[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump expected to shake up White House briefing room Ukrainians have stolen up to half of US aid ex-Polish deputy minister Gaza doctor raped, tortured to death in Israeli custody, new report reveals German Lutheran Church Bans AfD Members From Committees, Calls Party 'Anti-Human' Berlin Teachers Sound Alarm Over Educational Crisis Caused By Multiculturalism Trump Hosts Secret Global Peace Summit at Mar-a-Lago! Heat Is Radiating From A Huge Mass Under The Moon Elon Musk Delivers a Telling Response When Donald Trump Jr. Suggests FBI recovers funds for victims of scammed banker Mark Felton: Can Russia Attack Britain? Notre Dame Apologizes After Telling Hockey Fans Not To Wear Green, Shamrocks, 'Fighting Irish' Dear Horse, which one of your posts has the Deep State so spun up that's causing 4um to run slow? Bomb Cyclone Pacific Northwest Death Certificates Reveal FBI 'Revised' Murder Stats Still Bogus A $110B bubble on $500M earnings. History warns: Bubbles always burst. Joy Behar says people like their show because they tell the truth, unlike "dragon believer" Joe Rogan. Male Passenger Disappointed After Another Flight Ends Without A Stewardess Frantically Asking If Anyone Can Land The Plane Could the Rapid Growth of AI Boost Gold Demand? LOOK AT MY ASS! Elon Musk Responds As British Government "Summons" Him To 'Disinformation' Hearing MSNBC Contributor Panics Over Trump Nominating Bondi For AG: Dangerous Because Shes Competent House passes dangerous bill that targets nonprofits, pro-Palestine groups Navy Will Sideline 17 Support Vessels to Ease Strain on Civilian Mariners Israel carries out field executions, massacres in north Gaza AOC votes to back Israel Lobby's bogus anti-Semitism definition Biden to launch ICE mobile app, further disrupting Trump's mass deportation plan: Report Panic at Mar-a-Lago: How the Fake Press Pool Fueled Global Fear Until X Set the Record Straight Donald Trumps Nominee for the FCC Will Remove DEI as a Priority of the Agency Stealing JFK's Body Trump plans to revive Keystone XL pipeline to solidify U.S. energy independence

4play
See other 4play Articles

Title: Who would destroy this nation faster, McKooK or Obama?
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: May 30, 2008
Author: moi
Post Date: 2008-05-30 18:10:18 by Jethro Tull
Keywords: None
Views: 526
Comments: 51

It's a tough call. As weary as I am of stewing slowly in the pot, I'm beginning to think the worst of two evils would be better than the lesser of two evils, if only to hope they go too quickly, waking a few frogs up in the process. Just a thought.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 25.

#5. To: Jethro Tull (#0) (Edited)

No question about it. The most dangerous man ever to run for president is the McCainiac, McKook. The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.

If, instead, we get four more years of it under McKook, it could kill the country.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-30   19:08:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

No question about it. The most dangerous man ever to run for president is the McCainiac, McKook. The future of the Republic hangs on Obama rising to the challenge, seizing the historical opportunity before him, reversing course and beginning what will be a decades long repair of the system- wide and globe-wide damage done to America by 25 plus years of corrupt, spooked-up Bush- Clintonism.

This the sort of mentality that really bugs me, because it reminds me of Bush 2000.

By all means vote for Obama over McCain because Obama is less likely to start a war with Iran (or worse, Russia or China). Or, by all means vote for McCain because he's slightly less of a gun-grabber or welfare state socialist than Obama. I don't agree with the "lesser evil" line anymore, but at least I understand it.

What I don't understand is people who talk about Obama as some sort of Messiah or Saviour. They sound just like the wingnuts who back in 2000, didn't just vote for Bush because they thought he'd raise taxes or grab guns less than Gore, but who talked about Bush "bringing decency back to the Presidency after 8 years of Clinton" or "a great man is back in charge." Some of those people are still in cloud cuckoo land, others woke up and were really disappointed to discover that the girl who looked hot after 10 shots of whisky last night looks like a hippo in a skirt when they're sober. I think most of you Obama-ites are in for the same surprise as many of the Bush people from 8 years ago.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-05-31   11:50:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

What I don't understand is people who talk about Obama as some sort of Messiah or Saviour.

It really does take much for a president to be a "Messiah or Saviour" these days. The bar has been set so low by Obama's predecessors that if he merely demonstrates a modicum of faithfulness to the Constitution, some semblance of sanity and an ability to communicate he might very well be so regarded.

That's not really not asking for much, though. We don't need a Messiah. We just need a normal, well-adjusted, intelligent and rational human being in that office (as opposed to a neocon nutjob). Is that too much to ask? Or expect? I think not.

Arator  posted on  2008-05-31   12:55:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#26. To: Arator (#25)

We don't need a Messiah. We just need a normal, well-adjusted, intelligent and rational human being in that office (as opposed to a neocon nutjob). Is that too much to ask? Or expect? I think not.

Do you see any currently on the political horizon???

Cynicom  posted on  2008-05-31 12:57:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

We just need a normal, well-adjusted, intelligent and rational human being in that office (as opposed to a neocon nutjob).

There was ONE of those running. His name is Ron Paul. The guy you are touting now is just about his exact opposite in every way imaginable.

James Deffenbach  posted on  2008-05-31 13:43:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]