Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: McClellan: Bush should have fired Rove
Source: Register Guard
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... &SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Published: Jun 1, 2008
Author: BEN FELLER
Post Date: 2008-06-01 16:16:10 by Ferret Mike
Keywords: None
Views: 1975
Comments: 7

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush broke his promise to the country by refusing to fire aide Karl Rove for leaking a CIA agent's identity, said Scott McClellan, the president's chief spokesman for almost three years.

"I think the president should have stood by his word and that meant Karl should have left," McClellan said Sunday in a broadcast interview about his new tell-all book, a scathing rebuke of the White House under Bush's leadership.

McClellan now acknowledges he felt burned by Rove, Bush's top political adviser, and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff. He said Rove and Libby assured him they were not involved in leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, and he repeated those assurances to reporters.

In fact, Rove and Libby did help leak Plame's identity, as confirmed in a later criminal investigation. Libby had resigned by then, but Rove remained in office and eventually stepped down on his terms in August 2007.

"I think the president should have stood by the word that we said, which was that if you were involved in this in any way, then you would no longer be in this administration. And Karl was involved in it," McClellan said.

White House press secretary Dana Perino declined comment Sunday, as did Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin.

The White House had said in 2003 that anyone who leaked classified information in the case would be dismissed. Bush reiterated that promise in June 2004.

By July 2005, Bush qualified his position, saying he would fire anyone for leaking classified information if that person had "committed a crime."

Rove was never charged with a crime.

McClellan writes in his book that Bush backpedaled to protect Rove, a point McClellan repeated in the interview.

"We had higher standards at the White House," McClellan said. "The president said he was going to restore honor and integrity. He said we were going to set the highest of standards. We didn't live up to that. When it become known that his top adviser had been involved, then the bar was moved."

Current and former White House aides have disputed McClellan's account of a White House that pushed aside candor and honesty as needed.

McClellan says he shares some blame for getting caught up in the culture of spin and passing on information he later learned to be untrue.

On other topics from his book, McClellan said Sunday:

-He was part of a White House effort to shade the truth about the case for war in Iraq. "I was part of this propaganda campaign, absolutely," he said.

-His tone for the book changed and grew sharper as he wrote it, and he reached different conclusions than he anticipated. "I believe I have gotten to the truth, from my perspective."

-He anticipated the fierce reaction he has received from critics, including former Sen. Bob Dole, who called McClellan a "miserable creature" motivated by greed. "This book takes aim at Washington, and there are many in Washington that were not going to be happy with it. I knew that going in," McClellan said.

-He would donate some profits from the book to families of those killed in the Iraq war.

McClellan was Bush's press secretary from July 2003 to April 2006. The White House says Bush was surprised, saddened and disappointed about the book, which is titled, "What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception."

McClellan appeared on "Meet the Press" on NBC.

© 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Ferret Mike (#0)

I appreciate what McClellan seems to be doing. I didn't know that anyone from that disgusting pit of vipers would or even could break ranks.

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-01   16:24:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: buckeye (#1)

I appreciate what McClellan seems to be doing. I didn't know that anyone from that disgusting pit of vipers would or even could break ranks.

Well said!

SCPO Blackshoe Retired  posted on  2008-06-01   19:19:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: buckeye (#1)

McClennan came forward about 5 years too late for his information to do any good.

Rupert_Pupkin  posted on  2008-06-02   16:12:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#3)

McClennan came forward about 5 years too late for his information to do any good.

McClellan was never an "insider".

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-02   16:13:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#3)

McClennan came forward about 5 years too late for his information to do any good.

Oh I think McClellan coming forward now can do alot of good to stop another useless foreign war ie against Iran. MSM is talking about this story non-stop - while the media have their own agenda for doing so, nonetheless it's reaching lotsa American voters.

The President and the President's Men took us to a Middle East war for lies - it had nothing to do with America's national defense.

So Mr Joe Six Pack and Mrs Suzy Soccer Mom are not going to be fooled so easily by this President or the next President about invading another ME nation ( ie. Iran).

"Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me"

This idiom is about learning from a previous mistake and not allowing oneself to be taken advantage of repeatedly.

scrapper2  posted on  2008-06-02   16:21:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: scrapper2 (#5)

Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me

There was a TV show last night - outrageous bloopers and the like - it showed Dubya flubbing this line.

Priceless.

swarthyguy  posted on  2008-06-02   17:00:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Rupert_Pupkin (#3)

McClennan came forward about 5 years too late for his information to do any good.

I disagree. The truth has to come out eventually, and the longer we wait, the more painful it is going to be.

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-02   19:38:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest