[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room

Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister

Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals

German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human'

Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism

Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago!

Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon

Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests

FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker

Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain?

Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish'

Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow?

Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest

Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus

A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst.

Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan.

Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane

Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand?

LOOK AT MY ASS!

Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing

MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent

House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups

Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners

Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza

AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition

Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report

Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight

Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency

Stealing JFK's Body

Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence


4play
See other 4play Articles

Title: Who would destroy this nation faster, McKooK or Obama?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 30, 2008
Author: moi
Post Date: 2008-05-30 18:10:18 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 509
Comments: 51

It's a tough call. As weary as I am of stewing slowly in the pot, I'm beginning to think the worst of two evils would be better than the lesser of two evils, if only to hope they go too quickly, waking a few frogs up in the process. Just a thought.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#1. To: Jethro Tull (#0)

Ill-posed question; the nation is not this government. Properly, a diverse nation is an oxymoron.

waking a few frogs up in the process

In that sense, I might vote Obama. It's easier to snooze when The Man on the TeeVee looks more or less like you.

At this point, blacks will behave worse whoever wins. A lot of whites who sincerely might vote for Obama will eventually have the same feeling as when waking up next to an ugly woman and not being able to remember the previous night.

Tauzero  posted on  2008-05-30   18:19:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tauzero (#1)

They both pledged to destroy America by passing Amnesty for Illegal Aliens. They both did obeisance to the Rothschilds and Rockefellers before their conventions were held. They both have pledged to invade big Muslim nations who have militaries we cannot handle. It's a tie though Obama's affirmative action policies would drive me insane.

Horse  posted on  2008-05-30   18:37:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Horse (#3) (Edited)

They both have pledged to invade big Muslim nations who have militaries we cannot handle.

You are wrong about that. There isn't a military in existence today in the world the USA military can't handle.

RickyJ  posted on  2008-05-30   19:33:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: RickyJ (#8)

There isn't a military in existence today in the world the USA military can't handle.

As far as bombing a country and obliterating, then yes, the US can easily "defeat" any military on Earth, with the exception of China. So if we're willing to exterminate most of the civilian population of a country, then we can "win," like we could have "won" in Vietnam by using nuclear weapons.

Since not even the Bush administration is that depraved, it means that realistically, war means occupying a country and fighting against guerillas, like we did in Vietnam, and as we'll do if Bush invades Iran before leaving office. And guerillas in their native land can usually win a war of attrition.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-05-31   11:45:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]