[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap

Russia Moves to Nationalize Country's Third Largest Gold Mining Firm

Britain must prepare for civil war | David Betz

The New MAGA Turf War Over National Intelligence

Happy fourth of july

The Empire Has Accidentally Caused The Rebirth Of Real Counterculture In The West

Workers install 'Alligator Alcatraz' sign for Florida immigration detention center

The Biggest Financial Collapse in China’s History Is Here, More Terrifying Than Evergrande!

Lightning

Cash Jordan NYC Courthouse EMPTIED... ICE Deports 'Entire Building

Trump Sparks Domestic Labor Renaissance: Native-Born Workers Surge To Record High As Foreign-Born Plunge

Mister Roberts (1965)

WE BROKE HIM!! [Early weekend BS/nonsense thread]

I'm going to send DOGE after Elon." -Trump

This is the America I grew up in. We need to bring it back

MD State Employee may get Arrested by Sheriff for reporting an Illegal Alien to ICE

RFK Jr: DTaP vaccine was found to have link to Autism

FBI Agents found that the Chinese manufactured fake driver’s licenses and shipped them to the U.S. to help Biden...

Love & Real Estate: China’s new romance scam

Huge Democrat shift against Israel stuns CNN

McCarthy Was Right. They Lied About Everything.

How Romans Built Domes

My 7 day suspension on X was lifted today.

They Just Revealed EVERYTHING... [Project 2029]

Trump ACCUSED Of MASS EXECUTING Illegals By DUMPING Them In The Ocean

The Siege (1998)

Trump Admin To BAN Pride Rainbow Crosswalks, DoT Orders ALL Distractions REMOVED

Elon Musk Backing Thomas Massie Against Trump-AIPAC Challenger

Skateboarding Dog


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Female VP hopefuls differ from Clinton
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 1, 2008
Author: Ben Adler
Post Date: 2008-06-01 11:09:40 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 477
Comments: 45

Like Hillary Rodham Clinton, the three other women most frequently mentioned as possible running mates for Barack Obama are widely recognized as shrewd, trailblazing politicians who would provide critical ballast to an Obama-led presidential ticket.

But according to interviews with Republicans in their home states, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano and Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill differ from Clinton by two important measures: They’ve managed to win elections without developing polarizing personas, and they’ve shied away from emphasizing gender in their campaigns.

The distinctions are important for Obama, the front-runner in the Democratic nominating contest, as his campaign begins the process of thinking about possible running mates. Selecting a woman might serve to mend the gender-based rifts that have surfaced as a result of Clinton’s historic candidacy — and Sebelius, Napolitano and McCaskill all possess red-state political portfolios that would make them attractive vice presidential candidates.

Some common themes emerge when talking to Republicans who have battled them. All three are respected for their ability to win in difficult political environments for Democrats, and all are credited with having done so by successfully tacking to the center, reaching out to Republican voters by crafting an independent image. In part, that’s why Napolitano and Sebelius made Time magazine’s “5 Best Governors” list in 2005.

Napolitano draws praise from the other side of the aisle for managerial competence and canny political skills. Arizona Republicans describe the former federal prosecutor as extremely smart, noting that she has adeptly handled hot-button issues such as immigration.

“I think Gov. Napolitano, to the dismay of a lot of Republicans in this state, has been effective because she has governed from the center,” said Jaime Molera, a Republican political consultant in Phoenix. “She has not been seen as a partisan Democrat.”

Molera points to her successful budget compromises with the Republican state Senate last year as a prime example.

Napolitano’s opponents also agree that her pragmatic approach is an asset — though critics say it reflects a lack of core principles.

“I can’t help but wonder if her strengths and weaknesses are one and the same. She’s a highly calculating politician. She does not make a move without considering the political implications,” said Republican consultant Garrick Taylor. “That has benefited her in a traditionally Republican state, but she runs the risk of being cast as a typical politician.”

In Kansas, where Sebelius has managed to frustrate the Republican political establishment while winning over GOP voters, opponents also view her with a kind of grudging admiration. Though conceding she is warm and persuasive in small settings, Republicans gleefully note that she fell flat in her first moment in the national spotlight — when she delivered the Democratic response to the president’s State of Union speech in January.

But more than anything else, Sebelius’ foes generally agree that she has a great talent for recognizing and seizing opportunities in a state where the Republican majority has been bitterly divided between conservatives and moderates.

“She ran as a conservative. She won [reelection] in Kansas because she’s adopted whatever things the Legislature has done,” said Republican state House Speaker Melvin Neufeld. “She takes credit for whatever happens, which a good politician does.”

When Sebelius first captured the governorship in 2002, she did it with a Republican business executive as her running mate. Four years later, in her 2006 reelection, she stunned the state’s political establishment by selecting a new lieutenant governor candidate to run with — the state’s former Republican Party chairman.

“Kathleen has done a good job of walking through fissures in the Kansas Republican Party,” said Republican state Senate Majority Leader Derek Schmidt. “She’s governor because our party has been fairly deeply factionalized since the late '90s, particularly during the last two gubernatorial cycles.”

McCaskill is also respected for her savvy political instincts, winning credit for her campaign trail work ethic and for not making the same mistakes twice.

In an unsuccessful 2004 run for governor, she concentrated heavily on urban areas and got beaten badly in rural counties. When she won her Senate seat in 2006, it was with a populist flavor and a more pronounced focus on rural Missouri.

“She learned that a Democrat in Missouri can’t just focus on urban areas,” said Jared Craighead, executive director of the Missouri Republican Party. “You need to focus on rural areas.”

“Claire McCaskill is a crafty politician who campaigns hard,” added Gregg Keller, a Republican consultant who managed Talent’s 2006 campaign.

Curiously, while Sebelius and Napolitano both do well among women voters — according to 2006 exit polls, Napolitano won 66 percent among women in her easy reelection win — McCaskill’s advantage seems less pronounced. In 2006, she won 51 percent among women in a narrow victory.

Like Sebelius and Napolitano, McCaskill did not highlight the gender factor. “I frankly hope gender is not an issue in this campaign at all,” she told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch in 2006. “This is not something we’re stressing around the state.”

In Arizona and Missouri, Republicans also said gender has been a political nonissue.

“The story in Arizona is that we’ve had a number of female chief executives,” said Taylor, the Republican political consultant. “So [Napolitano’s gender] has been part of a story line but hasn’t been part of her narrative personally.”

“I don’t know that [Sebelius’] gender has played a big role, other than that her percentage of female appointees has been greater than most governors,” said Kansas state Senate President Stephen Morris.

Regardless of the strengths Sebelius, Napolitano and McCaskill might bring to the ticket, home state Republicans insist that none of them could deliver their respective states if they were on the ticket.

McCaskill has narrowly lost and narrowly won Missouri in her two most recent elections, and her popularity doesn’t rank with the two governors. Kansas, which delivered 62 percent to President Bush in 2004, is not considered a competitive state for the Democratic nominee. As for Arizona, local Republicans say any boost Napolitano might provide would be washed out by the presence of another home-stater on the ballot — presumptive Republican nominee and Arizona Sen. John McCain.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

#1. To: christine (#0)

I think I'm living in a foreign country. This isn't America, is it?

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-01   11:14:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: buckeye (#1)

"I think I'm living in a foreign country. This isn't America, is it?"

Heehee, that's what I said when that blithering idiot Ronald Reagan was first elected. Since then the White House has been Bizarroland. ;-D

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-06-01   11:34:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Ferret Mike (#3)

Harold Ickes on MTP. "Hillary Clinton will get the nomination."

christine  posted on  2008-06-01   11:41:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: christine (#6) (Edited)

Harold Ickes speaks of a game plan the Democratic Party is loath to be an enabler of. In fact, they obviously plan to kick Hillary in the balls she walks around acting like she has, and privately relate to her what it will cost her to take this fight to the convention in August.

Hillary has brought back a full blown case of Clinton Fatigue in record time. After a taste of her this primary season, the consensus is that she and her little leg humping dog Bill can go. With a consolation prize of shepherding her health care plan through Congress or a Cabinet post of note as a spoonful of sugar to help the medicine of cold hardball truth go down, that she is -- like it or not -- going to get the yo heave ho.

She will be told she can go nicely or as a wannabe spoiler, but she is going, period.

That is the American way to do politics these days, at least when you deal with people like the Clintons who are ethical, moral and wholesomely good folks; as long as it pays to posture that way of course.

Team Billary is a dangerous and self serving entity, and is the literal Humpty Dumpty of the political season. Nothing is putting her back together politically any time soon.

Things like Hil's courage under imaginary sniper fire where she even parses her words to hide her lie, and Bill's foot in mouth disease in South Carolina where he single handedly gave all the Clinton black support away to Barack Obama who had stayed with him and her out of loyalty equate to a climate not conducive to getting super delegates to buy the Clinton act.

Barack Obama will get the nomination and win the general election in November.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-06-01   12:09:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Ferret Mike (#12)

Barack Obama will get the nomination and win the general election in November.

Ha...In your wildest dreams Mike.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-01   12:11:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Cynicom (#13)

"Ha...In your wildest dreams Mike."

The hunger for victory for Democrats will be at a 'throw Mama in front of the train' level of do anything to make this happen, so Barack Obama will get the Hillary faction's support in November.

He is also more formidable a player then you think he is, with talents you underestimate. He will get the nomination and win in November, unless something radically alters the landscape of this election campaign, or he gets Diebolted.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-06-01   12:33:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Ferret Mike (#21)

so Barack Obama will get the Hillary faction's support in November.

Do you forget us small town, bitter, people that do not like "others"???

We vote also.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-01   12:36:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Cynicom (#22)

Medford [Oregon] man jailed in "KKK" burning at mixed-race couple's home

Posted by The Associated Press May 31, 2008 19:06PM A 37-year-old Medford man was arrested Friday on hate crime charges.

Police believe Gary Moss was involved in a case of racial intimidation that left a cross and the letters "KKK" scorched into the front yard of a mixed-race couple's home late on Memorial Day.

The couple received another hate-filled message this week. Now they say they are planning to move elsewhere in the Rogue Valley. The two will move in with relatives while they save up for a place of their own.

Community members have been dropping off flowers, cards and letters of support at their west Medford home all week, including from students at a local high school.

Moss is facing accusations of intimidation, arson, possession of a destructive device and reckless endangerment.

-- The Associated Press

http://blog.oregonlive.com/breakingnews/2008/05/medford_man_jailed_in_kkk_burn.html

Just wanted to cheer you up with the news that one small town bitter person is getting his just desserts.

Ferret Mike  posted on  2008-06-01   14:50:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Ferret Mike (#31)

Just wanted to cheer you up with the news that one small town bitter person is getting his just desserts.

Mike, what a piker.

If that was his best, he needs re-education.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-01   15:05:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 32.

        There are no replies to Comment # 32.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 32.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]