US military hasn't won a knock down drag out fight since WWII.
"The more I see of life, the less I fear death." - Me.
"If violence solved nothing, then weapons technology would have never advanced past crude clubs and rocks." - Me.
The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.
About how high up on the building were you when you jumped or fell or whatever and hit your head? Nothing short of severe brain damage could explain all this bs hyperbole about what a hero obummer is.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton
They can't even handle insurgents in Iraq, let alone a real standing army.
Handle them? They have demolished them. They are not trying to handle a Army now, they are trying to keep the "peace", that is the only reason they are being picked off. They were never meant to keep the peace, they were meant to kill.
Dead heat. They're both a couple of circling sharks about to devour the Constitutional Republic.
The best and first guarantor of our neutrality and our independent existence is the defensive will of the people and the proverbial marksmanship of the Swiss shooter. Each soldier a good marksman! Each shot a hit! Schweizerische Schutzenseitunt (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.
That's quite a wish list for a mere mortal, never mind a politician.
The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.
Obama is not meant to wake any one up. He is meant for race riots. The elite chose him specifically for this purpose or they would have found a much better qualified black to run, if they were looking for a black president.
Can you imagine Obama losing a squeaker to McKooK? You'll have race riots on top of race riots. No question about that.
Can you imagine Obama losing a squeaker to McKooK? You'll have race riots on top of race riots. No question about that.
Well I guess Obama has woken some whites up to black racism, but unfortunately not many. Blacks will see ordinary whites won't put up with them if they try riots again. Many are ready and waiting for them.
Who would destroy this nation faster, McKooK or Obama?
It's a trick, isn't it?
You want me to vote for Obama just to start Civil War II.
Where did you get your awesome powers of mind control?
:)
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot
There isn't a military in existence today in the world the USA military can't handle.
As far as bombing a country and obliterating, then yes, the US can easily "defeat" any military on Earth, with the exception of China. So if we're willing to exterminate most of the civilian population of a country, then we can "win," like we could have "won" in Vietnam by using nuclear weapons.
Since not even the Bush administration is that depraved, it means that realistically, war means occupying a country and fighting against guerillas, like we did in Vietnam, and as we'll do if Bush invades Iran before leaving office. And guerillas in their native land can usually win a war of attrition.
No question about it. The most dangerous man ever to run for president is the McCainiac, McKook. The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.
This the sort of mentality that really bugs me, because it reminds me of Bush 2000.
By all means vote for Obama over McCain because Obama is less likely to start a war with Iran (or worse, Russia or China). Or, by all means vote for McCain because he's slightly less of a gun-grabber or welfare state socialist than Obama. I don't agree with the "lesser evil" line anymore, but at least I understand it.
What I don't understand is people who talk about Obama as some sort of Messiah or Saviour. They sound just like the wingnuts who back in 2000, didn't just vote for Bush because they thought he'd raise taxes or grab guns less than Gore, but who talked about Bush "bringing decency back to the Presidency after 8 years of Clinton" or "a great man is back in charge." Some of those people are still in cloud cuckoo land, others woke up and were really disappointed to discover that the girl who looked hot after 10 shots of whisky last night looks like a hippo in a skirt when they're sober. I think most of you Obama-ites are in for the same surprise as many of the Bush people from 8 years ago.
#25. To: Rupert_Pupkin, Jethro Tull, RickyJ (#23)(Edited)
What I don't understand is people who talk about Obama as some sort of Messiah or Saviour.
It really does take much for a president to be a "Messiah or Saviour" these days. The bar has been set so low by Obama's predecessors that if he merely demonstrates a modicum of faithfulness to the Constitution, some semblance of sanity and an ability to communicate he might very well be so regarded.
That's not really not asking for much, though. We don't need a Messiah. We just need a normal, well-adjusted, intelligent and rational human being in that office (as opposed to a neocon nutjob). Is that too much to ask? Or expect? I think not.
We don't need a Messiah. We just need a normal, well-adjusted, intelligent and rational human being in that office (as opposed to a neocon nutjob). Is that too much to ask? Or expect? I think not.
Do you see any currently on the political horizon???
#27. To: Jethro Tull, X-15, Pissed Off Janitor, Arator, cynicom, christine, RickyJ, Rupert_Pupkin, James Deffenbach, Horse, Tauzero, Dakmar, All (#0)
BOTH Obama and McCain are scheduled to address AIPAC next week.
Oh goody, Americans will get yet another chance to see our politicians, Presidential candidates grovel and try to out-do one another as to how far they can stick their noses up AIPAC's butt crack.
Here's a little preview of the gala AIPAC event to come - McCain is interviewed by Jeffrey Goldberg at The Atlantic Monthly - yikes, sicko, gag bag alert.
As I believe Obama is a closet racist, he might be the best choice for chaos domestically. If words are to be believed, McCain will get us nuked quicker.
If Obama wins the bar will be moved and an all white candidates slate will never again be seen.
We'll have white nerds debating screaming rads like Angela Davis and Sista Soulja, who has been teaching college and getting groomed for the future, just like Davis.
Presidential debates will look more like the BET Music awards, with soulful singing of "the message" and hooting and howling preventing any serious discussions of "white people politics".
Once the overly-inflected gospel singing begins white folks will tune out and selecting the president will be forfeited to "them other people."
If McCain and Lieberman win then it will go in a different direction. (it's a sure bet that McCain will not finish his term and Lieberman will be president)
Either way the reign of the white (pseudo) Christian president may be over.
i said long ago that i thought mccain would choose lieberman, but as far as i know, lieberman was not on mccain's shortlist. you're thinking he will be mccain's pick?
if so, i'll be convinced than that this pair was the PTB selection from the getgo. there's no other explanation for mckook "winning" the GOP nom.
Count the number of times "diverse" appears in this article and win a jar of jelly beans.
And they write innumerable books; being too vain and distracted for silence: seeking every one after his own elevation, and dodging his emptiness. - T. S. Eliot